Clinically significant incidental findings on the unenhanced CT portion of PET/CT studies: frequency in 250 patients.

PET/CT technology is in rapid evolution. It remains unclear if the unenhanced CT portion, performed for attenuation correction and lesion localization, provides additional independent diagnostic information not apparent on PET alone. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the incremental added value and frequency of potentially clinically significant incidental findings from the independent reading of the unenhanced CT portion of PET/CT studies by an expert CT radiologist. METHODS: PET/CT was performed on 250 patients (123 men and 127 women; mean age, 56.5 y) referred for clinical evaluation of known or suspected cancer. Unenhanced CT studies were read without knowledge of findings from PET and PET/CT fused images. Findings from unenhanced CT were considered clinically significant if they were not detected or explained by PET findings and were considered, after examination of all available clinical data, to clearly require additional work-up. Small pulmonary nodules < 7 mm were not considered to require immediate work-up. RESULTS: Unenhanced CT revealed potentially clinically significant incidental findings in 7 patients. Three patients had indeterminate renal lesions, 1 patient had a solid renal mass, 1 patient had sclerotic bone metastases (albeit inactive on PET), 1 patient had liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension, and 1 patient had a 5 cm abdominal aortic aneurysm. These findings were generally not detected on PET. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant findings from the unenhanced CT portion of PET/CT are relatively infrequent (3%) but could be serious enough to warrant major alterations in clinical management. Thus, we believe it is most appropriate for the CT portion to be interpreted by a physician skilled in CT interpretation with special attention to the lesions that PET alone can fail to detect.     

PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT.

PET/CT combines functional and morphologic data and increases diagnostic accuracy in a variety of malignancies. This study prospectively compares the agreement between contrast-enhanced full-dose PET/CT and unenhanced low-dose PET/CT in lesion detection and initial staging of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. METHODS: Forty-seven biopsy-proven lymphoma patients underwent a 18F-FDG PET/CT study that included unenhanced low-dose CT and enhanced full-dose CT for initial staging. Patients who had undergone previous diagnostic CT for initial staging were excluded. For every patient, each modality of PET/CT images was evaluated by either of 2 pairs of readers, with each pair comprising 1 experienced radiologist and 1 experienced nuclear physician. While evaluating one of the 2 types of PET/CT, the readers were unaware of the results of the other type. Lesion detection, number of sites affected in each anatomic region, and disease stage were assessed. Agreement between techniques was determined by the kappa-statistic, and discordances were studied by the McNemar test. Clinical, analytic, histopathologic, diagnostic CT, and PET data; data from other imaging techniques; and follow-up data constituted the reference standard. RESULTS: For region-based analysis, no significant differences were found between unenhanced low-dose PET/CT and contrast-enhanced full-dose PET/CT, although full-dose PET/CT showed fewer indeterminate findings and a higher number of extranodal sites affected than did low-dose PET/CT. Agreement between the 2 types of PET/CT was almost perfect for disease stage (kappa = 0.92; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study showed a good correlation between unenhanced low-dose PET/CT and contrast-enhanced full-dose PET/CT for lymph node and extranodal disease in lymphomas, suggesting that unenhanced low-dose PET/CT might suffice in most patients as the only imaging technique for the initial staging of lymphomas, reserving diagnostic CT for selected cases.     

Is unenhanced CT sufficient for evaluation of acute abdominal pain?

Background: To determine whether intravenous contrast improves the ability of radiologists to establish the cause of acute abdominal pain after nondiagnostic or normal unenhanced CT. Methods: Out of 164 consecutive emergency department patients presenting with less than 48 h of nontraumatic, acute abdominal pain, a confident diagnosis for cause of pain was made prospectively in 71/164 (43%) patients on these unenhanced scans by the monitoring radiologist. In the other 93 patients, our study sample, intravenous contrast-enhanced CT was obtained. At a later date, retrospectively, two experienced abdominal CT radiologists independently evaluated unenhanced CT scans alone for potential causes of pain and diagnostic confidence level on a 1–3 scale. At least 2 weeks later, intravenous enhanced and unenhanced scans were read side-by-side for the same assessment. Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic confidence levels comparing unenhanced CT alone (2.59) vs. intravenous enhanced and unenhanced CT together (2.64). Chi-square analysis found no significant difference in finding a cause for pain when intravenous contrast was added compared to the initial unenhanced scan alone. Conclusions: Intravenous contrast did not significantly improve the ability of CT to establish a cause of abdominal pain after a negative or nondiagnostic unenhanced CT.     

Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions

PURPOSE: To assess unenhanced and delayed phase computed tomographic (CT) images combined with arterial phase images for detecting endoleaks after endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of endoleaks after endovascular treatment of AAAs in 33 patients with endoleak (positive group) and 40 patients without evidence of endoleak or aneurysm enlargement (negative group). All patients underwent unenhanced and biphasic contrast material-enhanced CT. The CT scans were reviewed in the following combinations: (a) arterial phase and unenhanced scans (uniphasic/unenhanced set), (b) arterial and delayed phase scans only (biphasic set), and (c) arterial and delayed phase scans with unenhanced scans (complete set). Each set was reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the diagnosis of endoleak. Findings were recorded as positive, negative, or indeterminate for endoleak. RESULTS: Within the positive group, endoleaks were diagnosed with the uniphasic/unenhanced, biphasic, and complete image sets in 30 (91%), 32 (97%), and 33 (100%) patients, respectively. With the uniphasic/unenhanced set, three (9%) endoleaks (seen only on delayed phase images) were missed. With the biphasic set, one (3%) endoleak was interpreted as indeterminate. Within the negative group, uniphasic/unenhanced, biphasic, and complete image sets were negative for endoleaks in 100%, 80%, and 100% of patients, respectively. With the biphasic set, results were indeterminate in 20% of cases. CONCLUSION: A delayed CT acquisition enables detection of additional endoleaks, while an unenhanced acquisition helps eliminate indeterminate results. Thus, both acquisitions contribute to accurate diagnosis of endoleaks when combined with an arterial phase acquisition.     

Effective methods to correct contrast agent-induced errors in PET quantification in cardiac PET/CT.

In combined PET/CT studies, x-ray attenuation information from the CT scan is generally used for PET attenuation correction. Iodine-containing contrast agents may induce artifacts in the CT-generated attenuation map and lead to an erroneous radioactivity distribution on the corrected PET images. This study evaluated 2 methods of thresholding the CT data to correct these contrast agent-related artifacts. METHODS: PET emission and attenuation data (acquired with and without a contrast agent) were simulated using a cardiac torso software phantom and were obtained from patients. Seven patients with known coronary artery disease underwent 2 electrocardiography-gated CT scans of the heart, the first without a contrast agent and the second with intravenous injection of an iodine-containing contrast agent. A 20-min PET scan (single bed position) covering the same axial range as the CT scans was then obtained 1 h after intravenous injection of (18)F-FDG. For both the simulated data and the patient data, the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced attenuation datasets were used for attenuation correction of the PET data. Additionally, 2 threshold methods (one requiring user interaction) aimed at compensating for the effect of the contrast agent were applied to the contrast-enhanced attenuation data before PET attenuation correction. All PET images were compared by quantitative analysis. RESULTS: Regional radioactivity values in the heart were overestimated when the contrast-enhanced data were used for attenuation correction. For patients, the mean decrease in the left ventricular wall was 23%. Use of either of the proposed compensation methods reduced the quantification error to less than 5%. The required time for postprocessing was minimal for the user-independent method. CONCLUSION: The use of contrast-enhanced CT images for attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT significantly impairs PET quantification of tracer uptake. The proposed CT correction methods markedly reduced these artifacts; additionally, the user-independent method was time-efficient.     

Tissue characterization of solitary pulmonary nodule: comparative study between helical dynamic CT and integrated PET/CT.

Recent advances in the technology of helical multidetector CT allow precise evaluations of nodule hemodynamics. In addition, the efficacy of tissue characterization has improved, and now sensitivity and specificity of >90% are achieved. Moreover, the efficacy of PET for the tissue characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) has also become of importance. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of helical dynamic (HD) CT (HDCT) and integrated PET/CT for pulmonary nodule characterization. METHODS: One hundred nineteen patients with an SPN underwent both HDCT (unenhanced scans, followed by series of images at 30, 60, 90, 120 s and at 5 and 15 min after intravenous injection of contrast medium) and integrated PET/CT. On HDCT, a nodule was regarded as malignant with a net enhancement of > or =25 Hounsfield units (HU) and a washout of 5-31 HU. On integrated PET/CT, nodules were considered malignant with a > or =3.5 maximum standardized uptake value and an 18F-FDG uptake greater than that of mediastinal structures. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 2 modalities for malignancy were compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS: There were 79 malignant and 40 benign nodules. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for malignancy on HDCT were 81% (64/79 nodules), 93% (37/40), and 85% (101/119), respectively, whereas those on integrated PET/CT were 96% (76/79), 88% (35/40), and 93% (111/119), respectively (P = 0.008, 0.727, and 0.011, respectively). All malignant nodules were interpreted correctly on either HDCT or PET/CT. CONCLUSION: Integrated PET/CT is more sensitive and accurate than HDCT for the malignant nodule characterization; therefore, PET/CT may be performed as the first-line evaluation tool for SPN characterization. Because HDCT has high specificity and acceptable sensitivity and accuracy, it may be a reasonable alternative for nodule characterization when PET/CT is unavailable.     

