Postendoscopy barium enema examinations

A study was designed to evaluate whether sigmoidoscopy performed on the same day as barium enema examination interferes with quality or interpretation of the barium study. The study included 295 patients who had either single- or double-contrast barium enema examinations subsequent to sigmoidoscopy performed either on a prior day or the same day. Luminal air, spasm, colonic fluid, and mucosal coating were assessed, as was the resultant diagnostic quality of each barium examination. The results suggest that rigid or fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy can be performed the same day as single- or double-contrast barium enema examinations without adversely affecting the quality or interpretation of the barium study.     

Bacteremia during barium enema study.

The occurrence of bacteremia was studied in patients undergoing barium enema. Blood cultures were done on 34 patients before, during, and after the procedure using two schedules. Cultures were obtained once during the procedure in the first schedule and four times in the second. None of the cultures were positive by the first schedule, while 23% of patients studied by the second schedule had one or more positive cultures. Organisms isolated were anaerobes. The bacteremia was transient and self-limited, without serious clinical sequelae. The incidence of bacteremia during barium enema examination was statistically indistinguishable from bacteremia previously reported during colonscopy. It is concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated in most patients undergoing colonic diagnostic procedures. Prophylaxis in selected high-risk patients requires further study.     

Feasibility of instructing radiology technologists in the performance of gastrointestinal fluoroscopy

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if dedicated gastrointestinal technologists could be trained to properly perform esophagography and double-contrast barium enema examinations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients undergoing double-contrast barium enema examinations and 123 patients undergoing esophagographic examinations were included in the study. The study was conducted over a 4-month period, with examinations performed by eight gastrointestinal technologists, 10 radiology residents, and four staff radiologists. Four random lists were generated for each set of examinations. Each staff gastrointestinal radiologist, who was unaware of who had performed the examination, independently scored the representative radiographs. RESULTS: For the double-contrast barium enema examinations, no statistically significant differences were found between the technologists and residents for amount of barium used, degree of distention, cecal opacification, and quality of spot radiographs. The technologist-performed examinations had a statistically significant lower mean fluoroscopy time (3.2 min, compared with 4.0 min for staff radiologists and 5.7 min for residents). For the esophagrams, no statistically significant differences between technologists and residents were found for single-contrast esophagrams; radiographs of the gastric cardia; assessment of motility, reflux, and transit of a solid bolus; and fluoroscopy time. Double-contrast esophagrams obtained by technologists received a better mean score than did those of the residents. CONCLUSION: Radiology technologists can be trained to perform high-quality esophagography and double-contrast barium enema examinations without an unacceptably high radiation dose.     

Early rectal tube removal for improved patient tolerance during double- contrast barium enema examination

During a five year period, 62 patients each underwent two barium enema examinations. The length of time that the rectal tube remained in place varied in each subject. Early rectal-tube removal resulted in better patient acceptance of the double-contrast barium enema examination.     

Performance of barium examinations after acute myocardial infarction: report of a survey

A survey of members of the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists was conducted to ascertain the standards of practice and timing for elective barium studies of the gastrointestinal tract in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction. Sixty-two percent of respondents do not have cardiac monitoring apparatus readily available in the fluoroscopy suite. When readily available, such equipment is rarely (42%) or never (58%) used during routine barium examinations. Twenty-four percent of respondents take special precautions when performing examinations on these patients by reducing patient movement, the length of the examination, and the number of radiographs exposed, and by employing cardiac monitoring. Seventy-two (89%) of 81 respondents noted at least one adverse cardiovascular reaction. This was most often chest pain, but there were 10 deaths from cardiac causes. Two-thirds of respondents delay elective barium examinations of any kind for at least 4 weeks after acute myocardial infarction. The remaining one-third perform these studies earlier than 4 weeks. The latter typically limit their studies to the upper gastrointestinal tract (82%), 42% of which are single-contrast; the rest are equally divided between double-contrast and biphasic studies. This minority of radiologists is twice as likely to perform a single-contrast barium enema than a double-contrast barium enema during this period. No such preference for single-contrast (47%) over double-contrast (53%) barium enema is revealed by the majority who delay their elective barium enemas 4 or more weeks. The data indicate a strong preference to defer elective barium examinations a minimum of 4 weeks after acute myocardial infarction. A sizable minority (one-third) of radiologists, however, feel comfortable performing a single-contrast upper gastrointestinal examination at an earlier time.     

