Trunk,pelvis, and knee kinematics during running in females with and without patellofemoral pain

BackgroundFemales are two times more likely to develop patellofemoral pain (PFP) than males. Abnormal trunk and pelvis kinematics are thought to contribute to the pathomechanics of this condition. However, there is a scarcity of evidence investigating proximal segments kinematics in females with PFP.Research questionThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether females with PFP demonstrate altered trunk, pelvis, and knee joint kinematics compared with healthy controls during running.MethodsThirty-four females (17 PFP, 17 controls) underwent a 3-dimensional motion analysis during treadmill running at preferred and fixed speeds, each trial for 30 s. Variables of interest included magnitudes of peak angles for trunk (forward flexion, ipsilateral trunk lean), pelvis (anterior tilt, contralateral drop), knee (flexion, valgus, internal rotation), range of motion (RoM) of trunk and pelvis in sagittal and frontal planes and RoM of knee joint in the three cardinal planes of motion. Kinematic data were compared between groups using mixed model repeated measure analysis of variance with the trial as the repeated measure.ResultsThe PFP group displayed significantly less pelvis frontal plane RoM, greater knee frontal plane RoM, and less knee sagittal plane RoM during running compared with controls, irrespective of running trial. No differences were found in peak kinematic variables between PFP and healthy groups.SignificanceThese results may suggest a rigid stabilization strategy at the pelvis, which the body has adapted to prevent further frontal plane knee malalignment. Less knee sagittal plane RoM may be indicative of another protective strategy in the PFP group to avoid patellofemoral joint reaction force. Clinical assessments and rehabilitative treatments may benefit from considering a global program with focus on pelvis kinematics in addition to the knee joint in females with PFP.     

The reliability of upper limb kinematics in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

This study describes the reliability of a protocol for upper limb three-dimensional movement analysis (UL-3DMA) in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP). The UL-3DMA is based on the ISB-recommendations, and contains a set of functional and clinically relevant tasks. Tasks were selected to reflect the characteristic movement deficits seen in children with HCP. The protocol consists of three reach tasks (forwards, upwards, sideways); two reach-to-grasp tasks (with objects requiring different hand orientations); and three gross motor tasks. Within and between session reliability was tested in a group of 12 children with HCP, aged 6-15 years. Reliability of movement duration/speed and joint angles at endpoint was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient; similarity of the waveforms with the coefficient of multiple correlation. Measurement errors were calculated for all parameters. Results indicated good within and between session reliability for movement duration/speed. Trunk, scapula, shoulder, elbow and wrist angles at endpoint generally showed moderately high to very high reliability. High levels of reliability were also found for scapula, shoulder and elbow waveforms and lower levels for the wrist and trunk. Within and between session measurement errors were below 5° and 7°, respectively, for most kinematic parameters. Joint angles in the transverse plane, as well as wrist flexion generally showed higher between session errors (7-10°). This study indicates that the proposed protocol is a reliable tool to quantify upper limb movements in children with HCP, providing a sound base for its clinical application. Further research is needed to establish the discriminative ability of the UL-3DMA.     

Upper limb kinematics: development and reliability of a clinical protocol for children

This study proposed a child-friendly measurement procedure for the three-dimensional analysis of upper limb movements, based on a comprehensive movement protocol. Within and between session reliability was tested in a group of 10 typically developing children (TDC) (mean age 10.3±3.2 years). The movement protocol was constructed for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP) and contained three reach tasks (forwards, upwards, sideways), three reach-to-grasp tasks (with objects requiring different hand orientations) and three gross motor tasks. Upper limb kinematics were calculated following the ISB-guidelines. Reliability of movement duration/speed and endpoint joint angles was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient; similarity of the waveforms with the coefficient of multiple correlation; measurement errors were also calculated. Reliability coefficients were generally high for movement duration/speed and most kinematic parameters. Endpoint angles for scapular tilting, shoulder elevation plane and elevation, elbow flexion-extension and wrist ulnar-radial deviation showed highest reliability. Angular waveforms were best repeated for scapular medio-lateral rotation and pro-retraction, shoulder elevation plane and elevation, and elbow flexion-extension. Results also seemed task-dependent. This study indicated that the proposed procedure could be used reliably to quantify upper limb movements in TDC. However, to compose proper age-related standards for the different tasks, larger study samples are needed. This will also help with a well-founded task-selection depending on the joints of interest. Finally, further research will need to establish the reliability in children with HCP.     

