Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has increased dramatically in the last 20 years, with clinical applications progressively being explored for most of the medical specialties. The field of gastroenterology and hepatology, substantially reliant on vast amounts of imaging studies, is not an exception. The clinical applications of AI systems in this field include the identification of premalignant or malignant lesions (e.g., identification of dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus, pancreatic malignancies), detection of lesions (e.g., polyp identification and classification, small-bowel bleeding lesion on capsule endoscopy, pancreatic cystic lesions), development of objective scoring systems for risk stratification, predicting disease prognosis or treatment response [e.g., determining survival in patients post-resection of hepatocellular carcinoma), determining which patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will benefit from biologic therapy], or evaluation of metrics such as bowel preparation score or quality of endoscopic examination. The objective of this comprehensive review is to analyze the available AI-related studies pertaining to the entirety of the gastrointestinal tract, including the upper, middle and lower tracts; IBD; the hepatobiliary system; and the pancreas, discussing the findings and clinical applications, as well as outlining the current limitations and future directions in this field.     

Impact of microbiota-immunity axis in pancreatic cancer management

The microbiota impact on human diseases is well-known, and a growing body of literature is providing evidence about the complex interplay between microbiota-immune system-human physiology/pathology, including cancers. Together with the defined risk factors (e.g., smoke habits, diet, diabetes, and obesity), the oral, gut, biliary, and intrapancreatic microbiota contribute to pancreatic cancer development through different pathways including the interaction with the immune system. Unfortunately, a great majority of the pancreatic cancer patients received a diagnosis in advanced stages not amenable to be radically treated and potentially cured. Given the poor pancreatic cancer prognosis, complete knowledge of these complicated relationships could help researchers better understand the disease pathogenesis and thus provide early potential non-invasive biomarkers, new therapeutic targets, and tools for risk stratification that might result in greater therapeutic possibilities and eventually in a better and longer patient survival.     

Adenoviral gene therapy in gastric cancer： A review

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. With current therapeutic approaches the prognosis of gastric cancer is very poor, as gastric cancer accounts for the second most common cause of death in cancer related deaths. Gastric cancer like almost all other cancers has a molecular genetic basis which relies on disruption in normal cellular regulatory mechanisms regarding cell growth, apoptosis and cell division. Thus novel therapeutic approaches such as gene therapy promise to become the alternative choice of treatment in gastric cancer. In gene therapy, suicide genes, tumor suppressor genes and anti-angiogenesis genes among many others are introduced to cancer cells via vectors. Some of the vectors widely used in gene therapy are Adenoviral vectors. This review provides an update of the new developments in adenoviral cancer gene therapy including strategies for inducing apoptosis, inhibiting metastasis and targeting the cancer cells.     

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors achieve prolonged transgene expression in mouse myocardium and arteries in vivo: a comparative study with adenovirus vectors

Plasmid DNA and adenovirus vectors currently used in cardiovascular gene therapy trials are limited by low efficiency and short-lived transgene expression, respectively. Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) has recently emerged as an attractive vector for cardiovascular gene therapy. In the present study, we have compared AAV and adenovirus vectors with respect to gene transfer efficiency and the duration of transgene expression in mouse hearts and arteries in vivo. AAV vectors (titer: 5×10⁸ transducing units (TU)/ml) and adenovirus vectors (1.2×10¹⁰ TU/ml) expressing a green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene were injected either intramyocardially (n=32) or intrapericardially (n=3) in CD-1 mice. Hearts were harvested at varying time intervals (3 days to 1 year) after gene delivery. After intramyocardial injection of 5 μl virus stock solution, cardiomyocyte transduction rates with AAV vectors were 4-fold lower than with adenovirus vectors (1.5% (range: 0.5–2.6%) vs. 6.2% (range: 2.7–13.7%); P<0.05), but similar to titer-matched adenovirus vectors (0.7%; range: 0.2–1.2%). AAV-mediated EGFP expression lasted for at least 1 year. AAV vectors instilled into the pericardial space transduced epicardial myocytes. Arterial gene transfer was studied in mouse carotids (n=26). Both vectors selectively transduced endothelial cells after luminal instillation. Transduction rates with AAV vectors were 8-fold lower than with adenovirus vectors (2.0% (range: 0–3.2%) vs. 16.2% (range: 8.5–20.2%); P<0.05). Prolonged EGFP expression was observed after AAV but not adenovirus-mediated gene transfer. In conclusion, AAV vectors deliver and express genes for extended periods of time in the myocardium and arterial endothelium in vivo. AAV vectors may be useful for gene therapy approaches to chronic cardiovascular diseases.     

