The management of malignant bone tumors in children and adolescents

A series of 205 pediatric patients affected by osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone were treated from 1978 to 1988. Ninety-eight percent of the patients received chemotherapy and 63% had a surgical resection. Sixty-five percent of all patients were alive at 30 months and were considered disease free. The functional results after surgery were evaluated according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. In all diaphyseal resections and resections of the upper extremity and pelvis, the results were excellent or good in 60% of the cases. In resections of the proximal femur, distal femur, or proximal tibia and reconstruction with nonexpansible prostheses, the results were excellent or good in 75%. On the other hand, when arthrodeses of the lower extremity were used, only 14% of cases had a good result. This correlates with the resulting lack of articulation and serious limb shortening seen with progression of skeletal growth.     

Complications and functional outcomes of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft after intra-articular resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome and the complications of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft in patients who had had intra-articular resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus. METHODS: Sixteen patients who had had intra-articular resection and reconstruction of the proximal aspect of the humerus for the treatment of a tumor between 1986 and 1996 were evaluated. The length of the resected part of the humerus ranged from eight to 27.5 centimeters. The resections were classified as either S34A or S345A resections of the shoulder girdle on the basis of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society classification system. Reconstruction was performed with use of a nonirradiated, frozen osteoarticular allograft with intact capsular and rotator cuff attachments. Dual orthogonal dynamic compression plates were used for internal fixation of the allograft to the host bone. The oncological parameters that were evaluated included survival of the patient, local recurrence, and metastasis. The radiographic parameters included time to union, stability of the joint, fracture of the allograft, and fragmentation of the epiphysis of the allograft (subchondral collapse). Survival of the graft was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The modified Musculoskeletal Tumor Society evaluation system was used to assess functional outcome. RESULTS: At a median of forty-seven months (range, fourteen to 130 months) after the operation, fourteen of the patients in the study group were free of disease and two had died of disease. No patient had local recurrence or nonunion. Late complications included four fractures of the allograft and one infection of the graft. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a 68 percent rate of survival of the allograft at five years. Instability of the glenohumeral joint in the form of ptosis and anterior subluxation was noted in three patients, and dislocation of the glenohumeral joint was seen in eight patients. On the basis of the modified Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional evaluation, the mean score at the most recent follow-up evaluation (at a mean of thirty-four months) was 70 percent. This score was lower than the mean score of 81 percent at a mean of fourteen months. All patients had normal manual dexterity and had mild or no pain at the most recent follow-up evaluation. However, all had restriction of recreational activities or partial disability in addition to limitations with regard to placement of the hand and the ability to lift. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of the proximal aspect of the humerus with an osteoarticular allograft is an option that provides good relief of pain and preserves manual dexterity. However, in our study, function was limited by impairment of elevation of the shoulder and hand as well as by decreased strength of the shoulder. There was an extremely high rate of complications, including joint instability, fracture of the allograft, and infection of the allograft. We no longer routinely perform this reconstruction at our institution.     

Shoulder reconstruction after tumor resection by pedicled scapular crest graft

The current authors present and evaluate a technique for reconstructing proximal humeral defects that result after resection of malignant bone tumors. Sixteen patients were included in this study with an average followup of 3 years (range, 12-76 months). Twelve patients had intraarticular resections, two had extraarticular resections, and two had intercalary resections. Reconstruction was done at the lateral border of the scapula (based on the circumflex scapular vessels) that was osteotomized and mobilized to bridge the resultant defect. Shoulder arthrodesis was done in 14 patients and the shoulder was spared in the two patients who had intercalary resections. Function was evaluated according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system. The average time for union of the graft proximally and distally was 6 months after which the graft started to hypertrophy. The average functional score was 22.5 points (75%) with a minimum score of 18 points (60%) and a maximum score of 27 points (90%). Nonunion of the distal host-graft junction occurred in two patients; both patients required iliac crest bone grafting and both achieved clinical and radiographic union without additional intervention. In three patients, the proximal fixation became loose but had no effect on function. The authors conclude that this technique is inexpensive, effective, and a durable reconstructive option for proximal humeral defects that are less than 15 cm. It has a predictable functional outcome (60%-90%) that is comparable with other reconstructive options.     

