Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: across the years for a standard of care

Chemotherapy is of crucial importance in advanced gastric cancer patients, in order to obtain palliation of symptoms and improve survival. The most extensively studied drugs as single agents are 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, mitomycin C and etoposide. Newer chemotherapeutic agents include the taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel), oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine and S-1), oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Randomised trials comparing monotherapy with combination regimens have consistently shown increased response rates in favour of combination regimens, whereas only marginally improved survival rates were usually found. Several combination therapies have been developed and have been examined in Phase III trials. However, in most cases, they have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over the reference arm. There is no internationally accepted standard of care, and uncertainty remains regarding the choice of the optimal chemotherapy regimen. The objective of this article is to review the present literature available on major Phase II – III clinical trials, in which patients suffering from advanced gastric cancer were treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy.     

Novel combination chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a vexing problem and long-term survival beyond 5 years is extremely rare. Five new agents, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine and irinotecan, have been introduced for the treatment of NSCLC and investigated extensively both preclinically and clinically. Monotherapy with one of these agents has produced survival benefits over the best supportive care in Phase III studies. Combination chemotherapy with a new agent and platinum produced a higher response rate than conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy and improved survival was observed in some randomised trials. There was little difference in efficacy and toxicity between the chemotherapeutic regimens with a new agent and a platinum in Phase III trials, suggesting the clinical utility of these regimens is similar. Many trials have focused on regimens containing two new agents, with or without platinum. Preliminary results of Phase III trials of three drug combinations versus two drug combinations suggested the former to be more promising, in terms of response rates and survival. Whether the era of platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC should continue or not must be determined by Phase III trials, evaluating the use of a platinum agent with one of the new agent combinations. These aggressive chemotherapeutic combinations will hopefully improve survival and quality of life for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Novel combination chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a vexing problem and long-term survival beyond 5 years is extremely rare. Five new agents, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine and irinotecan, have been introduced for the treatment of NSCLC and investigated extensively both preclinically and clinically. Monotherapy with one of these agents has produced survival benefits over the best supportive care in Phase III studies. Combination chemotherapy with a new agent and platinum produced a higher response rate than conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy and improved survival was observed in some randomised trials. There was little difference in efficacy and toxicity between the chemotherapeutic regimens with a new agent and a platinum in Phase III trials, suggesting the clinical utility of these regimens is similar. Many trials have focused on regimens containing two new agents, with or without platinum. Preliminary results of Phase III trials of three drug combinations versus two drug combinations suggested the former to be more promising, in terms of response rates and survival. Whether the era of platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC should continue or not must be determined by Phase III trials, evaluating the use of a platinum agent with one of the new agent combinations. These aggressive chemotherapeutic combinations will hopefully improve survival and quality of life for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Novel investigational drugs for gastric cancer

Background: Gastric cancer still represents a leading cause of death worldwide. Several cytotoxic agents have demonstrated activity and combination regimens improve progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life. Nevertheless, now there is no standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer patients. Objective: To evaluate the role of new investigational agents. Methods: We analysed Phase I, II and III studies that evaluated tailored drugs directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the c-erbB2, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Conclusion: Data from Phase II trials indicate the potential of improved efficacy of chemotherapy when administered in combination with bevacizumab and cetuximab. Trastuzumab results are ongoing, while marimastat has not obtained clinical developments even if it has demonstrated to be an active drug in this setting of patients.     

Capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer

Since the routine introduction of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in the early 1990s, median survival for gastric cancer has improved from 3 months, with best supportive care alone, to > 11 months in recently reported Phase III trials of triplet chemotherapy. Capecitabine is an orally-active fluoropyrimidine, which is selectively metabolised to fluorouracil in tumour cells. The combinations of platinum compounds and capecitabine have been evaluated in two recent, large, Phase III trials demonstrating non-inferiority in efficacy compared with platinum plus continuous infusion fluorouracil. In view of the convenience and flexibility of patients in adjusting dosage when encountering toxicities, capecitabine is replacing continuous infusion fluorouracil as the backbone of combination chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients. Future trials evaluating biologicals are now incorporating capecitabine combinations as control arms in both advanced disease and peri-operative settings in gastric cancer.     

Capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer

Since the routine introduction of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in the early 1990 s, median survival for gastric cancer has improved from 3 months, with best supportive care alone, to > 11 months in recently reported Phase III trials of triplet chemotherapy. Capecitabine is an orally-active fluoropyrimidine, which is selectively metabolised to fluorouracil in tumour cells. The combinations of platinum compounds and capecitabine have been evaluated in two recent, large, Phase III trials demonstrating non-inferiority in efficacy compared with platinum plus continuous infusion fluorouracil. In view of the convenience and flexibility of patients in adjusting dosage when encountering toxicities, capecitabine is replacing continuous infusion fluorouracil as the backbone of combination chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients. Future trials evaluating biologicals are now incorporating capecitabine combinations as control arms in both advanced disease and peri-operative settings in gastric cancer.     