Gene therapy developments for pancreatic cancer

Treatment options for pancreatic cancer have limited success and it is therefore an appropriate target for the development of new strategies, including gene therapy. Gene therapy approaches include inhibition of activated oncogenes (KRAS, LSM1) with antisense and RNA interference strategies, replacement of inactivated tumour suppressor genes (TP53, CDKN2A, CDKN1A), targeting of cell signalling pathways, gene-directed prodrug-activation therapies and the use of replication-competent oncolytic viruses. Angiogenesis and apoptosis have also been targeted for gene therapy. Clinical trials of gene therapy have shown only moderate anti-tumour effects. As there are many genetic abnormalities in pancreatic cancer, strategies combining different targets or indeed different modalities of treatment, may be more successful. Identification of new targets and improvements in delivery and targeting may further improve the efficacy of gene therapy in pancreatic cancer.     

Pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: A case of the chicken or the egg

Acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic cancer are three distinct pancreatic diseases with different prognoses and treatment options. However, it may be difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant disease. AP may be a first symptom of pancreatic cancer, particularly in patients between the ages of 56 and 75 with presumed idiopathic AP who had a concomitant diagnosis of new-onset diabetes mellitus or patients who present with CP at diagnosis of AP. In these patients, additional imaging is warranted, preferably by endoscopic ultrasonography. CP may lead to pancreatic cancer through oncogenic mutations, mostly in patients with hereditary CP, and in patients in whom risk factors for pancreatic cancer (e.g., nicotine and alcohol abuse) are also present. Patients with PRSS1-mediated CP and patients with a history of autosomal dominant hereditary CP without known genetic mutations may be considered for surveillance for pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic inflammation may mimic pancreatic cancer by appearing as a focal mass-forming lesion on imaging. Differentiation between the above mentioned benign and malignant disease may be facilitated by specific features like the duct-penetrating sign and the duct-to-parenchyma ratio. Research efforts are aimed towards developing a superior discriminant between pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in the form of imaging modalities or biomarkers. This may aid clinicians in timely diagnosing pancreatic cancer in a potentially curable stage.     

Antagonistic Analogs of Growth Hormone-releasing Hormone: New Potential Antitumor Agents

Recently, new potent antagonistic analogs of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GH-RH) have been synthesized. These GH-RH antagonists bind to pituitary receptors for GH-RH and inhibit the release of GH in vitro and in vivo. This suggests that they could be clinically useful in conditions such as acromegaly. The main applications of GH-RH antagonists would be in the field of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I)- and IGF-II-dependent cancers. GH-RH antagonists inhibit the growth of various human cancer cell lines xenografted into nude mice, including mammary cancers, androgen-independent prostate cancers, small-cell lung carcinomas, non-small-cell lung carcinomas, renal adenocarcinomas, pancreatic cancers, colorectal carcinomas and malignant gliomas. These effects could, in part, be exerted indirectly through inhibition of the secretion of GH and the resulting reduction in levels of hepatic IGF-I. However, the principal action of GH-RH antagonists in vivo appears to be the direct suppression of the autocrine and/or paracrine production and expression of the genes encoding IGF-I (IGF1) and IGF-II (IGF2) in tumors. In vitro, antagonists of GH-RH inhibit the proliferation of mammary, prostatic, pancreatic and colorectal cancer cell lines, reducing the expression of IGF2 mRNA in the cells and the secretion of IGF-II. The presence of the GH-RH ligand has been demonstrated in human ovarian, endometrial, mammary and lung cancers, suggesting that GH-RH could be a growth factor. Further development of GH-RH antagonists should lead to potential therapeutic agents for IGF-dependent cancers.     

