The prevalence of risk factors for gastrointestinal complications and use of gastroprotection among persons hospitalized for cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND: Aspirin is often used in patients with cardiovascular disease, but it can also cause gastrointestinal complications. Proton pump inhibitors reduce the risk of gastrointestinal complications in aspirin users with a history of gastrointestinal complications. AIM: To determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal risk factors in aspirin users and the prevalence of proton pump inhibitor utilization in high-risk patients. METHODS: We reviewed all patients admitted to hospital between April and October 2004 with a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. We collected data on demographics, medication use, comorbid illnesses, previous gastrointestinal complications, and medication use on admission and discharge. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were admitted with cardiovascular disease of whom 94% were discharged on aspirin. Seventy-eight per cent of patients admitted had at least one gastrointestinal risk factor in addition to having cardiovascular disease, and 15% had three or more additional gastrointestinal risk factors. Patients with additional gastrointestinal risk factors were more likely to be prescribed proton pump inhibitor therapy (27% vs. 10%, P < 0.001). Only 10% of proton pump inhibitor-naíve high-risk aspirin users were prescribed a proton pump inhibitor upon discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of high-risk aspirin users are not receiving proton pump inhibitors for gastroprotection. Further work is required to encourage providers to consider the use of gastroprotective strategies in appropriate patients.     

Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events

There is significant evidence that low-dose aspirin is effective in preventing the first myocardial infarction in men and ischemic stroke in women. There is also an increased risk for major gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and a suggestive, but nonsignificant, increase in the risk for hemorrhagic stroke. If there is a history of ulcer disease or upper-gastrointestinal tract bleeding, Helicobacter pylori should be eradicated (if present) and a proton pump inhibitor used with aspirin therapy. In conclusion, the benefits of low-dose aspirin (75-162 mg/day) in the prevention of myocardial infarction in men and thrombotic stroke in women generally outweigh the risks of serious bleeding in adults with a coronary heart disease risk >1% per year or >1% in 10 years.     

Unmet needs in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal diseases

The use of traditional and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) for the relief of pain and inflammation increases the risk of gastrointestinal side-effects ranging from dyspepsia to symptomatic and complicated ulcers. The COX-2-selective agents were designed to provide comparable pain relief to traditional NSAID, with a reduced rate of adverse gastrointestinal events. However, there appears to be little clinically significant difference between COX-2 and traditional NSAID in terms of dyspepsia, a common cause of the discontinuation of a traditional NSAID. Furthermore, concomitant aspirin use substantially reduces the gastrointestinal safety advantage of COX-2-selective drugs. An increase in the numbers of people taking low-dose aspirin for cardioprotection, an aging population and potential chemoprevention benefits are resulting in the rising consumption of NSAID. Proton pump inhibitors have a demonstrated role in the treatment and prevention of both non-selective NSAID and selective COX-2 inhibitor-related upper gastrointestinal damage. However, the use of gastroprotective agents is far from optimal, and many high-risk patients are not being clearly identified. At the same time, inappropriate low-dose aspirin use is placing low cardiovascular risk patients at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Combined with the recent withdrawal of rofecoxib and valdecoxib from the market because of excess cardiovascular adverse events, and concerns about the safety of other COX-2 inhibitors, a review of strategies to reduce the overall risks in users of anti-inflammatory drugs is timely. This article examines the current issues of understanding and managing NSAID-induced upper gastrointestinal diseases.     

Management of high-risk patients on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin

Low-dose aspirin is increasingly used for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events. However, current evidence suggests that the gastrointestinal and other bleeding risks of aspirin probably outweigh its potential benefits in primary prevention. Various strategies have been proposed to reduce the gastrointestinal risk of aspirin, including gastroprotection with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and replacing aspirin with other anti-platelet agents. Although co-therapy with a PPI and the eradication of H. pylori substantially reduce the risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding with aspirin, the replacement of aspirin by clopidogrel cannot be recommended to patients with a high gastrointestinal risk. Traditionally, strategies for the prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced ulcer complications included co-therapy with a gastroprotective agent and the substitution of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors for non-selective NSAID. Evidence emerged recently that COX-2 inhibitors and some non-selective NSAID increase cardiovascular risk. Before prescribing anti-inflammatory therapy, both gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk factors of individual patients need to be evaluated. In patients with increased cardiovascular risk requiring anti-inflammatory analgesics, the combination of a non-selective NSAID, low-dose aspirin and a PPI is the preferred treatment.     

