首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


Tooth hop variability in human and nonhuman bone: Effect on the estimation of saw blade TPI
Authors:Alicia R Grosso
Affiliation:1. Department of Physical Therapy, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York, USA;2. Alicia R. Grosso, Department of Physical Therapy, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Avenue, Potsdam, NY 13699-5805, USA.;3. Email: agrosso@clarkson.eduSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 29 September 2021
Presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropology, 2020, online;4. and at the 88th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropology, March 27–30, 2019, in Cleveland, OH.
Abstract:Forensic research has demonstrated that tooth hop (TH) is a valuable measurement from saw-cut bones as it can be used to estimate teeth-per-inch (TPI) of a saw used in postmortem dismemberment cases. However, error rates for TPI estimation are still under development and knowledge of how bone tissue affects TH measurements remains unclear. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of tissue variability through the use of different taxa on the accuracy and precision of TH measurements in the bone to estimate TPI of the blade. A total of 1766 TH measurements were analyzed from human, pig, and deer long bones cut by two 7 TPI saw blades of different tooth type. Fifty distance-between-teeth measurements before and after sawing were collected directly from each blade for comparison to bone-measured TH to assess potential effects of tooth wear on TH variability. ANOVA and F tests were used to compare mean TH and variance, respectively, by saw-species (i.e., crosscut-deer, rip-deer) and species groups (i.e., all deer, all pig), with significance determined at the p < 0.05 level. TH measurements were converted to usable TPI ranges, which would typically be presented in a forensic report. It is concluded that significant differences in TH (mm) do not necessarily reflect significant differences in associated TPI ranges of suspect blades. Forensic reports should report mean TPI ± 1.5–2.5 TPI while providing a sample size indicating number of TH measured rather than just number of cuts or cut surfaces examined.
Keywords:bone hardness  dismemberment  error rate  forensic anthropology  saw mark analysis  teeth-per-inch  TPI
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号