Technical tips for intersphincteric resection: how to take out the rectum

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is an ideal technique that preserves the anus, regardless of whether the internal anal sphincter is removed. However, it is difficult to dissect the anterior wall of the rectum from the adjacent organs. We herein describe a safe and useful ISR technique which draws out the rectum through the anus. The intersphincteric space (ISS) between the internal and external anal sphincter muscles was first transabdominally dissected. Next, the transanal dissection was advanced into the ISS bilaterally from the posterior side without dissecting the anterior wall of the anal canal, and the sigmoid colon and rectum were drawn out through the anus. Dissection between the anterior wall of the rectum and prostate/vagina could be easily performed under direct vision. This technique enables the dissection without any risk of a positive surgical margin or unexpected bleeding, and avoids injury to adjacent organs. This technique seems to be a safe and useful dissection technique for approaching the anterior wall of the anal canal.     

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy and Salvage Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Associated With Multiple Lung Metastases: A Case Report

The prognosis of esophageal cancer with distant metastasis is dismal. We report a 70-year-old man with esophageal cancer and multiple lung and lymph node metastases. Complete response was achieved following definitive chemoradiotherapy. Twenty-four months after the initial chemoradiotherapy, local recurrence was detected but there was no evidence of distant metastasis. Therefore, the patient underwent salvage esophagectomy. The surgery was well tolerated without any postoperative complications. The patient is still alive 48 months after the salvage surgery. Our experience suggests that salvage esophagectomy is an important component of multimodal therapy for the recurrence of esophageal cancer.Key words: Esophageal cancer, Chemoradiotherapy, Salvage surgeryThe prognosis of esophageal cancer has improved in recent years, but remains poor despite curative resection.¹ The prognosis is extremely dismal in patients with distant metastasis. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85-01 showed that chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improved outcomes, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 26% compared with 0% following radiotherapy alone. Moreover, residual cancer was less common following CRT (26%) than following radiotherapy alone (37%).² However, local recurrence occurs in 37% of patients after definitive CRT.³ Salvage esophagectomy is one strategy for residual cancer or local recurrence after definitive CRT. Of note, when R0 resection is achieved, long-term survival can be expected.⁴⁻⁶ On the other hand, this is an invasive procedure associated with high morbidity and mortality⁶ and the patient''s prognosis is extremely poor after R1/R2 resection.⁴⁻⁶ Therefore, salvage esophagectomy should only be performed if complete removal of the tumor is expected.Here, we report a rare case with esophageal cancer and multiple lung metastases, in which complete response (CR) was achieved after definitive CRT and salvage esophagectomy was effective for the local recurrence.     

Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) Can Be a Useful Indicator to Determine Prognosis of Patients With Colorectal Carcinoma

The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), an inflammation-based score, has been used to predict the biologic behavior of malignant tumors. The aim of the current study was to elucidate a further significance of GPS in colorectal carcinoma. Correlation of GPS and modified GPS (mGPS), which are composed of combined score provided for serum elevation of C-reactive protein and hypoalbuminemia examined before surgical treatment, with clinicopathologic features was investigated in 272 patients with colorectal carcinoma. Survival of GPS 1 patients was significantly worse than that of GPS 0 patients (P= 0.009), and survival of GPS 2 patients was significantly worse than that of GPS 1 patients (P < 0.0001). Similarly, survival of mGPS 1 patients was significantly worse than that of mGPS 0 patients (P = 0.009), and survival of mGPS 2 patients was significantly worse than that of mGPS 1 patients (P = 0.0006). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that GPS (P < 0.0001) as well as tumor stage (P= 0.004) and venous invasion (P = 0.011) were factors independently associated with worse prognosis. Both GPS and mGPS could classify outcome of patients with a clear stratification, and could be applied as prognostic indicators in colorectal carcinoma.Key words: Colorectal carcinoma, Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), Prognostic indicatorAlthough many tumor-environmental elements, including both tumor-related and host-related factors, have been linked with tumor progression, host inflammatory response is one of the more important factors that has a role in the progression and/or development of tumors.¹Serum elevation of C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute phase protein, has been shown to be a prognostic indicator in a variety of neoplasms, including colorectal carcinoma.^2–5 Moreover, hypoalbuminemia brought about by malnutrition and related to cachexic condition has been reported to be correlated with an unfavorable prognosis of some gastrointestinal tumors.^6,7The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), which is a cumulative inflammation-based cancer-prognostic marker composed of serum elevation of CRP and decrease in albumin concentration, is likely to reflect host systemic inflammatory response and has been reported to be significant as a prognostic indicator in cancer-bearing patients.^8–10Moreover, it has been found that hypoalbuminemia alone is unlikely to be associated with reduced survival likelihood in patients with colorectal carcinoma¹¹; therefore, the GPS has been modified (mGPS), providing a score of 1 only for a case with serum elevation of CRP, and score of 0 for a case only with hypoalbuminemia or where neither was elevated. Although, until now, there have been some reports regarding the significance of GPS as a prognostic indicator in colorectal carcinoma,^9,11–16 the aim of this study was to elucidate further the significance of GPS and mGPS in colorectal carcinoma.     