CT增强扫描对外伤性脾破裂的诊断价值

目的　探讨CT增强扫描在外伤性脾破裂诊断中的应用价值。方法　对 34例经手术证实为外伤性脾破裂患者的CT平扫及增强扫描表现进行回顾性分析。结果　34例患者中,手术前CT平扫能肯定脾破裂诊断的 23例、可疑脾破裂诊断的 6例、未见异常的 5例(敏感性 85. 3%、特异性 67. 6% );对以上所有患者行CT增强扫描后,全部患者均能确诊为脾破裂(敏感性 100%、特异性 100% )。结论　增强扫描在外伤性脾破裂的CT诊断中非常重要,它能够明显提高诊断准确率,为临床治疗提供可靠依据。     

PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients

Purpose If the CT scan of a combined PET/CT study is performed as a full diagnostic quality CT scan including intravenous (IV) contrast agent, the quality of the joint PET/CT procedure is improved and a separate diagnostic CT scan can be avoided. CT with IV contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction, but this may result in a bias in the attenuation factors. The clinical significance of this bias has not been established. Our aim was to perform a prospective clinical study where each patient had CT performed with and without IV contrast agent to establish whether PET/CT with IV contrast can be used for PET attenuation without reducing the clinical value of the PET scan.Methods A uniform phantom study was used to document that the PET acquisition itself is not significantly influenced by the presence of IV contrast medium. Then, 19 patients referred to PET/CT with IV contrast underwent CT scans without, and then with contrast agent, followed by an ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET scan. The CT examinations were performed with identical parameters on a GE Discovery LS scanner. The PET data were reconstructed with attenuation correction based on the two CT data sets. A global comparison of standard uptake value (SUV) was performed, and SUVs in tumour, in non-tumour tissue and in the subclavian vein were calculated. Clinical evaluation of the number and location of lesions on all PET/CT scans was performed twice, blinded and in a different random order, by two independent nuclear medicine specialists.Results In all patients, the measured global SUV of PET images based on CT with IV contrast agent was higher than the global activity using non-contrast correction. The overall increase in the mean SUV (for two different conversion tables tested) was 4.5±2.3% and 1.6±0.5%, respectively. In 11/19 patients, focal uptake was identified corresponding to malignant tumours. Eight out of 11 tumours showed an increased SUV_max (2.9±3.1%) on the PET images reconstructed using IV contrast. The clinical evaluation performed by the two specialists comparing contrast and non-contrast CT attenuated PET images showed weighted kappa values of 0.92 (doctor A) and 0.82 (doctor B). No contrast-introduced artefacts were found.Conclusion This study demonstrates that CT scans with IV contrast agent can be used for attenuation correction of the PET data in combined modality PET/CT scanning, without changing the clinical diagnostic interpretation.     

Integrated PET/CT and the dry pleural dissemination of peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung: diagnostic implications

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe retrospectively the CT findings of dry pleural dissemination of peripheral lung adenocarcinoma, and to compare the mutual roles of PET and CT components of integrated PET/CT in the diagnosis of the disease. METHODS: The authors analyzed retrospectively the CT findings of pathologically proved dry pleural dissemination in 8 of 172 patients with peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung. Subsequently, one radiologist and one nuclear medicine physician (unaware of the CT and pathologic results) evaluated together in a random order the integrated PET/CT of 172 adenocarcinoma patients (8 with dry pleural dissemination and 164 without). They recorded the presence of pleural dissemination using PET images only and using both PET and CT images. The diagnostic accuracies with respect to the presence of pleural dissemination were evaluated. RESULTS: The CT findings of dry pleural dissemination were pleural small nodules (n=8, 100%) (>or=6 in number in all patients; 198/204 nodules were <5 mm in diameter and 6/204 were 5-10 mm) and uneven (n=4, 50%) or band-like (n=3, 38%) fissural thickening. By PET only, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dry pleural dissemination were 25% (2/8), 90% (147/164), and 87% (149/172), respectively; by PET plus CT these were 100% (8/8), 100% (164/164), and 100% (172/172), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CT findings of dry pleural dissemination are multiple small pleural nodules and uneven pleural thickening. Dry pleural dissemination should be diagnosed using CT findings at integrated PET/CT because lesions causing pleural dissemination without pleural effusion are usually beyond PET resolution.     