计算机辅助恶性骨肿瘤个性化切除与精确重建

目的探讨计算机辅助恶性骨肿瘤个性化切除与精确重建的新方法,评价计算机辅助技术在恶性骨肿瘤手术治疗中的价值。方法 2007年1月～2010年7月共收治13例恶性骨肿瘤患者。其中男7例,女6例,年龄19～46岁。Enneking分期ⅡA期8例,ⅡB期5例。所有患者均采用薄层CT扫描获取病变部位的二维数据,重建三维解剖模型,运用计算机辅助设计（computer aided design,CAD）技术精确设计肿瘤切除范围、个性化辅助手术模板以及个性化骨修复体,模拟骨缺损修复重建过程。术中按照CAD方案精确切除肿瘤组织,采用外形匹配的异体骨或异体骨＋个性化人工关节置换重建骨肿瘤切除后遗留骨缺损。随访期间采用骨与软组织肿瘤学会（Musculoskeletal Tumor Society,MSTS）保肢评分系统对随访患者进行功能评价。结果 13例患者均获得随访,随访时间10～52个月,平均24.8个月。术后早期X线片显示骨缺损区域结构重建效果好,骨缺损区域解剖结构获得恢复。所有患者均存活,末次随访MSTS评分为17～27分,平均23.5分,其中优7例,良4例,可2例。2例发生异体骨感染,1例异体骨不愈合,1例钢板断裂,2例异体骨吸收。1例髋臼肿瘤术后18个月局部复发,行肿瘤再切除治疗。结论将计算机辅助技术用于骨恶性肿瘤的手术治疗,可以正确设计肿瘤切除边界、准确切除肿瘤并对病变区域的骨关节结构进行精确重建,从而将骨肿瘤手术治疗提升到个性化外科手术的高度。     

Clinical effectiveness of hemipelvic reconstruction using computer-aided custom-made prostheses after resection of malignant pelvic tumors

This is a retrospective analysis of 16 patients with primary malignant pelvic tumors who underwent wide resection of the hemipelvis and consequent reconstruction between 2003 and 2007. Mean patient age was 27 years, whereas median follow-up was 36 months (range, 23-62 months). Hemipelvic prostheses were individually designed for each patient based on preoperative computed tomographic scans and consequent surgical modeling. The 3-year prosthesis survival rate was 69%. There were 3 cases of local recurrence (19%), and 4 patients died because of pulmonary metastases. The mean follow-up Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score was 72%. In conclusion, computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis can be applied to quickly and effectively restore the bone defect after internal hemipelvectomy for treatment of pelvic tumors.     

冷冻异体骨移植治疗骨肿瘤切除后骨缺损

目的探讨冷冻异体骨移植在治疗骨肿瘤切除后骨缺损中的作用。方法1992年3月至2002年9月应用深低温保存同种异体骨治疗骨肿瘤切除后骨缺损164例患者,其中男性90例,女性74例,年龄12～65岁,平均20岁。疾病种类以骨巨细胞瘤和骨肉瘤为主。外科治疗以Enneking外科分期标准为原则。主要发病部位为股骨上端、股骨下端、胫骨上端及胫骨上端及肱骨上端。异体骨均为北京骨科创伤研究所骨库提供。重建方式为1／2关节移植术95例,1／4关节移植术15例,人工关节．异体骨复合物12例,大块骨移植23例,骨干节段移植15例,骨盆骨移植4例。结果所有患者均获得随访,平均随访时间47个月。治疗满意率74．4％（122／164）,复发率12．8％（21／164）,感染率11．0％（18／164）,骨端不愈合23．2％（38／164）,内固定折断6．7％（11／164）,关节不稳定7．9％（13／164）,异体骨骨折6．7％（11／164）,死亡6．1％（10／164）,最终保肢率91．5％（150／164）。结论深低温保存异体骨降低了异体骨的免疫原性,具有与自体骨近似的骨传导性及骨诱导性,可保留韧带附丽以供软组织重建应用。但异体骨移植具有较高并发症,只有在移植骨与宿主完全愈合后,方可发挥作用。     

Intercalary reconstruction following resection of diaphyseal bone tumors: A systematic review