NSAID induced gastrointestinal damage and designing GI-sparing NSAIDs

ABSTRACT

NSAIDs are widely used to treat pain and rheumatic conditions, but they induce adverse events in different body systems, although the major, most frequent events occur in the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tracts.

Areas covered: This review is focused on damage caused by NSAIDs in the upper and lower GI tracts, the different mechanisms of damage and the GI-sparing NSAIDs designed to minimize adverse events based on understanding of these mechanisms.

Expert commentary: Among the new NSAIDs, COX-2 selective inhibitors have been extensively investigated, and some were approved for human use. Celecoxib demonstrated its safety for the entire GI tract, compared to traditional NSAIDs. However, coxibs, like traditional NSAIDs, are toxic to the cardiovascular (CV) system. Other GI-sparing agents include nitric oxide-NSAIDs and phosphatidylcholine-associated NSAIDs. Testing in animal models and humans they showed GI advantages over the parent NSAID compounds, but none obtained regulatory approval or were further investigated. Hydrogen sulfide-releasing NSAIDs are currently under clinical development, and more data are needed before clinical use. Alternative therapies, such as modulating gut microbiota, are being explored. Currently, clinicians must continue prescribing traditional NSAIDs or coxibs, associated with/without proton pump inhibitor therapy, based on the presence of GI/CV risk factors.     

Investigation into the effect of gastric secretion inhibitor for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal lesions associated with low-dose aspirin

In this study, we investigated the effect of histamin H? receptor antagonist (H?RA) or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal lesions associated with low-dose aspirin. We carried out a retrospective study of 2811 patients who had been prescribed low-dose aspirin (Bayaspirin? 100 mg) for more than 30 days at Tokai University Hachioji Hospital from 2006 to 2008. We classified them into three groups: aspirin alone group (n=1103), aspirin with H?RA group (n=844) and aspirin with PPI group (n=864). Patients who developed upper gastrointestinal lesions were diagnosed with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastritis or duodenitis by gastroscopy. We then compared the incidence of upper gastrointestinal lesions among the groups. The incidence in aspirin alone group, aspirin with H?RA group and aspirin with PPI group was 2.54%, 1.54% and 1.04%, respectively; that of aspirin with PPI group being significantly lower (p<0.05). Additively, the odds ratio (OR) of aspirin with H?RA group and aspirin with PPI group was 0.60 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.31-1.17) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.19-0.86) as compared with aspirin alone group, respectively. The upper gastrointestinal lesions were developed within two years in all groups. Our results suggest that the combined administration of low-dose aspirin and PPI is effective for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal lesions associated with low-dose aspirin. Also, the pharmacists should be especially careful for upper gastrointestinal lesions development within two years after administration of low-dose aspirin, regardless of combined whether H?RA or PPI.     

Guidelines for the appropriate use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors in patients requiring chronic anti-inflammatory therapy

AIM: To rationalize decision making around the use of different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment strategies in patients with varying degrees of gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk. METHODS: The panel comprised nine physicians (three rheumatologists, two internists, two gastroenterologists and two cardiologists) from geographically diverse areas practising in community-based settings (n = 4) and academic institutions (n = 5). A literature review was performed by the authors on the risks, benefits and costs of NSAIDs, cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitors and proton pump inhibitor co-therapy. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to rate 304 clinical scenarios as 'appropriate', 'uncertain' or 'inappropriate'. RESULTS: In patients with no previous gastrointestinal event and not concurrently on aspirin (low risk), the panel rated the use of an NSAID alone as 'appropriate' for those aged < 65 years, and the use of an NSAID +proton pump inhibitor or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor + proton pump inhibitor as 'inappropriate'. For patients aged > 65 years and at low risk, an NSAID or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor alone was rated as 'uncertain'. For patients with a previous gastrointestinal event or who concurrently received aspirin, an NSAID alone was rated as 'inappropriate', and either a cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor or an NSAID +proton pump inhibitor was rated as 'appropriate'. Finally, for patients with a previous gastrointestinal event and on aspirin, an NSAID or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor in conjunction with a proton pump inhibitor was rated as 'appropriate'. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and managed care entities need to balance the risks, benefits and costs of NSAIDs, cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitors and the prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors. The guidelines given here can assist this process.     

