首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

在高风险冠脉介入患者中IABP与Impella 2.5对血流动力学支持的对比研究
引用本文:评价者:靳立军文献合成者:王宗涛.在高风险冠脉介入患者中IABP与Impella 2.5对血流动力学支持的对比研究[J].循证医学,2013,13(6):330-333.
作者姓名:评价者:靳立军文献合成者:王宗涛
作者单位:广东省人民医院、广东省医学科学院、广东省心血管病研究所心内科, 广州510080
摘    要:1文献来源 O'Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention : Circulation, 2012,126 The PROTECT Ⅱ study J] (14) : 1717-1727.

关 键 词:心脏辅助装置  Impella  2  5  主动脉内球囊反  搏术  经皮冠状动脉介入治疗

A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
JIN Li-jun,WANG Zong-tao.A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J].The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine,2013,13(6):330-333.
Authors:JIN Li-jun  WANG Zong-tao
Affiliation:Authors’ address: Department of Cardiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Provincial Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou 510080, China
Abstract:heart-assist device Impella 2.5 intra-aorticballoon pump percutaneous coronary intervention
Keywords:heart-assist device  Impella 2  5  intra-aorticballoon pump  percutaneous coronary intervention
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《循证医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《循证医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号