排序方式: 共有31条查询结果,搜索用时 37 毫秒
1.
2.
目的:观察针刺对于抑郁性神经症的临床疗效。方法:采用多中心随机对照研究,将440例患者分为针刺组、百忧解组、非穴位针刺组。针刺组采用四关穴(合谷、太冲)为主的穴位,百忧解组服用药物百忧解20mg/d,非穴位针刺组患者接受针刺治疗,但取穴偏离真正的穴位。在治疗前、后进行汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)计分,按HAMD减分率进行疗效评价,以Asberg氏抗抑郁药副反应量表(SERS)结合严重不良反应记录进行安全性评估,对数据进行意向性分析(ITT分析)。结果:针刺组的总有效率为86.4%,优于非穴位针刺组的59.1%及百忧解组的72.7%;针刺组的HAMD计分与百忧解组相当,而且2组均优于非穴位针刺组;针刺组及非穴位针刺组的SERS计分均明显低于百忧解组,未见晕针等严重针刺不良反应记录。结论:针刺对于抑郁性神经症是一种有效、安全的疗法;针刺治疗抑郁性神经症的疗效可能优于百忧解或与百忧解相当,但副作用远低于百忧解。 相似文献
3.
STUDY ON THE SOMESTHETIC EVOKED POTENTIAL IN ELECTRO-ACUPUNCTURE TREATMENT OF CERVICAL SPONDYLOPATHY
Cervicalspondylopathy(CS)isacommondiseaseoccurredinthemiddleagsedandtheagedpeople.Recentdataindicatethatthisdiseaseisalsooftenseeninyoungerpeople,presentingayoungishtendency.Inthepast,objectivestandardsfordiagnosisandevaluationofthetherapeuticeffectofCS… 相似文献
4.
Mental retardation (MR) children are referred to those who have a lower intelligence incomparison with that of the normal children with similar ages in the developmenal stage and someconcurrent defects in adaptive behavior simultaneously. In the past more than 10 years, we adopted “Jinsanzhen ( Jin‘‘ s Three Needles )”principally to treat many MR children and achieved satisfied results^[1,2]. In Order to rais ethe therapeutic effect further, we adopted combined therapies of “Jin-three Needles” and pointinjection of drugs and oral administration of Chinese patent drugs to treat it and obtained a striking therapeutic effect. Here is the report. 相似文献
5.
小柴胡汤抗鸭乙肝病毒的实验研究 总被引:25,自引:0,他引:25
目的:通过体内抗鸭乙型肝炎病毒(DHBV)的实验研究,印证小柴胡汤治疗慢性乙型肝炎的独特疗效。揭示其扶正祛邪组方机理的合理性。方法:按人体公斤体重折算分为小柴湖汤20、15、5倍不同剂量组,根据所含药物不同分成小柴胡汤全方组、半方组和单味柴胡组,分别观察其抗DHBV的不同作用。并与抗病毒西药无环鸟苷(ACV)进行比较。结果:小柴胡汤20倍剂量组对DHBV的抑制作用最佳;小柴胡汤不同组别对DHBV均 相似文献
6.
7.
Objective: To observe therapeutic effect of acupuncture for regulating the liver on depressive neurosis. Methods: In a multi-center randomized controlled trial, 440 patients were divided into 3 groups: Acupuncture group for regulating the liver (Acup., 176 cases) was treated by acupuncture at Siguan Points, i.e. bilateral Hegu (LI 4) and Taichong (LR 3), Baihui (GV 20) and Yintang (EX-HN3) plus ear-acupuncture, Prozac group (P., 176 cases) by oral administration of Prozac, and Non-acupoint needling group (NAN, 88 cases) by acupuncture at non-acupoints as acupuncture placebo. Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) was examined before treatment, and one month, two and three months after treatment respectively to evaluate therapeutic effect, and Rating Scale for Side Effects (SERS) was used to evaluate the safety. Results: After one month of treatment, SDS scores in Acup. Group were significantly lower than that in P. Group (P〈0.05) and than that in NAN Group (P〈0.01), and SDS scores in P. Group were lower than that in NAN Group (P〈0.05), showing the SDS scores in Acup. Group 〈P. Group 〈NAN Group. After 2 months of treatment, SDS scores in Acup. Group were also significantly lower than that in P. Group (P〈0.01) and than that in NAN Group (P〈0.01), and SDS scores in P. Group were also lower than that in NAN Group (P〈0.05), showing the SDS scores in Acup. Group 〈P. Group 〈NAN Group. After 3 months of treatment, SDS scores in Acup. Group were also significantly lower than that in P. Group (P〈0.01) and than that in NAN Group (P〈0.01), and SDS scores in P. Group were also lower than that in NAN Group (P〈0.01), showing the SDS score in Acup. Group 〈P. Group 〈NAN Group. After treatment, SERS scores were 0.16±0.95, 6.51±5.09 and 0.23±1.36 in Acup. Group, P. Group and NAN Group respectively. A significant difference existed between Acup. Group and P. Group (P〈0.05), but no significant difference between Acup. Group and NAN Group (P〉0.05), showing the SERS scores in Acup. Group 〈NAN Group 〈P. Group. No side effect was found in Acup. and NAN groups. Conclusion: The therapeutic effect of acupuncture on depressive neurosis is better than or similar to that of Prozac but with less side effect. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
目的:观察挑针疗法治疗颈椎病的疗效。方法:将158例颈椎病患者随机分为3组。挑针治疗组 56例,采用挑针疗法治疗;局麻对照组47例,采用利多卡因皮下注射治疗;针刺对照组55例,采用常规针 刺治疗。结果:挑针治疗组与局麻对照组、针刺对照组疗效比较,差异均有显著性意义(P<0.05);针刺对照 组与局麻对照组疗效比较,差异也有显著性意义(P<0.05)。证属气滞血瘀型疗效挑针治疗组与局麻对照组、 针刺对照组比较,差异均有非常显著性意义(P<0.01)。治疗前后疼痛指数(PRI)评分变化挑针治疗组与局麻 对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论:挑针疗法治疗颈椎病是一种高效、安全的疗法。 相似文献