NSAID-induced peptic ulcers and Helicobacter pylori infection: implications for patient management.

The conflicting data about the influence of Helicobacter pylori infection on the ulcer risk in patients receiving NSAIDs can be accounted for by the heterogeneity of study designs and the diversified host response to H. pylori. Factors that will affect the outcome include the choice of H. pylori diagnostic tests, previous ulcer complications, concurrent use of acid suppressants, NSAID-naive versus long-term users, low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) versus non-aspirin NSAIDs and whether the result was derived from a pre-specified endpoint or post hoc subgroup analysis. Current evidence suggests that H. pylori eradication reduces the ulcer risk for patients who are about to start receiving NSAIDs but not for those who are already on long-term NSAID therapy. Since treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) worsens H. pylori-associated corpus gastritis, H. pylori should be tested for, and eradicated if present, before starting long-term prophylaxis with PPIs. Patients with H. pylori infection and a history of ulcer complications who require NSAIDs should receive concomitant PPIs or misoprostol after curing the infection. Among patients receiving low-dose aspirin, who have H. pylori infection and previous ulcer complications, long-term treatment with a PPI further reduces the risk of complicated ulcers if H. pylori eradication fails or if patients use concomitant non-aspirin NSAIDs. Current data on the gastric safety of COX-2 selective NSAIDs in H. pylori-infected patients are conflicting. Limited data suggest that the gastroduodenal sparing effect of rofecoxib is negated by H. pylori infection in patients who have had prior upper gastrointestinal events. In light of potential cardiovascular risk with COX-2 selective NSAIDs, it is important to weigh the potential adverse effects against the benefits for an individual patient.     

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: add an anti-ulcer drug for patients at high risk only. Always limit the dose and duration of treatment with NSAIDs

In addition to their cardiac, renal, hepatic, cutaneous and neuropsychological adverse effects, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can have severe effects on the entire gastrointestinal tract, including bleeding, perforation and occlusion. Which anti-ulcer drugs reduce the risk of the severe gastrointestinal adverse effects of NSAIDs, and which patients should receive them? To answer these questions, we conducted a review of the literature, using the standard Prescrire methodology. The main risk factors for severe gastrointestinal adverse effects during NSAID therapy are: a high dose regimen; age over 65 years; a history of gastric or duodenal ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding; heavy use of both alcohol and tobacco; and concomitant treatment with a corticosteroid, antiplatelet drug, anticoagulant, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant. Gastrointestinal symptoms and ulceration (on endoscopy) are poor predictors of severe gastrointestinal reactions. A meta-analysis examined randomised placebo-controlled trials of misoprostol in more than 11 000 patients. The results were mainly based on a large trial including about 9000 rheumatoid arthritis patients with an average age of 68 years. Misoprostol (400 microg to 800 microg/day, in 4 doses) prevented about 4 severe gastroduodenal events when 1000 patients over 60 years of age were treated for 6 months. Diarrhoea and other mild gastrointestinal disorders were frequent. There are no randomised trials comparing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H2 receptor antagonists versus misoprostol or versus placebo therapy for the prevention of severe adverse effects associated with NSAIDs. PPIs and H2 antagonists both reduce the incidence of gastric or duodenal ulceration detected by routine endoscopy. A randomised trial compared an H2 antagonist (famotidine) versus a PPI (pantoprazole) in 128 patients with an average age of 69 years who had a very high risk of serious gastrointestinal adverse effects while taking low-dose aspirin. After 48 weeks of treatment, pantoprazole was more effective than famotidine for the prevention of overt gastrointestinal bleeding. The symptomatic effects of PPIs and H2 antagonists may create a false sense of security, leading some patients to increase their NSAID use and resulting in a paradoxical increase in severe gastrointestinal effects. In practice, anti-ulcer drugs are not sufficiently effective to warrant their use by NSAID-treated adults who are not at high risk of severe gastrointestinal events. Misoprostol has proven efficacy in patients with risk factors for NSAID-induced severe gastroduodenal adverse effects, especially patients over 65 years of age, but it also has frequent adverse effects and necessitates 4 daily doses. Omeprazole is an alternative when the adverse effects or dosing frequency of misoprostol are unacceptable, provided patients are warned not to increase their NSAID consumption.     