Role of platinum agents in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer, one of the most common gastrointestinal tumors, has a 5-year survival rate of < 5%. Since 1997, when gemcitabine showed superior clinical benefit to single-agent 5-fluorouracil, it has remained the only standard chemotherapy approved by the US FDA for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Numerous new agents, both cytotoxic and targeted, have been tested against and in combination with this standard. Many combination therapy regimens showed encouraging results in Phase II settings, which led to > 12 randomized Phase III trials in the last decade. Some trials showed improved response rates or progression-free survival, but there was no clear improvement in survival. Among these combinations, the combination of gemcitabine plus platinum agents showed improved progression-free survival or time-to-tumor progression, but failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over gemcitabine. This combination has regained attention after a recent pooled analysis and a meta-analysis suggested a survival benefit of gemcitabine-platinum doublets when compared with single agent gemcitabine. There are preclinical data showing synergism between gemcitabine and platinum agents. Hence, this review covers the role of platinum doublets in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Role of platinum agents in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer, one of the most common gastrointestinal tumors, has a 5-year survival rate of < 5%. Since 1997, when gemcitabine showed superior clinical benefit to single-agent 5-fluorouracil, it has remained the only standard chemotherapy approved by the US FDA for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Numerous new agents, both cytotoxic and targeted, have been tested against and in combination with this standard. Many combination therapy regimens showed encouraging results in Phase II settings, which led to > 12 randomized Phase III trials in the last decade. Some trials showed improved response rates or progression-free survival, but there was no clear improvement in survival. Among these combinations, the combination of gemcitabine plus platinum agents showed improved progression-free survival or time-to-tumor progression, but failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over gemcitabine. This combination has regained attention after a recent pooled analysis and a meta-analysis suggested a survival benefit of gemcitabine-platinum doublets when compared with single agent gemcitabine. There are preclinical data showing synergism between gemcitabine and platinum agents. Hence, this review covers the role of platinum doublets in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Cytotoxic chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Advances to date and future directions

Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for pancreatic cancer as most patients present with advanced disease, which precludes locoregional treatment. However, the efficacy of chemotherapy is limited. Gemcitabine is the only agent that improves symptoms and confers a modest survival advantage. Many combination therapy regimens have been studied in phase II settings. Eleven randomised phase III trials have been conducted to compare gemcitabine-containing regimens with gemcitabine monotherapy since gemcitabine became available clinically. The combination of gemcitabine plus capecitabine has demonstrated a survival advantage over gemcitabine, whereas gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus cisplatin have shown improved progression-free survival or time to tumour progression but failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over gemcitabine. The search for effective therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer continues. Gemcitabine in combination with cytotoxic agents or molecular targeted agents hold promise.     

Erlotinib: a new therapeutic approach for non-small cell lung cancer

Although treatment with cytotoxic agents has produced modest survival improvement in patients with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it appears that a plateau has been reached with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens. Increasing knowledge regarding the properties of malignant neoplasms has identified a number of potential therapeutic targets. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of these targets. Preclinical models have revealed that tumour growth can be inhibited by monoclonal antibodies directed against EGFR and EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Erlotinib (Tarceva?; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Genentech and Roche), a quinazoline derivative with good oral absorption, is one of several EGFR tyrosine kinases that has been studied in clinical trials. In a Phase I study, mild diarrhoea and mild rash were the most common toxicities. At a dose of 200 mg/day, diarrhoea was the dose-limiting toxicity. The observation that EGFR overexpression is relatively common in NSCLC led to a Phase II trial of erlotinib at the maximum-tolerated dose (150 mg/day) in previously treated NSCLC patients. Erlotinib produced a 12% response rate and there was no apparent relationship between response and tumour EGFR levels. More recent reports suggest that patients who develop a rash have higher responses. Based on its single agent activity, erlotinib has been evaluated in two Phase III trials which compared erlotinib plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone in previously untreated NSCLC patients. Erlotinib has also been compared to placebo in a Phase III trial which was limited to advanced stage NSCLC patients whose disease had progressed after two previous chemotherapy regimens. The optimum use of erlotinib in NSCLC will be determined by the results of the completed and future Phase III trials.     

