Augmented and Mixed Reality: Technologies for Enhancing the Future of IR

Augmented and mixed reality are emerging interactive and display technologies. These technologies are able to merge virtual objects, in either 2 or 3 dimensions, with the real world. Image guidance is the cornerstone of interventional radiology. With augmented or mixed reality, medical imaging can be more readily accessible or displayed in actual 3-dimensional space during procedures to enhance guidance, at times when this information is most needed. In this review, the current state of these technologies is addressed followed by a fundamental overview of their inner workings and challenges with 3-dimensional visualization. Finally, current and potential future applications in interventional radiology are highlighted.     

Current Interventional Radiology-Related Benchmarked Clinical Quality Measures Are Less Likely to be “Capped” Than Diagnostic Radiology Clinical Quality Measures

In the merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS), quality measures are considered topped out if national median performance rates are ≥95%. Quality measures worth 10 points can be capped at 7 points if topped out for ≥2 years. This report compares the availability of diagnostic radiology (DR)-related and interventional radiology (IR)-related measures worth 10 points. A total of 196 MIPS clinical quality measures were reviewed on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services MIPS website. There are significantly more IR-related measures worth 10 points than DR measures (2/9 DR measures vs 9/12 IR measures; P = .03), demonstrating that clinical IR services can help mixed IR/DR groups maximize their Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services payment adjustment.     

Transitioning the IR Clinic to Telehealth: A Single-Center Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Telehealth has not previously been widely implemented as a result of regulatory and reimbursement concerns; however, in the current national emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has relaxed many of its rules, allowing increased adoption of telehealth services, improving the safety and access of outpatient health care. A complete understanding of the regulatory requirements, technologic options, and billing processes of telehealth is required to initiate a successful clinic. A model is presented here based on a single institution’s experience with implementing telehealth in the outpatient interventional radiology clinic.     

Benchmark Status of Women Interventional Radiologists in China

PurposeTo evaluate the current status of women interventional radiologists in China and discuss possible measures to boost their representation in this male-dominated field for a more diverse workplace environment in the future.Materials and MethodsThe list of Chinese interventional radiologists obtained from the Chinese College of Interventionalists was retrospectively reviewed. Key information was extracted from the database, including sex, chronologic trends of representation of women interventional radiologists, position, education level, geographic distribution, interventional radiology (IR) practice time, departmental affiliation, and hospital classification.ResultsOf the 13,855 entries, 7,324 (52.9%) were interventional radiologists having valid information. Among them, 684 (9.3%) were identified as women. The number of women interventional radiologists has continued to increase since the first woman registered in 1992. The average age of women interventional radiologists was 39.1 years ± 5.7 (range, 26–50). The majority of them were attending physicians (n = 280; 40.9%) with a bachelor’s degree (n = 363; 53.1%). Most women interventional radiologists (n = 215, 31.4%) joined this specialty 5–9 years after becoming physicians, whereas 128 (18.7%) started practicing IR from the very beginning. A total of 42.4% of women interventional radiologists were from the departments of IR and cardiology.ConclusionsAlthough the total number shows an upward trend, women interventional radiologists are still underrepresented. Education level, geographic areas, and other socioeconomic factors may simultaneously influence the population size of women interventional radiologists in China.     

Changes in IR from 2007 to 2017 in China

In this article, the updated status of interventional radiology (IR) in China is reported and compared vs that a decade ago based on a poll carried out in 2017 in Jiangsu Province, where the economy and overall health level are among the best of the 31 provinces in China. All 98 polled centers responded, and 56 IR departments (57%) had become independent departments separate from the radiology department; 74 (76%) had inpatient wards. In 2017, there were 538 interventional radiologists performing IR procedures in Jiangsu Province, with a total of 69,277 procedures performed, with interventional oncologic procedures accounting for the largest proportion (58%).     

Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Research Consensus Panel on Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Radiology: From Code to Bedside

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies are the most rapidly growing field of innovation in healthcare with the promise to achieve substantial improvements in delivery of patient care across all disciplines of medicine. Recent advances in imaging technology along with marked expansion of readily available advanced health information, data offer a unique opportunity for interventional radiology (IR) to reinvent itself as a data-driven specialty. Additionally, the growth of AI-based applications in diagnostic imaging is expected to have downstream effects on all image-guidance modalities. Therefore, the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation has called upon 13 key opinion leaders in the field of IR to develop research priorities for clinical applications of AI in IR. The objectives of the assembled research consensus panel were to assess the availability and understand the applicability of AI for IR, estimate current needs and clinical use cases, and assemble a list of research priorities for the development of AI in IR. Individual panel members proposed and all participants voted upon consensus statements to rank them according to their overall impact for IR. The results identified the top priorities for the IR research community and provide organizing principles for innovative academic-industrial research collaborations that will leverage both clinical expertise and cutting-edge technology to benefit patient care in IR.     

