简易精神状态量表和蒙特利尔认知评测量表对急性期缺血性脑血管病患者认知功能障碍筛查能力的比较研究

目的 比较简易精神状态量表（Mini-Mental State Examination,MMSE）和蒙特利尔认知评测量表（Montreal Cognitive Assessment,MoCA）对急性期缺血性脑血管病患者认知功能障碍的筛查能力。方法 对筛选的107例发病7 d内的短暂性脑缺血发作（transient ischemic attack,TIA）或脑梗死患者应用MMSE及MoCA量表进行认知功能障碍的评测,比较经两量表评测筛查出认知障碍患者的比例。根据患者教育程度对应的MMSE临界值筛选出MMSE评分在正常范围的患者,以MoCA量表评分26分为临界值将受试者分为MoCA评测正常组与异常组,比较两组在各个认知领域的得分。结果 107例患者MMSE平均分25.89±3.65分,MoCA平均分20.67±4.56分。MMSE评测异常者8例（7.5%）,正常者99例（92.5%）。MoCA评测异常者98例（91.6%）,正常者9例（8.4%）。MoCA评测正常者MMSE评测均正常。MMSE评测正常的99例患者中,MoCA评测正常者9例（9.1％,9/99）,评测异常者（<26分）90例（90.9％,90/99）。MoCA评测异常组在视空间与执行能力、命名、延迟记忆等认知领域得分低于MoCA评测正常组（P＜0.05）。结论 MoCA量表在筛查急性缺血性脑血管病患者认知障碍方面可能比MMSE量表更敏感,MMSE正常MoCA评测异常的患者认知损害主要表现在视空间执行功能、命名、延迟记忆等方面。     

Differences in Cognitive Profile between TIA, Stroke and Elderly Memory Research Subjects: A Comparison of the MMSE and MoCA

Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) appears more sensitive to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): over 50% of TIA and stroke patients with an MMSE score of ≥27 ('normal' cognitive function) at ≥6 months after index event, score <26 on the MoCA, a cutoff which has good sensitivity and specificity for MCI in this population. We hypothesized that sensitivity of the MoCA to MCI might in part be due to detection of different patterns of cognitive domain impairment. We therefore compared performance on the MMSE and MoCA in subjects without major cognitive impairment (MMSE score of ≥24) with differing clinical characteristics: a TIA and stroke cohort in which frontal/executive deficits were expected to be prevalent and a memory research cohort. Methods: The MMSE and MoCA were done on consecutive patients with TIA or stroke in a population-based study (Oxford Vascular Study) 6 months or more after the index event and on consecutive subjects enrolled in a memory research cohort (the Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing). Patients with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score of <24), dysphasia or inability to use the dominant arm were excluded. Results: Of 207 stroke patients (mean age ± SD: 72 ± 11.5 years, 54% male), 156 TIA patients (mean age 71 ± 12.1 years, 53% male) and 107 memory research subjects (mean age 76 ± 6.6 years, 46% male), stroke patients had the lowest mean ± SD cognitive scores (MMSE score of 27.7 ± 1.84 and MoCA score of 22.9 ± 3.6), whereas TIA (MMSE score of 28.4 ± 1.7 and MoCA score of 24.9 ± 3.3) and memory subject scores (MMSE score of 28.5 ± 1.7 and MoCA score of 25.5 ± 3.0) were more similar. Rates of MoCA score of <26 in subjects with normal MMSE ( ≥27) were lowest in memory subjects, intermediate in TIA and highest after stroke (34 vs. 48 vs. 67%, p < 0.001). The cerebrovascular patients scored lower than the memory subjects on all MoCA frontal/executive subtests with differences being most marked in visuoexecutive function, verbal fluency and sustained attention (all p < 0.0001) and in stroke versus TIA (after adjustment for age and education). Stroke patients performed worse than TIA patients only on MMSE orientation in contrast to 6/10 subtests of the MoCA. Results were similar after restricting analyses to those with an MMSE score of ≥27. Conclusions: The MoCA demonstrated more differences in cognitive profile between TIA, stroke and memory research subjects without major cognitive impairment than the MMSE. The MoCA showed between-group differences even in those with normal MMSE and would thus appear to be a useful brief tool to assess cognition in those with MCI, particularly where the ceiling effect of the MMSE is problematic.     

