Carboplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a phase II multicenter study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: In the present phase II multicenter study, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin at an AUC of 4 on day 8 of a 3-week cycle, for a total of six cycles. Primary end points were response rate and clinical benefit; secondary end points were, survival, time to progression (TTP) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study, 47 of whom were eligible for treatment. The median age was 63 years (range 34-76) and the median Karnofsky performance status (PS) was 80%. Patients received a median of six cycles (range 1-11). Among 35 patients evaluable for response, eight (17%) achieved partial response; 15 (32%) and 12 (25%) patients had stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median overall survival was 7.4 months; the median TTP was 4.4 months and the 1-year survival was 28%. The observed clinical benefit response was remarkable. After the second cycle of chemotherapy, 21 of 31 (68%) patients experienced pain improvement and reduced analgesic consumption. At the same time, 35% and 56% of our patients significantly improved their Karnofsky PS and weight, respectively. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hematological, including 8% anemia, 6% neutropenia and 13% thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin is a moderately active treatment for patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. This regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile and provides a significant clinical benefit, and hence warrants further investigation.     

Irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI) and oxaliplatin (OXA) are effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC) were randomly assigned to receive IRI plus leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or OXA plus LV/5-FU in order to compare the response rates, time-to-tumor progression, overall survival rates, and toxicity profiles of these two agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to February 2002, 295 patients were randomized to receive either IRI/LV/5-FU or OXA/LV/5-FU. The treatment schedules consisted of weekly IRI 70 mg/m(2) or OXA 45 mg/m(2) plus LV 200 mg/m(2) followed immediately by intravenous bolus 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Treatment was continued for up to four cycles or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the study arms in the overall response rate (33% with IRI/LV/5-FU versus 32% with OXA/LV/5-FU based on responses demonstrated on a single evaluation; 23% with IRI/LV/5-FU versus 22.3% with OXA/LV/5-FU based on responses confirmed according to WHO criteria) median time to progression (8.9 versus 7.6 months), and median overall survival (17.6 versus 17.4 months). Toxicity profiles (grades 3 and 4) were similar in the IRI and OXA arms (diarrhea 12.3% and 9.8%, neutropenia 8.2% and 4.9%, and febrile neutropenia 1.4% and 1.4%, respectively), with the exception of grade 3 sensory neuropathy, which almost exclusively occurred in the OXA arm (0% versus 5.6%; P=0.003, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: The IRI/LV/5-FU and OXA/LV/5-FU regimens demonstrated equally substantial efficacies and manageable toxicity profiles in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced CRC. However, IRI/LV/5-FU may be the preferable regimen to avoid significant neurotoxicity associated with OXA-LV/5-FU.     

Treatment of intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using CEOP versus CNOP

INTRODUCTION: During the last few years epirubicin (E) and mitoxantrone (M) (Novantrone) have been used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), because of their favorable principal profile. In particular, M has less severe non-hematological toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized multicenter phase III study was conducted in order to compare the efficacy and toxicity of CEOP and CNOP in intermediate- and high-grade NHL. CEOP (arm A) consisted of cyclophosphamide 1000mg m(-2), vincristine 2mg, E 70mg m(-2) on day 1 and prednisone 60mg on days 1-7. The CNOP regimen (arm B) was identical to CEOP except for replacement of E by M at a dose of 12mg m(-2). Randomization was stratified according to stages I-IV. From September 1993 to March 1999, 249 patients registered for the trial. Patient characteristics were equally distributed in the two arms, except for age and International Prognostic Index (IPI) groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of complete (CR) and partial response (PR). The overall response rate was 78% in arm A (57% CR, 21% PR) and 82% in arm B (60% CR, 22% PR). With a median follow-up time of 47.3 months, the median survival was not reached in arm A, while it was 39.5 months in arm B (P=0.09). Three-year survival rates were 62.5% for CEOP and 51.5% for CNOP. There was no significant difference regarding the time to progression between the two groups (29.7 vs. 18.5 months); furthermore the median duration of CRs was 71.6 and 49 months for CEOP and CNOP, respectively (P=0.07). The therapeutic efficacies of both regimens were equivalent among the four IPI groups. More alopecia was observed in arm A. WHO grade >2 neutropenia was more frequent in arm B. Supportive treatment with G-CSF was given to 22 and 24 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in terms of overall response rates, overall survival and time to progression between CEOP and CNOP in the treatment of intermediate- and high-grade NHL. Patients with low or low intermediate IPI risk treated with either CEOP or CNOP showed significantly better survival, response rates and time to progression than those with high intermediate or high IPI risk. Therefore, new improved therapeutic approaches should be developed for the treatment of high IPI risk patients.     

Cancer-related neuropathic pain in out-patient oncology clinics: a European survey

Background

Although pain is frequently experienced by patients with cancer, it remains under-treated. The primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of cancer-related neuropathic pain (CRNP) in patients with chronic pain who attended an outpatient clinic for standard care in Europe (irrespective of the reason or stage of the cancer). The secondary aims of this study were to characterise pain and cancer in patients with CRNP (including treatment) and to evaluate the usefulness of the painDETECT (PD-Q) screening tool to help physicians identify a potential neuropathic component of cancer-related pain.

