Effect of Compromised Cortical Bone on Implant Load Distribution

Purpose: To investigate photoelastically the difference in load distribution of dental implants with different implant neck designs in intact and compromised bone. Materials and Methods: Composite photoelastic models were fabricated using two different resins to simulate trabecular bone and a 1‐mm thick layer of cortical bone. The following parallel‐sided, threaded implants were centrally located in individual models representing intact and compromised cortical bone: Straumann (4.1‐mm diameter × 12‐mm length), AstraTech (4.0‐mm diameter × 13‐mm length), and 3i (3.75‐mm diameter × 13‐mm length). The compromised cortical bone condition was simulated by contaminating a 1‐mm neck portion with Vaseline to impair the implant–resin interface. Vertical and oblique static loads were applied on the abutments, and the resulting stresses were monitored photoelastically and recorded photograhphically. Results: For the fully intact condition, the highest stresses were observed around the crest and apical region for all implant designs under vertical and inclined loads. There were no appreciable differences in magnitude or distribution between implant types. With compromised cortical bone, for all designs and load directions, higher stresses in the supporting structures were observed. Increased stresses were noted especially at the cortical bone–trabecular bone interface. Somewhat lower stress levels were observed with the 3i implant. Conclusions: The condition of implant–cortical bone contact has considerable influence on stress distribution. A compromised cortical bone condition caused higher level stresses for all implant designs tested.     

Composition of supra- and subgingival biofilm of subjects with healthy and diseased implants

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the microbial composition of supra‐ and subgingival biofilm in subjects with and without peri‐implantitis. Material and methods: Forty‐four subjects (mean age 48.9 ± 13.51 years) with at least one implant restored and functional for at least 2 years were assigned to two groups: a peri‐implantitis group (n=22), consisting of subjects presenting peri‐implant sites with radiographic defects >3 mm, bleeding on probing and/or suppuration; and a control group (n=22), consisting of subjects with healthy implants. The clinical parameters evaluated were plaque index, gingival bleeding, bleeding on probing, suppuration, probing depth and clinical attachment level. Supra‐ and subgingival biofilm samples were taken from the deepest sites of each implant and analyzed for the presence of 36 microorganisms by checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridization. Results: Higher mean counts of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola and Tannerella forsythia were observed in the peri‐implantitis group, both supra‐ and subgingivally (P<0.05). The proportions of the pathogens from the red complex were elevated, while host‐compatible beneficial microbial complexes were reduced in diseased compared with healthy implants. The microbiological profiles of supra‐ and subgingival environments did not differ substantially within each group. Conclusion: Marked differences were observed in the composition of supra‐ and subgingival biofilm between healthy and diseased implants. The microbiota associated with peri‐implantitis was comprised of more periodontal pathogenic bacterial species, including the supragingival biofilm.     

Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment

Biofilms form on all hard non-shedding surfaces in a fluid system, i.e. both on teeth and oral implants. As a result of the bacterial challenge, the host responds by mounting a defence mechanism leading to inflammation of the soft tissues. In the dento-gingival unit, this results in the well-described lesion of gingivitis. In the implanto-mucosal unit, this inflammation is termed "mucositis". If plaque is allowed to accumulate for prolonged periods of time, experimental research has demonstrated that "mucositis" may develop into "periimplantitis" affecting the periimplant supporting bone circumferentially. Although the bony support may be lost coronally, the implant still remains osseointegrated and hence, clinically stable. This is the reason why mobility represents an insensitive, but specific diagnostic feature of "periimplantitis". More sensitive and more reliable parameters of developing and existing periimplant infections are "bleeding on probing", "probing depths" and radiographic interpretation of conventional or subtraction radiographs. Depending on the diagnosis made continuously during recall visits, a maintenance system termed Cumulative Interceptive Supportive Therapy (CIST) has been proposed.