“透明性”视阈下景观空间矛盾内涵辨析

“透明性”从一种空间美学，演变为一种用以描述事物深层组织关系的空间性质，因兼具“秩序性”与“多义性”而衍生出“矛盾性”特质。这种矛盾性源于“现代性”共时态与历时态的对立统一——共时态的理性逻辑追求“秩序性“，历时态的流动观念则导向“多义性”。“透明性”的“矛盾性”以图示语言为载体，通过语素“词义扭曲”、语体“结构重组”和语义“语涉双关”3个层面予以呈现。不同层面的矛盾在绘画、建筑、景观3种艺术形式中存在差异化外在表征，且在“绘画-建筑-景观”的演进顺序中，呈现出逐步综合与复杂的态势。景观空间中的“透明性”矛盾，可以归纳为“动态生长”“尺度嵌套”和“时空层叠”3种表达形式。针对上述3种特性，当代景观设计可分别通过“形式动态与过程设计”“分级渗透、抽象隐喻与视廊建构”“异质拼贴与厚性共融”等多种基于“透明性”的设计手法，来充分挖掘设计场地的“矛盾”潜力，并创造新型景观设计范式。

Analysis of the Contradictory Connotation of Landscape Space from the Perspective of "Transparency"

Transparency has evolved from a spatial aesthetic to a property used to describe the deep organizational relationships of things. It is contradictory for it is both orderliness and polysemy. This contradictoriness derived from modernity that has the unity of opposites between synchronic and diachronic states - synchronic rational logic pursues orderliness and diachronic flowing concept leads to polysemy. Transparency''s contradictoriness that takes graphic language as the carrier is presented in three aspects: "morpheme distortion", "structure reorganization" and "semantic pun". Contradictions in different aspects appeared in different external representations in painting, architecture and landscape art forms. And in the evolutionary sequence of painting, architecture, and landscape, it presented a gradually comprehensive and complex state. Transparency contradiction from landscape space can be summarized in three characteristics: dynamic growth, multi-scale nesting and space-time overlapping. For these three characteristics, contemporary landscape design can tap design place''s potential of contradiction and create the new paradigm of landscape design.