Ileocecal valve: spectrum of normal findings at double-contrast barium enema examination

PURPOSE: To characterize the spectrum of normal findings of the ileocecal valve at double-contrast barium enema examination to allow differentiation between a normal valve and one infiltrated by tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of radiology and endoscopy files showed 106 patients who underwent double-contrast barium enema examination and colonoscopy. The radiographic images were reviewed by two authors to determine the morphology of the ileocecal valve and to evaluate whether it appeared normal or abnormal. The radiographic data were then correlated with endoscopic and pathologic findings. RESULTS: The ileocecal valve was visible in 91 (86%) of 106 patients. It was round or ovoid in 71 patients (78%) and triangular in 20 (22%). In the 88 patients with a normal valve at colonoscopy, mean valve height was 1.7 cm, and mean width was 2.8 cm. The valve was smooth in 75 patients (85%) and smoothly lobulated in 13 (15%). The lips of the valve were symmetric in 77 patients (88%) and asymmetric in 11 (12%). All 87 patients with a normal valve at double-contrast barium enema examination had a normal valve at colonoscopy, whereas the two patients with a valve suspicious for tumor at barium enema examination had neoplasms (one carcinoma and one villous adenoma) at colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: The ileocecal valve may show a spectrum of normal findings at double-contrast barium enema examination and may appear as a round, ovoid, or triangular structure with a maximal height of nearly 4 cm. The valve may be large, asymmetric, or smoothly lobulated, even in the absence of tumor.     

Bacteremia and the barium enema.

To investigate the possible association of bacteremia with barium enema examinations, blood samples were obtained from 42 patients before and at 5, 10, and 20 min after administration of the enema. Patients with fever or symptoms suggestive of inflammatory bowel disease were not included in the study; neither were patients who had received antimicrobiotic medication during the preceding 3 months. Pour-plate blood cultures showed no bacteremia due to enteric organism in the 42 patients-a result at variance with previously published reports.     

Single-contrast vs double-contrast barium enema in the detection of colonic polyps

Radiographic and colonoscopic correlation in 139 patients with 234 colonic polyps compared the sensitivity of single- and double-contrast barium enema. Single-contrast barium enema detected 68 (80%) of polyps, with 72% of polyps under 1 cm and 94% of those 1 cm or over detected. Double-contrast barium enema detected 135 (91%) of 149 polyps, with 88% of polyps under 1 cm and 96% of larger polyps detected. Thus, the double-contrast barium enema was more effective than the single-contrast examination only for detection of polyps under 1 cm. The single-contrast barium enema was more likely performed on patients in poor physical condition and in those over 70 years old. The results suggest that for elderly patients, who may have difficulty in cooperating for a double-contrast enema, a properly performed single-contrast examination is an acceptable option.     

Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiologic findings of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) of the colon at double-contrast barium enema examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double-contrast barium enema findings in six patients with pathologically proved PTCL of the colon were retrospectively evaluated and compared with colonoscopic and histopathologic findings. RESULTS: There was a diffuse involvement of almost all segments of the colon in four patients and a focal segmental involvement in two. Frequent findings at double-contrast barium enema examination included geographic ulcerations (n = 6), aphthous ulcerations (n = 4), pseudopolyps (n = 4), circumferential luminal narrowing (n = 4), and ileocecal deformity (n = 4). CONCLUSION: PTCL of the colon manifested as either a diffuse or a focal segmental lesion and showed extensive mucosal ulceration at double-contrast barium enema examination. These findings are similar to those of inflammatory bowel disease and are different from those of colorectal lymphoma with the B-cell phenotype.     

Colorectal cancer: screening double-contrast barium enema examination in average-risk adults older than 50 years

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the diagnostic yield of double-contrast barium enema examinations performed for colorectal cancer screening of neoplasms 1 cm or larger or advanced neoplastic lesions of any size in average-risk adults older than 50 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board at the affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center approved this HIPAA-compliant study protocol and did not require informed consent from patients. Computerized databases revealed 276 double-contrast barium enema examinations performed for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults older than 50 years. Radiographic and pathologic reports were reviewed to determine the number of patients who had polypoid lesions 1 cm or larger, polyps smaller than 1 cm, or advanced neoplastic lesions of any size. Forty-five (16.3%) of the 276 patients underwent follow-up sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Medical, endoscopic, and pathologic records were reviewed and compared with radiographic findings. RESULTS: The results of double-contrast barium enema examination revealed 74 (26.8%) of 276 patients with 104 polypoid lesions in the colon, including 32 patients (11.6%) with 41 polypoid lesions 1 cm or larger, 15 patients (5.4%) with 19 polyps 6-9 mm, and 27 patients (9.8%) with 44 polyps 5 mm or smaller. Endoscopy was performed in 24 (75%) of 32 patients, the results of which confirmed 23 (72%) of 32 radiographically diagnosed lesions 1 cm or larger in 16 (67%) of 24 patients. In two of these individuals, the polyps were hyperplastic. The remaining 14 patients had a total of 21 neoplastic lesions 1 cm or larger, including 11 tubular adenomas, seven tubulovillous adenomas, one villous adenoma with marked dysplasia, and two cancers. The diagnostic yield of screening double-contrast barium enema examination was 5.1% (14 of 276 patients) for neoplastic lesions 1 cm or larger and 6.2% (17 of 276 patients) for advanced neoplastic lesions of any size. CONCLUSION: Double-contrast barium enema examinations performed in average-risk adults older than 50 years have a diagnostic yield of 5.1% for neoplastic lesions 1 cm or larger and 6.2% for advanced neoplastic lesions, regardless of size.     