Gene therapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer(PC) is a highly lethal disease and notoriously difficult to treat. Only a small proportion of PC patients are eligible for surgical resection, whilst conventional chemoradiotherapy only has a modest effect with substantial toxicity. Gene therapy has become a new widely investigated therapeutic approach for PC.This article reviews the basic rationale, gene delivery methods, therapeutic targets and developments of laboratory research and clinical trials in gene therapy of PC by searching the literature published in English using the PubMed database and analyzing clinical trials registered on the Gene Therapy Clinical Trials Worldwide website(http://www. wiley.co.uk/genmed/ clinical). Viral vectors are main gene delivery tools in gene therapy of cancer, and especially, oncolytic virus shows brighter prospect due to its tumor-targeting property.Efficient therapeutic targets for gene therapy include tumor suppressor gene p53, mutant oncogene K-ras,anti-angiogenesis gene VEGFR, suicide gene HSK-TK,cytosine deaminase and cytochrome p450, multiple cytokine genes and so on. Combining different targets or combination strategies with traditional chemoradiother-apy may be a more effective approach to improve the efficacy of cancer gene therapy. Cancer gene therapy is not yet applied in clinical practice, but basic and clinical studies have demonstrated its safety and clinical benefits. Gene therapy will be a new and promising field for the treatment of PC.     

Discussion on gemcitabine combined with targeted drugs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumor with poor prognosis. The treatment of pancreatic cancer depends on the tumor stage and type, and includes local treatment (surgery, radiotherapy and ablation intervention) and systemic therapy (chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy). We read with great interest the review “Effective combinations of anti-cancer and targeted drugs for pancreatic cancer treatment” published on World J Gastroenterol and intended to share some of our perspectives in pancreatic cancer treatment. This review presents the therapeutic effects of the combination of gemcitabine and targeted drugs, which gives us a deeper insight into the combination treatments for pancreatic cancer.     

Micelles as potential drug delivery systems for colorectal cancer treatment

Despite the significant progress in cancer therapy, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. Chemotherapy is currently the mainstay therapeutic modality adopted for CRC treatment. However, the long-term effectiveness of chemotherapeutic drugs has been hampered by their low bioavailability, non-selective tumor targeting mechanisms, non-specific biodistribution associated with low drug concentrations at the tumor site and undesirable side effects. Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in using nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems to circumvent these limitations. Various nanoparticles have been developed for delivering chemotherapeutic drugs among which polymeric micelles are attractive candidates. Polymeric micelles are biocompatible nanocarriers that can bypass the biological barriers and preferentially accumulate in tumors via the enhanced permeability and retention effect. They can be easily engineered with stimuli-responsive and tumor targeting moieties to further ensure their selective uptake by cancer cells and controlled drug release at the desirable tumor site. They have been shown to effectively improve the pharmacokinetic properties of chemotherapeutic drugs and enhance their safety profile and anticancer efficacy in different types of cancer. Given that combination therapy is the new strategy implemented in cancer therapy, polymeric micelles are suitable for multidrug delivery and allow drugs to act concurrently at the action site to achieve synergistic therapeutic outcomes. They also allow the delivery of anticancer genetic material along with chemotherapy drugs offering a novel approach for CRC therapy. Here, we highlight the properties of polymeric micelles that make them promising drug delivery systems for CRC treatment. We also review their application in CRC chemotherapy and gene therapy as well as in combination cancer chemotherapy.     

Targeting adeno-associated virus and adenoviral gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) heavily endangers human heath worldwide. HCC is one of most frequent cancers in China because patients with liver disease, such as chronic hepatitis, have the highest cancer susceptibility. Traditional therapeutic approaches have limited efficacy in advanced liver cancer, and novel strategies are urgently needed to improve the limited treatment options for HCC. This review summarizes the basic knowledge, current advances, and future challenges and prospects of adeno-associated virus (AAV) and adenoviruses as vectors for gene therapy of HCC. This paper also reviews the clinical trials of gene therapy using adenovirus vectors, immunotherapy, toxicity and immunological barriers for AAV and adenoviruses, and proposes several alternative strategies to overcome the therapeutic barriers to using AAV and adenoviruses as vectors.     

