Unique molecular signatures as a hallmark of patients with metastatic breast cancer: Implications for current treatment paradigms

Our analysis of the tumors of 57 women with metastatic breast cancer with next generation sequencing (NGS) demonstrates that each patient''s tumor is unique in its molecular fingerprint. We observed 216 somatic aberrations in 70 different genes, including 131 distinct aberrations. The most common gene alterations (in order of decreasing frequency) included: TP53, PIK3CA, CCND1, MYC, HER2 (ERBB2), MCL1, PTEN, FGFR1, GATA3, NF1, PIK3R1, BRCA2, EGFR, IRS2, CDH1, CDKN2A, FGF19, FGF3 and FGF4. Aberrations included mutations (46%), amplifications (45%), deletions (5%), splices (2%), truncations (1%), fusions (0.5%) and rearrangements (0.5%), with multiple distinct variants within the same gene. Many of these aberrations represent druggable targets, either through direct pathway inhibition or through an associated pathway (via ‘crosstalk’). The ‘molecular individuality’ of these tumors suggests that a customized strategy, using an “N-of-One” model of precision medicine, may represent an optimal approach for the treatment of patients with advanced tumors.     

Next generation predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition

With the advent of targeted therapies, there has been a revolution in the treatment of cancer across multiple histologies. Immune checkpoint blockade has made it possible to take advantage of receptor-ligand interactions between immune and tumor cells in a wide spectrum of malignancies. Toxicity in healthy tissue, however, can limit our use of these agents. Immune checkpoint blockade has been approved in advanced melanoma, renal cell cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, relapsed refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and urothelial cancer. Though FDA-approved indications for use of some of these novel agents depend on current protein-based programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays, detection methods come with several caveats. Additional predictive tools must be interrogated to discern responders from non-responders. Some of these include measurement of microsatellite instability, PD-L1 amplification, cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) infiltrate density, and tumor mutational burden. This review serves to synthesize biomarker detection at the DNA, RNA, and protein level to more accurately forecast benefit from these novel agents.     

Secondary malignancies among nonseminomatous germ cell tumor cancer survivors

BACKGROUND:

Men on active surveillance for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) undergo frequent computed tomography imaging to avoid delayed detection of disease. Irradiation from frequent imaging and chemotherapy upon progression may place patients at increased risk of a second malignancy. In this study, the authors sought to identify such an increased risk among men who chose initial surveillance for NSGCT.

METHODS:

The authors utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program and stratified the cohort based on whether they underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). A propensity‐score model was used to adjust for covariates, and a competing‐risks regression analysis was performed to estimate cumulative incidence rates of second malignancy. Incidence risk ratios were predicted by using the cumulative incidence rates per 10,000 patients.

RESULTS:

There was no statistically significant increase in the incidence of a secondary malignancy for the entire cohort of testicular cancer survivors. However, when the analysis was restricted to patients with clinical stage I NSGCT, nonsurgical management only in those aged >45 years was an independent predictor of developing a second malignancy. For every 10,000 patients with stage I NSGCT who chose to forego RPLND, an absolute excess incidence of 22, 52, and 73 secondary malignancies would be diagnosed at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results indicated that patients aged >45 years who forego RPLND for T1 or T2 clinical stage I NSGCT are more likely to develop a second malignancy than those who do undergo RPLND. Nonsurgical management of NSGCT may be associated with more long‐term health risks than primary RPLND. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Effects of patupilone on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in patients with advanced malignancies: a phase I clinical trial

Patupilone is a novel microtubule-targeting cytotoxic agent, which exerts its antitumor effect through microtubule stabilization. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of warfarin when administered concomitantly with patupilone were investigated, and antitumor activity was assessed. This was a phase I, two-center, drug-drug interaction study. In the core phase of the study, treatment consisted of warfarin 20 mg orally (days 1 and 29) and patupilone 10 mg/m(2) i.v. (days 8 and 29). Patients benefiting from patupilone treatment continued treatment every 3 weeks (extension phase) until progression of disease, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Seventeen patients were treated (core phase, 17; extension, 9). The geometric mean ratios (comedication/monotherapy) for C(max) and area under the curve(0-168) of warfarin were near unity and their 90% confidence intervals were within the equivalence limits of 0.80 and 1.25. The half-life, plasma clearance, and International Normalized Ratio (INR) of warfarin were not affected by patupilone coadministration. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, anorexia, dehydration, asthenia, and peripheral neuropathy. Five (29.4%) patients experienced grade 3 study drug-related adverse events (diarrhea, 17.6%; increased INR, 11.8%; dehydration, 5.9%; and neutropenia, 5.9%). One patient with triple-negative breast cancer (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2/neu negative) had a partial response (35% decrease in tumor measurements by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), and 11 had stable disease for 6 weeks or more (≥12 weeks, 6 patients). The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin were not affected by patupilone coadministration, suggesting that patupilone has no clinically relevant effect on CYP2C9 metabolism. Patupilone showed antitumor activity in triple-negative breast cancer.     

Safety,pharmacokinetics, and activity of EZN‐2208, a novel conjugate of polyethylene glycol and SN38, in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND:

EZN‐2208 is a water‐soluble, polyethylene glycol drug conjugate of SN38, which is the active moiety of irinotecan. In this study, the authors evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and activity of EZN‐2208 in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS:

Patients in sequential cohorts (3 + 3 design) received intravenous EZN‐2208 at doses between 1.25 mg/m² and 25 mg/m² once every 21 days.

RESULTS:

Thirty‐nine patients received EZN‐2208. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 0‐10 prior therapies). Seventeen patients received prior irinotecan. Two maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) were defined: EZN‐2208 with (16.5 mg/m²) and without (10 mg/m²) granulocyte‐colony–stimulating factor (G‐CSF). The dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) was febrile neutropenia. Two of 19 patients who were heterozygous for a polymorphism in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1 family, polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1) gene (UGT1A1*28) developed DLTs (dose, 25 mg/m² with G‐CSF), and 2 patients who were homozygous for UGT1A1*28 were treated without DLTs (dose, 5 mg/m²). PK analysis indicated a mean terminal half‐life of 19.4 ± 3.4 hours. Sixteen patients (41%) achieved stable disease, including 6 of 39 patients (15%) who had stable disease that lasted ≥4 months. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma (no prior irinotecan) achieved a short‐lived 32% tumor regression. Among 6 patients who had stable disease that lasted for ≥4 months, 3 had received prior irinotecan, and 1 had KRAS‐positive colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS:

EZN‐2208 was well tolerated and produced stable disease that lasted for ≥4 months/unconfirmed partial responses in 7 of 39 heavily pretreated patients (18%) with advanced solid tumors, including those who had failed prior irinotecan therapy. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Age-stratified phase I trial of a combination of bortezomib,gemcitabine, and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced malignancies

Background  

Preclinical data suggest synergistic activity of bortezomib, gemcitabine, and liposomal doxorubicin. Because tolerance to therapy may be attenuated in elderly patients, we performed an age-stratified phase I trial of this combination.