行为抑制激活系统与情绪调节在青少年抑郁中的作用

目的探讨行为抑制／激活系统与情绪调节在青少年抑郁中的作用。方法随机整群抽取某中学和某高校800名学生，采用行为抑制／激活系统量表、贝克抑郁量表（BDI）、流调用抑郁量表（CES．D）和认知情绪调节问卷（CERQ）进行调查，采用pearson相关分析，F检验和多元逐步回归分析进行统计处理。结果（1）贝克和流调抑郁分与行为抑制系统呈显著正相关（r=0．39，0．41，P〈0．01），抑郁与自我责难、沉思、灾难化和责难他人和理性分析呈显著正相关（r=0．19—0．50，P〈0．05—0．01），与计划、积极再评价呈显著负相关（r=-0．08～0．24，P〈0．05）；（2）重度抑郁组行为抑制系统水平（15．45±2．57，P〈0．01）最高，驱力（9．60±2．99，P〈0．01）最少；使用非适应情绪调节策略最多，适应性情绪调节策略最少。（3）灾难化、行为抑制系统、积极再评价、沉思、积极再关注和自我责难联合解释抑郁35％的方差变异量，其中灾难化和行为抑制系统解释比例最多，分别达到25％和4％。结论行为抑制系统、情绪调节可能是预测非临床青少年抑郁的重要因素。

Effects of behavioral inhibition system/behavioral activation system and emotion regulations on depression of adolescents

Objective To explore the effects of behavioral inhibition system/activation system （BIS/ BAS） and emotion regulations on depression of adolescents. Methods 800 adolescents from an university and a middle school were chosen by cluster random sampling, and were surveyed by BIS/BAS scale, Beck depression in- ventory（BDI） , center for epidemiologie studies depression scale （CESD） and cognitive emotion regulation ques- tionnaire （CERQ）. The data were analyzed by pearson correlation, F test and multiple stepwise regression analy- sis. Results （ 1 ） BDI and CESD were correlated positively with BIS （ r =0. 39,0.41, P 〈0. 01 ） ,self-blame ,rumination, catastrophizing,blame others and perspective （ r = 0.19-0. 50, P 〈 0. 05-0. O1 ）, and negatively with planning, reappraisal （ r = -0.08-0.24, P 〈0.05）. （2）The scores of severe depression group were highest（15.45 _＋2.57, P 〈0. 01 ） in BIS,lowest in BAS-drive （9.60 ＋ 2.99, P 〈 0. 01 ）,and nonadaptive emotion regulations were used mostly,and adaptive emotion regulations were done leastly. （3） Catastrophizing,BIS,reappraisal,rumination,refocusing and self-blame explained 35% of total vari- ance,and catastrophizing and BIS explained the largest proportion,respectively 25% and 4%. Conclusion BIS/BAS and emotion regulations may be inrportant factors influencing non-clinical depression of adolescents.