Focal tracer uptake: a potential artifact in contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT scans.

This study was performed to evaluate a possible artifact related to the administration of intravascular contrast agent in dual-modality PET/CT imaging. METHODS: Thirty oncology patients underwent whole-body PET/CT. CT images, which were collected in the presence of intravenous and oral iodinated contrast agent, were used for PET attenuation correction. PET images were assessed for the artifact, defined as a region of high count rate on attenuation-corrected images in accurate coregistration with a contrast-enhanced blood vessel. Intravascular enhancement of thoracic veins was quantified by application of regions of interest, and quantities in patients with the artifact (group 1) and without the artifact (group 2) were correlated. Body surface area was calculated for all patients. RESULTS: The contrast-induced PET artifact was present in 4 (13%) of 30 patients. Mean density differences in intravascular enhancement were highly significant (P < 0.001) in a comparison of group 1 (2,262 +/- 304 Hounsfield units [HU]) and group 2 (1,058 +/- 209 HU). Body surface area was significantly lower (P = 0.035) in the patients of group 1 (1.67 +/- 0.11 m(2)) than in the patients of group 2 (2.01 +/- 0.18 m(2)). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT examinations may result in a PET artifact that is due to the transient bolus passage of undiluted intravenous contrast agent.     

13. PET and CT Correlation. An Important Explanation for Discordant Findings

Purpose: The purpose of this investigation is to compare and explain discordant findings on high quality PET and CT where no corresponding CT abnormality is seen despite a significant appearing PET abnormality.Methods: The methods involved the review of forty sequential oncologic cases. State-of-the-art helical post contrast CT scans and state-of the-art attenuated corrected and uncorrected PET images were examined. Discordant findings were classified as: Type A Obvious PET abnormalities fail to reveal CT anatomic abnormalities. Type B CT anatomic abnormalities show no PET abnormalities (usually benign disease). Only Type A discordance was evaluated and repeat CT scans were obtained if more than two weeks separated the exams.Results: The results showed that there were four cases of Type A discordance. Case I showed a large PET abnormality with a negative CT. Repeat CT was again negative. The suspicion of a mis-registration artifact on PET due to motion was confirmed. Cases II, III, & IV had prominent PET abnormalities with normal CT scans within two to six weeks preceding the PET. Repeat CTs showed remarkable new findings corresponding exactly with the PET abnormalities.Conclusion: In conclusion, when a conspicuous hypermetabolic focus has no corresponding CT anatomic structure on a high quality CT exam, extra evaluation is in order. Aside from technical artifacts, a relatively short time delay between CT and PET may account for development of new findings on CT in the face of aggressive disease.     

Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) performed at reduced milliampere-second, and therefore at a reduced patient radiation dose, by using conventional unenhanced helical CT as the standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with acute flank pain who weighed less than 200 lb (90 kg) were prospectively recruited for this study. Conventional helical CT scans were obtained with patients in the prone position by using 5-mm-thick sections, 140 kVp, 135-208 mAs (mean, 160 mAs), and a pitch of 1.5 (single-detector row CT) or 0.75 (multi-detector row CT, 4 x 5-mm detector configuration). Conventional CT was immediately followed by low-dose scanning, whereby the tube current was reduced to 100 mA (mean, 76 mAs). All other technical parameters and anatomic coverage remained constant. Three independent readers who were blinded to patient identity interpreted the scans in random order. The observers noted the location, size, and number of calculi; secondary signs of obstruction; and other clinically relevant findings. High- and low-dose scans were compared by using paired t tests and the signed rank test. RESULTS: Calculi were found in 33 (66%) patients; 25 (50%) had renal calculi and 19 (38%) had an obstructing ureteral calculus. The accuracy rates (averaged over the three readers) for determining the various findings on the low-dose scan compared with the high-dose scan were as follows: nephrolithiasis, 91%; ureterolithiasis, 94%; obstruction, 91%; and normal findings, 92%. When interpretations between readers were compared, agreement rates were 90%-95% for standard-dose scans and 90%-92% for reduced-dose scans (P >.5). Uncomplicated mild diverticulitis was found in three patients. No other clinically important abnormality was identified. A reduction in the tube current to 100 mA resulted in a dose reduction of 25% for multi-detector row CT and 42% for single-detector row CT. CONCLUSION: In patients who weighed less than 200 lb, unenhanced helical CT performed at a reduced tube current of 100 mA, and therefore at a reduced patient dose, resulted in scans of high accuracy.     

