Functional and psychosocial impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rheumatic patients’ quality of life in Saudi Arabia

Quality of Life Research - The COVID-19 pandemic might add to the stressors experienced by people living with rheumatic diseases. This study aimed to examine rheumatic patients’ functional...     

Treatment of multiple adjacent RT 1 gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: 9-year results of a split-mouth randomized clinical trial

Clinical Oral Investigations - To evaluate t he long-term outcomes following treatment of RT 1 multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGR) using the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) with...     

Update PONV – Was gibt es Neues bei der Prophylaxe und Therapie von postoperativer Übelkeit und postoperativem Erbrechen?

Die Anaesthesiologie - Auch wenn für Anästhesiologen über Jahrzehnte die Prophylaxe und Therapie postoperativer Schmerzen im Rahmen des postoperativen Patientenkomforts an vorderster...     

盐酸利托君治疗晚期先兆流产保胎患者的临床疗效及不良反应发生率分析

目的分析盐酸利托君治疗晚期先兆流产保胎患者的临床疗效及不良反应发生率。方法选取2019年6—12月本院收治的行硫酸镁保胎治疗的35例晚期先兆流产患者作为对照组,另选取2020年1—7月本院收治的行盐酸利托君保胎治疗的35例晚期先兆流产患者作为研究组,比较两组治疗情况、保胎成功率、不良反应发生率、新生儿Apgar评分。结果研究组宫缩消失时间、止血时间、腹痛缓解时间、腰痛缓解时间、起效时间均短于对照组,且延长孕期时间长于对照组(P<0.05);研究组保胎成功33例(94.29%),对照组保胎成功26例(74.29%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组不良反应发生率为22.86%,低于对照组的20.00%,但差异无统计学意义;研究组Apgar评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论盐酸利托君治疗晚期先兆流产保胎患者,可尽快改善患者临床症状,有助于提高保胎成功率,改善母婴结局,且无明显不良症状,安全性较高,值得临床推广。     

A systematic review of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders

PurposeUnderstanding the value of genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders requires high-quality, methodologically robust economic evaluations. This systematic review sought to assess the methodological quality among such studies and examined opportunities for improvement.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science for economic evaluations of genetic screening/testing (2013-2019). Methodological rigor and adherence to best practices were systematically assessed using the British Medical Journal checklist.ResultsAcross the 47 identified studies, there were substantial variations in modeling approaches, reporting detail, and sophistication. Models ranged from simple decision trees to individual-level microsimulations that compared between 2 and >20 alternative interventions. Many studies failed to report sufficient detail to enable replication or did not justify modeling assumptions, especially for costing methods and utility values. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or calibration were rarely used to derive parameter estimates. Nearly all studies conducted some sensitivity analysis, and more sophisticated studies implemented probabilistic sensitivity/uncertainty analysis, threshold analysis, and value of information analysis.ConclusionWe describe a heterogeneous body of work and present recommendations and exemplar studies across the methodological domains of (1) perspective, scope, and parameter selection; (2) use of uncertainty/sensitivity analyses; and (3) reporting transparency for improvement in the economic evaluation of genetic screening/testing.