Ergonomics in IR

Ergonomic research in the field of interventional radiology remains limited. Existing literature suggests that operators are at increased risk for work-related musculoskeletal disorders related to the use of lead garments and incomplete knowledge of ergonomic principles. Data from existing surgical literature suggest that musculoskeletal disorders may contribute to physician burnout and female operators are at a higher risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders. This review article aims to summarize the existing ergonomic challenges faced by interventional radiologists, reiterate existing solutions to these challenges, and highlight the need for further ergonomic research in multiple areas, including burnout and gender.     

Appendix to the Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus Guidelines for the Periprocedural Management of Thrombotic and Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Image-Guided Interventions: Pediatric Considerations

PurposeTo provide guidance on the use of anticoagulant and antithrombotic agents in pediatric patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures.Materials and MethodsA multidisciplinary writing group conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify studies on the topic of interest. Recommendations were developed for procedural risk and medication dosage and withholding. A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus agreement on the recommendations.ResultsA total of 24 studies, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies, were identified as relevant. The expert writing group agreed on procedural risk categorization, laboratory testing thresholds, and medication dosage and withholding recommendations specific to pediatric practice. They additionally described the nuances of anticoagulation in clinical conditions specific to pediatrics.ConclusionsThe Society of Interventional Radiology recommends following the guidance provided in the document when developing multidisciplinary management protocols for anticoagulation and antithrombotic treatment in pediatric patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures.     

Research Priorities in Percutaneous Image- and Endoscopy-Guided Interventions for Biliary and Gallbladder Diseases: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Multidisciplinary Research Consensus Panel

Recent technological advancements, including the introduction of disposable endoscopes, have enhanced the role of interventional radiology (IR) in the management of biliary and gallbladder diseases. There are unanswered questions in this growing field. The Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation convened a virtual research consensus panel consisting of a multidisciplinary group of experts to develop a prioritized research agenda regarding percutaneous image- and endoscopy-guided procedures for biliary and gallbladder diseases. The panelists discussed current data, opportunities for IR, and future efforts to maximize IR’s ability and scope. A recurring theme throughout the discussions was to find ways to reduce the total duration of percutaneous drains and improve patients’ quality of life. After the presentations and discussions, research priorities were ranked on the basis of their clinical relevance and impact. The research ideas ranked top 3 were as follows: (a) percutaneous multimodality management of benign anastomotic biliary strictures (laser vs endobiliary ablation vs cholangioplasty vs drain upsize protocol alone), (b) ablation of intraductal cholangiocarcinoma with and without stent placement, and (c) cholecystoscopy/choledochoscopy and lithotripsy in nonsurgical patients with calculous cholecystitis. Collaborative, retrospective, and prospective research studies are essential to answer these questions and improve the management protocols for patients with biliary and gallbladder diseases.     

A Review of Professional Liability in IR: Sweeping the Mines

Medical professional liability (MPL) is becoming a substantial issue in interventional radiology (IR), with both impact on health care costs and negative psychological effects on physicians. MPL presents special challenges within IR because of the field’s complex and innovative therapies that are provided to a diverse group of patients and complicated by the off-label use of devices and drugs that is pervasive in the field. This review discusses the principles and practices to avoid and manage MPLs that are specific to the field of IR.     

Next-Generation Sequencing and Image-Guided Tissue Sampling: A Primer for Interventional Radiologists

The discovery of increasing numbers of actionable molecular and gene targets for cancer treatment has driven the demand for tissue sampling for next-generation sequencing (NGS). Requirements for sequencing can be very specific, and inadequate sampling leads to delays in management and decision making. It is important that interventional radiologists are aware of NGS technologies and their common applications and be cognizant of the factors that contribute to successful sample sequencing. This review summarizes the fundamentals of cancer tissue collection and processing for NGS. It elaborates on sequencing technologies and their applications with the aim of providing readers with a working understanding that can enhance their clinical practice. It then describes imaging, tumor, biopsy, and sample collection factors that improve the chances of NGS success. Finally, it discusses future practice, highlighting the problem of undersampling in both clinical and research settings and the opportunities within interventional radiology to address this.     

