Clinical epidemiology and survival of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: Data from the Italian Registry Investigative Neuro AIDS (IRINA)

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) remains a relevant clinical problem even in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Aims of the study were to analyze clinical and treatment-related features and the survival probability of PML patients observed within the Italian Registry Investigative Neuro AIDS (IRINA) during a 29-month period of HAART. Intravenous drug use, the presence of focal signs, and the involvement of white matter at neuroradiology increased the risk of having PML. A reduced probability of PML was observed when meningeal signs were reported. Patients starting HAART at PML diagnosis and previously naïve for antiretrovirals showed significantly higher 1-year probability of survival (.58), compared to those continuing HAART (.24), or never receiving HAART (.00). Higher CD4 cell count were associated with a higher survival probability (.45). At multivariate analysis, a younger age, higher CD4, starting HAART at PML diagnosis, the absence of previous acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining events, and the absence of a severe neurologic impairment were all associated with a reduced hazard of death. The use of cidofovir showed a trend towards a reduced risk of death.     

Metabolic consequences of physical inactivity.

Physical inactivity is associated with alteration of normal physiologic processes leading to muscle atrophy, reduced exercise capacity, insulin resistance, and altered energy balance. Bed rest studies in human beings using stable isotopes of amino acids indicate that muscle unloading decreases the turnover rates of muscle and whole-body proteins, with a prevailing inhibition of protein synthesis. In the fasting state, muscle and whole-body nitrogen loss was not accelerated during bed rest. In experimental postprandial states, the amino acid-mediated stimulation of protein synthesis was impaired, whereas the ability of combined insulin and glucose infusion to decrease whole-body proteolysis was not affected by muscle inactivity. Thus, an impaired ability of protein/amino acid feeding to stimulate body protein synthesis is the major catabolic mechanism for the effect of bed rest on protein metabolism. This suggests that a protein intake level greater than normal could be required to achieve the same postprandial anabolic effect during muscle inactivity. Metabolic adaptation to muscle inactivity also involves development of resistance to the glucoregulatory action of insulin, decreased energy requirements, and increased insulin and leptin secretion. These alterations may lead to the development of the metabolic syndrome that is defined as the association of hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and abdominal obesity. This cluster of metabolic abnormalities is a risk factor for coronary artery disease and stroke. Evidence indicates that exercise training programs may counteract all of these abnormalities both in healthy sedentary subjects and in patients affected by a variety of chronic disease states.     

The role of multiparametric MRI in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: The ROMAS randomized controlled trial

BackgroundWe aim to evaluate the impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion-target biopsy for early reclassification of patients with low-risk Prostate Cancer in a randomized trial.Materials and methodsBetween 2015 and 2018, patients diagnosed with Prostate Cancer after random biopsy fulfilling PRIAS criteria were enrolled and centrally randomized (1:1 ratio) to study group or control group. Patients randomized to study group underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3 months from enrollment: patients with positive findings (PIRADS-v2>2) underwent fusion-target biopsy; patients with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging or confirmed ISUP - Grade Group 1 at fusion-target biopsy were managed according to PRIAS schedule and 12-core random biopsy was performed at 12 months. Patients in control group underwent PRIAS protocol, including a confirmatory 12-core random biopsy at 12 months. Primary endpoint was a reduction of reclassification rate at 12-month random biopsy in study group at least 20% less than controls. Reclassification was defined as biopsy ISUP Grade Group 1 in >2 biopsy cores or disease upgrading.ResultsA total of 124 patients were randomized to study group (n = 62) or control group (n = 62). Around 21 of 62 patients (34%) in study group had a positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and underwent fusion-target biopsy, with 11 (17.7%) reclassifications. Considering the intention-to-treat population, reclassification rate at 12-month random biopsy was 6.5% for study group and 29% for control group, respectively (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe early employment of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for active surveillance patients enrolled after random biopsy consents to significantly reduce reclassifications at 12-month random biopsy.     