Validity and reliability of 2-dimensional trunk,hip, and knee frontal plane kinematics during single-leg squat,drop jump,and single-leg hop in females with patellofemoral pain

ObjectivesTo investigate validity and between-session reliability of frontal plane trunk, hip, and knee kinematics during three functional tasks in females with patellofemoral pain (PFP).DesignObservational.SettingResearch Laboratory.Participants20 females with PFP (22.7 ± 3.2 years, 69.9 ± 9.2 kg, 167.7 ± 9.6 cm).Main outcome measuresTrunk, hip, and knee frontal plane peak angles during the single leg squat (SLS), drop vertical jump (DVJ), and single leg hop (SLH) kinematics were evaluated using 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) motion capture. Participants returned to the lab one week later and competed a second 2D analysis of the functional tasks. Concurrent validity was assessed by evaluating relationship between 2D and 3D frontal plane kinematics with Pearson correlations. Between-session reliability was assessed by evaluating 2D kinematics with intraclass correlation coefficients by a single assessor.ResultsModerate to strong correlations (r = 0.55–0.76, p < .05) were found for frontal plane hip kinematics during all three tasks and the trunk during the SLH. Frontal plane kinematics demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability for each of the three tasks, (ICC _(2,1) = 0.70–0.90).Conclusion2D hip joint angles during the three functional tasks were the only valid frontal plane angles. Trunk, hip, and knee 2D frontal plane kinematics ranged between good-excellent reliability.     

An ankle joint model-based image-matching motion analysis technique

This study presented a model-based image-matching (MBIM) motion analysis technique for ankle joint kinematic measurement. Five cadaveric below-hip specimens were manipulated through a full range of ankle joint motions in bare-foot and shoed conditions. The ankle motions were analyzed by bone-pin marker-based motion analysis and MBIM motion analysis techniques respectively. The root mean square errors of all angles of motion were less than 3°. The average Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) for the intra-rater reliability were greater than 0.928 and the average ICCs for the inter-rater reliability were greater than 0.948 for all angles of motion. Excellent validity, intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability were achieved for the MBIM technique in both bare-foot and shoed conditions. The MBIM technique can therefore provide good estimates of ankle joint kinematics.     

Changes in joint kinematics and dynamic postural stability with free and restricted arm movements in children

BackgroundArm movements make a substantial and functionally relevant contribution to quiet standing and dynamic balance tasks. The impact of restricted arm movements on balance control is particularly important for children as their postural control system is not fully matured.Research questionThis study investigated the effects of arm movements on lower body joint kinematics and dynamic postural stability during anterior and lateral dynamic movements in children.MethodsEighteen boys (age, 10.1 ± 1.6 years) completed an anterior and a lateral jump-landing task under two different verbally conveyed instructions of arm position; (1) arms placed flat across the chest touching the contralateral shoulder (i.e., restricted arm movement) and (2) arm movement without restriction. Lower body joint kinematics were recorded and used to calculate mean joint position, joint range of motion (ROM) and joint movement variability.ResultsRestricting arm movements resulted in a reduction of joint movement variability and joint ROM of the pelvis during the lateral jump (p <0.05), but increased joint movement variability and joint ROM of the pelvis during the anterior jump (p <0.05).SignificanceThe reduced joint movement variability and joint ROM with restricted arm movements during the lateral jump may represent a potential compensatory ‘stiffenin strategy’, whilst the increase during the anterior jump suggest an exploratory strategy. These novel findings highlight that it is important for children to be introduced to different dynamic task constraints so that they can learn to control and organise the motor system degrees of freedom appropriately.     

Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics of getting into and out of a car in patients after total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundIn modern society, car usage is one of the most important activities of daily living. However, the three-dimensional (3D) mechanics of getting into and out of a car in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients have not been studied.Research questionThis study aimed to elucidate the hip kinematics and kinetics of unilateral THA patients while getting into and out of a car.Methods3D motion and ground reaction force data were collected for 40 unilateral primary THA and 30 control participants using motion capture of getting into and out of a car. Normalized joint power was used to determine the individual joint contribution and was calculated by dividing the power of each joint by the total lower-extremity power. These kinematic and kinetic data were compared between unilateral THA and control participants.ResultsWhen getting into the car using the surgical side as the pivot limb, the peak flexion, abduction angle, and normalized power of the pivot hip were significantly lower, and the normalized power of the contralateral ankle was significantly higher. The peak flexion and abduction angle of the pivot hip were significantly lower, and normalized contralateral hip power was significantly higher when getting out of the car. In getting into and out of the car using the contralateral side as the pivot limb, there was no significant difference in the range of motion (RoM) and normalized joint power.SignificanceThe restoration of RoM and muscle strength in the surgical hip joint and adopting the normal side as the pivot limb may allow for a more appropriate balance in motion of getting into and out of a car, which will lead to safe mobility, assist in social participation, and improved quality of life.Level of evidenceLevel III, therapeutic study.     

The influence of tracking marker locations on three-dimensional wrist kinematics

ObjectivesTo determine the influence of tracking marker locations on wrist kinematics during free movements and the golf swing, with the intention of recommending a solution that generates meaningful three-dimensional wrist kinematics.DesignRepeated measures.MethodsSix participants performed free movements of flexion/extension, radial/ulnar deviation and forearm supination/pronation, with a further sixteen participants performing golf drives. A passive motion capture system tracked four different marker sets located on participants’ hand and forearm segments. Variables of peak angle and range of motion were used to compare marker sets during free movements and angles at the top of the backswing and impact were compared during the golf swing.ResultsWrist marker set had a large (η² ≥ 0.557) and often significant (p ≤ 0.051) effect on the variables measured during free movements, and a mixed (η² ≥ 0.108, p ≤ 0.198) effect on wrist angles during the golf swing. Wrist axial rotation range of motion during free forearm supination/pronation revealed the greatest difference between marker sets (∼42°). The large values generated by two of the marker sets for this rotation appeared to influence the values of flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation during the golf swing.ConclusionsThe location of markers used to measure wrist kinematics can have a large effect on the angles generated. A solution of two markers located at the distal end of the forearm and one at the proximal, appears to minimise values of wrist axial rotation during free forearm supination/pronation and, consequently, produce more meaningful three-dimensional wrist kinematics.     

Functional range of motion in the upper extremity and trunk joints: Nine functional everyday tasks with inertial sensors

BackgroundFunctional range of motion is defined as the required range of motions for individuals to maintain maximal independence, along with optimal conditions for activities of daily living. Intervention plans for rehabilitation are directed towards the acquisition of anatomical range of motion. However, this isn’t always possible based on person’s etiology, prognosis, or severity of disease.Research questionThe aim of this study is to determine functional range of motion during different unilateral, bilateral symmetrical and bimanual asymmetrical tasks of activities of daily living.MethodsParticipants completed nine basic activities of daily living (hand to head, hanging jacket, eating, wallet placement to back pocket, washing hands and face, removing belt, water pouring, brushing teeth) linked according to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, while joint kinematics of the trunk and upper extremity were recorded with inertial measurement units. Peak values of mean joint angles were determined for each activities of daily living. MVN BIOMECH Awinda MTW2-3A7G6 sensors (Xsens Technologies B.V. Enschede, Netherlands) were used for 3D kinematic analysis of activities.ResultsForty-six healthy subjects (right-dominant) were included in this study. Range of motion requirements of all activities were defined 37.85° extension, 91.18° flexion, 1.25° adduction, 39.45° abduction, 63.6° internal rotation, 21.8° external rotation in the dominant shoulder, 124.17° flexion in the dominant elbow, 40.29° extension, 23.66° flexion, 18.31° supination, 12.56° pronation, 18.27 ulnar deviation and, 18.36° radial deviation in the dominant wrist. Maximum trunk range of motions were found to be 29.75° flexion in C7-T1, 10.74° flexion in T12-L1, and 24.16° flexion in L5-S1.SignificanceIt is thought that the results of this research will contribute to the determination of normative data needed for surgical interventions, technological rehabilitation devices and task-spesific rehabilitation programs which based patient's motor skill level.     