蒙特利尔认知评估量表在帕金森病认知障碍患者中的应用价值

目的 分析蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)量表(中文版)在筛查帕金森病(PD)患者中认知障碍的应用价值.方法 使用RoSA编制的,根据年龄及教育程度调整的MMSE分界值筛出整体认知功能正常的213例PD患者,并进一步使用MoCA量表对其进行分组,MoCA评分≥26分的PD患者入PD认知正常组(PD-NC组),MoCA评分<26分的PD患者入PD认知损害组(PD-CI组).比较2组患者MoCA各分测验分数的差异及认知功能改变的特点,并应用单因素及多元Logistic回归分析PD患者认知损害的影响因素.结果 (1)PD组患者中52.6%(112/213)的患者MoCA评分<26分;(2)与PD-NC组比较,PD-CI组在MoCA视空间和执行、命名、注意力、语言、抽象、延迟回忆、定向分测验中得分诸项比较均有统计学意义;(3)Logistic回归分析结果显示,低文化程度是PD患者认知损害的影响因素(OR:0.72,95%CI0.64～0.81,P<0.05).结论 MMSE正常者中仍然存在相当比例的患者MoCA评分异常.因此,临床上建议使用MoCA对PD患者认知水平进行测试,在患者未达到PD痴呆时,应结合患者的教育水平及时发现并处理患者认知损害症状,使PD患者得到及时治疗并能提高生活质量.

Abstract：

Objective To examine the application of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in Parkinson' s disease (PD) patients with normal general cognitive function by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) evaluation.Methods PD patients were examined with MMSE, and those having a normal ageand education-adjusted MMSE score were included in the further study of MoCA testing.The patients with MoCA score not less than 26 were selected into normal control PD-NC group, and the patients with less than 26 into cognitive impaired PD-CI group.Scores of MoCA subtests were used in PD-CI group and PD-NC group to characterize cognitive changes in PD patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).MoCA score in PD-CI group used as dependent variable, and sex, educational level, age, course of disease, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), Self-rating depression Scale (SDS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Unified Parkinson' s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were used as independent variable, the risk factors of CI in PD patients was analysed by Linear Regression Analysis.Results There are 52.6% (112/213) PD patients with MMSE ≥ 26 while their MoCA < 26.Significant differences were observed in subtests of MoCA in visuospatial, executive, naming, attention,language, abstract, delayed recall and orientation between PD-CI group and PD-NC group (all P <0.01).Univariate and multivariate regression analysis showed that educational level is the most significant factor in PD-CI (OR:0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.81, P < 0.05).Conclusions There is a high proportion of PD patients whose MMSE test showed normal but MoCA test showed cognitive impairment.MoCA examination was used to detect cognitive function of PD patients.Furthermore we suggest consider the education level in PD patients when evaluate their cognitive function.     

Breath holding index in detection of early cognitive decline

The aim of the study was to evaluate role of breath holding index (BHI) as a functional parameter for intracranial subclinical atherosclerotic changes in recognizing patients who are at risk for developing cognitive impairment of the vascular type. We included 60 volunteers divided into 3 groups according to age and presence of cognitive impairment (healthy subjects 30-40 years old, controls 60-70 years old and subjects with mild cognitive impairment 60-70 years old). We excluded individuals with moderate and severe carotid stenosis. There was a decreasing trend in the mean blood flow velocities of the intracranial blood vessels due to age increase, but it was not statistically significant. BHI values were 1.66±0.20 in the first group, 1.35±0.31 in the second and 0.69±0.30 in the third group. There was a statistically significant difference between the first two groups and the group with a mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) score (29±1, 27±1 and 19±1 respectively), no statistically significant difference was found in Mini mental state exam (MMSE) score (29±1, 28±1, and 28±1 respectively). After regressing out age and conventional vascular risk factors, we found a good correlation between the decreasing trend in BHI values and MoCA score, and no statistically significant correlation between the BHI values and MMSE score. Results of our study show that BHI test as a parameter of impaired cerebrovascular reactivity (intracranial small vessel wall dysfunction) might differentiate individuals with early cognitive decline from healthy subjects.     

