两种腹腔镜手术方案在乙状结肠癌患者中的疗效对比

目的对比传统腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术与腹部无切口经直肠取出标本腹腔镜手术的近期疗效。方法以2015年1月-2016年12月于该院拟实施腹腔镜辅助乙状结肠癌根治手术的患者中选出34例实施腹部无切口经直肠取出标本腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术的患者作为腹部无切口组。以1∶2的配对方式选择同期内年龄、性别一致,体质指数(BMI)相近的实施腹腔镜辅助乙状结肠癌根治手术的患者68例作为对照组。对比两种腹腔镜手术方案的手术时间、手术出血量、术后排气时间、术后疼痛评分、手术并发症、术后住院时间、附加镇痛处理情况、肠管切除长度、近远端切缘、肿瘤大小、淋巴结清扫数目和p TNM分期。结果腹部无切口组乙状结肠癌患者的手术时间、手术出血量明显高于对照组,腹部无切口组乙状结肠癌患者的术后排气时间、术后清醒时疼痛评分、术后第1天的疼痛评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组乙状结肠癌患者的肠管切除长度、远近端切缘、肿瘤大小、淋巴结清扫数目和p TNM分期差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。腹部无切口组随访5~8个月,平均6个月;对照组随访6~9个月,平均7个月,均未发现肿瘤局部复发及远处转移。结论相比于传统腹腔镜手术,腹部无切口经直肠取出标本腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术可以明显降低患者的疼痛程度,缩短术后排气时间,肿瘤根治效果相近。

Comparison of the efficacy of two laparoscopic surgical procedures in patients with sigmoid colon cancer

To compare the efficacy of traditional laparoscopic radical resection of sigmoid colon and rectal specimens without abdominal incision laparoscopic surgery. Methods From January 2015 to December 2016 in our hospital to implement selected laparoscopic assisted sigmoid colon cancer surgery patients in 34 patients with abdominal incision rectal specimens of laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection of colorectal cancer patients without abdominal incision group. As to the choice of 1 ~ 2 pairs in the same period of age, gender, as the control group were given laparoscopic assisted sigmoid colon body mass index similar to radical surgery in 68 patients with operation time. Comparing the two kinds of laparoscopic surgery, perioperative bleeding, postoperative exhaust time postoperative pain score, complications, surgery, postoperative hospital stay, additional analgesic treatment, length of bowel resection, proximal and distal margin, tumor size, lymph node dissection the number of pTNM staging. Results The abdominal surgery time without incision group of sigmoid colon cancer patients, intraoperative bleeding was significantly higher than control group, abdominal incision group of sigmoid colon cancer patients with postoperative exhaust time, postoperative pain awake score, postoperative 1 d pain score was significantly lower than the control group, there was statistical significance the difference (P < 0.05); the two group of sigmoid colon cancer patients with bowel resection length of proximal margin, tumor size, number of lymph node dissection, there was no significant difference in pTNM staging (P > 0.05). Abdominal incision group were followed up for 5~8 months, average 6 months; the control group were followed up for 6 ~ 9 months, an average of 7 in August, there were no tumor recurrence and metastasis. Conclusion Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, abdominal incision rectal specimens of laparoscopic radical resection of sigmoid colon cancer can significantly reduce the pain of patients, shorten the postoperative exhaust time, tumor root Treatment effect is similar