Alphaviruses in Gene Therapy

Alphavirus vectors present an attractive approach for gene therapy applications due to the rapid and simple recombinant virus particle production and their broad range of mammalian host cell transduction. Mainly three types of alphavirus vectors, namely naked RNA, recombinant particles and DNA/RNA layered vectors, have been subjected to preclinical studies with the goal of achieving prophylactic or therapeutic efficacy, particularly in oncology. In this context, immunization with alphavirus vectors has provided protection against challenges with tumor cells. Moreover, alphavirus intratumoral and systemic delivery has demonstrated substantial tumor regression and significant prolonged survival rates in various animal tumor models. Recent discoveries of the strong association of RNA interference and disease have accelerated gene therapy based approaches, where alphavirus-based gene delivery can play an important role.     

Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 1 promotes cell growth and metastasis in colorectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the expression of special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 1 (SATB1 ) gene in colorectal cancer and its role in colorectal cancer cell proliferation and invasion.METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the protein expression of SATB1 in 30 colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue samples and pair-matched adjacent nontumor samples. Cell growth was investigated after enhancing expression of SATB1. Wound-healing assay and Transwell assay were used to investigate the impact of SATB1 on migratory and invasive abilities of SW480 cells in vitro . Nude mice that received subcutaneous implantation or lateral tail vein were used to study the effects of SATB1 on tumor growth or metastasis in vivo . RESULTS: SATB1 was over-expressed in CRC tissues and CRC cell lines. SATB1 promotes cell proliferation and cell cycle progression in CRC SW480 cells. SATB1 over-expression could promote cell growth in vivo . In addition, SATB1 could significantly raise the ability of cell migration and invasion in vitro and promote the ability of tumor metastasis in vivo . SATB1 could up-regulate matrix metalloproteases 2, 9, cyclin D1 and vimentin, meanwhile SATB1 could down-regulate E-cadherin in CRC. CONCLUSION: SATB1 acts as a potential growth and metastasis promoter in CRC. SATB1 may be useful as a therapeutic target for CRC.     

Gene therapy for gastric cancer： Is it promising？

Gastric cancer is one of the most common tumorsworldwide.The therapeutic outcome of conventionaltherapies is inefficient.Thus,new therapeutic strategiesare urgently needed.Gene therapy is a promisingmolecular alternative in the treatment of gastric cancer,including the replacement of defective tumor suppressorgenes,the inactivation of oncogenes,the introduction ofsuicide genes,genetic immunotherapy,anti-angiogeneticgene therapy,and virotherapy.Improved molecularbiological techniques and a better understanding ofgastric carcinogenesis have allowed us to validate avariety of genes as molecular targets for gene therapy.This review provides an update of the new developmentsin cancer gene therapy,new principles,techniques,strategies and vector systems,and shows how they maybe applied in the treatment of gastric cancer.     

Advances in paediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Role of lipidomics

Due its close relationship with obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become a major worldwide health issue even in childhood. The most accepted pathophysiological hypothesis is represented by the “multiple hits” theory, in which both hepatic intracellular lipid accumulation and insulin resistance mainly contribute to liver injury through several factors. Among these, lipotoxicity has gained particular attention. In this view, the pathogenic role of different lipid classes in NAFLD (e.g., sphingolipids, fatty acids, ceramides, etc.) has been highlighted in recent lipidomics studies. Although there is some contrast between plasma and liver findings, lipidomic profile in the NAFLD context provides novel insights by expanding knowledge in the intricate field of NAFLD pathophysiology as well as by suggesting innovative therapeutic approaches in order to improve both NAFLD prevention and treatment strategies. Selective changes of distinct lipid species might be an attractive therapeutic target for treating NAFLD. Herein the most recent evidence in this attractive field has been summarized to provide a comprehensive overview of the lipidomic scenario in paediatric NAFLD.     