The assessment of intracranial bleeding with virtual unenhanced imaging by means of dual-energy CT angiography

The purpose of this study was to assess virtual unenhanced brain computed tomography (CT) images obtained by dual-energy CT angiography (CTA) for the detection of intracranial bleeding. In total, 25 patients were included in the study (average age 53.2 years, range 25–75 years, 14 male, 11 female), all with intracranial bleeding on unenhanced brain CT and who underwent additional CTA performed on a dual-source CT in a dual-energy acquisition mode. The two X-ray tubes were operated at 140 and 80 kV, respectively. Data were analyzed using dual-energy evaluation software. Virtual unenhanced images were calculated by removing the relative iodine content from each voxel. The virtual unenhanced images were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to the findings of the conventional images related to the presence of intracranial bleeding. The image quality and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between bleeding and brain tissue were assessed. The virtual image quality was found to be sufficient in 96%. The agreement in detection of intracranial bleeding on virtual and conventional unenhanced images reached 96% in per-lesion analysis and 100% in per-patient analysis. The averaged CNR reached 2.63 in virtual unenhanced images and 3.27 in conventional. Virtual unenhanced images are sufficient for the detection of intracranial bleeding.     

Spontaneous suburothelial hemorrhage in coagulopathic patients: CT diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to identify and describe the spectrum of CT findings in patients with coagulopathy-induced suburothelial hemorrhage involving the renal collecting system. CONCLUSION: CT findings of suburothelial hemorrhage are often subtle and are best appreciated on unenhanced CT scans because of the high density of the hemorrhage. After contrast injection, uniformly thickened soft tissue enveloping the collecting system is suggestive of this condition. Clinical information regarding the presence of coagulopathy is essential for the radiologist to entertain this relatively rare diagnosis.     

Dual-phase versus single-phase helical CT to detect and assess resectability of pancreatic carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare dual-phase and single-phase helical CT for the detection and assessment of resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 60 patients (31 men, 29 women; age range, 31-84 years; mean age, 62 years) with suspected pancreatic malignancy. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. For group A (n = 30), unenhanced scans through the liver and pancreas were followed by two separate acquisitions (dual-phase) at 20-25 and at 60-80 sec after IV contrast administration. For group B (n = 30), unenhanced scans were followed by one set of scans (single-phase) acquired caudocranially (from the inferior hepatic margin to the diaphragm) starting 50 sec after IV contrast administration. Two observers independently scored images for the presence of tumor and for assessment of tumor resectability. RESULTS: Comparison of dual-phase versus single-phase helical CT for tumor detection showed a diagnostic accuracy for observer 1 of 87% and 90%, respectively, and for observer 2, of 90% and 87%, respectively. For both helical CT techniques, the overall agreement between the two observers was 83% (kappa = 0.73 +/- 0.03) for single-phase helical CT and 90% (kappa = 0.89 +/- 0.03) for dual-phase helical CT. The assessment of resectability was affected by the low number of resectable tumors (n = 8). CONCLUSION: Single-phase helical CT is effective for the diagnosis and assessment of resectability of patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Advantages are the lower radiation dose and fewer images to film and store.     

Correction for oral contrast artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected PET images obtained by combined PET/CT.

