InSAR数据约束的2021年5月21日云南漾濞MS6.4地震发震构造研究

运用Sentinel-1A卫星数据和D-InSAR技术,获取2021-05-21云南漾濞M_S6.4地震的同震形变场。结果显示,漾濞地震同震形变场长轴近NW展布升降轨形变场符号相反,视线向最大沉降量和抬升量为0.1 m。InSAR同震形变场反演的滑动分布主要集中在沿走向2～12 km,倾向1～9 km的范围内,最大滑动量0.35 m,发震断层长9.8 km、宽4 km,滑动量主要集中在地下3～6 km范围内,滑动角-146.7°。同震位移场及滑动分布模型反映本次地震为发震断层的右旋走滑事件,地震破裂未达到地表。断层模型反演结果显示,矩震级为M_W6.1,发震断层以北西走向右旋走滑运动为主,初步认为本次M_W6.1地震发震断裂可能是一条NW向的维西—乔后断裂西侧的隐伏次生断裂。     

利用InSAR技术研究2016年青海门源MW5.9地震同震形变场及断层滑动分布

2016年1月21日, 青海省门源县冷龙岭断裂带附近发生了M_W5.9地震。 基于Sentinel-1A影像, 采用差分干涉雷达测量技术研究了此次地震产生的同震形变场, 结果表明, 门源地震的形变影响范围约20~30 km, 形变态势在升降轨道形变场均显示为隆升, 基本沿冷龙岭断裂呈近似同心圆展布, 推测可能是冷龙岭断裂与民乐—大马营断裂之间的一条逆断层, 沿雷达视线方向最大形变量级约为6 cm。 均匀滑动反演显示门源发震断层长7.3 km, 宽6.2 km, 走向298.6°, 倾角34.5°, 倾向宽度9.5 km, 沿走向滑动量为170 mm, 沿倾向滑动量为460 mm, 矩震级为M_W5.97; 分布式滑动反演显示门源地震以逆冲为主, 兼具少量右旋走滑分量, 滑动量主要集中在沿断层倾向方向, 距离地表5～15 km处, 最大滑动量约0.3 m, 位于断层倾向深度10 km处, 矩震级为M_W5.93。     

InSAR观测与小震分布联合分析2021年云南漾濞MS6.4地震应力卸载对周围区域的影响

为分析2021年5月21日云南省漾濞M_S6.4地震后震区应力变化对周围断层的影响,本文通过InSAR技术获得了漾濞地震的同震形变场,并联合小震分布数据建立断层破裂滑动模型,继而通过计算断层面上的同震库仑应力来评估此次地震对周边断层的影响,以便有效地分析地震破裂的时空解析度.结果显示:(1)在升降轨InSAR数据获得的精细同震形变场中,升轨最大视线向形变量约为5.00 cm,降轨最大视线向形变量约为7.80 cm;(2)余震精定位的主震震中为(99.89°E,25.67°N),震源深度为13.29 km,除主震之外震源深度主要集中在5—15 km;通过小震位置拟合出的发震断层走向为NW-SE(316.69°),断层倾角为88.56°,滑动角为177.97°;(3)基于InSAR同震形变场结果及小震拟合断层参数联合反演得到此次地震的断层滑动以右旋走滑为主,升轨断层最大滑动量为0.80 m,对应的深度为8.85 km,平均滑动量为0.22 m,矩震级为M_W6.41;降轨的断层最大滑动量为0.30m,对应的深度为6.88 km,平均滑动量为0.05 ...     

