| 也谈《中日园林文学比较》--与刘庭风教授商榷 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘海燕.也谈《中日园林文学比较》--与刘庭风教授商榷[J].中国园林,2003,19(4):61-62. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘海燕 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南城市学院规划建筑系园林教研室,长沙,413000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对《中日园林文学比较》一文中的中国园林文学及哲学底蕴方面的观点,提出了不同看法。例举之曹操《观沧海》、崔颢《黄鹤楼》与园林诗文联系,实属牵强附会;马致远的《天净沙·秋思》,无法与园林全盘挂钩;中国园林偏于儒家思想之结论,似以点代面、以偏概全,不能成立。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国 日本 风景园林 园林文学 刘庭风 哲学 儒家思想 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-6664(2003)04-0061-02 |
On Comparison of Chinese and Japanese Landscape Literature--Discussion with Prof.LIU Tingfeng |
| |
| LIU Hai-yan.On Comparison of Chinese and Japanese Landscape Literature--Discussion with Prof.LIU Tingfeng[J].Chinese Landscape Architecture,2003,19(4):61-62. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Hai-yan |
| |
| Affiliation: | LIU Hai-yan |
| |
| Abstract: | The paper put forward another view on Chinese landscape literature and philosophical basis,different from the one in Comparison of Chinese and Japanese Landscape Literature.The connection of CAO Cao ' s See Canghai Sea and CUI Hao ' s Yellow Crane Tower to landscape architecture,cited in Prof.LIU Tingfeng ' s article,is far-fetched.And MA Zhiyuan' s Thoughts in Autumn should not be fully connected with landscape architecture.Prof.Liu ' s conclusion that Chinese landscape is inclined to Confucian thoughts seems one-sided and untenable. |
| |
| Keywords: | Landscape Architecture Chinese Landscape Literature Philosophy |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