The use of kinematic and parametric information to highlight lack of movement and compensation in the upper extremities during activities of daily living

A problem that is common to the study of upper limb kinematics and gait analysis is the translation of the evidence from kinematic measurements into easily interpretable information on the status of the patient, such as the amount of compensation or lack of motion. In this study parameters that can be helpful in the rapid and clear identification of limited wrist motion and compensation were derived from kinematic data. A group of six subjects (group A) with no hand impairment, average age 32.5 ys SD 10.7 ys, and another group of five subjects (group B), average age 34.2 ys SD 16.8 ys, having suffered from distal radius fracture were tested during a cyclic activity of daily living. The activity simulated page turning. Thorax, shoulder, elbow and wrist angles were measured during this task using a motion capture system. Corresponding angle ranges were also calculated.The active range of motion (AROM) found for Group B was generally lower than that of Group A, particularly for elbow supination and wrist movements, with wrist flexion/extension statistically smaller for group B (P = 0.02). Additional parameters that took into account lack of movements at the wrist and compensation from shoulder elevation, rotation and elbow pronation/supination proved to be more useful at identifying those subjects of group B outside the normative range and can provide clinicians with a rapid and efficient tool that can shorten the analysis process and help make more informed decisions on therapeutic treatments.     

Effects of prophylactic knee bracing on knee joint kinetics and kinematics during netball specific movements

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of a prophylactic knee brace on knee joint kinetics and kinematics during netball specific movements.DesignRepeated measures.SettingLaboratory.ParticipantsTwenty university first team level female netball players.Outcome measurementsParticipants performed three movements, run, cut and vertical jump under two conditions (brace and no-brace). 3-D knee joint kinetics and kinematics were measured using an eight-camera motion analysis system. Knee joint kinetics and kinematics were examined using 2 × 3 repeated measures ANOVA whilst the subjective ratings of comfort and stability were investigated using chi-squared tests.ResultsThe results showed no differences (p > 0.05) in knee joint kinetics. However the internal/external rotation range of motion was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced when wearing the brace in all movements. The subjective ratings of stability revealed that netballers felt that the knee brace improved knee stability in all movements.ConclusionsFurther study is required to determine whether reductions in transverse plane knee range of motion serve to attenuate the risk from injury in netballers.     

Review of quantitative measurements of upper limb movements in hemiplegic cerebral palsy

This review provides an overview of results found in literature on objective measurements of upper limb movements in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP). Seventeen articles were selected following a systematic search. Analysed tasks varied from simple reaching and gross motor functions to complex, fine motor tasks. Spatiotemporal characteristics have been extensively studied and longer movement durations, slower movement speed and reduced trajectory straightness at the affected upper limb, compared to the non-affected side or healthy children, were most frequently reported. Joint kinematics has been far less studied. The limited data confirm the clinical impression of children with HCP using less elbow extension and supination to reach for an object, which is compensated by increased trunk flexion. Increased trunk involvement was also reported during gross motor functions. Although three-dimensional (3D) movement analysis seems promising to provide additional insights in the pathological upper limb movements observed in HCP, future standardisation of the entire protocol is crucial. No consensus exists on the procedures for data collection, processing, analysing and reporting of results, or what upper limb tasks should be assessed. The International Society of Biomechanics recently proposed recommendations on the definition of upper limb joint coordinate systems and rotation sequences. These guidelines were not yet applied in these studies. Although the diverse methodological approaches used in the studies complicate the comparison of published results, some general conclusions could be drawn. A further standardisation of the protocol for 3D upper limb movement analysis will provide the foundation for comparable and repeatable results and eventually facilitate the selection and planning of treatment interventions.     