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with antiplatelet drugs

BACKGROUND: The risk of major upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with various antiplatelet drugs and the protection conferred by gastroprotective agents are not well defined. AIM: To estimate the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with the use of antiplatelet drugs and its prevention by gastroprotective agents. METHODS: In a case-control study, we compared all cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a gastric or duodenal lesion in patients over 18 years of age (2813 cases), with 7193 matched controls. Odds ratios of upper gastrointestinal bleeding for individual antiplatelet drugs with adjustment for potential confounders were estimated. RESULTS: The individual risks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding were cardiovascular acetylsalicylic acid 4.0 (3.2-4.9), clopidogrel 2.3 (0.9-6.0), dipyridamole 0.9 (0.4-2.0), indobufen 3.8 (1.2-12.2), ticlopidine 3.1 (1.8-5.1) and triflusal 1.6 (0.9-2.7). Concomitant proton pump inhibitors decreased all risk estimates. For acetylsalicylic acid plus a proton pump inhibitor, the odds ratio was 1.1 (0.5-2.6). As a group, antiplatelet drugs accounted for 14.5% of all cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, i.e. 58 per million per year (334 per million per year among those older than 70 years). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding is substantially decreased by the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors. The risk of acetylsalicylic acid plus a proton pump inhibitor seems lower than that of ticlopidine or clopidogrel.     

Review article: prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastrointestinal complications--review and recommendations based on risk assessment

The incidence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related ulcer complications remains high despite the availability of potent anti-ulcer drugs and selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related ulcer complications can be minimized by prospective assessment of patients' baseline risk, rational choice and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and selective use of co-therapy strategies with gastroprotectives. Current recommendations regarding strategies using anti-ulcer drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors for prevention of clinical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug upper gastrointestinal events are largely derived from studies using surrogates such as endoscopic ulcers, erosions, and symptoms in low- to average-risk patients. Conclusions based on surrogate and potentially manipulatable end-points are increasingly suspect with regard to applicability to clinical situations. This article reviews the risks associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including aspirin and includes the effect of the patients' baseline risk, and the confounding effects of Helicobacter pylori infection. In addition, uncertainties regarding the clinical efficacy of anti-ulcer drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors against non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related ulcer complications are put into perspective. We propose management strategies based on the risk category: low risk (absence of risk factors) (least ulcerogenic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug at lowest effective dose), moderate risk (one to two risk factors) (as above, plus an antisecretory agent or misoprostol or a cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor), high risk (multiple risk factors or patients using concomitant low-dose aspirin, steroids, or anticoagulants) (cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor alone with steroids, plus misoprostol with warfarin, or plus a proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol with aspirin), and very high risk (history of ulcer complications) (avoid all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, if possible or a cyclo-oxygenase-2 plus a proton pump inhibitors and/or misoprostol). The presence of H. pylori infection increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal complications in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users by two- to fourfold suggesting that all patients requiring regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy be tested for H. pylori.     

Cardioprotective effects and gastrointestinal risks of aspirin: Maintaining the delicate balance

Aspirin is a very useful medication for the prevention of cardiovascular thrombotic events in patients with or those at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Aspirin, however, carries an increased risk for gastrointestinal (GI) injury (e.g., ulceration) and its complications (e.g., hemorrhage), which may be caused by its antiplatelet and gastric mucosal effects. In those with established CVD, aspirin use has been documented to decrease the risk of a first myocardial infarction (MI). Its effects on stroke and vascular death are less conclusive. The use of aspirin in these individuals is recommended only for those whose risk for cardiovascular events (based on coronary risk assessment tools) is sufficiently high that it outweighs the risk for GI complications. Secondary prevention refers to the use of aspirin to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with established CVD such as an MI, stroke, or angina. The use of aspirin in these individuals is recommended based on a documented decrease in future cardiovascular events and mortality. The risk for GI events with aspirin is at least additive to the risk for these events in those who also are receiving therapy with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Patients being treated with aspirin, even at 81 mg/day for cardioprotection, should be assessed for factors that increase the risk for GI injury. Studies have confirmed that co-therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or misoprostol decreases the risk for GI injury and complications. Although both classes of such gastroprotective agents are effective, treatment with a PPI is tolerated better, with fewer patients discontinuing the drug because of side effects such as diarrhea.     