2016年新疆阿克陶MS6.7地震同震形变特征和断层滑动分布反演

本文针对2016年11月25日在新疆阿克陶发生的地震, 用差分干涉测量技术(D-InSAR)对3种不同观测模式的升、 降轨数据进行处理, 提取了多视线向的同震形变场; 根据不同模式的LOS向形变量, 构建形变分解模型, 将其分解为垂直向形变量和沿断层走向形变量; 结合同震形变场特征与震源机制解, 采用单断层模型, 利用梯度下降法(SDM), 以Multi-LOS向形变进行约束, 反演了阿克陶地震的同震滑动分布特征。 研究结果表明, 升、 降轨LOS向同震形变场在发震断层两侧具有不同的形变特征, 发震断层走向近EW向; LOS向形变量分解表明, 此次地震破裂以右旋走滑为主; 滑动分布反演的形变残差介于0~5 cm之间, 发震断层的滑动量主要位于2~16 km深部, 最大滑动量可达1.02 m, 位于断层面深部5.83 km处, 最大滑动量处的滑动角为185.24°; 平均滑动角为181.32°, 平均滑动量为0.12 m; 滑动分布反演也证明该地震为右旋走滑破裂事件, 与LOS向形变分解结果一致; 当剪切模量μ=3.2 GPa时, 反演得到的地震矩震级约M_W6.6。     

基于Sentinel-1A数据的四川长宁MS6.0地震同震形变场分析及断层滑动分布反演

利用大地测量数据研究2019年6月17日四川长宁M_S6.0地震同震形变场特征和发震断层参数, 基于DInSAR技术处理升降轨Sentinel-1A数据获取干涉相位图, 并考虑大气折射效应和余震形变误差实现同震形变场改正。四叉树采样后的形变数据作为反演数据源, 采用弹性半空间分层模型反演发震断层几何面滑动分布。结果表明本次地震发震机制为兼具逆冲和左旋走滑, 矩震级为M_W5.9, 断层破裂尺度达28 km×20 km, 震源深度约9.4 km。升降轨视线向同震形变场在断层两侧呈现形变特征差异, 最大沉降量分别是8.34 cm(升轨)和4.23 cm(降轨), 最大抬升量分别是5.5 cm(升轨)和7.5 cm(降轨); 发震断层走向为302°, 倾角为43°, 平均滑动角为50°, 断层面最大滑动量达到0.28 m。     

漾濞MS6.4地震同震形变特征及发震构造探讨

2021年5月21日云南省漾濞县发生M_S6.4地震。文中基于升、降轨Sentinel-1 SAR影像,利用In SAR技术获取了此次地震的同震形变场,反演获取了发震断层的精细滑动分布,计算了区域应变分配及同震位错引起的周边各断裂上的库仑应力变化,对发震构造及周边断裂的地震危险性进行了讨论。结果表明:In SAR同震形变场显示,降轨LOS向形变最大量级约为8.6cm,同震形变呈对称分布,升轨LOS向形变最大量级为5.7cm,NE盘噪声明显;同震位错以右旋走滑为主,主要发生在2～10km深度,最大滑动量约为0.46m,位于6.5km深处,同震错动未破裂到地表,反演得到的矩震级为M_W6.1;漾濞地震的发震断层可能为维西-乔后断裂的分支断裂或W侧与其近平行的一条未知断裂;此次地震是继1996年丽江M_S7.0和2018年墨江M_S5.9地震之后发生在川滇菱形块体西南地区的又一次典型地震事件,对川滇菱形块体西南地区的龙蟠-乔后断裂、程海断裂和红河断裂北段的库仑应力影响较为显著,滇西北拉张构造系统和红河断裂北段未来的强震危险性值得关注。     

2020年伽师MS6.4地震InSAR同震形变与滑动分布特征分析

利用Sentinel-1A升轨和降轨数据,基于D-InSAR技术,获取2020年1月19日伽师M_S6.4地震同震形变场,并结合其他研究机构给出的震源机制解参数和已有研究成果,反演得到伽师地震的发震断层几何特征和滑动分布。研究结果表明,伽师地震同震形变在地表有明显差异;升轨同震形变在卫星视线方向北侧抬升55 mm,南侧下降42 mm;降轨同震形变在卫星视线方面北侧抬升63 mm,南侧下降23 mm。通过反演得到发震断层走向为275°,倾角为20°,地震滑动主要分布在地下5 km处,最大滑动量约为0.32 m,平均滑动角为89.3°,累积地震矩为1.46×1018 N·m,合矩震级M_W6.1,发震构造为具有少量走滑性质的逆冲断裂。从发震构造特征、同震滑动分布推测,伽师地震发震构造是柯坪塔格褶皱带滑脱面以上沉积盖层内的逆冲断裂,支持了柯坪推覆体的薄皮构造模型观点。     