脊髓小脑共济失调12型患者认知功能障碍的研究

目的探讨脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA)12型患者是否存在认知功能障碍及其影响因素。方法采用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、简易精神状态检查量表(MMSE)对5例SCA12型患者(SCA12型组)及13名健康体检者(正常对照组)进行认知功能评估;采用国际协作共济失调评估量表(ICARS)进行共济失调严重程度评分。结果 MoCA评分结果显示,SCA12型组存在认知功能障碍5例(100%),正常对照组存在认知功能障碍10例(77%)。MMSE评分结果显示,SCA12型组存在认知功能障碍2例(40%),正常对照组存在认知功能障碍1例(7.7%)。SCA12型组MoCA和MMSE评分明显低于正常对照组(均P<0.05)。SCA12型组ICARS评分为23～75分,平均(42.6±21.0)分。正常对照组均无共济失调。Spearmans相关性分析显示,SCA12型患者MMSE评分与病程呈负相关(r=-0.894,P=0.041);MoCA抽象功能得分与病程呈负相关(r=-0.884,P=0.047)。结论 SCA12型患者可并发认知功能障碍,这可能与其病程较长有关。     

Profiles of cognitive subtest impairment in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a research cohort with normal Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores

The comparative ability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and MMSE to detect mild cognitive difficulties was investigated in 107 older adults. The sensitivity of the MoCA to detect cognitive impairment with a cutoff score of <26 was investigated, as compared to the MMSE across all scores, and at a cutoff of ≥27. Performance on MoCA subtests was compared at these MMSE cutoffs to determine profiles of early cognitive difficulties. The MoCA detected cognitive impairment not detected by the MMSE in a high proportion of participants, and this impairment was evident across various subtests. The MoCA appears to be a sensitive screening test for detection of early cognitive impairment.     

晚发型抑郁障碍与轻度认知功能损害患者的认知功能差异研究

目的 探讨晚发型抑郁障碍患者与轻度认知功能损害患者的认知功能损害的差异.方法 研究对象为2012年7月～2013年8月上海市精神卫生中心老年科住院与门诊就诊符合DSM—Ⅳ诊断标准且起病年龄≥60岁的抑郁障碍患者,共26例为晚发型抑郁障碍组（LOD组）,另选择26例轻度认知功能损害的患者（MCI组）与26例正常老年人（NC组）.认知功能评估采用简明精神状态量表（MMSE）、蒙特利尔量表（MoCA）.结果 MMSE总分、MMSE分测验中计算力与注意力及MoCA总分、MoCA分测验中连线、注意、持续注意、计算、复述、延迟回忆在LOD组与MCI组差比较异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）,两组与NC组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.三组在MMSE分测验的时间定向、延迟回忆、三步指令、书写书面指令及MoCA分测验的复制图、画钟、命名比较,MCI组均值最低,与NC组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）,与LOD组比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.结论 LOD组认知功能在注意力、延迟回忆、连线测验方面与MCI组损害程度相当.MCI组认知功能受损范围较LOD组广泛.     