Rationale for a trial of low-dose aspirin for the primary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events and vascular dementia in the elderly: Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE)

Low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of vascular events and there is increasing evidence of its potential to reduce the rate of cognitive decline in the elderly. Adverse effects including gastrointestinal and intracranial haemorrhage may offset these benefits. The balance of risks versus benefits of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and vascular dementia has not been established in the elderly. There is clearly a need to conduct a study in family practice to investigate whether routine use of low-dose aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and vascular dementia in the elderly is beneficial or harmful. Aspirin in reducing events in the elderly (ASPREE) is a placebo-controlled trial of low-dose aspirin for the primary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events and vascular dementia. It will follow 15,000 subjects aged 70 years or more for an average of 5 years. This sample size has a power of 87% to detect a 15% reduction in primary events in the aspirin group, with an anticipated combined primary event rate of 20 per 1000 patient years.     

选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂对心血管影响的研究进展

目的 综述选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂在心血管方面的安全性及其作用机制.方法 通过查阅国内外相关文献,分别比较归纳了不同选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂引发心血管事件的风险性,并总结了罗非昔布、塞来昔布等对心血管的作用机制.结果 对选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂引发心血管不良反应的研究进展进行了比较全面的总结.结论 不同选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂在心血管安全性方面有明显差别,比较几种昔布类药物,塞来昔布相对安全,与小剂量阿司匹林联合服用可降低心血管风险性.     

Pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation of esomeprazole and ASA for the prevention of gastroduodenal ulcers in cardiovascular patients

Introduction: Low-dose aspirin (ASA, 75 - 325 mg/day) is widely used for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) diseases. However, the value of primary prevention ASA is uncertain as the reduction in occlusive events needs to be weighed against the significant increase in major bleedings. Prevention with antisecretory drugs has been proposed to reduce the incidence of ASA-induced gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings, but non-adherence to gastro-protection is of concern, as it significantly increases the risk of upper GI adverse events. Beside patients and physicians education, one approach to overcome non-adherence is the development of fixed-dose combination. Area covered: This review explores the results of clinical studies on the influence of the combination esomeprazole (ESA) and ASA on pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and the role for such combination in prevention of CV events in patients at risk of gastric ulcers. Expert opinion: Patients at risk of ASA-induced gastroduodenal ulcer might benefit from a fixed ASA and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) combination. PK and PD parameters suggest there is no significant interaction between these drugs. Nevertheless, attention must be paid on the appropriate use of such combination, that is, still balancing the risk:benefit ratio in a real-life setting, and any increase in the proportion of patients receiving ASA and PPI should be considered as a warning signal.     

Recent advances in gastric ulcer therapeutics

In developed countries at least, ulcers related to Helicobacter pylori infection are becoming rarer. However, ulcers associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain a major clinical problem, which has not been solved through the introduction of selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2. Recent studies suggest that NSAID-induced ulcers can be prevented largely through co-administration of a proton pump inhibitor to block acid secretion in the stomach. In patients requiring aspirin therapy to prevent cardiovascular diseases, co-administration of aspirin plus a proton pump inhibitor was found to be safer than using another anti-platelet therapy that does not block gastric prostaglandin production (e.g. clopidogrel). Several recent papers have clarified further the contribution of COX-2 to gastric mucosal defence and to the healing of ulcers. In some circumstances, COX-2 produces a highly potent gastroprotective substance (15-R-lipoxin A(4)), and analogues of this substance could have therapeutic value for preventing gastric ulceration. Nitric oxide-releasing NSAIDs continue to show promise in terms of limiting damage to the gastrointestinal tract, even when given in combination with aspirin. Recent studies support the notion that platelets make a major contribution to ulcer healing, and the release of several key growth factors from platelets appears to be regulated by proteinase-activated receptors.