2021年5月21日云南漾濞Ms6.4地震:一次破裂在隐伏断层上的浅源走滑事件

2021年5月21日,在中国云南省大理州漾濞县发生了 Ms6.4地震.该地震震中位于川滇菱形块体西部边缘的维西—乔后—巍山断裂附近.作为该区域过去45年以来发生的最大地震,快速的灾害反应及震源参数反演将为防震减灾提供重要的帮助.由于未搜集到与此次地震地表破裂相关的报告,这次地震的发震断层目前仍难以确定.本文利用哨兵1A/B卫星的合成孔径雷达干涉(InSAR)数据获得了与此次地震相关的同震形变,并反演了这次事件的断层几何参数及详细的滑动分布.反演结果显示:破裂断层以右旋走滑运动为主,兼有少量的正断分量;滑动主要分布在2到12 km深度范围内,在约7 km深度处滑动达到最大,约为0.64 m.破裂断层浅部0到2 km范围内滑动的缺失揭示了一个重要的滑动亏损区,该区域很可能被震后余滑及震间浅部滑动所弥补.通过对反演结果、余震序列和局部断层构造特性的综合分析,认为此次地震可能破裂在维西—乔后—巍山断裂的隐伏分支断层或一个独立的未知的隐伏主断层上.计算的同震库仑应力变化表明维西—乔后—巍山断裂的巍山盆地段北端、维西—乔后—巍山断裂的玉狮场—乔后段最南端及洱源—弥渡断裂的中段北端具有较高的破裂风险.     

2016年新疆阿克陶地震Sentinel-1 InSAR同震形变特征

2016年11月25日新疆克孜勒苏州阿克陶县发生M_W6.6地震。 本文利用合成孔径雷达差分干涉测量技术, 对Sentinel-1卫星获取的升、 降轨雷达数据进行了处理, 提取了该次地震的同震形变场, 并结合形变场特征与震源机制解, 采用梯度下降法反演发震断层的滑动分布。 结果表明, 升、 降轨LOS向同震形变场在发震断层两侧具有明显不同的形变特征, 主要形变区域分布在断层两侧, 升轨LOS向形变量可达-8.2 cm与11.2 cm, 降轨LOS向形变量可达-21.4 cm与13.1 cm; 反演的升、 降轨干涉形变场与InSAR测量值之间的残差得到有效控制, 大部分的残差介于±5 cm之间; 断层滑动分布主要集中于沿断层面深约2~18 km处, 最大滑动量位于沿断层面深约7 km处可达0.96 m; 平均滑动角约182.29°, 最大滑动处的滑动角约197.13°, 两个滑动分布中心的滑动角均接近180°, 表明阿克陶地震为一典型的右旋走滑破裂性事件; 当剪切模量取32 Gpa时, 反演的发震断层地震矩M₀可达9.75×10¹⁸, 相当于矩震级M_W6.60, 与地震波形反演结果一致。     

2020年西藏尼玛MW6.3地震的InSAR同震形变与构造意义

2020年西藏尼玛MW6.3地震发生在羌塘块体中部、依布茶卡-日干配错断裂系内的半地堑盆地内,基于震源机制解确定的发震断层存在较大差异.文中采用InSAR技术和Sentinel-1卫星升、降轨SAR数据获取了同震形变场,基于弹性半空间位错模型反演确定了发震断层参数,基于非均匀位错模型获得了断层面上的精细滑动分布.结果表明:1)在升、降轨InSAR同震形变场中,尼玛地震引起一椭圆形沉降区(长约12km,宽约8km),最大LOS向沉降值分别为-0.298m、-0.238m.2)同震位错以正断倾滑为主,兼有少许走滑分量,滑动主要集中在3～12km深度,最大滑动量达1.1 m,位于7km深处.3)发震断层为依布茶卡-日干配错断裂西侧的分支断层,走向约为30°,倾角约为68°,滑动角约为-73°.4)此次地震的破裂模式显示依布茶卡-日干配错走滑断裂存在张性应力积累,羌塘块体中部处于张性应力状态.     