Recent studies have shown increased artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected (CTAC) PET images acquired with oral contrast agents because of misclassification of contrast as bone. We have developed an algorithm, segmented contrast correction (SCC), to properly transform CT numbers in the contrast regions from CT energies (40-140 keV) to PET energy at 511 keV. METHODS: A bilinear transformation, equivalent to that supplied by the PET/CT scanner manufacturer, for the conversion of linear attenuation coefficients of normal tissues from CT to PET energies was optimized for BaSO(4) contrast agent. This transformation was validated by comparison with the linear attenuation coefficients measured for BaSO(4) at concentrations ranging from 0% to 80% at 511 keV for PET transmission images acquired with (68)Ge rod sources. In the CT images, the contrast regions were contoured to exclude bony structures and then segmented on the basis of a minimum threshold CT number (300 Hounsfield units). The CT number in each pixel identified with contrast was transformed into the corresponding effective bone CT number to produce the correct attenuation coefficient when the data were translated by the manufacturer software into PET energy during the process of CT attenuation correction. CT images were then used for attenuation correction of PET emission data. The algorithm was validated with a phantom in which a lesion was simulated within a volume of BaSO(4) contrast and in the presence of a human vertebral bony structure. Regions of interest in the lesion, bone, and contrast on emission PET images reconstructed with and without the SCC algorithm were analyzed. The results were compared with those for images obtained with (68)Ge-based transmission attenuation-corrected PET. RESULTS: The SCC algorithm was able to correct for contrast artifacts in CTAC PET images. In the phantom studies, the use of SCC resulted in an approximate 32% reduction in the apparent activity concentration in the lesion compared with data obtained from PET images without SCC and a <7.6% reduction compared with data obtained from (68)Ge-based attenuation-corrected PET images. In one clinical study, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) measurements for the lesion, bladder, and bowel were, respectively, 14.52, 13.63, and 13.34 g/mL in CTAC PET images, 59.45, 26.71, and 37.22 g/mL in (68)Ge-based attenuation-corrected PET images, and 11.05, 6.66, and 6.33 g/mL in CTAC PET images with SCC. CONCLUSION: Correction of oral contrast artifacts in PET images obtained by combined PET/CT yielded more accurate quantitation of the lesion and other, normal structures. The algorithm was tested in a clinical case, in which SUV(max) measurements showed discrepancies of 2%, 1.3%, and 5% between (68)Ge-based attenuation-corrected PET images and CTAC PET images with SCC for the lesion, bladder, and bowel, respectively. These values correspond to 6.5%, 62%, and 66% differences between CTAC-based measurements and (68)Ge-based ones.     

Improving the false-negative rate of CT in acute appendicitis—Reassessment of CT images by body imaging radiologists: A blinded prospective study

Purpose

To compare the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) analyzed by individual radiology staff members and body imaging radiologists in a non-academic teaching hospital for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Patients and methods

In a prospective study 199 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were examined with unenhanced CT. CT images were pre-operatively analyzed by one of the 12 members of the radiology staff. In a later stage two body imaging radiologist reassessed all CT images without knowledge of the surgical findings and without knowledge of the primary CT diagnosis. The results, independently reported, were correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings.

Results

In 132 patients (66%) acute appendicitis was found at surgery, in 67 patients (34%) a normal appendix was found. The sensitivity of the primary CT analysis and of the reassessment was 76% and 88%, respectively; the specificity was 84% and 87%; the positive predictive value was 90% and 93%; the negative predictive value was 64% and 78%; and the accuracy was 78% and 87%.

Conclusion

Reassessment of CT images for acute appendicitis by body imaging radiologists results in a significant improvement of sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy. To prevent false-negative interpretation of CT images in acute appendicitis the expertise of the attending radiologist should be considered.     

Multidetector row computed tomography of acute pancreatitis: Utility of single portal phase CT scan in short-term follow up

Objective

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the question of whether nonenhanced CT or contrast enhanced portal phase CT can replace multiphasic pancreas protocol CT in short term monitoring in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. From April 2006 to May 2010, a total of 52 patients having acute pancreatitis who underwent initial dual phase multidetector row CT (unenhanced, arterial, and portal phase) at admission and a short term (within 30 days) follow up dual phase CT (mean interval 10.3 days, range 3–28 days) were included. Two abdominal radiologists performed an independent review of three sets of follow up CT images (nonenhanced scan, single portal phase scan, and dual phase scan). Interpretation of each image set was done with at least 2-week interval. Radiologists evaluated severity of acute pancreatitis with regard to pancreatic inflammation, pancreatic necrosis, and extrapancreatic complication, based on the modified CT severity index. Scores of each image set were compared using a paired t-test and interobserver agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient statistics.