Erlotinib: a new therapeutic approach for non-small cell lung cancer

Although treatment with cytotoxic agents has produced modest survival improvement in patients with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it appears that a plateau has been reached with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens. Increasing knowledge regarding the properties of malignant neoplasms has identified a number of potential therapeutic targets. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of these targets. Preclinical models have revealed that tumour growth can be inhibited by monoclonal antibodies directed against EGFR and EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Erlotinib (Tarceva trade mark; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Genentech and Roche), a quinazoline derivative with good oral absorption, is one of several EGFR tyrosine kinases that has been studied in clinical trials. In a Phase I study, mild diarrhoea and mild rash were the most common toxicities. At a dose of 200 mg/day, diarrhoea was the dose-limiting toxicity. The observation that EGFR overexpression is relatively common in NSCLC led to a Phase II trial of erlotinib at the maximum-tolerated dose (150 mg/day) in previously treated NSCLC patients. Erlotinib produced a 12% response rate and there was no apparent relationship between response and tumour EGFR levels. More recent reports suggest that patients who develop a rash have higher responses. Based on its single agent activity, erlotinib has been evaluated in two Phase III trials which compared erlotinib plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone in previously untreated NSCLC patients. Erlotinib has also been compared to placebo in a Phase III trial which was limited to advanced stage NSCLC patients whose disease had progressed after two previous chemotherapy regimens. The optimum use of erlotinib in NSCLC will be determined by the results of the completed and future Phase III trials.     

Capecitabine: in advanced gastric or oesophagogastric cancer

The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is metabolised preferentially in tumour tissue to the cytotoxic moiety fluorouracil. In a well designed phase III trial in patients with advanced gastric cancer, capecitabine plus cisplatin was noninferior to fluorouracil plus cisplatin in terms of progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [95% CI 0.63, 1.04]). In another similarly designed phase III trial in patients with oesophagogastric cancer (REAL 2), pooled capecitabine-based regimens were noninferior to pooled fluorouracil-based regimens in terms of overall survival (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.80, 0.99]). These data are supported by randomised and noncomparative phase II trials in treatment-naive or pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer or oesophagogastric cancer receiving capecitabine either as monotherapy or in combination with other antitumour agents. Given the nature of chemotherapy, capecitabine-based regimens were generally well tolerated, with the nature of treatment-related adverse events occurring with capecitabine-based regimens being similar to those of fluorouracil-based regimens.     

Locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer: current management and new treatment developments

The management of gastric cancer remains a challenge. In recent years, the most important advances have been achieved in the adjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced disease, where significant survival benefits have been demonstrated for both perioperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. These findings have changed the standard of care for patients with resectable disease. In the setting of metastatic gastric cancer, the development of new cytotoxic regimens must consider the balance between efficacy and toxicity in patients whose overall prognosis is poor. Major advances in recent years include the development of orally administered fluoropyrimidine analogues, which can be used in place of intravenous fluorouracil, and the addition of newer agents such as oxaliplatin and docetaxel, which have demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced disease. Targeted therapies have had a major impact on the management of certain malignancies, and while their evaluation in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer remains early, it is likely that these agents will continue to be developed and studied in combination with chemotherapy. This article reviews recent advances in the use of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Targeted therapies, their mechanisms of action and emerging data supporting their use in gastric cancer are also discussed. The two randomized phase III trials supporting adjuvant therapy for locally advanced, resectable gastric cancer are discussed in detail, together with strategies for future trials in this area. Overall, there remains optimism that further incremental gains will be achieved with future studies combining chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapies, both in the adjuvant and metastatic disease settings.     

Current status of targeted therapies in advanced gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION: In metastatic gastric cancer, chemotherapy is the standard treatment because it prolongs survival when compared to best supportive care alone. However, even after the use of more effective regimens, the overall survival remains disappointing, justifying the need for new treatment options. AREAS COVERED: Areas covered in this review include the most common molecular pathways, which have provided novel targets in gastric cancer therapy. These therapeutic strategies include EGFR inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, cell cycle inhibitors and apoptosis promoters. EXPERT OPINION: Several mAbs and kinase inhibitors, especially those targeting EGFR and VEGF/VEGFR, have already demonstrated promising activity in gastric cancer. The Phase III ToGA trial reported an increase in overall survival for patients with human EGF receptor (HER)2-positive gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy and trastuzumab compared to chemotherapy alone. This means that accurate HER2 testing in gastric cancer is necessary. Final data of ongoing trials with novel agents will be critical to further progress with this cancer.     