Methods

An observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional, multi-centre study of adult patients with cancer using patient and physician case report forms (CRFs). Patients with CRNP were identified by physicians’ clinical assessments after examining the completed PD-Q.

Results

A total of 951 patients visiting outpatient clinics across Europe were enrolled in this study between August 2010 and July 2011. Of these, 310 patients (32.60%; 95% confidence interval 29.62, 35.58) were identified as having CRNP. Twenty-nine of 39 (74.4%) physicians who completed the CRF relating to the PD-Q considered it a useful tool to help detect CRNP in daily practice and 28 of 39 (71.8%) indicated that they would use this tool in the future for most or some of their patients. Data from physicians before and after review of the completed PD-Qs showed a shift in clinical opinion (either to positive CRNP diagnosis [yes] or negative CRNP diagnosis [no]) in respect of 142 patients; about half of which (74) were categorised with an initial diagnosis of unknown. Opinions also shifted from a no to a yes diagnosis in 10 patients and from a yes to a no diagnosis in 51 patients.

Conclusions

Approximately one-third of adults with cancer experiencing chronic pain attending outpatient clinics as part of routine care were considered to have CRNP in the opinion of the physicians after considering scores on the PD-Q. While physicians did not consider the PD-Q to be a useful tool for all patients, shifts in diagnosis before and after the use of this tool indicate that it may help physicians identify CRNP, especially where there is initial uncertainty.

     

Expression profiling of 21 biomolecules in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas of Caucasian patients

Background

Since scarce data exist on the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Caucasian patients, we attempted to elucidate the responsible molecular pathways in this patient population.

Methods

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples from 107 patients, diagnosed with locally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and treated with chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy, were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for the expression of the following proteins: E-cadherin, P-cadherin, Fascin-1, Cyclin D1, COX-2, EGFR, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, ERCC1, p53, p63, Ki67, MAPT, phospho-p44/42MAPK, PTEN, phospho-AKT, phospho-mTOR, and phospho-GSK-3β. EBER status was assessed by in situ hybridization. The majority of the cases were included in tissue microarray. All stains were performed and assessed centrally by two pathologists. The median follow-up time was 76.8 (42.3 – 99.2) months.

Results

Biomolecules expressed in >90% of cases were: p53, COX-2, P-cadherin, EBER, phospho-GSK-3β, and Fascin-1. WHO II+III tumors were more frequently EBER & PTEN positive and VEGF-A negative. Advanced age was significantly associated with positive phospho-GSK-3β and ERCC1 expression; male gender with positive phospho-AKT and phospho-p44/42MAPK; and worse performance status (1 or 2) with negative Ki67, ERCC1, PTEN, and phospho-mTOR expression. Earlier disease stage was closely associated with p63, MAPT, PTEN, and Cyclin D1 positivity. Univariate Cox regression analysis highlighted Cyclin D1 as a negative prognostic factor for disease-free survival (p=0.034) and EBER as a positive one for overall survival (p=0.048). In multivariate analysis, advanced age and stage, poor performance status, and positive ERCC1 emerged as predictors of worse disease-free and overall survival, as opposed to positive phospho-mTOR. Clustering analysis defined two protein-expression groups being predictive of better overall survival (p=0.043).

Conclusions

Our study is the first to examine the activation and interaction of established biomolecules and signaling pathways in Caucasian NPC patients in an effort to reveal new therapeutic targets.     

EGFR gene gain and PTEN protein expression are favorable prognostic factors in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab

Introduction

Cetuximab is a monoclonal epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting antibody, used in the treatment of colon cancer. KRAS mutation status is strongly predictive of cetuximab efficacy, but more predictive factors are needed for better patient selection. PTEN is a downstream inhibitor of the EGFR pathway and has been evaluated as a predictive factor of cetuximab efficacy in colorectal cancer.

Patients and methods

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples were collected from 226 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer that had been treated with cetuximab. Clinical information was collected retrospectively from the patients’ medical records. After central evaluation, 147 cases with adequate material were eligible for further evaluation. EGFR and PTEN status was evaluated with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Data were associated with cetuximab treatment outcome. Additional analysis was performed with previously published data on PIK3CA, BRAF and KRAS mutation status and EGFR ligand amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin intratumoral mRNA expression levels. PIK3CA mutation status and PTEN protein expression were also analyzed as a single complex parameter, to evaluate the predictive value of PI3K/PTEN axis dysfunction as one entity.

Results

Analysis showed a borderline association of overall response rate (ORR) and time to progression (TTP) with EGFR protein overexpression by IHC (p = 0.059 and p = 0.057, respectively) and a positive association of EGFR gain by FISH (found in only five cases) with longer TTP (p = 0.026). No association was found between ORR or TTP and PTEN IHC or FISH status. Comparative analysis with previously published data showed that PTEN protein expression is associated with longer TTP in patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS (p = 0.036) and especially in the ones with elevated AREG levels (p = 0.046), as well as in patients with both KRAS and BRAF WT (p = 0.019). Patients with both PIK3CA WT and PTEN protein expression had significantly longer TTP (p = 0.010) versus all others, in the absence of BRAF and KRAS mutations, a finding which persisted in the KRAS WT/AREG high subgroup (p = 0.046).