Comparisons of cervical and thoracic spine kinematic joint and body segment angles,timing, and velocity between individuals with and without chronic idiopathic neck pain during functional tasks

BackgroundFew studies comprehensively analyse 3D neck kinematics in individuals with chronic idiopathic neck pain during functional tasks considered challenging. This critical knowledge is needed to assist clinicians to recognise and address how altered movement strategies might contribute to pain.Research questionAre there differences in 3D neck kinematics (angles, timing, velocity) during functional tasks in people with chronic neck pain compared to matched asymptomatic control participants?MethodsParticipants with chronic idiopathic neck pain (n = 33) and matched asymptomatic controls (n = 30) performed four functional tasks (overhead reach forward, right and left, and putting on a seatbelt) while evaluated using 3D motion capture. Kinematic variables included joint angles, range of motion (ROM,°), velocity (m s⁻¹) and timing (% of movement phase) for joint angles (head-neck [HN joint], head+neck-upper trunk [HNT], and thoracolumbar) and segments (head, neck, head+neck [HN segment], upper trunk, and trunk. Generalised linear mixed models examined between-group differences.ResultsThere were few between-group differences. The neck pain group had less HN segment extension that controls (mean difference [MD] left −2.06°; 95% CI −3.82, −0.29; p = .023; and right reach −2.52°; −4.67, −0.37; P = .022), and had less total sagittal HNT ROM across all tasks (−1.28; 95% CI −2.25, −0.31; p = .010). Approaching significance was the pain group having less thoracolumbar left rotation than controls (MD −2.14, 95% CI −4.41 to 0.13, p = .064). The pain group had higher neck segment peak flexion velocity than controls across all tasks (MD −3.09; 95% CI −5.21 to −0.10; P = .004). Timing of joint angle peaks did not differ between groups.SignificanceWhen performing an overhead reach task to the left and right and putting on a seatbelt, people with neck pain maintain a more flexed HN segment, use less sagittal ROM and have higher velocity peaks. These findings can assist clinicians in their assessment of patients by identifying possible underlying contributors to neck pain.     

Upper extremity motion during gait in adolescents with structural leg length discrepancy—An exploratory study

Background and purposeDepending on the extent of a structural leg length discrepancy (LLD), several compensatory mechanisms take place in order to maintain function and to optimize energy consumption during gait. However, studies describing the influence of a structural LLD on upper limb motion are lacking. The current study therefore aimed at the evaluation of upper limb motion during gait in LLD patients compared to healthy controls.MethodsMotion capture data from 14 patients with structural LLD and 15 healthy controls that were collected during barefoot walking at a self-selected speed were retrospectively analyzed. Specifically, kinematic parameters of the shoulder and elbow joints as well as the trunk segment were investigated and considered in relation to a minimal clinically important difference of 5°.ResultsThe shoulders in LLD patients were kept constantly in a more extended and at initial contact in a more adducted position as compared to healthy controls. In addition, the patients’ elbow joints showed increased flexion motion and the trunk segment indicated a constant trunk lateral-flexion and axial rotation tendency towards the affected side.ConclusionsPatients with structural LLD indicated clinically relevant secondary deviations in shoulder and elbow motion. While some of these deviations were most likely passive physical effects, others might have occurred as active strategies to maintain balance or to regulate total body angular momentum. These findings contribute to the understanding of secondary gait deviations induced by a structural LLD and might serve as a basis for further investigations using complex musculoskeletal models.     

Trunk flexion during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundOver 50% of the body’s mass is concentrated within the head, arms and trunk. Thus, small deviations in the orientation of the trunk, during normal walking, could influence the position of the centre of mass relative to the lower limb joint centres and impact on lower limb biomechanics. However, there are minimal data available on sagittal kinematics of the trunk in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) during walking.Research questionDo people with knee OA have altered kinematic patterns of the trunk, pelvis or hip compared with healthy control participants during walking?MethodsStatistical parametric mapping was used to compare sagittal and frontal plane kinematic patterns, during walking, between a healthy group and cohort of people with knee OA.ResultsIndividuals with knee OA walked with a mean increase in trunk flexion of 2.6°. Although this difference was more pronounced during early stance, it was maintained across the whole of stance phase. There were no differences, between the groups, in sagittal plane pelvic or hip kinematics. There were also no differences in trunk, pelvic or hip kinematics in the frontal plane.SignificanceMost previous gait research investigating trunk motion in people with knee OA has focused on the frontal plane. However, our data suggest that an increase in sagittal trunk flexion may be a clinical hallmark of people with this disease. Altered trunk flexion could affect joint moments and muscle patterns and therefore our results motivate further research in this area.     

