Transplanting the Highly Sensitized Patient: The Emory Algorithm

Renal transplant patients sensitized to HLA antigens comprise nearly one-third of the UNOS wait-list and receive 14% of deceased donor (DD) transplants, a rate half that of unsensitized patients. Between 1999 and 2003, we performed 492 adult renal transplants from DD; 120 patients (approximately 25%) had a panel reactive antibody (PRA) of >30%, with nearly half (n = 58) having a PRA of >80%. Our approach is based upon high-resolution solid-phase HLA antibody analysis to identify class I/II antibodies and a 'virtual crossmatch' to predict compatible donor/recipient combinations. Recipients are excluded from the United Network for Organ Sharing match run if donors possess unacceptable antigens. Thus, when sensitized patients appear on the match run, they have a high probability of a negative final crossmatch. Here, we describe our 5-year experience with this approach. Five-year graft survival ranged from 66% to 70% among unsensitized (n = 272), moderately sensitized (PRA < 30%, n = 100) and highly sensitized (>30% PRA; n = 120) patients, equal to the average national graft survival (65.7%). The application of this approach (the Emory Algorithm) provides a logical and systematic approach to improve the access of sensitized patients to DD organs and promote more equitable allocation to a highly disadvantaged group of patients awaiting renal transplantation.     

Sensitization Following LVAD Implantation Using Leucodepleted Blood Is Not Due to HLA Antibodies

Implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is associated with HLA antibody sensitization. The objective of this study was to determine the specificity of antibodies produced by LVAD recipients using a combination of ELISA, Luminex and microcytotoxicity assays. Fifty-one LVAD patients were studied, from 44 to 838 days post-implantation. No patient developed HLA antibodies, although 24 produced IgG antibodies detectable in both ELISA and Luminex assays. These antibodies manifest as positive reactions with class I and class II wells of the ELISA and also blank wells. In Luminex assays, they produce high MFI readings with the negative control beads. Antibodies were detected 18 to 228 days after implantation. This reactivity was found to be directed against bovine serum albumin (BSA), commonly used to block non-specific binding in ELISA and Luminex assays; absorption of sera with BSA-coated beads completely abrogated reactivity in all solid phase assays, but did not eliminate anti-HLA antibodies in control sera. Ten of the 24 patients have proceeded to transplantation, with a 1-year graft survival of 69%. In conclusion, it appears that implantation of LVADS disrupts immunoregulatory pathways leading to production of anti-albumin antibodies. These can be misinterpreted as anti-HLA antibodies in solid phase assays.     

La Déclaration de Phuket sur la santé bucco-dentaire et le VIH/SIDA, 2004 – Un engagement à agir

The following declaration was agreed by all participants at the conclusion of the 5th World Workshop on Oral Health and Disease in AIDS. It is reproduced here to draw attention to the world's oral health scientists, and others, of the burden that oral disease causes to those who are HIV positive, and to the important role of the dental and allied oral health professions in caring for these individuals and in the research which will underpin improved understanding and care.     

Single-antibiotic use for penetrating abdominal trauma

A prospective randomized study compared the use of moxalactam disodium vs clindamycin phosphate and tobramycin sulfate for treatment of 190 patients with penetrating abdominal trauma. Twenty-seven patients were disqualified because of early death or failure to follow the protocol. The patients in each group were comparable regarding the cause and severity of injury. No significant difference was seen in the incidence of intra-abdominal infection between the moxalactam-treated group (13%) and the clindamycin- and tobramycin-treated group (9%). The intra-abdominal infection rate in patients with colon injuries (21%) was significantly increased when compared with the patients without colon injuries (6%), but the antibiotic regimen did not significantly change the infection rate. No evidence of bleeding problems from moxalactam were noted. Changes in prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times appeared to be related to shock rather than the use of moxalactam. The most severe coagulopathies occurred prior to moxalactam therapy and were seen only in those patients who had shock requiring 10 or more units of blood. Moxalactam is as effective as combination (clindamycin and tobramycin) antimicrobial therapy in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.     

The development of a comprehensive, institution-based patient risk evaluation program: II. Validity and reliability of questionnaire data

The accuracy of historical information derived from self-administered questionnaires must be confirmed. We report the results of studies conducted to assess the reliability and validity of data collected from a comprehensive cancer risk factor questionnaire developed at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. A comparison of the basic demographic data of a randomly selected sample of 80 respondents and 70 nonrespondents revealed no fundamental ethnic or socioeconomic differences. We verified self-reported past illnesses, surgical procedures, and cancers by reviewing 72 patient charts, using stringent diagnostic criteria for verification. We noted substantial agreement between self-reported and documented illnesses and operations. With the exception of nine patients who misclassified metastatic disease, the verification of primary cancers was excellent. We determined reliability by interviewing 50 of these patients by telephone. Questions with a dichotomous outcome (e.g., smoking status) were reliably answered; however, those requiring quantification (e.g., amount of alcohol consumed) were less accurately reported on interview. While we recognize the limitations of self-administered questionnaires, we believe this program will develop into a comprehensive, standardized, easily accessible patient risk factor data base.