Distal Radial Artery Access for Noncoronary Endovascular Treatment Is a Safe and Feasible Technique

PurposeTo evaluate safety and feasibility of distal radial artery (DRA) access for noncoronary interventional radiology procedures.Materials and MethodsAll interventional radiology procedures by means of DRA puncture from July 2017 to August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-two punctures in 56 patients were included, mostly in male patients (84% vs 16%). Mean age was 67.8 years (range, 33.3–87.3 years); mean height was 172 cm (range, 142–190 cm); and mean weight was 83 kg (range, 43–120 kg). Procedural characteristics, technical success, and complication rates were gathered from the medical records and follow-up ultrasound when available. Prerequisites for DRA access were adequate radioulnar collateral circulation, sufficient radial artery diameter, and informed consent in patients initially intended for conventional transradial access.ResultsProcedures included transarterial chemoembolization (n = 34), yittrium-90 pretreatment angiography (n = 21), yittrium-90 administration (transarterial radioembolization; n = 20), and embolization of visceral organs (n = 7). Both 4-Fr (n = 35) and 5-Fr (n = 46) sheaths were used. Technical success of DRA access was 97.6%, with conversion to transfemoral access in 2 cases (2.4%). No major complications were reported as a result of DRA access.ConclusionDRA access is a feasible and safe technique for abdominal interventional radiology embolization procedures. No radial artery occlusion or other major complications were observed in patients who underwent follow-up ultrasound.     

Public Awareness of Interventional Radiology: Population-Based Analysis of the Current State of and Pathways for Improvement

PurposeTo evaluate the awareness of interventional radiology (IR) among the public and identify methods for improvement.Materials and MethodsParticipants (N = 1,000) were anonymously surveyed using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing platform about medical and IR-specific knowledge, preferred methods of acquisition of medical information, and suggestions for improving awareness of IR. The survey consisted of 69 questions, including both Likert Scale and free text questions.ResultsOf the participants, 92% preferred undergoing a minimally invasive procedure over surgery. However, 39.8% recognized IR as a medical specialty, and less than 50% of these participants correctly identified IR as procedurally oriented. Of those who discussed or underwent an IR procedure (n = 113), most were also offered to undergo the procedure performed by a surgeon (n = 66). Furthermore, 71% (n = 20) of those who underwent the procedure performed by a surgeon reported that lack of awareness of IR played a role in their decision. Almost half of the respondents (n = 458) were interested in learning more about IR, particularly the diseases treated and procedures performed (42% and 37%, respectively). Short (<10-minute) educational videos and increased patient education by primary care providers (PCPs) were among the most suggested ways to improve awareness. Regarding the ambiguity of the name “interventional radiology,” most respondents (n = 555) reported this to be true, and “minimally invasive radiologist” was the most preferred alternative (21.18%).ConclusionsLack of awareness of IR may underlie underutilization. When presented with the knowledge that IR improves patient outcomes, minimally invasive procedures by an interventional radiologist are more often desired by the public than surgical options. Educational videos and patient education by PCPs may increase awareness of IR.     

Interventional Radiology Obesity Therapeutics: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Research Consensus Panel

The Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation commissioned a Research Consensus Panel to establish a research agenda on “Obesity Therapeutics” in interventional radiology (IR). The meeting convened a multidisciplinary group of physicians and scientists with expertise in obesity therapeutics. The meeting was intended to review current evidence on obesity therapies, familiarize attendees with the regulatory evaluation process, and identify research deficiencies in IR bariatric interventions, with the goal of prioritizing future high-quality research that would move the field forward. The panelists agreed that a weight loss of >8%–10% from baseline at 6–12 months is a desirable therapeutic endpoint for future IR weight loss therapies. The final consensus on the highest priority research was to design a blinded randomized controlled trial of IR weight loss interventions versus sham control arms, with patients receiving behavioral therapy.     

The Role of Physician-Driven Device Preference in the Cost Variation of Common Interventional Radiology Procedures

PurposeTo analyze the impact of physician-specific equipment preference on cost variation for procedures typically performed by interventional radiologists at a tertiary care academic hospital.Materials and MethodsFrom October 2017 to October 2019, data on all expendable items used by 9 interventional radiologists for 11 common interventional radiology procedure categories were compiled from the hospital analytics system. This search yielded a final dataset of 44,654 items used in 2,121 procedures of 11 different categories. The mean cost per case for each physician as well as the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CV) of the mean cost per case across physicians were calculated. The proportion of spending by item type was compared across physicians for 2 high-variation, high-volume procedures. The relationship between the mean cost per case and case volume was examined using linear regression.ResultsThere was a high variability within each procedure, with the highest and the lowest CV for radioembolization administration (56.6%) and transjugular liver biopsy (4.9%), respectively. Variation in transarterial chemoembolization cost was mainly driven by microcatheters/microwires, while for nephrostomy, the main drivers were catheters/wires and access sets. Mean spending by physician was not significantly correlated with case volume (P =.584).ConclusionsPhysicians vary in their item selection even for standard procedures. While the financial impact of these differences vary across procedures, these findings suggest that standardization may offer an opportunity for cost savings.     