Reliability and validity of the Kinect V2 for the assessment of lower extremity rehabilitation exercises

BackgroundBesides its initial use as a video gaming system the Kinect might also be suitable to capture human movements in the clinical context. However, the system’s reliability and validity to capture rehabilitation exercises is unclear.Research questionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of lower extremity kinematics during squat, hip abduction and lunge exercises captured by the Kinect and to evaluate the agreement to a reference 3D camera-based motion system.MethodsTwenty-one healthy individuals performed five repetitions of each lower limb exercise on two different days. Movements were simultaneously assessed by the Kinect and the reference 3D motion system. Joint angles and positions of the lower limb were calculated for sagittal and frontal plane. For the inter-session reliability and the agreement between the two systems standard error of measurement (SEM), bias with limits of agreement (LoA) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r) were calculated.ResultsParameters indicated varying reliability for the assessed joint angles and positions and decreasing reliability with increasing task complexity. Across all exercises, measurement deviations were shown especially for small movement amplitudes. Variability was acceptable for joint angles and positions during the squat, partially acceptable during the hip abduction and predominately inacceptable during the lunge. The agreement between systems was characterized by systematic errors. Overestimations by the Kinect were apparent for hip flexion during the squat and hip abduction/adduction during the hip abduction exercise as well as for the knee positions during the lunge. Knee and hip flexion during hip abduction and lunge were underestimated by the Kinect.SignificanceThe Kinect system can reliably assess lower limb joint angles and positions during simple exercises. The validity of the system is however restricted. An application in the field of early orthopedic rehabilitation without further development of post-processing techniques seems so far limited.     

Reliability of the Thomas test for assessing range of motion about the hip

ObjectivesRehabilitative protocols and research are significantly influenced by the ability to perform reliable measures of specific physical attributes or functions. The hypothesis was that the Thomas test for evaluating range of motion about the hip joint is a reliable clinical assessment tool.SubjectsParticipants (n=54) were between the ages of 18 and 45, and had no history of trauma.MethodsThree Board-Certified Athletic Therapists assessed hip range of motion using pass/fail and goniometer scoring systems. A re-test session was completed seven to ten days later.ResultsStatistically, Kappa values for pass/fail scoring (intra-rater ℜ=0.47, inter-rater ℜ=0.39) and ICC values (intra-rater ℜ=0.52, inter-rater ℜ=0.60) for goniometer data both indicated that the Thomas test demonstrated poor intra and inter-rater reliability. However, measurement error values (SEM=1°, ME=2°, and CV=15%) and Bland and Altman plots demonstrated that there was only a small degree of intra-rater variance for each examiner when executing the Thomas test in a clinical setting.ConclusionsResults call into question the statistical reliability of the Thomas test, but provide clinicians with important information regarding the reliability limits of the Thomas test when used to clinically evaluate hip range of motion and ilio-psoas muscle flexibility in a physically active population. More research is required in order to determine the variables that may confound statistical reliability of this orthopaedic technique that is commonly used in a clinical setting to assess hip function.     

The influence of maturation and sex on pelvis and hip kinematics in youth distance runners

