Involved field radiation for Hodgkin's lymphoma: The actual dose to breasts in close proximity

To decrease the risk of late toxicities in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) (HL), involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) has largely replaced the extended fields. To determine the out-of-field dose delivered from a typical IFRT to surrounding critical structures, we measured the dose at various points in an anthropomorphic phantom. The phantom is divided into 1-inch-thick slices with the ability to insert TLDs at 3-cm intervals grid spacing. Two treatment fields were designed, and a total of 45 TLDs were placed (equally spaced) at the margin of the each of the 2 radiation fields. After performing a computed tomography simulation, 2 treatment plans targeting the mediastinum, a typical treatment field in patients with early stage HL, were generated. A total dose of 3060 cGy was delivered to the gross tumor volume for each field consecutively. The highest measured dose detected at 1 cm from the field edge in the planning target volume was 496 cGy, equivalent to 16% of the isocentric dose. The dose dropped significantly with increasing distance from the field edge. It ranged from 1.1–3.9% of the isocentric dose at a distance of 3.2–4 cm to <1.6% at a distance of >6 cm. Although the computer treatment planning system (CTPS) frequently underestimated the dose delivered, the difference in dose between measured and generated by CTPS was <2.5% in 90 positions measured. The collateral dose of radiation to breasts from IFRT is minimal. The out-of-field dose, although mildly underestimated by CTPS, becomes insignificant at >3 cm from the field edge of the radiation field.     

When is a varicocele repair indicated: the dilemma of hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction?

In the past, the indications for varicocelectomy are primarily for infertility with abnormal semen parameters, testicular hypotrophy/atrophy in adolescents, and/or pain. The surgical treatment of varicocele for hypogonadism is controversial and debated. Recently, multiple reports in the literature have suggested that varicocele is associated with hypogonadism and varicocele repair can increase testosterone levels. Men with hypogonadal symptoms should have at least two serum testosterone levels. Microsurgical varicocelectomy may be beneficial for men with clinically palpable varicoceles with documented hypogonadism. In this review, we summarize the most recent literature linking varicocele to hypogonadism and sexual dysfunction and the impact of repair on serum testosterone levels. We performed a search of the published English literature. The key words used were “varicocele and hypogonadism” and “varicocele surgery and testosterone.” We included published studies after 1998. We, also, evaluated the effect of surgery on the changes in the serum testosterone level regardless of the indication for the varicocele repair.     

Deletions and losses in chromosomes 5 or 7 in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia: incidence, associations and implications.

Deletions or losses in chromosomes 5 or 7 are recurrent non-random abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and are associated with prior exposure to carcinogens or leukemogenic agents, and with poor prognosis. Their occurrence and significance in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is not well described. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence, associations and implications of chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities in adult ALL. Patients with newly diagnosed ALL referred to MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1980 and 1996 were analyzed. Characteristics and outcome of patients with or without chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities were compared by standard statistical methods. Thirty-one of 468 patients (6.6%) had chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities. Loss of chromosome 5 occurred in six cases, three of them had both chromosome 5 and 7 abnormalities. Deletion or loss of chromosome 7 occurred as a single abnormality in three patients; in 28 patients it was associated with other abnormalities. The most significant cytogenetic association was with the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) abnormality occurring in nine patients (29%). Compared with patients without the abnormalities, patients with chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities tended to express CD34 more frequently (74% vs 54% P = 0.07), to be older (age >60 years 29% vs 18% P = 0.14), and to be associated with Ph (29% vs 11% P = 0.004). With therapy, the complete response (CR) rate with chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities was lower (64% vs 79% P = 0.038) but the survival rate was similar (3-year survival rate 32% vs 36% P = 0.14). When the 22 patients without Ph were considered separately, the CR and survival rates were similar among patients with or without chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities. Abnormalities in chromosome 5 or 7 are not specific for AML, and may occur in ALL. Unlike in AML, chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities in ALL were not predictive of worse prognosis, which is accounted for mostly by the association with Ph.     

Diagnosis and Management of Gynecomastia for Urologists

Purpose of Review

Our aim is to review the steps of diagnosis and management of gynecomastia with a special focus on treatment of gynecomastia associated with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Recent Findings

Recent studies investigating tamoxifen and radiation therapy for both therapy and prophylaxis of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia are reviewed.

Summary

Gynecomastia is a common clinical problem, affecting between one and two thirds of middle-aged men. Diagnosis is typically made by history and physical exam. Common causes include chronic medical conditions and medications; however, unexplained gynecomastia should prompt laboratory work-up, followed by appropriate imaging studies to evaluate for hormone producing cancers. For patients taking bicalutamide for treatment of prostate cancer, tamoxifen or radiation therapy for gynecomastia are excellent options.

     

Endocrine,Sexual Function,and Infertility Side Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Genitourinary Cancers

Purpose of Review

Immune checkpoint therapy has grown in prominence in the last few decades and is being increasingly utilized in treatment of advanced cancers. Although information on toxicities of these drugs is forthcoming, not much is known regarding the toxicity profile of these drugs from a sexual function standpoint. We undertook the current review to appraise the literature for endocrine/sexual side effects of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy.

Recent Findings

Our review included 32 articles and focused primarily on the programmed death (PD) pathway. We found that endocrine side effects after anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy are relatively rare, with hypothyroidism (range <?1 to 40%) and hypophysitis (range <?1 to 10%) being the two most common. None of the studies specifically commented on the infertility or sexual side effects of these drugs. However, two studies evaluating biochemical profiles of patients undergoing therapy with ipilimumab (a CTLA-4 inhibitor) or combination therapy (CTLA-4 + PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) noted that about <?1 to ~?60% of the patients developed hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. None of the studies provided information regarding clinically meaningful sexual health endpoints such as libido, erectile function assessments, or sexual function-related quality of life.

Summary

Endocrine side effects, although uncommon, are important and unique side effects of immune checkpoint therapy because they are often complex and can be life threatening. While side effects on sexual health may not be life threatening, they are lifestyle limiting. Thus, long-term follow-up, post-marketing surveillance, and future studies will need to elucidate the true rates of endocrine/sexual side effects and the mechanisms underlying them. This will aid in better counseling of the patients, as more of them undergo these novel immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies.

     

Practical application of nonrandomized research to patient care: a case study of nesiritide

Prospective, randomized clinical trials are the gold standard for establishing cause-and-effect relationships between therapeutic interventions and specific outcomes. Unfortunately, these types of studies are not always available to evaluate important clinical end points such as mortality. Meta-analyses and observational studies are often used in an attempt to fill the gap in the literature when no prospective, randomized trials exist to answer a research question. A rapid increase in the number of published meta-analyses and observational studies has occurred in recent years. In the absence of prospective, randomized studies, it is essential for the clinician to understand the important issues involved in interpreting these other types of studies. When evaluating a meta-analysis, the clinician should assess for several different forms of bias, clinical heterogeneity, and use of appropriate methodology. When evaluating an observational study, sources of bias and confounding should be identified. If the potential for confounding is present, the methods used to minimize the impact of confounders should be evaluated for appropriateness. Mortality associated with nesiritide in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure is a contemporary example of the use of nonrandomized research to address a research question that is unanswered by prospective, randomized studies. We review the details of a recent meta-analysis and observational evaluation of mortality associated with nesiritide and discuss the issues that are important in critical evaluation of nonrandomized study designs.