Conclusions

In this cetuximab-treated colorectal cancer population, EGFR gain was associated with better outcome and PTEN protein expression with longer TTP in KRAS WT, KRAS WT/AREG high and KRAS/BRAF WT subpopulations. Cetuximab efficacy is greater with intact and activated EGFR signaling, without activating mutations of KRAS/BRAF and in the presence of preserved PTEN inhibitory activity upon the PI3K/AKT pathway. These results reflect a solid biological rationale and warrant further evaluation of the predictive role of PTEN in prospective studies.     

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (PLD) and paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic head and neck carcinoma: a phase I/II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)

A phase I pharmacokinetics and dose-finding study and a phase II study of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (PLD) and paclitaxel were conducted in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC). Sixty patients with recurrent or metastatic disease were enrolled in the study: 11 patients in the phase I study and 49 patients in the phase II study. In the phase I study, the initial dose level of PLD was 35 mg/m as a 1-h infusion with escalating increments of 5 mg/m until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached. A fixed dose of paclitaxel (175 mg/m) was administered as a 3-h infusion. The combination was administered every 28 days. Pharmacokinetic studies performed on 10 patients indicated that the sequence of drug administration did not cause clinically significant modifications in the pharmacokinetics of either drug. The MTD for PLD was 45 mg/m (dose level 3) and the dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia, occurring in three of five patients. The phase II dose of PLD was 40 mg/m (dose level 2) and a total of 214 cycles were delivered. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 26% patients and febrile neutropenia occurred in 16% of patients. Grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was recorded in only one patient. The overall response rate was 28% for patients with non-nasopharyngeal tumors [95% confidence interval (CI) 15-45%] and 28.6% for the study population (95% CI 17-43%). The median survival for the study population was 9.7 months; 1-year survival was 38%. We conclude that the recommended dose for the combination of PLD and paclitaxel is 40 and 175 mg/m every 28 days, without granulocyte colony stimulating factor support. The combination of paclitaxel with PLD demonstrated activity in recurrent or metastatic HNC, a favorable toxicity profile and relative ease of administration.     

Docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: a multicenter phase II trial

Purpose: To investigate the activity of docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (G-CSF) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with cisplatin. Patients and methods: A total of 60 patients with locoregional and metastatic NSCLC who had relapsed or progressed after first-line treatment with cisplatin-based regimens were enrolled into the trial. Docetaxel at 100 mg/m² was given as a 1-h infusion with G-CSF (rhG-CSF given s.c. at 150 μg/m²) support from day 2 to day 8 every 3 weeks; all patients received premedication with corticosteroids. Results: In all, 1 (1.6%) and 14 (23.3%) patients achieved a complete response (CR) and a partial response (PR), respectively, for an overall response rate of 25% (95% CI 14.0–35.9%); stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were documented in 18 (30%) and 27 (45%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 20 weeks and the median time to tumor progression was 28 weeks. The median overall survival was 32 weeks and the 1-year survival rate was 23%. A total of 263 courses were given at a median of 3 cycles/patient. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 11 (18%) and 14 (23%) patients, respectively, with 18 (30%) patients requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever; 1 patient died of sepsis. Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 9 patients (15%) and grade 3 asthenia, in 4 (7%). Other toxicities were mild. Conclusions: Docetaxel has considerable single-agent activity in patients with NSCLC who have relapsed or progressed after first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin-based regimens. Received: 17 June 1998 / Accepted: 17 August 1998     

HLA Class II Alleles and the Presence of Circulating Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Greek Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) represents a seldom malignancy in most developed countries. Nevertheless, NPC receives an endemic form in concrete racial entities. The aims of this study were to detect the presence of Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV-DNA) in peripheral blood of NPC patients, to molecularly define human leukocyte antigens (HLA) DRB1*, DQA1* and DQB1* allele frequencies, and, finally, to determine whether the genetic predisposition of an individual to NPC depends on the liability to EBV infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 101 patients of Hellenic origin and nationality, with histologically proven NPC, participated in this study. EBV-DNA detection was also applied in 66 patients with EBV-related malignancies (Hodgkin's [HL] and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL]) and infectious mononucleosis (IM), as well as in 80 healthy EBV-seropositive controls. RESULTS: 81% of the NPC patients, 77.8% with HL, 72.2% with NHL, and 66.7% with IM were EBV-DNA positive, whereas the EBV genome was detected only in 15% of the healthy controls. These differences were statistically significant in all cases. Analysis of HLA class II antigens showed decreased frequency of the DRB1*07 (p = 0.003), DQA1*0103 (p = 0.002), and DQA1*0201 (p = 0.003) alleles among NPC patients. A significant association between the HLA-DR/DQ alleles and the presence of EBV-DNA in peripheral whole blood was not established. CONCLUSION: Circulating EBV-DNA and specific HLA class II alleles may predispose to or protect from NPC. However, the results of this study suggest that the genetic predisposition of an individual to NPC is independent of the liability to EBV infection.