Taxanes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The emergence of novel chemotherapeutic agents with promising anticancer activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during the 1990s has led to an expanded role for chemotherapy in the management of this disease. The taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) are novel microtubule stabilising agents, and have become an integral part of several commonly-used chemotherapy regimens in NSCLC. Taxanes inhibit the growth of lung cancer cell lines, exhibit synergistic interaction with other chemotherapy agents and enhance the efficacy of radiation in vitro. When used in low doses (metronomic dosing), they have important antiangiogenic properties. Several Phase II and III clinical trials have established the efficacy of the taxanes, as single agents and when used in combination with a platinum compound, in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The use of a taxane in combination with a platinum compound has become an acceptable standard for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In addition to its efficacy in the first-line therapy of NSCLC, docetaxel is also the FDA-approved second-line agent for recurrent or relapsed NSCLC in the US. Several ongoing trials are comparing the efficacy of combining molecularly targeted agents with taxane-based regimens for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.     

Taxanes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The emergence of novel chemotherapeutic agents with promising anticancer activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during the 1990s has led to an expanded role for chemotherapy in the management of this disease. The taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) are novel microtubule stabilising agents, and have become an integral part of several commonly-used chemotherapy regimens in NSCLC. Taxanes inhibit the growth of lung cancer cell lines, exhibit synergistic interaction with other chemotherapy agents and enhance the efficacy of radiation in vitro. When used in low doses (metronomic dosing), they have important antiangiogenic properties. Several Phase II and III clinical trials have established the efficacy of the taxanes, as single agents and when used in combination with a platinum compound, in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The use of a taxane in combination with a platinum compound has become an acceptable standard for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In addition to its efficacy in the first-line therapy of NSCLC, docetaxel is also the FDA-approved second-line agent for recurrent or relapsed NSCLC in the US. Several ongoing trials are comparing the efficacy of combining molecularly targeted agents with taxane-based regimens for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.     

Docetaxel in advanced gastric cancer

Standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer remains undefined. Two of the most popular regimens-ECF [epirubicin-cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] and PELF (cisplatin-epirubicin-5-FU-leucovorin)-have been shown to be active, but each has limitations. Phase II trials show that single-agent docetaxel is an active agent in advanced gastric cancer, producing overall response rates (ORRs) of 17.5-24%. Docetaxel has also been shown to lack cross-resistance with other drugs in gastric cancer, and is likely to be at least additive to cisplatin and 5-FU. Phase II results of docetaxel combinations in advanced gastric cancer are encouraging. Docetaxel-cisplatin has yielded response rates similar to those achieved by ECF and PELF. Adding 5-FU to docetaxel-cisplatin has achieved an ORR of 52 versus 45% for docetaxel-cisplatin in a randomized phase II trial. Docetaxel-based regimens demonstrate acceptable tolerability despite predictable hematotoxicity. Neutropenia, the major toxicity, is manageable by dose modification or by using prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Several phase III trials are now ongoing, including a large-scale trial of docetaxel-cisplatin-5-FU versus cisplatin-5-FU. Results will show whether docetaxel improves overall response and survival, as suggested in the phase II setting.     

A cost-benefit analysis of chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Surgery remains the mainstay of any curative treatment; however, those patients who are considered not amenable of curative resection generally receive chemotherapy, in order to obtain palliation of symptoms and improved survival. Many drugs have been tested in several combination regimens yielding higher response rates. In spite of the fact that chemotherapy has been extensively used in advanced gastrointestinal cancer, there are few studies that focus on its economic costs. The aim of this paper is to review the results of the main studies regarding the relationship between the cost of chemotherapy and its effectiveness in advanced gastric and gastrointestinal cancer patients.     

A cost–benefit analysis of chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Surgery remains the mainstay of any curative treatment; however, those patients who are considered not amenable of curative resection generally receive chemotherapy, in order to obtain palliation of symptoms and improved survival. Many drugs have been tested in several combination regimens yielding higher response rates. In spite of the fact that chemotherapy has been extensively used in advanced gastrointestinal cancer, there are few studies that focus on its economic costs. The aim of this paper is to review the results of the main studies regarding the relationship between the cost of chemotherapy and its effectiveness in advanced gastric and gastrointestinal cancer patients.     

Esophagogastric cancer: integration of targeted therapies into systemic chemotherapy

Although combination chemotherapy has been shown to be more effective than single agents in advanced esophagogastric cancer, the better response rates have not fulfilled their promise as overall survival times from best combination still range between 8 to 11 months. So far, the development of targeted therapies stays somewhat behind their integration into treatment concepts compared to other gastrointestinal diseases. Thus, the review summarizes the recent advances in the development of targeted therapies in advanced esophagogastric cancer. The majority of agents tested were angiogenesis inhibitors or agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptors EGFR1 and HER2. For trastuzumab and bevacizumab, phase III trial results have been presented recently. While addition of trastuzumab to cisplatin/5-fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy results in a clinically relevant and statistically significant survival benefit in HER 2+ patients, the benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was not significant. Thus, all patients with metastatic disease should be tested for HER-2 status in the tumor. Trastuzumab in combination with cisplatin/5-fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy is the new standard of care for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.