Rectal motility after sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence

Abstract  Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is effective against faecal incontinence, but the mode of action is obscure. The aim of this study was to describe the effects of SNS on fasting and postprandial rectal motility. Sixteen patients, 14 women age 33–73 (mean 58), with faecal incontinence of various aetiologies were examined. Before and during SNS, rectal cross-sectional area (CSA) and ano-rectal pressures were determined with impedance planimetry and manometry for 1 h during fast and 1 h postprandially. Neither in the fasting state nor postprandially did SNS affect the number of single rectal contractions, total time with cyclic rectal contractions, the number of aborally and orally propagating contractions, the number of anal sampling reflexes or rectal wall tension during contractions. Postprandial changes in rectal tone were significantly reduced during SNS ( P  < 0.02). Before SNS, median rectal CSA was 2999 mm² (range: 1481–3822) during fast and 2697 mm² (range: 1227–3310) postprandially ( P  < 0.01). During SNS, median rectal CSA was 2990 mm² (1823–3678) during fast and 2547 mm² (1831–3468) postprandially ( P  = 0.22). SNS for faecal incontinence does not affect phasic rectal motility but it impairs postprandial changes in rectal tone.     

Sacral nerve stimulation and rectal function: results of a prospective study in faecal incontinence

Abstract The mechanisms of action of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) to treat faecal incontinence remain poorly understood. The aims of our study were: (i) to measure the effect of SNS on rectal function and (ii) to evaluate rectal function as a predictive factor of clinical response to SNS. Rectal function was studied before and 3 months after permanent SNS in 18 patients (17 women, mean age 58.5 years) with faecal incontinence, using an electronic barostat. Rectal sensitivity and volume variations were recorded during isobaric distensions. Three months after SNS, 14 patients had a significant improvement of faecal incontience symptoms and four had not. Baseline ‘maximal tolerated volume’ was significantly lower in the positive response group (210 ± 56 vs 286 ± 30 mL, P = 0.02). Baseline rectal compliance was lower in patients with a positive response than those without, although this difference did not reach significance (6.2 ± 3.2 vs 9.2 ± 2.9 mL mmHg^?1,P = 0.10). Rectal compliance was not significantly modified by SNS. Our results suggest that an increased rectal capacity as measured by the maximal tolerated volume may be a predictive factor of poor response to SNS in faecal incontinence. SNS does not significantly modify rectal function.     

Does magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve roots modify colonic motility? Results of a randomized double‐blind sham‐controlled study

Abstract  Although sacral nerve root stimulation (SNS) can result in a symptomatic improvement of faecal incontinence, the mechanism of action remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether short-term magnetic SNS can inhibit pharmacologically induced propulsive colonic contractions. Twelve healthy volunteers (median age: 43.5 years old) were studied on two separate occasions and randomized into either active (15 Hz, 100% output intensity for 5 s min⁻¹ for 30 min) or sham rapid rate lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rLSMS). Colorectal motility was recorded with a manometric catheter located at the most proximal transducer in the left colon and the most distal, in the rectum. Colonic contractions were provoked by instilling Bisacodyl. The effects of rLSMS on colonic, sigmoid and rectal contractions were monitored and recorded after Bisacodyl instillation. The appearance of high-amplitude contractions propagated or not (HAC/HAPC) provoked by Bisacodyl instillation was significantly delayed during active compared to sham stimulation ( P  = 0.03). There was no difference in the characteristics of HAC/HAPC (i.e. frequency, amplitude, duration, velocity of propagation) or the motility index with active or sham stimulation. The perception of urgency tended to be decreased with rLSMS following Bisacodyl instillation. The catheter was expulsed within a median of 16.5 min (range 8–39) after Bisacodyl administration during active stimulation compared to 14 min (range 5–40) during sham stimulation ( P  = 0.03). This study suggests that rLSMS could delay the appearance of the first Bisacodyl-induced colonic contractions.     

Effects of autonomic nerve stimulation on colorectal motility in rats

Background Several disease processes of the colon and rectum, including constipation and incontinence, have been associated with abnormalities of the autonomic nervous system. However, the autonomic innervation to the colon and rectum are not fully understood. The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of stimulation of vagus nerves, pelvic nerves (PN) and hypogastric nerves (HGN) on colorectal motility in rats. Methods Four strain gauge transducers were implanted on the proximal colon, mid colon, distal colon and rectum to record circular muscle contractions in rats. Electrical stimulation was administered to the efferent distal ends of the cervical vagus nerve, PN and HGN. Motility index (MI) was evaluated before and during stimulation. Key Results Electrical stimulation (5–20 Hz) of the cervical vagus elicited significant contractions in the mid colon and distal colon, whereas less pronounced contractions were observed in the proximal colon. Pelvic nerves stimulation elicited significant contractions in the rectum as well as the mid colon and distal colon. Atropine treatment almost completely abolished the contractions induced by vagus nerve and PN stimulation. Hypogastric nerves stimulation caused relaxations in the rectum, mid colon and distal colon. The relaxations in response to HGN stimulation were abolished by propranolol. Conclusions & Inferences Vagal innervation extends to the distal colon, while the PN has projections in the distribution of the rectum through the mid colon. This suggests a pattern of dual parasympathetic innervation in the left colon. Parasympathetic fibers regulate colorectal contractions via muscarinic receptors. The HGN mainly regulates colorectal relaxations via beta‐adrenoceptors.