同型半胱氨酸与高血压患者轻度认知障碍的相关性

目的 探讨同型半胱氨酸（homocysteine，Hcy）与高血压患者轻度认知障碍的相关性。 方法 回顾性纳入2017年1月-2018年2月邯郸市第一医院神经内科连续收治的原发性高血 压患者，根据其血浆Hcy水平，将患者分为单纯型高血压组（Hcy<15 μm m ol/L）与H型高血压组 （Hcy≥15 μmmol/L），采用Spearman秩相关分析Hcy与MMSE和MoCA评分的相关性，并采用Logistic回归 分析高血压患者轻度认知功能障碍的影响因素。 结果 共纳入原发性高血压患者113例，其中单纯型高血压组49例，H型高血压组64例。H型高血压 组患者的MMSE和MoCA评分均低于单纯型高血压组（分别为24.94±1.83 vs 27.96±1.54和23.45±2.47 vs 27.24±1.80，均P <0.001）。相关分析显示，Hcy水平与MMSE和MoCA评分存在负相关性（分别为r =- 0.513和r =-0.500，均P＜0.001）。多因素Logistic回归分析显示，高龄（OR 1.236，95%CI 1.124～1.361）、 H型高血压（OR 22.218，95%CI 8.243～59.654）是高血压患者轻度认知功能障碍的独立危险因素。 结论 Hcy水平升高是高血压患者轻度认知功能障碍发生的独立危险因素。     

蒙特利尔认知评价量表(中文版)在轻度认知损害诊断及进展过程中的作用

目的研究蒙特利尔认知评价量表(MoCA)中文版在轻度认知损害(MCI)诊断筛查中的作用,评价认知功能在疾病进展过程中的临床意义。方法对年龄、性别、文化程度构成无统计学差异的两组受试者(正常对照组29例、MCI组28例)进行MoCA和简易智能状态检查量表(MMSE)测试,以其总成绩及各单项成绩作为基线成绩,观察MoCA和MMSE在筛查MCI中的作用,并比较两种量表对筛查轻度认知损害的敏感性、特异性的差异。于初次筛查后12个月对两组受试者进行再次测试,并与基线成绩进行配对t检验,比较前后测试成绩间的差异及各单项成绩对预测疾病进展的作用。结果 MoCA和MMSE对鉴别正常老龄化和轻度认知损害均具有初步筛查作用,MoCA量表中的视空间执行功能(t=2.151,P=0.036)、抽象(t=2.787,P=0.009)、定向(t=3.162,P=0.003)、记忆(t=4.704,P=0.000)等单项测试成绩,两组间差异具有统计学意义;以26分为分界值,MoCA和MMSE诊断MCI的敏感度分别为89.29%和10.71%,特异度为82.76%和100%,MoCA诊断敏感性显著高于MMSE。MCI组患者在12个月后的随访测试中各项成绩均略有下降,其中MoCA总成绩(t=6.454,P=0.000)、视空间执行功能(t=5.610,P=0.000)、语言(t=4.954,P=0.000)测试成绩,复查前后差异有统计学意义。结论 MoCA对轻度认知损害的诊断敏感性高于MMSE,其中视空间执行功能、抽象、定向、记忆各单项测试成绩具有诊断价值;MoCA总评分、视空间执行功能、语言等项成绩复查后降低,对轻度认知损害向阿尔茨海默病转化具有提示作用。     

MMSE和MoCA对脑肿瘤患者认知功能评估的应用比较

目的研究比较简易精神状态量表（MMSE）与中文版蒙特利尔认知评价量表（MoCA）在脑肿瘤患者认知障碍中的诊断筛查作用。方法对年龄、性别及教育水平构成无统计学差异的两组受试者在同一天内进行MoCA和MMSE评测,并逐一比较两组受试者各亚项得分以确定脑肿瘤患者的认知功能,比较两个量表对筛查脑肿瘤患者认知功能的差异。结果308例脑肿瘤患者中,综合评估有认知障碍的139例,发生率45．1％;MoCA和MMSE对脑肿瘤患者认知功能障碍都具有初步的筛查作用。MoCA的敏感性为82．0％,特异性为92．7％。MMSE的敏感性为19．4％,特异性为100％。结论MoCA敏感性高于MMSE,而特异性与MMSE相近,亚项设置较为复杂合理,能全面评价脑肿瘤患者的认知功能,更适合于具有广泛认知功能障碍的脑肿瘤患者。     

