Accuracy of MRI-guided Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Patients Under Active Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This meta-analysis focuses on the accuracy of upgrading to clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) versus systematic biopsy (SB). We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus, and Literatura Latino Americana em Ciências da Saúde databases through January 2020 for comparative, retrospective/prospective, paired-cohort, and randomized clinical trials with paired comparisons. The population consisted of patients with low-risk PCa in active surveillance with at least 1 index lesion on imaging. We evaluated the quality of evidence by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 score. Group comparisons considered the differences between the area under the curve summary receiver operating characteristic curve in a 2-tailed method. We also compared the positive predictive value of the best single method (MRI-TB or SB) and the referral study test (combined biopsy, a combination of MRI-TB and SB). The meta-analysis included 6 studies enrolling 741 patients. The pooled sensitivity for the 2 groups was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.83; I² = 75%) and 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.74; I² = 55.4%), respectively. The area under the curve for the MRI-TB and SB groups were 0.99 and 0.92 (P < .001), respectively. The positive predictive value for the MRI-TB and combined biopsy groups were similar. The accumulated evidence suggests better results for MRI-TB compared with SB. Therefore, use of MRI-TB alone may be preferable in patients in active surveillance harboring low-risk PCa.     

Transperineal template‐guided mapping biopsy of the prostate

Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer has eluded clinicians for decades. With our current understanding of prostate cancer, urologists should devise and confidently present the available treatment options – active surveillance/radical treatment/focal therapy to these patients. The diagnostic modalities used for prostate cancer have the dual problem of false negativity and overdiagnosis. Various modifications in the prostate biopsy techniques have increased the accuracy of cancer detection, but we are still far from an ideal diagnostic technique. Transperineal template‐guided mapping biopsy of the prostate is an exhaustive biopsy technique that has been improvised over the past decade, and has shown superior results to other available modalities. We have carried out a PubMed search on the available experiences on this diagnostic modality, and along with our own experiences, we present a brief review on transperineal template‐guided mapping biopsy of the prostate.     

A 16-year clinical experience with intermittent androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: oncological results

Objective  

To present oncological results with intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) in a single center.     

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is feasible and effective in ‘fit’ senior men with localized prostate cancer

Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of age and comorbidity on short‐term complications, long‐term continence and oncological outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 2048 consecutive men underwent LRP for localized prostate cancer in one institution. Comorbidity was assessed using the Charlson index. Short‐term postoperative complications, transfusion rate, duration of hospital stay, long‐term continence and oncological outcome were analysed by age and comorbidity classes. RESULTS Of the 2048 men, 297 were aged ≥70 years and 281 had a Charlson index of >0 (mainly diabetes 31%, chronic pulmonary disease 26%, prior other nonmetastatic cancer 16%, prior myocardial infarction 12%). Compared with younger men, senior men had significantly higher pathological stages and tumor grades. Of those 297 men aged ≥70 years, 90 (30.3%) developed biochemical relapse, none died from prostate cancer and five (1.7%) died from another cause over a median follow‐up of 5 years. The occurrence and severity of short‐term postoperative complications were more strongly related to comorbidity than chronological age. Multivariate analysis with stepwise regression confirmed that most important predictors of short‐term postoperative complications were a Charlson index of ≥2, prostate weight of >80 g, obesity and age of ≥70 years. Postoperative continence significantly declined with age (ranging from 87% in men aged <60 years to 67.5% in men aged ≥70 years). Predictors of long‐term incontinence were age of ≥70 years, obesity and need for perioperative transfusion. CONCLUSIONS LRP is feasible and effective in fit senior men (aged ≥70 years) with localized prostate cancer, including those at high risk of dying from it.