Improved survival rate by temperature control at compression sites in rat model of crush syndrome

Background

Crush syndrome (CS) has been reported in disasters, terrorist incidents, and accidents, and the clinical and pathologic picture has gradually been clarified. Few lethal and reproducible animal models of CS with use of a quantitative load are available. A new model is needed to investigate pathologic and therapeutic aspects of this injury.

Materials and methods

Using a device built from commercially available components, both hindlimbs of anesthetized rats were respectively compressed for 6 h using 3.6-kg blocks. The effects of trunk warming alone without compressed hindlimbs (Group A), non-warming at room temperature (Group B), whole-body warming including compressed hindlimbs (Group C), or warming of compressed hindlimbs alone (Group D) during compression were examined. Survival rates were compared and hematological and histologic analyses were performed at specific time points after compression release.

Results

Limb or whole-body warming significantly worsened the survival of rats. We found a much lower survival rate of 0%–10% in animals, in which the hindlimbs were warmed during compression (Groups C and D) at 12 h after compression release, compared with 90%–100% in animals without warming of the hindlimbs (Groups A and B). Groups C and D showed significantly enhanced hyperkalemia at ≥4 h after compression release and all blood samples from dead cases showed hyperkalemia (>10 mEq/L).

Conclusions

We developed a new lethal and reproducible rat CS model with a quantitative load. This study found that warming of compressed limbs worsened the survival rate and significantly enhanced hyperkalemia, apparently leading to cardiac arrest.     

Fecoflowmetric Analysis of Anorectal Motor Function in Postoperative Anal-Preserving Surgery Patients With Low Rectal Cancer Comparison With the Wexner Score and Anorectal Manometry

The aim of this study was to elucidate whether fecoflowmetry (FFM) could evaluate more detailed evacuative function than anorectal manometry by comparing between FFM or anorectal manometric findings and the clinical questionnaires and the types of surgical procedure in the patients who received anal-preserving surgery. Fifty-three patients who underwent anal-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer were enrolled. The relationships between FFM or the manometric findings and the clinical questionnaires and the types of procedure of anal-preserving surgery were evaluated. There were significant differences between FFM markers and the clinical questionnaire and the types of the surgical procedure, whereas no significant relationship was observed between the manometric findings and the clinical questionnaire and the types of the surgical procedure. FFM might be feasible and useful for the objective assessment of evacuative function and may be superior to manometry for patients undergoing anal-preserving surgery.Key words: Anorectal manometry, Anal-preserving surgery, Fecoflowmetry, Incontinence, Rectal cancerSphincter preservation has been one of the key issues of rectal cancer surgery. Low anterior resection (LAR)¹ and internal and external sphincter resection (ISR and ESR) are anal-preserving surgeries.^2,3 The aim of these procedures is to restore the normal process of defecation, along with its function, and to improve the quality of life of patients by avoiding permanent colostomy. However, anal-preserving surgery is often associated with evacuative dysfunction and various degrees of incontinence.^4–7Most studies that have assessed the evacuation function have used clinical questionnaires, which are subjective and may vary according to the patient perception.⁷ There are many factors that can affect the evacuative function, such as the stool consistency, rectal capacity, anal sphincters, pelvic floor muscles, and intra-abdominal pressure. Although manometry with or without the clinical score has also commonly been used, fecoflowmetry (FFM) has been reported to be more accurate and useful for assessing the postoperative anorectal motor function.^8–13 FFM was first introduced by Shafik and is a dynamic method for examining the anorectal motor activity that simulates the natural act of defecation.¹⁴ Some studies have shown its usefulness in postoperative patients with anorectal disease,^8–11 but only a few studies have been performed to examine the evacuative function following anal-preserving surgery.^12,13 The aim of this study was to evaluate the evacuative function in the postoperative period following anal-preserving surgery in patients with low rectal cancer using FFM, and to compare the results with the Wexner score and anorectal manometry.¹⁵     

Safety of peritoneal dialysis catheter surgery under dexmedetomidine and local anesthesia for elderly patients in Japan: a single-center prospective cohort study

Clinical and Experimental Nephrology - The number of patients aged ≥ 75&nbsp;years and who need renal replacement therapy is steadily increasing. The study aimed to determine...     

Impact of preoperative factors on catheter position in peritoneal dialysis: a prospective cohort study

Clinical and Experimental Nephrology - Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter malposition is one of the complications of renal replacement therapy. This study aimed to determine the preoperative factors...