Characteristics of ground cracks caused by the MS 6.4 Yangbi earthquake and the corresponding tectonic significance

An M_S 6.4 earthquake occurred near Yangbi County, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, at 21:48 on May 21, 2021. The earthquake location is characterized by complex geological structures, with multiple active faults distributed around the epicenter that is located at the west edge of the Sichuan-Yunnan rhombic block (25.67°N, 99.87°E). A total of 42 ground cracks are found by earthquake field investigations. The cracks are mainly concentrated in the Ⅷ degree area on the west side of the Yangbi River. Among these, 9 coseismic tectonic ground cracks generated by shear fractures are found in three villages (i.e., Akechang, Meijia-Lijia, and Huajiazhuang), which are distributed along the strike of the northwest-trending linear folds, showing the tectonic characteristics of right-lateral tension or left-stepping cracks. The structural attribute of ground cracks sustains the kinematic properties of the Weixi-Qiaohou fault, namely right-lateral strike-slip.     

Coseismic Slip from the 6 October 2008, M w6.3 Damxung Earthquake, Tibetan Plateau, Constrained by InSAR Observations

Coseismic deformation fields of the 6 October 2008 M _w6.3 Damxung earthquake were obtained from interferometric synthetic aperture radar by using three descending and two ascending Envisat images. Significant coseismic surface deformation occurred within 20?km?×?20?km of the epicenter with a maximum displacement of ~0.3?m along the satellite line of sight. We model a linear elastic dislocation in a homogeneous half space and use a nonlinear constraint optimized algorithm to estimate the fault location, geometry and slip distribution. The results indicate a moment magnitude M _w6.3, and the earthquake is dominated by oblique normal and right-lateral slip with a maximum slip of 2.86?m at depth of 8?km. The rupture plane is about 15?km?×?14?km with strike S190°W and dip 55° to NW, located at a secondary fault of the Southeastern Piedmont of the Nyainqentanglha Mountains. Slip on normal faults in the Tibetan Plateau contributes to the rift evolution.     

InSAR数据约束的2022年1月8日青海门源MS6.9地震发震构造研究

利用Sentinel-1A卫星升降轨道数据和D-InSAR技术获得青海门源2022年1月8日M_S6.9地震的同震形变场,并基于弹性半空间位错模型反演其震源参数,利用分布滑动模型确定断层面上的滑动分布。结果表明,2022年1月8日青海门源地震的同震形变场沿NWW-SEE方向分布;断裂带南缘升轨影像和降轨影像最大视距分别为61 cm和62 cm,断裂带北缘升轨影像和降轨影像最大视距地表形变量分别为43 cm和56 cm。InSAR同震形变场断裂尺度模型断层长30 km,宽18 km,最大滑移量3.5 m;断层滑动分布模型表明该地震为左旋走滑地震。结合冷龙岭断裂的运动特征和几何特征,初步确定此次M_S6.9地震的发震断裂为冷龙岭断裂     

Structural analysis and interpretation of the surface deformation associated with the Ning’er, Yunnan Province, China M S6.4 earthquake of June 3, 2007

