首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

PRA在焦化厂污染土壤健康风险评价中的应用
引用本文:姜林,贾晓洋,夏天翔,姚珏君,梁竞,王琪.PRA在焦化厂污染土壤健康风险评价中的应用[J].环境科学研究,2013,26(2):220-226.
作者姓名:姜林  贾晓洋  夏天翔  姚珏君  梁竞  王琪
作者单位:北京市环境保护科学研究院, 北京100037;国家城市环境污染控制工程技术研究中心, 北京100037;污染场地风险模拟与修复北京市重点实验室, 北京100037
基金项目:国家环境保护公益性行业科研专项(201009032)
摘    要:以北京市某炼焦化学厂场地污染调查为依据,采用PRA(概率风险评价)研究了15个人体暴露参数和土壤中污染物浓度不确定性对苯、苯并芘健康风险评价结果的影响. 结果表明:对于表层和深层土壤,苯、苯并芘各暴露途径及总暴露途径PRA95%分位值均小于相应DRA(确定性风险评价)风险值;该场地整个土层中苯的PRA总风险值为1.5×10-8~6.9×10-3,苯并芘为2.3×10-9~2.2×10-3,二者95%分位值分别为3.8×10-4和1.1×10-4;苯、苯并芘的DRA总风险值分别为PRA96.8%和99.1%分位值,并且二者的DRA总风险值/PRA95%分位值分别为1.5和3.2,表明DRA风险值偏保守. 参数敏感性分析表明,对苯总风险不确定性贡献较大的为深层土壤中的苯浓度(贡献率为94.63%,下同)和成人暴露周期(4.12%),苯并芘为表层土壤中苯并芘浓度(92.63%)、成人暴露周期(2.40%)、儿童每日土壤摄入量(2.12%)和儿童暴露周期(1.21%). 

关 键 词:PRA    健康风险评价    敏感性分析    污染土壤    焦化厂
收稿时间:2012/9/19 0:00:00
修稿时间:2012/12/13 0:00:00

Research on Application of PRA in Health Risk Assessment of Soil in a Coking Plant Site
JIANG Lin,JIA Xiao-yang,XIA Tian-xiang,YAO Jue-jun,LIANG Jing and WANG Qi.Research on Application of PRA in Health Risk Assessment of Soil in a Coking Plant Site[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2013,26(2):220-226.
Authors:JIANG Lin  JIA Xiao-yang  XIA Tian-xiang  YAO Jue-jun  LIANG Jing and WANG Qi
Affiliation:Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China;National Urban Environment Pollution Control Engineering Techniques Research Center, Beijing 100037, China;Beijing Key Laboratory for Risk Modeling and Remediation of Contaminated Sites, Beijing 100037, China
Abstract:Based on the previous results of contamination survey on a coking plant in Beijing, the effects of uncertainty of 15exposure parameters and soil pollutant concentrations on human health risk assessment of benzene and benzopyrene were investigated with the methods of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). Results showed that the risk values of PRA, which was located at the 95th centile in the probabilistic range of risk values, were lower than that of deterministic risk assessment (DRA) of benzene and benzopyrene in both surface and subsurface soil through single and total exposure pathways. The total risk calculated by PRA ranged from 1.5×10-8 to 6.9×10-3 for benzene and 2.3×10-9 to 2.2×10-3 for benzopyrene, and the values were located at the 95th centile in the probabilistic range of risk were 3.8×10-4 and 1.1×10-4, respectively. The total risks conducted by DRA were located at the 96.8th and 99.1th centiles in the probabilistic range of risk, which were 1.5and 3.2times of the values by PRA. This indicated that the methods of DRA overestimated the real risk. The results of parameter sensitivity analysis revealed that the concentration of benzene in the subsurface soil (94.63%) and the adult exposure duration (4.12%) contributed the most to the uncertainty in benzene risk assessment, and the concentration of benzopyrene in the surface soil (92.3%), adult exposure duration (2.40%), soil ingestion rate (2.12%) and child exposure duration (1.21%) contributed the most to the uncertainty in benzopyrene risk assessment. 
Keywords:PRA  health risk assessment  sensitivity analysis  contaminated soil  coking plant
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号