Results

Mean scores of sum of CT severity index on nonenhanced scan, portal phase scan, and dual phase scan were 5.7, 6.6, and 6.5 for radiologist 1, and 5.0, 5.6, and 5.8 for radiologist 2, respectively. In both radiologists, contrast enhanced scan (portal phase scan and dual phase scan) showed significantly higher severity score compared with that of unenhanced scan (P < 0.05), while portal phase and dual phase scan showed no significant difference each other. The trend was similar regarding pancreatic inflammation and extrapancreatic complications, in which contrast enhanced scans showed significantly higher score compared with those of unenhanced scan, while no significant difference was observed between portal phase scan and dual phase scan. In pancreatic necrosis analysis, there was no significant difference between the three image sets for both radiologists. However, when only the patients having pancreatic necrosis (n = 13) was separately analyzed, significant differences were observed between the unenhanced and portal phase scan (P = 0.04, for radiologist 1), or unenhanced and dual phase scan (P = 0.013, for radiologist 2).

Conclusion

For short-term follow up imaging in assessment of patients with acute pancreatitis, single portal phase CT images without adding unenhanced or arterial phase images provide sufficient information, and thereby reduce radiation exposure.     

CT arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: CT fluoroscopy versus conventional CT and fluoroscopy--comparison of image-guidance techniques

PURPOSE: To compare examination time with radiologist time and to measure radiation dose of computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy, conventional CT, and conventional fluoroscopy as guiding modalities for shoulder CT arthrography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Glenohumeral injection of contrast material for CT arthrography was performed in 64 consecutive patients (mean age, 32 years; age range, 16-74 years) and was guided with CT fluoroscopy (n = 28), conventional CT (n = 14), or conventional fluoroscopy (n = 22). Room times (arthrography, room change, CT, and total examination times) and radiologist times (time the radiologist spent in the fluoroscopy or CT room) were measured. One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-Dunn posthoc tests were performed for comparison of mean times. Mean effective radiation dose was calculated for each method with examination data, phantom measurements, and standard software. RESULTS: Mean total examination time was 28.0 minutes for CT fluoroscopy, 28.6 minutes for conventional CT, and 29.4 minutes for conventional fluoroscopy; mean radiologist time was 9.9 minutes, 10.5 minutes, and 9.0 minutes, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. Mean effective radiation dose was 0.0015 mSv for conventional fluoroscopy (mean, nine sections), 0.22 mSv for CT fluoroscopy (120 kV; 50 mA; mean, 15 sections), and 0.96 mSv for conventional CT (140 kV; 240 mA; mean, six sections). Effective radiation dose can be reduced to 0.18 mSv for conventional CT by changing imaging parameters to 120 kV and 100 mA. Mean effective radiation dose of the diagnostic CT arthrographic examination (140 kV; 240 mA; mean, 25 sections) was 2.4 mSv. CONCLUSION: CT fluoroscopy and conventional CT are valuable alternative modalities for glenohumeral CT arthrography, as examination and radiologist times are not significantly different. CT guidance requires a greater radiation dose than does conventional fluoroscopy, but with adequate parameters CT guidance constitutes approximately 8% of the radiation dose.     

Combined PET/CT in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: what is the impact of each modality?

Purpose ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a well-established method in the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), elevated thyroglobulin (Tg) and negative ¹³¹I scans. This retrospective clinical study was designed to evaluate the impact of computed tomography (CT) and that of FDG-PET in combined FDG-PET/CT examinations on the restaging of DTC patients. Methods Forty-seven FDG-PET/CT scans of 33 patients with a history of DTC, elevated Tg levels and negative ¹³¹I uptake or additionally suspected ¹³¹I-negative lesions were studied. PET and CT images were analysed independently by an experienced nuclear medicine specialist and a radiologist. Afterwards a final consensus interpretation, the gold standard in our department, was provided for the fused PET/CT images and, if available, for supplementary investigations. Results Thirty-five investigations (74%) revealed pathological FDG-PET/CT findings. In summary, 25 local recurrences, 62 lymph node metastases and 122 organ metastases (41 lung, 60 bone, 21 other organs) were diagnosed. In 36 out of 47 examinations (77%), the original PET diagnoses were modified in the final consensus interpretation owing to the CT assessments. In 8 of the 35 pathological FDG-PET/CT examinations (23%), the final consensus interpretation of the PET/CT images led to an alteration in the treatment plan. Conclusion PET/CT is a powerful fusion of two pre-existing imaging modalities, which not only improves the diagnostic value in restaging DTC patients with elevated Tg and negative ¹³¹I scan, but also provides accurate information regarding subsequent treatment options and may lead to a change in treatment management.