The seismogenic fault and the dynamic mechanism of the Ning’er, Yunnan Province MS6.4 earthquake of June 3, 2007 are studied on the basis of the observation data of the surface fissures, sand blow and water eruption, land-slide and collapse associated with the earthquake, incorporating with the data of geologic structures, focal mecha-nism solutions and aftershock distribution for the earthquake area. The observation of the surface fissures reveals that the Banhai segment of the NW-trending Ning’er fault is dominated by right-lateral strike-slip, while the NNE-trending fault is dominated by left-lateral strike-slip. The seismo-geologic hazards are concentrated mainly within a 330°-extending zone of 13.5 km in length and 4 km in width. The major axis of the isoseismal is also oriented in 330° direction, and the major axis of the seismic intensity VIII area is 13.5 km long. The focal mechanism solutions indicate that the NW-trending nodal plane of the Ning’er MS6.4 earthquake is dominated by right-lateral slip, while the NE-trending nodal plane is dominated by left-lateral slip. The preferred distribution orientation of the aftershocks of MS≥2 is 330°, and the focal depths are within the range of 3~12 km, predominantly within 3~10 km. The distribution of the aftershocks is consistent with the distribution zone of the seismo-geologic hazards. All the above-mentioned data indicate that the Banhai segment of the Ning’er fault is the seismogenic fault of this earthquake. Moreover, the driving force of the Ning’er earthquake is discussed in the light of the active block theory. It is believed that the northward pushing of the Indian plate has caused the eastward slipping of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, which has been transformed into the southeastern-southernward squeezing of the southwest Yunnan region. As a result, the NW-trending faults in the vicinity of the Ning’er area are dominated by right-lateral strike-slip, while the NE-trending faults are dominated by left-lateral strike-slip. This tectonic     

Structural analysis and interpretation of the surface deformation associated with the Ning’er,Yunnan Province,China <Emphasis Type="Italic">M</Emphasis><Subscript>S</Subscript>6.4 earthquake of June 3, 2007

The seismogenic fault and the dynamic mechanism of the Ning’er, Yunnan Province M_S6.4 earthquake of June 3, 2007 are studied on the basis of the observation data of the surface fissures, sand blow and water eruption, landslide and collapse associated with the earthquake, incorporating with the data of geologic structures, focal mechanism solutions and aftershock distribution for the earthquake area. The observation of the surface fissures reveals that the Banhai segment of the NW-trending Ning’er fault is dominated by right-lateral strike-slip, while the NNE-trending fault is dominated by left-lateral strike-slip. The seismo-geologic hazards are concentrated mainly within a 330°-extending zone of 13.5 km in length and 4 km in width. The major axis of the isoseismal is also oriented in 330° direction, and the major axis of the seismic intensity VIII area is 13.5 km long. The focal mechanism solutions indicate that the NW-trending nodal plane of the Ning’er M_S6.4 earthquake is dominated by right-lateral slip, while the NE-trending nodal plane is dominated by left-lateral slip. The preferred distribution orientation of the aftershocks of M_S≥2 is 330°, and the focal depths are within the range of 3～12 km, predominantly within 3～10 km. The distribution of the aftershocks is consistent with the distribution zone of the seismo-geologic hazards. All the above-mentioned data indicate that the Banhai segment of the Ning’er fault is the seismogenic fault of this earthquake. Moreover, the driving force of the Ning’er earthquake is discussed in the light of the active block theory. It is believed that the northward pushing of the Indian plate has caused the eastward slipping of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, which has been transformed into the southeastern-southernward squeezing of the southwest Yunnan region. As a result, the NW-trending faults in the vicinity of the Ning’er area are dominated by right-lateral strike-slip, while the NE-trending faults are dominated by left-lateral strike-slip. This tectonic framework might be the main cause of the frequent occurrence of M_S6.0～6.9 earthquakes in the area.     

运用InSAR技术解算四川长宁MS6.0地震三维形变场及时间序列形变分析

运用升、降轨Sentinel-1A 卫星的差分干涉影像,获取2019-06-17四川宜宾长宁 MS6．0地震的三维同震形变场.在此基础上,以升降轨同震形变数据为约束条件,基于 Okada弹性半空间位错模型反演得到发震断层符合走滑和逆冲特征,断层破裂尺度约为15km×20km,断层滑动角为 44．37°,断层倾角为56．42°,震源深度约为10．2km,矩震级为 M W5．8.最后,采用SBAS-InSAR 技术获取该地区2019-04-05至2019-08-03各时间段的累计形变,结果认为该区域在震前近场形变波动较小,震后一段时间累积形变增长,分析原因可能是余震分布使得地表变化处于不稳定状态.通过与已有研究文献的比较和对该区域断层构造的分析,推测此次长宁地震发震断层由反演出的断层滑动引起,滑动面上缘接近地表,主震引起的次级断层活动触发短期内强余震频发.     

