肿瘤放化综合治疗中的靶向研究

放化疗综合应用是癌症治疗中的常用方法。研究表明,放化疗综合应用可以有效地控制杀伤肿瘤,但过程中对正常细胞的毒副作用严重制约着放化疗的剂量和疗效。如何在有效杀伤肿瘤细胞的同时减轻放化疗综合应用中对正常细胞的毒副作用已经成为探索更好的治疗策略的关键。随着研究的不断深入,各种相关的新药和新治疗思路层出不穷,比如针对肿瘤发生及代谢过程的靶向类新药、用于辐射增敏的新的基因靶点等都已进入研究者的视线。另外,近年来关于肿瘤细胞中药物转运蛋白的研究也为综合治疗靶点寻找提供了一定依据。本文根据当前研究现状,着重总结近年来放化疗综合治疗靶向研究在上述几方面的一些新进展。     

Radiation therapy in the last month of life

Aim

We sought to survey a large, multi-center patient sample to better characterize/quantify RT utilization at the end of life.

Background

Few objective data exist for radiation therapy (RT) delivery at end of life (EOL).

Materials and methods

Data were retrieved for all patients receiving RT in calendar year 2010 in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Indiana University (IU) and Howard University (HU) hospitals. Specific attention was made of the group of patients receiving RT in the last 30 days of life.

Results

A total of 852 patients received all or part of their RT during 2010 (HU: 139, IU: 713). At time of analysis in early 2012, 179 patients had died (21%). Fifty-four patients (6.3% of total; 30% of expired patients) died within 30 days of receiving their last treatment. Twenty patients (2.3% of total; 11.2% of expired patients) received RT within their last week of life. For both sites, the median time until death from completion of therapy was 12.5 days (range 2–30 days).

Conclusions

Radiation in the last month of life is likely to provide minimal palliation or survival benefit. This, coupled with the financial implications, time investment, and physical costs, suggests that physicians and patients should more strongly consider hospice, and minimize duration of palliative RT courses as far as possible. As with chemotherapy, RT utilization at EOL should be considered for collection as an overuse metric.     

The current management of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome and the role of radiotherapy: Principles and indications

Aim

To evaluate the current treatment of mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) focusing on the role of radiotherapy (RT), its principles and indications, and the perspectives of the novel irradiation technologies.

Background

MF and SS are rare lymphoproliferative diseases whose incidence is increasing. For a long time RT has been used as a single modality or in integrated treatment programs for these diseases.

Materials and methods

The latest systematic reviews, primary studies and new diagnostic and treatment guidelines on MF and SS were analyzed. Clinical outcomes together with the technical aspects and the role of RT were also evaluated.

Results

New data are available on pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, classification and staging procedures for MF and SS and several local and systemic therapies are proposed. Localized RT can cure “minimal stage” MF while total skin electron beam irradiation (TSEI) may cure initial-stage disease and may offer important symptom relief (itch, erythroderma) in a more advanced setting. Despite its efficacy, RT is not largely used, mainly because of some technical difficulties but new RT technologies may be proposed to treat large skin surfaces.

Conclusions

New treatment programs offer good results, with median survival of more than 12 years in early-stage MF, but the median survival of 2.5 years or less in advanced stages is still a challenge. RT remains an option for all stages with a good cost/effectiveness ratio in a curative or palliative setting. New RT technologies can overcome some technical problems of treating large skin surfaces.     

Institutional experience with a rotational total skin electron irradiation (RTSEI) technique—A three decade review (1981–2012)

Total skin electron irradiation (TSEI) for patients with cutaneous lymphomas is technically challenging, and numerous approaches have been developed to overcome the many field matching problems associated with such a large and complex treatment volume. Since 1981 we have delivered TSEI using a rotational total skin electron irradiation (RTSEI) technique in conjunction with patch, treat and boost fields in order to provide complete skin and dose coverage. Initially we used a 6 MeV electron beam at an extended source-skin distance (SSD) on a modified linear accelerator. More recently we began using a high dose rate electron mode on a commercially available linear accelerator. The RTSEI technique allows the delivery of a seamless surface dose to the majority of the patient''s skin surface in a single treatment. In this review paper we present our three-decade experience with the technical development, dosimetry, treatment delivery and clinical outcomes of our RTSEI technique.     

肿瘤放化综合治疗中的靶向研究

放化疗综合应用是癌症治疗中的常用方法。研究表明,放化疗综合应用可以有效地控制杀伤肿瘤,但过程中对正常细胞的毒副作用严重制约着放化疗的剂量和疗效。如何在有效杀伤肿瘤细胞的同时减轻放化疗综合应用中对正常细胞的毒副作用已经成为探索更好的治疗策略的关键。随着研究的不断深入,各种相关的新药和新治疗思路层出不穷,比如针对肿瘤发生及代谢过程的靶向类新药、用于辐射增敏的新的基因靶点等都已进入研究者的视线。另外,近年来关于肿瘤细胞中药物转运蛋白的研究也为综合治疗靶点寻找提供了一定依据。本文根据当前研究现状,着重总结近年来放化疗综合治疗靶向研究在上述几方面的一些新进展。     