Value Improvement by Assessing IR Care via Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing

PurposeTo evaluate time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) in interventional radiology for image-guided vascular malformation treatment as an example.Materials and MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed on consecutive vascular malformation treatment cycles [67 venous malformations (VMs) and 11 arteriovenous malformations (AVMs)] in a university hospital in 2018. All activities were integrated with a process map, and spent resources were assigned accordingly. TDABC uses 2 parameters: (i) practical capacity cost rate, calculated as 80% of theoretical capacity, and (ii) time consumption of each resource determined by interviews (23 items). Thereby, the total costs were calculated. Treatment cycles were modified according to identified resource waste and TDABC-guided negotiations with health insurance.ResultsTotal personnel time required was higher for AVM (1,191 min) than for VM (637 min) treatment. The interventional procedure comprised the major part (46%) of personnel time required in AVM, whereas it comprised 19% in VM treatment. Materials represented the major cost type in AVM (75%) and VM (45%) treatments. TDABC-based treatment process modification led to a decrease in personnel time need of 16% and 30% and a cost reduction of 5.5% and 15.7% for AVM and VM treatments, respectively. TDABC-guided cost reduction and TDABC-informed negotiations improved profit from ?56% to +40% and from +41% to +69% for AVM and VM treatments, respectively.ConclusionsTDABC facilitated the precise costing of interventional radiologic treatment cycles and optimized internal processes, cost reduction, and revenues. Hence, TDABC is a promising tool to determine the denominator of interventional radiology's value.     

Performance of Advanced Practice Providers compared with that of Physicians in Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules and Superficial Neck Masses

Advanced practice providers (APPs) perform ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) procedures for superficial neck lesions after appropriate training in some interventional radiology practices. This allows physicians additional time to be involved in more complex procedures. This report compared the performance between physicians and APPs. This observational retrospective study analyzed data obtained from October 2017 to December 2019. A total of 309 patients underwent US-guided FNA biopsies for superficial neck lesions. The positive diagnostic rates of FNA biopsies were evaluated for both groups. APPs and physicians performed 212 (68.6%) and 97 (31.4%) FNAs, respectively. Biopsies considered diagnostic for the APP and physician groups were 195 (92.0%) and 86 (88.7%), respectively (P = .345). There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic rates between the 2 types of providers when performing US-guided FNA for superficial neck lesions.     

Reimagining the IR Workflow for a Better Work–Life Balance

Several workflow changes were implemented in a large academic interventional radiology practice, including separation of inpatient and outpatient services, early start times, and using an adaptive learning system to predict case length tailored to individual physicians. Metrics including procedural volume, on-time start, accuracy at predicting case length, and room shutdown time were assessed before and after the intervention. Considerable improvements were seen in accuracy of first case start times, predicting block times, and last case encounter ending times. It is proposed that with improved role clarity, interventional radiologists can regain control over their schedules, utilize work hours more efficiently, and improve work–life balance.     

Salvage of Malfunctioning Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: An Algorithm for Recanalization and Repositioning

A peritoneal dialysis catheter salvage algorithm was developed and performed for 40 patients with documented catheter malfunction (obstruction and/or malposition) referred to the interventional radiology suite. This procedure utilized a metallic stiffener for repositioning and rotating dual guide wires for recanalization. A retrospective analysis of 35 cases of fluoroscopic manipulation showed that in 83% of the cases, the catheters were successfully repositioned and/or recanalized, and in 59%, they remained patent at 30 days. No major adverse events occurred. The results suggest that this algorithm is a safe and effective approach to salvage malfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters and that a trial of fluoroscopic salvage can be considered prior to surgical intervention.     

A Practical Guide to Use of Publicly Available Data Sets for Observational Research in Interventional Radiology

Observational data research studying access, utilization, cost, and outcomes of image-guided interventions using publicly available “big data” sets is growing in the interventional radiology (IR) literature. Publicly available data sets offer insight into real-world care and represent an important pillar of IR research moving forward. They offer insights into how IR procedures are being used nationally and whether they are working as intended. On the other hand, large data sources are aggregated using complex sampling frames, and their strengths and weaknesses only become apparent after extensive use. Unintentional misuse of large data sets can result in misleading or sometimes erroneous conclusions. This review introduces the most commonly used databases relevant to IR research, highlights their strengths and limitations, and provides recommendations for use. In addition, it summarizes methodologic best practices pertinent to all data sets for planning and executing scientifically rigorous and clinically relevant observational research.