Colonic stenoses: use of oral barium when retrograde flow is completely obstructed on barium enema studies

Forty patients with complete obstruction to retrograde barium flow on barium enema examinations, without clinical or radiographic evidence of obstruction, were studied further with orally administered barium in the same session. All patients had undergone aborted double-contrast barium enema studies and had received antispasmodics intramuscularly before the examination. The authors describe the technique, as well as the clinical and radiologic findings, that allows the safe ingestion of oral barium in patients with stenotic lesions of the colon. In all patients, oral barium passed through the small bowel and the stenotic site in an average of 148 minutes, with no complications. In seven patients, there were synchronous lesions in the colon and small bowel, and the findings were determined better with oral barium studies in 19 patients. If a barium enema study is done and retrograde passage of barium is obstructed by a lesion in the left side of the colon, additional diagnostic information can be obtained by giving the patients oral barium. This practice is safe if precise criteria are applied.     

Internal hemorrhoids: diagnosis with double-contrast barium enema examinations

The authors retrospectively studied 43 patients suspected of having internal hemorrhoids at double-contrast barium enema examination. At endoscopy, 24 patients (56%) had internal hemorrhoids, four (9%) had other pathologic lesions in the rectum without evidence of hemorrhoids, and 15 (35%) had no reported abnormalities in the rectum. Internal hemorrhoids were found at endoscopy in 10 of 20 patients (50%) with lobulated folds extending 3 cm or less from the anorectal junction and 10 of 13 patients (77%) with multiple submucosal nodules. However, no patients with these characteristic radiographic findings were found to have other pathologic lesions in the rectum that had been mistaken for hemorrhoids at barium enema examination. Conversely, three of four patients with lobulated folds extending more than 3 cm from the anorectal junction and one of six patients with solitary nodules had proctitis or rectal neoplasms. Thus, specific criteria are suggested for the diagnosis of internal hemorrhoids on double-contrast barium enema examinations. Suspected hemorrhoids that do not fulfill these criteria should be evaluated endoscopically to rule out other more serious pathologic lesions in the rectum.     

Barium filling for glucagon-resistant spasm on double-contrast barium enema examinations

Severe glucagon-resistant spasm on double-contrast barium enema (DCE) examinations may occasionally lead to a nondiagnostic examination or erroneously suggest colonic disease. In such cases, this glucagon-resistant spasm may be overcome by refilling the colon with single-contrast barium immediately after completion of the DCE examination.     

Feasibility of double-contrast barium enema in the elderly

In order to evaluate the feasibility of performing double-contrast barium enemas in the elderly, a consecutive series of 310 patients above 60 years of age referred for barium enema examinations was analyzed relative to the rate of successful studies. There was an overall success rate of 94.8%. There was a 99% success rate in patients in the seventh decade, 94.9% in the eighth decade, and a 90% success rate in patients 80 years and over. A conclusion is reached that the double-contrast barium enema examination is feasible in the elderly.     

What happens to patients after upper and lower gastrointestinal tract barium studies?

We investigated the occurrence of new constipation, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, visible blood in stool, abdominal pain, black stools, belching, and flatus in 324 outpatients following upper or lower gastrointestinal tract barium procedures. We also evaluated the roles of age, sex, patient mobility, and types of barium enema (single- or double-contrast). At least one new symptom was reported after 51% of all examinations. Constipation was the most frequently reported single symptom after barium meal or small bowel examinations. Fifty percent of all constipation occurred following upper gastrointestinal examinations. Abdominal pain was common in patients of the seventh decade, especially following barium enema. Nausea typically followed barium swallow or upper gastrointestinal series. Belching and passage of flatus were the most frequently reported symptoms after barium enema, both single- and double-contrast. No significant relationship between the frequency of symptoms and patient age, sex, or the type of barium enema was established.     