蒙特利尔认知评估量表识别首次卒中后轻度血管性认知障碍的作用

目的 探讨蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)识别首次卒中后轻度血管性认知障碍(mVCI-FS)的作用,并与简易智能精神状态量表(MMSE)比较. 方法 选取mVCI-FS患者60例.首次卒中后非血管性认知障碍(nVCI-FS)25例,于发病后(12+1)周由不知情的神经科医师进行MoCA及MMSE评估. 结果 MoCA总平均分为(19.78±4.573)分,MMSE为(25.48±3.148)分,偏相关分析间.r=9,P=0.000.MoCA除计算力和言语流畅性外,其余各项在mVCI-FS和nVCI-FS间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);MMSE的即刻记忆、计算力、命名和阅读理解在2组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).应用ROC曲线和Youden指数最大值初步确定MoCA识别mVCI-FS与nVCI-FS的最佳分界值为21分.以21分为分界值.MoCA筛查mVCI-FS的敏感度和特异度分别为84.6%和76.0%,明显优于MMSE(敏感度59.6%和特异度57.7%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05). 结论 初步确定MoCA识别mVCI-FS与nVCI-FS的最佳分界值为21分.MoCA筛查mVCI-FS的敏感度和特异度均高,是一种有效的mVCI.FS筛查量表;MMSE对mVCI.FS的敏感度低,识别mVCI-FS的作用有限.     

蒙特利尔认知评估量表在轻度认知功能障碍筛查中的应用

目的 探讨蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)在轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)患者筛查中的应用.方法 应用简易精神状态检查量表(MMSE)、MoCA对32例MCI患者和50例健康对照者进行神经心理评估,比较二者筛查MCI的效果.结果 以26分为分界值,MoCA筛查MCI的敏感性为96.87%、特异性为76%,MMSE筛查MCI的敏感性为56.25%、特异性为96%;MoCA中除抽象思维、地点定向两项外,其余各亚项的评分在MCI组和对照组间差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05):MMSE中仅计算与注意力、延迟回忆两项在MCI组和对照组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),其余各项差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 MoCA为高敏感性的MCI筛查工具,能全面评估MCI患者的认知功能.且可用于筛查MMSE得分正常的MCI患者.     

A comparison of the mini mental state exam to the montreal cognitive assessment in identifying cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease

Dementia is an important and increasingly recognized problem in Parkinson's disease (PD). The mini‐mental state examination (MMSE) often fails to detect early cognitive decline. The Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) is a brief tool developed to detect mild cognitive impairment that assesses a broader range of domains frequently affected in PD. The scores on the MMSE and the MoCA were compared in 88 patients with PD. A pronounced ceiling effect was observed with the MMSE but not with the MoCA. The range and standard deviation of scores was larger with the MoCA(7–30, 4.26) than with the MMSE(16–30, 2.55). The percentage of subjects scoring below a cutoff of 26/30 (used by others to detect mild cognitive impairment) was higher on the MoCA (32%) than on the MMSE (11%)(P < 0.000002). Compared to the MMSE, the MoCA may be a more sensitive tool to identify early cognitive impairment in PD. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society     