基于GNSS与InSAR约束的九寨沟MS7.0地震滑动模型及其库仑应力研究

2017年8月8日的九寨沟M_S7.0地震发生在岷江断裂、塔藏断裂及虎牙断裂交汇地区,地处青藏高原东北部的川甘交界地区,位于巴颜喀拉地块的东缘,地质构造复杂,对于九寨沟地震震中位置和发震断层的确定,存在不同意见.本文利用GNSS及升降轨InSAR观测,在获取九寨沟地震同震形变场的基础上,基于均匀弹性半无限位错模型,联合反演了发震断层的滑动分布模型,并计算了同震库仑应力变化.InSAR同震形变场显示,视线向最大沉降量和抬升量分别为0.21 m和0.16 m,形变场长轴为NW向,形变主要集中在断层西侧.距震中40 km和65 km的九寨和松潘两县,水平向的GNSS同震位移分别达14.31 mm和8.22 mm.联合GNSS和InSAR同震形变场反演得到的滑动分布主要集中在沿走向5~33 km,倾向2~20 km的范围内,平均滑动量为0.18 m,最大滑动量为0.91 m.发震断层长40 km,宽30 km,走向155°,倾角81°,滑动角-9.56°.同震位移场及滑移分布模型表明此次地震为一次左旋走滑为主的地震事件,地震破裂并未完全到达地表,与虎牙断裂北段的几何产状和运动学性质更为接近,结合精定位余震的分布,我们确定虎牙断裂北段为此次地震的发震断层,震中位于北纬33.25°,东经103.82°,震源深度10.86 km,矩震量为7.754×10¹⁸ Nm,相应的矩震级为M_W6.5,与美国地调局和哈佛大学给出的震源机制解基本一致.同震库仑应力导致了虎牙断裂北段延长线的东北和西南两端应力增强,其中塔藏断裂的罗叉段和马磨段未来强震的危险性值得关注.     

Study of dislocation model and evolution characteristics of vertical deformation field of gonghe M S=6.9 earthquake

The preliminary research results of vertical deformation dislocation model of GongheM _S =6.9 earthquake show that, the causative structure is a hidden fault with strike N60°W, dipping S47°W, which lies near the current subsidence center of Gonghe basin. The rupture length and width are 30km and 14km, the upper and lower bound depth of the fault in width direction are 3km and 17km respectively. The maximum coseismic and preseismic vertical deformation of GongheM _S =6.9 earthquake are 247mm and about 100mm. The reasons why there existed rapid postseismic uplift are also given a tentative discussion. The Chinese version of this paper appeared in the Chinese edition ofActa Seismologica Sinica,15, 289–295, 1993.     

Coseismic deformation of the 2021 MW7.4 Maduo earthquake from joint inversion of InSAR,GPS, and teleseismic data

The M_W7.4 Maduo earthquake occurred on 22 May 2021 at 02:04 CST with a large-expansion surface rupture. This earthquake was located in the Bayan Har block at the eastern Tibetan Plateau, where eight earthquakes of M_S >7.0 have occurred in the past 25 years. Here, we combined interferometric synthetic aperture radar, GPS, and teleseismic data to study the coseismic slip distribution, fault geometry, and dynamic source rupture process of the Maduo earthquake. We found that the overall coseismic deformation field of the Maduo earthquake is distributed in the NWW-SEE direction along 285°. There was slight bending at the western end and two branches at the eastern end. The maximum slip is located near the eastern bending area on the northern branch of the fault system. The rupture nucleated on the Jiangcuo fault and propagated approximately 160 km along-strike in both the NWW and SEE directions. The characteristic source rupture process of the Maduo earthquake is similar to that of the 2010 M_W6.8 Yushu earthquake, indicating that similar earthquakes with large-expansion surface ruptures and small shallow slip deficits can occur on both the internal fault and boundary fault of the Bayan Har block.