Effect of glucagon on the diagnostic accuracy of double-contrast barium enema examinations

The effect of glucagon-induced hypotonicity on the diagnostic accuracy of double-contrast barium enema examinations was determined in 133 consecutive patients in a double-blind crossover study. All patients underwent colonoscopy and served as their own controls by undergoing a double-contrast study after intravenous injection of 1 mg of glucagon and another after intravenous injection of 1 ml of saline placebo, in randomized order. The frequencies of good/excellent hypotonicity and quality of examinations after first doses of glucagon (55.3% and 80.8%) were not significantly different from the frequencies of good/excellent results after first doses of saline (51.3% and 86.5%). The sensitivity was 72.6% after glucagon and 64.5% after placebo; the specificity was 88.7% after glucagon and 77.9% after placebo; and the respective accuracies were 81.2% and 71.9%. These percentages should be used only to compare results with and without glucagon and, by study design, do not represent results of a complete double-contrast study. The variation among these percentages was not statistically significant, but diverticulitis was more accurately diagnosed after glucagon. It was concluded that glucagon does not significantly improve the sensitivity and specificity of the double-contrast barium enema examination and should be used only in selected instances.     

早期结肠癌低张气钡双对比造影检查与纤维结肠镜对比分析

目的:对于早期结肠癌的检查,通过低张气钡双对比造影(DCBE)图像与纤维结肠镜检查图像对比观察,分析气钡双对比结肠造影在检出早期结肠癌中的价值。方法:20例经病理证实早期结肠癌病例,采用低张气钡双对比造影方法,实时点片。常规纤维结肠镜检查。结果:Ⅰ型11例,Ⅱa型6例,混合型1例,LST型2例,对比观察造影像及内镜像表现。结论:正确运用气钡双对比造影检查,对早期结肠癌的显示有较大价值。     

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening

PURPOSE: To determine the most cost-effective colorectal cancer screening strategy costing less than $100,000 per life-year saved and to determine how available strategies compare with each other. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized methods were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from published estimates of cost and effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies, and the direction and magnitude of any effect on the ratio from parameter estimate adjustments based on literature values were estimated. RESULTS: Strategies in which double-contrast barium enema examination was performed emerged as optimal from all studies included. In average-risk individuals, screening with double-contrast barium enema examination every 3 years, or every 5 years with annual fecal occult blood testing, had an ICER of less than $55,600 per life-year saved. However, double-contrast barium enema examination screening every 3 years plus annual fecal occult blood testing had an ICER of more than $100,000 per life-year saved. Colonoscopic screening had an ICER of more than $100,000 per life-year saved, was dominated by other screening strategies, and offered less benefit than did double-contrast barium enema examination screening. CONCLUSION: Double-contrast barium enema examination can be a cost-effective component of colorectal cancer screening, but further modeling efforts are necessary.     

A comparison of Golytely and standard preparation for barium enema

A randomized prospective trial was performed comparing Golytely (with bisacodyl) with our standard two-day catharsis and bowel washout regimen as colon preparation for double-contrast barium enema examinations. Of the 107 patients who participated, 50 received the standard preparation and 57 Golytely. Two radiologists reviewed the enema films without knowledge of which preparation had been used. No significant difference was detected either in the number of failed preparations or in the quality. We conclude that routine use of Golytely is preferable to methods involving catharsis and standard tap water enemas for barium enema examination, on the grounds that it is equally effective, yet more convenient for patients and for the radiology department, and reduces total costs.     

Audit in action: significant reduction of double-contrast barium enema screening time with no loss of examination quality.

The double-contrast barium enema is an examination of high radiation exposure to the patient. As part of a departmental audit, our own fluoroscopic screening times were being recorded. A study was undertaken to see if a determined effort could reduce the screening time without having a detrimental effect on the quality of the examinations. Methods of screening time reduction were identified and then implemented by two radiologists. In the period before the study the average screening time for radiologists A and B was 2.6 min and 3.2 min, respectively (over 56 examinations). After implementation of the changes, the average screening time for both was 0.9 min (over 50 examinations). This is a statistically significant reduction (p less than 0.01). The examinations were assessed independently by a gastroradiologist. No difference in the quality of the examinations was identified. We conclude that a significant reduction of screening time for the double-contrast barium enema can be achieved without loss of examination quality.