Persistent anthelmintic activity of topically administered ivermectin in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) against lungworms (Dictyocaulus viviparus)

A controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the persistent anthelmintic effect of ivermectin as a topical treatment at 500 μg/kg against induced infection with lungworm (Dicryocaulus viviparus) in red deer (Cervus elaphus). The results showed a highly significant (p < 0.01) anthelmintic activity for at least 28 days against a newly acquired infection with Dictyocauus viviparus (> 99% efficacy).     

野生稻抗病虫基因的挖掘和利用

本文综合国内外文献,简要介绍了野生稻抗病虫基因发掘、定位、克隆及育种应用研究的进展,讨论了野生稻优异抗病虫基因在水稻育种中的应用前景。     

林木病虫害防治施药机的风机选型分析

通过对常用典型风机工作性能和结构特点的分析,结合林木病虫害风送施药防治的要求,提出针对不同高度林木风送施药防治病虫害设备在选用风机类型时的建议和原则。     

兴安盟扎赉特旗杨树病虫害的种类及其防治措施

对本地区杨树烂皮病的抗性树种进行了调查,筛选出最适合本地区栽植的抗病品种——小乘黑（P.Canadensis）和银中杨（P.alba‘Berolinensis’）。对天牛成虫进行了不同药剂不同浓度的防治对比试验,筛选出最合适的药剂——绿色葳蕾250倍液和触破800倍液。对其他地区的杨树病虫害的预防和控制能起到一定的借鉴作用。     

烟叶不同生育期病虫害防治要点分析

充分了解和掌握病虫害发生规律及传染途径,做到防重于治,科学、合理、安全使用农药,才能在病虫害防治方面取得明显效果。     

应用伪钝绥螨防治苹果全爪螨的试验

1987～1988年田间应用试验表明,青岛地区生态条件可以满足伪钝绥螨生存和发展的要求.5月下或6月初,以1:50的益害比,释放伪钝绥螨,可控制苹果全爪螨为害,减少果园施用杀螨剂3次。伪钝绥螨在当地可以自然越冬,完成周年循环,建立种群,成为控制叶螨发生的有效天敌。     

应用伪钝绥螨防治苹果全爪螨初报

伪钝绥螨是叶螨的有效天敌,1986年引入天水,1987、1988年在苹果园进行了释放试验,6月中、下旬按1:50的益害比释放于苹果树上,结果表明经过35～40天,苹果全爪螨从峰期(1987、7、31)7.79头/叶和(19888、2)21.84头/叶开始减退,至50～60天,分别减退为1.76头/叶和1.90头/叶,而对照树分别为19.43头/叶(8、20)和44.15头/叶(8、2)。该螨对苹果全爪螨越冬卵的控制效果明显,释放树平均一年生枝条单枝含卵量为15.95粒,化防树为93.64粒。     

甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒杀虫剂的研制及药效测定

用麦胚人工饲料饲养甘蓝夜蛾幼虫,饲料添毒接种生产甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒(MbNPV,东北农学院分离的菌株)。以2×10~6PIB/ml接种8龄末期幼虫为最佳接种条件,增殖效果最好,产量最高达4.55×10~9PIB/虫。自制MbNPV可湿性粉剂,室内毒力测定的LC_(50)为4.89×10~4PIB/ml,杀虫效力明显优于液剂。     

A hundred and more years of plant protection in the Netherlands

At the occasion of the Centenary of the Netherlands Society of Plant Pathology a reflection on past, present and future of plant protection, the subject matter of the Society, was thought to be appropriate.Developments in plant protection are projected against a general stream of thought. Three turning points are distinguished which can be seen as paradigm changes. The first occurred around 1890, when the concept of pathogenitism gained its final victory over autogenitism. The second occurred around 1940, when the public outlook on human and plant health changed drastically due to the advent of chemotherapeutants. The third occurred around 1990 when a clear change in public thinking on agriculture, environment and plant protection became apparent. The background of these changes is sketched in a personal manner.Some ideas on plant protection beyond the year 2000 are given, based upon recent developments in the Netherlands to which the Society contributed in its own way.