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate differences in stance phase pelvic and hip running kinematics based on maturation and sex among healthy youth distance runners.DesignCross-Sectional.Methods133 uninjured youth distance runners (M = 60, F = 73; age = 13.5 ± 2.7 years) underwent a three-dimensional running analysis on a treadmill at a self-selected speed (2.8 ± 0.6 m·s^?1). Participants were stratified as pre-pubertal, mid-pubertal, or post-pubertal according to the modified Pubertal Maturational Observation Scale. Stance phase pelvis and hip range of motion (RoM) and peak joint positions were extracted. Two-way ANCOVAs (sex, maturation; covariate of running velocity) were used with Bonferroni-Holm method to control for multiple comparisons with a target alpha level of 0.05.ResultsA two-way interaction between sex and maturation was detected (p = 0.009) for frontal plane pelvic obliquity RoM. Post-hoc analysis identified a maturation main effect only among females (p?0.008). Pelvic obliquity RoM was significantly greater among post-pubertal (p = 0.001) compared to pre-pubertal females. Significant main effects of sex (p = 0.02), and maturation (p = 0.01) were found for hip adduction RoM. Post-hoc analysis indicated a significant increase in hip adduction RoM from pre-pubertal to post-pubertal female runners (p = 0.001). A significant main effect of sex was found for peak hip adduction angle (p = 0.001) with female runners exhibiting greater maximum peak hip adduction compared to males.ConclusionsMaturation influences pelvic and hip kinematics greater in female than male runners. Sex differences became more pronounced during later stages of puberty. These differences may correspond to an increased risk for running-related injuries in female runners compared to male runners.     

Differences in upper body posture between individuals with and without chronic idiopathic neck pain during computerised device use: A 3D motion analysis study

BackgroundComputer use is associated with poor postures and increased risk of developing neck pain. Evaluating differences in working posture of individuals with and without chronic neck pain may assist the development of strategies to lessen or prevent pain.ObjectiveTo identify if upper body kinematics differs between individuals with and without chronic idiopathic neck pain during four conditions (tablet, laptop, and desktop computer sitting and standing).MethodsThree-dimensional (3D) motion capture measured upper body kinematics in 44 individuals with chronic idiopathic neck pain > 90 days (Cases n = 22) and without pain (Control n = 22), during a typing task under four conditions: tablet, laptop, desktop computer (sitting and standing). Differences between groups were evaluated using generalised linear mixed models.ResultsAcross all conditions and compared to controls, cases had significantly less flexion between their head-neck and upper trunk segments (between group mean difference 7.15°, 2.1, 12.2, p = .006), greater upper trunk flexion relative to the laboratory (−6.15°, −10.9, −1.3, p = .012), greater shoulder flexion bilaterally (left 12.35°, 6.7, 17.9, p < .001; right 13.49°, 7.9, 19.1, p < .001) and less right elbow flexion (−6.87°, −12.1, −1.7, p = .010). Approaching significance, the case group had less left elbow flexion (between group mean difference −5.36°, −10.9, 0.1, p = .056) and a smaller mean craniocervical angle for the seated desktop condition (group x condition interaction −6.37°; 95% CI −12.7, −0.1, p = .052).SignificanceIndividuals with neck pain consistently used different upper body postures compared to individuals without pain when working on computerised devices under varying workstation conditions. This finding suggests that people with neck pain work in potentially aggravating postures that may be associated with their pain.     

What is the minimum torque required to obtain passive elbow end range of motion?

BackgroundPassive range of motion is a common clinical assessment. The point at which passive end range of motion is measured is typically described by the ‘end-feel’of the joint.Research Question: What is the minimum amount of torque required to obtain passive elbow flexion and extension in children?MethodsTwenty-five children (age, 7.5 ± 1.6 years-old), who had previously sustained unilateral distal humeral fractures, participated in this prospective study.Passive elbow flexion and extension was measured at least 8 weeks and up to one year out of cast. Motion capture cameras were used to track twenty-one reflective markers placed on subjects and two markers attached to the pad of a force transducer.Five trials of passive range of motion (flexion and extension) were performed on both arms. Elbow joint moments were calculated as products of the forces applied and lengths to the elbow centers. A one way ANOVA was used to determine differences in moments for flexion and extension for both involved and uninvolved limbs. Pairedsamples t-tests were used to determine differences between the involved and the uninvolved limbs for both maximum flexion and extension.ResultsThere was no difference in the minimum mean joint moment (2.7 ± 1.1 Nm) at end range of motion. However, differences in passive range of motion was found between involved and uninvolved elbows (flexion p < .001; extension p = .001).SignificanceThe results demonstrate therapists obtained end range of passive elbow flexion and extension applying the same amount of minimum torque. A small torque is sufficient to achieve end range of elbow motion for children. This torque can be used in guiding clinical practice for assessing passive range of elbow motion in pediatric population. Because of a paucity of data for any joint, future research developing force data for other joints should be conducted