同型半胱氨酸与高血压患者轻度认知障碍的相关性

目的 探讨同型半胱氨酸（homocysteine,Hcy）与高血压患者轻度认知障碍的相关性。
方法 回顾性纳入2017年1月-2018年2月邯郸市第一医院神经内科连续收治的原发性高血
压患者,根据其血浆Hcy水平,将患者分为单纯型高血压组（Hcy<15 μm m ol/L）与H型高血压组
（Hcy≥15 μmmol/L）,采用Spearman秩相关分析Hcy与MMSE和MoCA评分的相关性,并采用Logistic回归
分析高血压患者轻度认知功能障碍的影响因素。
结果 共纳入原发性高血压患者113例,其中单纯型高血压组49例,H型高血压组64例。H型高血压
组患者的MMSE和MoCA评分均低于单纯型高血压组（分别为24.94±1.83 vs 27.96±1.54和23.45±2.47
vs 27.24±1.80,均P <0.001）。相关分析显示,Hcy水平与MMSE和MoCA评分存在负相关性（分别为r =-
0.513和r =-0.500,均P＜0.001）。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,高龄（OR 1.236,95%CI 1.124～1.361）、
H型高血压（OR 22.218,95%CI 8.243～59.654）是高血压患者轻度认知功能障碍的独立危险因素。
结论 Hcy水平升高是高血压患者轻度认知功能障碍发生的独立危险因素。     

Predictors of cognitive impairment in an early stage Parkinson's disease cohort

The impact of Parkinson's disease (PD) dementia is substantial and has major functional and socioeconomic consequences. Early prediction of future cognitive impairment would help target future interventions. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE), and fluency tests were administered to 486 patients with PD within 3.5 years of diagnosis, and the results were compared with those from 141 controls correcting for age, sex, and educational years. Eighteen‐month longitudinal assessments were performed in 155 patients with PD. The proportion of patients classified with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia varied considerably, depending on the MoCA and MMSE thresholds used. With the MoCA total score at screening threshold, 47.7%, 40.5%, and 11.7% of patients with PD were classified with normal cognition, MCI, and dementia, respectively; by comparison, 78.7% and 21.3% of controls had normal cognition and MCI, respectively. Cognitive impairment was predicted by lower education, increased age, male sex, and quantitative motor and non‐motor (smell, depression, and anxiety) measures. Longitudinal data from 155 patients with PD over 18 months showed significant reductions in MoCA scores, but not in MMSE scores, with 21.3% of patients moving from normal cognition to MCI and 4.5% moving from MCI to dementia, although 13.5% moved from MCI to normal; however, none of the patients with dementia changed their classification. The MoCA may be more sensitive than the MMSE in detecting early baseline and longitudinal cognitive impairment in PD, because it identified 25.8% of those who experienced significant cognitive decline over 18 months. Cognitive decline was associated with worse motor and non‐motor features, suggesting that this reflects a faster progressive phenotype. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

轻度认知功能障碍患者的神经心理学研究

目的 探讨轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)患者神经心理学的特点. 方法 对42例MCI患者和55例健康对照者进行多项神经心理学检查,包括简易精神状态检查量表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)、语言流畅性测验(RVR)、韦氏智力测验(WAIS-RC)[包括数字广度测验(DS)、积木测验(BD)、相似性测验]、韦氏记忆测验(WMS-R)(包括逻辑记忆、联想学习、视觉再认、图片回忆)、日常生活能力量表(ADL),比较2组患者上述量表评分和MMSE、MoCA量表各亚项评分的差异.结果 与对照者比较,MCI患者MMSE、MoCA总分和RVR、WAIS-RC、WMS-R分测验,MoCA量表各亚项(地点定向力除外),MMSE量表中计算与注意、延迟回忆两亚项评分较低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 MCI患者不仅记忆受损,其计算与注意力、命名、视空间结构能力、执行功能也可受损,尤以延迟回忆、计算与注意力受损明显.MoCA涵盖了重要的认知领域,能较全面评估MCI患者的认知功能,值的临床推广应用.     