Gene therapy of cancer

Gene therapy was initially thought of as a means to correct single gene defects in hereditary disease. In the meantime, cancer has become by far the most important indication for gene therapy in clinical trials. In the foreseeable future, the best way to achieve reasonable intratumoral concentrations of a transgene with available vectors is direct intratumoral injection with or without the aid of various techniques such as endoscopy or CT-guidance. At present, viral and non-viral methods of gene transfer are used either in vivo or ex vivo/in vitro. The most important viral vectors currently in use in clinical trials comprise retroviruses, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, and herpes viruses. None of the available vectors satisfies all the criteria of an ideal gene therapeutic system, and vectors with only minimal residues of their parent viruses ("gutless vectors") as well as completely "synthetic viral vectors" will gain more and more importance in the future. Non-viral gene therapy methods include liposomes, injection of vector-free DNA ("naked DNA"), protein-DNA complexes, delivery by "gene gun," calcium-phosphate precipitation, electroporation, and intracellular microinjection of DNA. The first clinical trial of gene therapy for cancer was performed in 1991 in patients with melanoma, and since then more than 5000 patients have been treated worldwide in more than 400 clinical protocols. With the exception of a case of fatal toxicity in a young man with hereditary liver disease treated intrahepatically with high doses of adenovirus, side effects have been rare and usually mild in all these studies and expression of the transgene could be demonstrated in patients in vivo. However, despite anecdotal reports of therapeutic responses in some patients, unequivocal proof of clinical efficacy is still lacking for most of the varied approaches to gene therapy in humans. As well as our only fragmentary understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of many diseases, the principal reason for the present lack of clinical success of gene therapy is the very low transduction and expression efficiency in vivo of available vectors. Despite the complexities of gene therapy for cancer, the numerous different approaches can be subdivided into three basic concepts: (1) strengthening of the immune response against a tumour, (2) repair of cell cycle defects caused by losses of tumour suppressor genes or inappropriate activation of oncogenes, and (3) suicide gene strategies. In addition, the importance of gene marker studies and gene therapeutic protection of normal tissue are briefly covered in this review.     

Novel targeting approaches and signaling pathways of colorectal cancer: An insight

Colorectal cancer(CRC) is the third most common cancer of mortality in the world. Chemotherapy based treatment leads to innumerable side effects as it delivers the anticancer drug to both normal cells besides cancer cells. Sonic Hedgehog(SHH), Wnt wingless-type mouse mammary tumor virus/β-catenin, transforming growth factor-β/SMAD, epidermal growth factor receptor and Notch are the main signaling pathways involved in the progression of CRC. Targeted therapies necessitate information regarding the particular aberrant pathways. Advancements in gene therapies have resulted in the recognition of novel therapeutic targets related with these signal-transduction cascades. CRC is a stepwise process where mutations occur over the time and activation of oncogenes and deactivation of tissue suppressor genes takes place. Genetic changes which are responsible for the induction of carcinogenesis include loss of heterozygosity in tumor suppressor genes such as adenomatous polyposis coli, mutation or deletion of genes like p53 and K-ras. Therefore, many gene-therapy approaches like gene correction, virusdirected enzyme-prodrug therapy, immunogenetic manipulation and virotherapy are currently being explored. Development of novel strategies for the safe and effective delivery of drugs to the cancerous site is the need of the hour. This editorial accentuates different novel strategies with emphasis on gene therapy and immunotherapy for the management of CRC.     

New gene therapy strategies for hepatic fibrosis

The liver is the largest internal organ of the body, which may suffer acute or chronic injury induced by many factors, leading to cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma. Cirrhosis is the irreversible end result of fibrous scarring and hepatocellular regeneration, characterized by diffuse disorganization of the normal hepatic structure, regenerative nodules and fibrotic tissue. Cirrhosis is associated with a high co-morbidity and mortality without effective treatment, and much research has been aimed at developing new therapeutic strategies to guarantee recovery. Liver-based gene therapy has been used to downregulate specific genes, to block the expression of deleterious genes, to delivery therapeutic genes, to prevent allograft rejection and to augment liver regeneration. Viral and non-viral vectors have been used, with viral vectors proving to be more efficient. This review provides an overview of the main strategies used in liver-gene therapy represented by non-viral vectors, viral vectors, novel administration methods like hydrodynamic injection, hybrids of two viral vectors and blocking molecules, with the hope of translating findings from the laboratory to the patient′s bed-side.