宫颈癌放疗患者生活质量的影响因素及与应对方式的关系研究

目的:探讨宫颈癌放疗患者生活质量的影响因素及与应对方式的关系。方法:选取2018年7月2019年11月期间我院收治的宫颈癌放疗患者139例,收集患者临床资料,采用癌症治疗功能评价系统中的宫颈癌量表(FACT-Cx)对宫颈癌患者的生活质量进行评分,采用Jalowiec的应对量表(JCS)记录并评估所有患者的应对方式,并采用Pearson相关性分析生活质量与应对方式的关系。采用单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析宫颈癌放疗患者生活质量的影响因素。结果:宫颈癌放疗患者的FACT-Cx总分与面对、乐观、姑息、依靠自我应对方式评分呈正相关(P<0.05),与情感宣泄、宿命应对方式评分呈负相关(P<0.05),与逃避、支持应对方式评分无相关性(P>0.05)。不同文化程度、年龄、化疗、肿瘤病理类型情况患者之间FACT-Cx总分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);不同家庭月收入、肿瘤分期、下肢水肿情况、婚姻状况患者之间FACT-Cx总分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,家庭月收入、肿瘤分期、下肢水肿情况、婚姻状况均是宫颈癌放疗患者生活质量的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论:宫颈癌放疗患者生活质量与应对方式存在密切联系,且家庭月收入、肿瘤分期、下肢水肿情况、婚姻状况均是其生活质量的影响因素,临床工作者应结合以上因素对患者放疗方案给予针对性调整。     

CBCT引导放疗摆位误差对中上段食管癌患者受照射剂量的影响

摘要 目的：探究锥形束CT（CBCT）引导放疗摆位误差对中上段食管癌患者受照射剂量的影响。方法：选取2017年5月～2019年5月于我院收治的60例中上段食管癌患者为研究对象,所有患者均行CBCT图像、计划CT图像采集。在患者放疗前进行CBCT扫描,将CBCT图像与计划CT图像匹配,得到左右（x轴）、头脚（y轴）、前后（z轴）三个方向的线性误差,分析出现的误差及误差的分布规律。利用模拟实际照射系统,进行模拟计划,得到实际照射靶区及正常组织受照射剂量,将其与治疗前计划比较,研究摆位误差对患者受照剂量的影响。结果：患者整体摆位误差为x轴（2.91±2.20）mm,y轴（3.89±2.17）mm,z轴（2.44±1.64）mm,x轴的MPTV为4.054 mm,y轴的MPTV为8.183 mm,z轴的MPTV为3.482 mm。模拟计划的CI、PTV的Dmin、Dmean、D95%均低于标准计划差异显著（P均＜0.05）,而模拟计划的HI低于标准计划（P＜0.05）。模拟计划的脊髓Dmax高于标准计划（P＜0.05）,而标准计划与模拟计划的双肺V20、Dmean,心脏V40差异比较无统计学意义（P均＞0.05）。结论：CBCT引导放疗摆位误差对中上段食管癌患者影响较小,提高PTV受照射剂量及治疗准确程度,对脊髓有保护效果。摆位误差对心、肺的剂量分布无明显影响。     

Total neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer

Locally advanced rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary management, traditionally based on neo-adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy, conservative surgery with total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite effective in term of local control, this strategy is linked to a high risk of distant metastasis (up to 30%). In this context, recent published randomized phase III clinical trials have tested the potential benefits with a different sequencing and/or intensification of the standard components of the trimodal therapy.Here, we briefly assess the efficacy and discuss the clinical relevance of total neoadjuvant treatment with a focus on indications and results in the short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy use for this setting of patients. Long term results and additional prospective studies are necessary to more accurately estimate the clinical benefit and further establish the role of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer disease.     

Evaluating the predictive value of quantec rectum tolerance dose suggestions on acute rectal toxicity in prostate carcinoma patients treated with IMRT

AimTo investigate the predictive value of convenience of rectum dosimetry with Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) dose limits, maximum rectum dose (Dmax), total rectal volume (TVrectum), rectal volume included in PTV (VrectumPTV) on Grade 2–3 acute rectal toxicity for utilization in clinical practice.BackgroundNumerous previous data have reported frequent acute proctitis after external-beam RT of prostate cancer. Predicting toxicity limited with dose information is inadequate in clinical practice due to comorbidities and medications used.Materials and MethodSixty-four non-metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT were enrolled. Patients were treated to a total dose of 70–76 Gy. Rectal dose volume histograms (DVH) of all patients were evaluated retrospectively, and a QUANTEC Score between 0 and 5 was calculated for each patient. The correlation between the rectal DVH data, QUANTEC score, TVrectum, VrectumPTV, rectum Dmax and Grade 2–3 rectal toxicity was investigated.ResultsIn the whole group grade 1, 2 and 3 acute rectal toxicities were 25%, 18.8% and 3.1%, respectively. In the DVH data, rectum doses of all patients were under RTOG dose limits. Statistically significant correlation was found between grade 2–3 rectal toxicity and TVrectum (p = 0,043); however. It was not correlated with QUANTEC score, VrectumPTV and Dmax.ConclusionOur results were not able to show any significant correlation between increasing convenience with QUANTEC limits and lower rectal toxicity. Conclusively, new dosimetric definitions are warranted to predict acute rectal toxicity more accurately in prostate cancer patients during IMRT treatment.