MoCA与MMSE对首发脑梗死患者认知功能的评估应用

目的探讨蒙特利尔认知评估量表（MoCA）与简易智能状态检查量表（MMSE）在脑梗死患者认知功能评估中的应用。方法选择首发单一病灶脑梗死患者160例,在其发病3个月后,用MoCA与MMSE进行认知功能检测,并将不同性别、年龄段、受教育程度患者的MoCA与MMSE评分进行比较。结果不同性别、年龄、受教育程度患者的MoCA评分均低于MMSE评分,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）。年龄（β=-3.176,P=0.000）、性别（β=2.189,P=0.002）、受教育程度（β=2.032,P=0.000）为MoCA评分的影响因素。结论与MMSE相比,MoCA更适用于脑梗死后认知功能障碍诊断,其评分受患者年龄、性别、受教育程度影响。     

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively validate the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a UK memory clinic. METHOD: We administered the MoCA and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to 32 subjects fulfilling diagnostic criteria for dementia, to 23 subjects fulfilling diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and to 12 memory clinic comparison subjects, at baseline and then at 6-month follow-up. Clinical diagnoses for dementia and MCI were made according to ICD-10 and Petersen criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of both measures were assessed for detection of MCI and dementia. RESULTS: With a cut-off score of 26, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 17% to detect subjects with MCI, whereas the MoCA detected 83%. The MMSE had a sensitivity of 25% to detect subjects with dementia, whereas the MoCA detected 94%. Specificity for the MMSE was 100%, and specificity for the MoCA was 50%. Of subjects with MCI, 35% developed dementia within 6 months, and all scored less than 26 points on the MoCA at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The MoCA is a useful brief screening tool for the detection of mild dementia or MCI in subjects scoring over 25 points on the MMSE. In patients already diagnosed with MCI, the MoCA helps identify those at risk of developing dementia at 6-month follow-up.     

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a screening tool for cognitive dysfunction in Huntington's disease

Cognitive dysfunction is one of the hallmarks of Huntington's disease (HD) and may precede the onset of motor symptoms. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a brief cognitive screening instrument with high specificity and sensitivity for detecting early cognitive impairments, has not been studied in the HD population. In this study, we compare the MoCA with the mini‐mental state examination (MMSE) as a screening tool for cognitive dysfunction among 53 patients with HD. The mean MMSE score was 26 ± 2.4, and mean MoCA score was 21 ± 4.4. Twenty‐one patients (81%) of those who scored ≥26 on the MMSE had the MoCA score <26. Thirty‐two patients (78%) of those who scored ≥24 on the MMSE had the MoCA score <24. The MoCA may be a more sensitive screening tool for cognitive impairments in HD relative to the MMSE. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

睡眠质量对轻中度帕金森病患者认知功能的影响

目的 探讨睡眠质量对轻中度帕金森病患者认知功能的影响.方法 选取71例PD患者为研究对象,采用简易精神状态检查量表（MMSE）和蒙特利尔认知评估表（MoCA,北京版）评定患者的认知功能,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数（PSQI）评定患者的认知功能,比较不同睡眠情况患者的认知水平和不同认知水平患者的睡眠质量,以及两者之间的相关性.结果 71例PD患者均为轻中度PD患者,其中出现睡眠障碍的患者有37例（52.1％）.睡眠障碍组统一帕金森评分量表（UPDRS）评分为（45.7±15.9）分高于睡眠正常组（35.8±13.8）分,MoCA（20.5±5.3）分和MMSE（25.7±3.3）分低于睡眠正常组（23.7±4.2）,（27.5±2.6）分,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.49例（69.0％）患者出现认知功能障碍,其中轻度认知功能障碍28例（39.4％）,痴呆21例（29.6％）.痴呆组MMSE评分为（23.0±1.7）分,为轻度痴呆.PD伴痴呆患者睡眠质量差,PSQI（8.9±4.5）分高于认知功能正常组（5.2±3.3）分,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）.存在睡眠障碍的PD患者认知障碍患病率高（P＜0.05）.结论 轻中度PD患者睡眠障碍发生率高.病情的严重程度影响PD患者的睡眠质量,病情重的PD患者,睡眠障碍的发生率高.睡眠质量差的PD患者认知功能减退,伴痴呆的PD患者的睡眠质量更差.