IntroductionThe options for the reconstruction of diaphyseal defects following the resection of bone tumors include biological or prosthetic implants. The purpose of our study was to evaluate different types of intercalary reconstruction techniques, including massive bone allograft, extracorporeal devitalized autograft, vascularized free fibula, and modular prosthesis.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of articles using the terms diaphyseal bone tumor and intercalary reconstruction. All the studies reporting the non-oncological complications such as infection, nonunion and fracture of the intercalary reconstructions were included. We excluded articles published before 2000 or did not involve humans in the study. Case reports, reviews, technique notes and opinion articles were also excluded based on the abstracts. Thirty-three articles included in this review were then studied to evaluate failure rates, complications and functional outcome of different surgical intercalary reconstruction techniques.ResultsNonunion rates of allograft ranged 6%–43%, while aseptic loosening rates of modular prosthesis ranged 0%–33%. Nonunion rates of allograft alone and allograft with a vascularized fibula graft ranged 6%–43% and 0%–33%, respectively. Fracture rates of allograft alone and allograft with a vascularized fibula graft ranged 7%–45% and 0%–44%, respectively. Infection rates of allograft alone and allograft with a vascularized fibula graft ranged 0%–28% and 0%–17%, respectively. All of the allograft (range: 67%–92%), extracorporeal devitalized autograft including irradiation (87%), autoclaving (70%), pasteurization (88%), low-heat (90%) or freezing with liquid nitrogen (90%), and modular prosthesis (range: 77%–93%) had similar Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores. Addition of a vascularized fibula graft to allograft did not affect functional outcome [allograft with a vascularized fibula graft (range: 86%–94%) vs. allograft alone (range: 67%–92%)].ConclusionAseptic loosening rates of modular prosthesis seem to be less than nonunion rates of allograft. Adding a vascularized fibula graft to allograft seems to increase bone union rate and reduce the risk of fractures and infections, though a vascularized fibula graft needs longer surgical time and has the disadvantage of donor site morbidity. These various intercalary reconstruction techniques with or without a vascularized fibula autograft had similar functional outcome.     

The use of massive allograft with intramedullary fibular graft for intercalary reconstruction after resection of tibial malignancy

Reconstruction after intercalary excision of tibia malignancy is challenging. The combined use of a vascularized fibular flap and allograft can provide a reliable reconstructive option. Eight patients underwent reconstruction with an allograft and vascularized fibula following tibia malignancy resection. Patients were examined clinically and radiographically. The average age of patients was 16.5 years. The mean follow-up time was 38.4 months. Contralateral free fibula flap was used in three patients and ipsilateral pedicle fibula in five. The average length of defect was 11.8 cm and of fibula flap was 15.9 cm. Primary union was achieved in seven patients. The average time for bone union was 5.8 months at fibula-tibia junction and 14.1 months at allograft-tibia junction. Five patients had 10 complications. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society average score was 90.8% at final follow-up. Intramedullary fibular flap in combination with massive allografts provide an excellent option for reconstruction of large bony defects after tibial malignancy extirpation. Ipsilateral pedicle fibula transportation had the advantages of short operation time and avoidance of donor site complications compared with the contralateral free fibula transfer.     

骨肿瘤初次保肢手术后生物性重建失败的肿瘤假体翻修术

目的评估骨肿瘤初次保肢手术后生物性重建失败的肿瘤假体翻修的疗效。方法2004至2006年，13例骨肉瘤和3例骨巨细胞瘤患者在香港威尔斯亲王医院接受手术治疗。15例患者应用同种异体骨重建，另1例患者应用带血管腓骨移植重建骨缺损。应用肿瘤型假体进行翻修手术的重建。翻修术后患者膝关节活动范围良好时，订制的可延长假体接受延长手术。结果患者平均年龄23．2岁（13～43岁），平均随诊26．4个月（6～47个月）。翻修手术的原因包括：7例患者出现同种异体骨骨折或软骨下骨塌陷，5例患者骨不愈合，3例患者异体骨感染，1例患者膝关节僵硬。翻修手术的假体包括10例患者应用订制型假体，其他患者应用组合式假体。翻修手术的部位包括9例股骨远端假体，6例胫骨近端假体和1例股骨中段假体。订制假体中6例是可延长假体，假体的延长方式中5例是微创延长、1例无创延长。翻修手术后，膝关节活动改善，平均从18．1°（0°-90°）至91．9°（50°-120°）。下肢缩短不等长畸形从平均5cm（2-11．5cm）纠正至平均1．5cm（0-4cm）。翻修术后患肢功能MSTS评分从34．6％改善到89．2％。翻修术后2例患者出现部分皮肤坏死，1例患者出现腓总神经麻痹，以后部分恢复，1例患者出现胫骨裂纹骨折；没有感染和植入物失败。结论保肢手术后生物学重建失败所引起下肢缩短和僵硬，应用人工假体翻修是可行的，早期效果令人鼓舞。膝关节僵硬患者可获得良好的关节活动度。严重的下肢缩短畸形通过可伸长假体逐渐获得纠正。     

