首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

急性阑尾炎肥胖患者腹腔镜与开腹手术的对比研究
引用本文:刘强,杨峥.急性阑尾炎肥胖患者腹腔镜与开腹手术的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014(10):903-905.
作者姓名:刘强  杨峥
作者单位:北京丰台医院普外科,北京100071
摘    要:目的:探讨肥胖的急性阑尾炎患者行腹腔镜手术的效果及优缺点。方法回顾性分析2010年1月~2013年12月80例手术治疗肥胖的急性阑尾炎患者的临床资料,体重指数28~40。开腹组38例,腹腔镜组42例。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、止痛药物及抗生素应用、术后发热、术后并发症、住院时间及费用的差异。结果腹腔镜组2例中转开腹。2组手术时间差异无显著性(P>0.05)。与开腹组比较,腹腔镜组术中出血少(14.98±12.77) ml vs.(31.58±19.00) ml, t=-4.550, P=0.000],术后抗生素使用时间短(2.7±1.0) d vs.(4.1±1.2) d, t=-5.470, P=0.000],术后需要止痛少5.0%(2/40) vs.26.3%(10/38),χ2=6.802,P=0.009],留置引流少2.5%(1/40) vs.18.4%(7/38),χ2=5.367, P=0.021],术后发热少5.0%(2/40) vs.23.7%(9/38),χ2=5.616, P=0.018],术后切口愈合不良少5.0%(2/40) vs.21.1%(8/38),χ2=4.493, P=0.034],住院时间短(5.9±3.2) d vs.(8.7±4.1) d, t=-3.345, P=0.001],但住院费用高(7800±396)元vs.(4914±434)元, t=30.716, P=0.000]。结论对于肥胖的阑尾炎患者,腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有手术创伤小、术后恢复快、疼痛轻、并发症少、住院时间短等优点,住院费用可以接受,是首选治疗方法。

关 键 词:肥胖  阑尾炎  腹腔镜

Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Obese Patients with Appendicitis
Liu Qiang,Yang Zheng.Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Obese Patients with Appendicitis[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2014(10):903-905.
Authors:Liu Qiang  Yang Zheng
Affiliation:. (Department of General Surgery, Beijing Fengtai Hospital, Beijing 100071, China)
Abstract:Objective To analyze the clinical effects, as well as its advantages and disadvantages, of laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis in obese patients. Methods Clinical data of 80 obese patients receiving appendectomy, including 38 cases of open appendectomy and 42 cases of laparoscopic appendectomy, were analyzed retrospectively.The operative time, blood loss, analgesic and antibiotic use, postoperative fever, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization cost were compared between the two operative methods. Results Conversions to open surgery were required in 2 patients in the laparoscopic group. There was no significant difference in operative time between the 2 groups (P 〉0.05).Compared with the open group, the laparoscopic group had less blood loss (14.98 ±12.77) ml vs.(31.58 ±19.00) ml, t=-4.550, P=0.000], shorter time of postoperative antibiotic use (2.7 ±1.0) d vs.(4.1 ±1.2) d, t=-5.470, P=0.000], less postoperative analgesics needed 5.0%(2/40) vs.26.3%(10/38),χ2 =6.802, P=0.009], less drainage 2.5% (1/40) vs.18.4% (7/38), χ2 =5.367, P=0.021], less postoperative fever 5.0%(2/40) vs.23.7%(9/38),χ2 =5.616, P=0.018], less postoperative wound healing 5.0%(2/40) vs.21.1%(8/38),χ2 =4.493, P=0.034], and shorter hospital stay (5.9 ±3.2) d vs.(8.7 ±4.1) d, t=-3.345, P=0.001], but the higher cost of hospitalization (7800 ±396) yuan vs.(4914 ±434) yuan, t=30.716, P=0.000]. Conclusion For obese patients with appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy has less surgical trauma, faster recovery, less postoperative pain, fewer complications,and shorter hospital stay, being a preferred method of treatment.
Keywords:Obesity  Appendicitis  Laparoscopy
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号