The impact of the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection,with special reference to the hematological setting

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is a disease known from a few months, caused by a recently arisen virus and, consequently, it is little known. The disease has a benign course in most infected subjects (children and young adults), is often symptomatic in adults over the age of 50 and often serious and life threatening in people with comorbidities and the elderly. The few data published on coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) in the blood‐oncology field report a serious clinical presentation, a serious course of the disease, and a high mortality rate, as has also been reported for other cancer contexts. The current strategy for treating patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 includes antivirals that are effective against other viral infections and drugs that can moderate the cytokine storm. There is no specific vaccine and consequently all possible precautions must be taken to prevent SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in the areas of oncology, oncohematology, and bone marrow transplantation. In this reviewer's article, we report the information currently available on SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to help young doctors and hematologists to successfully manage patients with COVID‐19.     

Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. An Independent Prognostic Factor Still Reliable

To evaluate whether, in a sample of patients radically treated for colorectal carcinoma, the preoperative determination of the carcinoembryonic antigen (p-CEA) may have a prognostic value and constitute an independent risk factor in relation to disease-free survival. The preoperative CEA seems to be related both to the staging of colorectal neoplasia and to the patient''s prognosis, although this—to date—has not been conclusively demonstrated and is still a matter of intense debate in the scientific community. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. A total of 395 patients were radically treated for colorectal carcinoma. The preoperative CEA was statistically compared with the 2010 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging, the T and N parameters, and grading. All parameters recorded in our database were tested for an association with disease-free survival (DFS). Only factors significantly associated (P < 0.05) with the DFS were used to build multivariate stepwise forward logistic regression models to establish their independent predictors. A statistically significant relationship was found between p-CEA and tumor staging (P < 0.001), T (P < 0.001) and N parameters (P = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors found were: p-CEA, stages N1 and N2 according to AJCC, and G3 grading (grade). A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) was evident between the DFS of patients with normal and high p-CEA levels. Preoperative CEA makes a pre-operative selection possible of those patients for whom it is likely to be able to predict a more advanced staging.Key words: Colorectal carcinoma, Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, Disease-free survival, Independent prognostic factorIn the world today, more than 1 million cases of patients with colorectal neoplasia are identified each year. Forty percent of these will have a poor prognosis for which targeted therapeutic strategies could most likely be more effective.^1–3 For this reason, finding prognostic factors that are early, reliable, and related to the extent of the tumor is of the utmost importance. Among these, the most that are considered even to this day are T and N parameters.^1,2,4,5 Less relied upon, however, is the M parameter, which is often understaged due to inadequate pretreatment diagnostic methods.⁶ However, these parameters, which are available to us only after surgery, do not represent the gold standard. In fact, the prognosis of patients with the same staging is often various and that the need to continually implement ever-changing variables in an already excessively fragmented staging is still present.^2,4,7–9Recently, in light of these needs, great attention has been paid to the study of molecular and genetic markers. At present, these markers still have not found a regular application due to the complexity of their determination, the difficulty of standardization and, last but not least, the low cost-benefit ratio.^1,3,4,9,10With this in mind, in our opinion, the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) maintains its position, as for over 30 years it has continued to be the most widely used marker¹¹ and whose validity, with regard to colorectal follow-up, has been sanctioned by leading organizations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)¹² and the European Group on Tumor Markers.¹³ Moreover, as Herrera¹⁴ and Wanebo¹⁵ had already reported by the end of the ‘70s, the preoperative determination of the CEA (p-CEA) seems to be related both to the staging of colorectal neoplasia and to the patient''s prognosis. However, to date, none of this has been conclusively demonstrated and is still a matter of intense debate both in prestigious scientific journals^{4,7,11,16–21} as well as in different guidelines.²²The American Society of Clinical Oncology itself, if on the one hand suggests using the determination of the CEA in the preoperative staging thus justifying a worse prognosis when increased,¹² on the other, does not validate using the p-CEA in the determination of an adjuvant or neo-adjuvant therapeutic strategy.²³Regarding this issue, we believe it still pertinent to evaluate whether in a sample of patients radically treated for colorectal carcinoma, the determination of the p-CEA may have a prognostic value and constitute an independent risk factor in relation to disease-free survival (DFS).