Overlapping allograft in reconstructive surgery for malignant bone tumours in paediatric patients: a preliminary report

The use of allografts for the treatment of bone tumours in children is limited by nonunion and the difficulty of finding a suitable graft. Furthermore, appositional growth can't be expected of an allograft. We used an overlapping allograft in 11 children, with a mean age of ten years (4 to 15), with a mean follow-up of 24.1 months (20 to 33). There were five intercalary and six intra-articular resections, and the tumours were in the femur in six cases and the humerus in five. Rates of union, times to union, remodelling patterns and allograft-associated complications were evaluated. No allograft was removed due to a complication. Of the 16 junctional sites, 15 (94%) showed union at a mean of 3.1 months (2 to 5). Remodelling between host and allograft was seen at 14 junctions at a mean of five months (4 to 7). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 26.5 of 30 (88.3%). One case of nonunion and another with screw protrusion required re-operation. Overlapping allografts have the potential to shorten time to union, decrease rates of nonunion and have positive appositional growth effect.     

Does the Addition of a Vascularized Fibula Improve the Results of a Massive Bone Allograft Alone for Intercalary Femur Reconstruction of Malignant Bone Tumors in Children?

BackgroundMassive bone allograft with or without a vascularized fibula is a potentially useful approach for femoral intercalary reconstruction after resection of bone sarcomas in children. However, inadequate data exist regarding whether it is preferable to use a massive bone allograft alone or a massive bone allograft combined with a vascularized free fibula for intercalary reconstructions of the femur after intercalary femur resections in children. Because the addition of a vascularized fibula adds to the time and complexity of the procedure, understanding more about whether it reduces complications and improves the function of patients who undergo these resections and reconstructions would be valuable for patients and treating physicians.Questions/purposesIn an analysis of children with bone sarcomas of the femur who underwent an intercalary resection and reconstruction with massive bone allograft with or without a vascularized free fibula, we asked: (1) What was the difference in the surgical time of these two different surgical techniques? (2) What are the complications and number of reoperations associated with each procedure? (3) What were the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores after these reconstructions? (4) What was the survival rate of these two different reconstructions?MethodsBetween 1994 and 2016, we treated 285 patients younger than 16 years with a diagnosis of osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma of the femur. In all, 179 underwent resection and reconstruction of the distal femur and 36 patients underwent resection and reconstruction of the proximal femur. Additionally, in 70 patients with diaphyseal tumors, we performed total femur reconstruction in four patients, amputation in five, and a rotationplasty in one. The remaining 60 patients with diaphyseal tumors underwent intercalary resection and reconstruction with massive bone allograft with or without vascularized free fibula. The decision to use a massive bone allograft with or without a vascularized free fibula was probably influenced by tumor size, with the indication to use the vascularized free fibula in longer reconstructions. Twenty-seven patients underwent a femur reconstruction with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, and 33 patients received massive bone allograft alone. In the group with massive bone allograft and vascularized fibula, two patients were excluded because they did not have the minimum data for the analysis. In the group with massive bone allograft alone, 12 patients were excluded: one patient was lost to follow-up before 2 years, five patients died before 2 years of follow-up, and six patients did not have the minimum data for the analysis. We analyzed the remaining 46 children with sarcoma of the femur treated with intercalary resection and biological reconstruction. Twenty-five patients underwent femur reconstruction with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, and 21 patients had reconstruction with a massive bone allograft alone. In the group of children treated with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, there were 17 boys and eight girls, with a mean ± SD age of 11 ± 3 years. The diagnosis was osteosarcoma in 14 patients and Ewing sarcoma in 11. The mean length of resection was 18 ± 5 cm. The mean follow-up was 117 ± 61 months. In the group of children treated with massive bone allograft alone, there were 13 boys and eight girls, with a mean ± SD age of 12 ± 2 years. The diagnosis was osteosarcoma in 17 patients and Ewing sarcoma in four. The mean length of resection was 15 ± 4 cm. The mean follow-up was 130 ± 56 months. Some patients finished clinical and radiological checks as the follow-up exceeded 10 years. In the group with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, four patients had a follow-up of 10, 12, 13, and 18 years, respectively, while in the group with massive bone allograft alone, five patients had a follow-up of 10 years, one patient had a follow-up of 11 years, and another had 13 years of follow-up. In general, there were no important differences between the groups in terms of age (mean difference 0.88 [95% CI -0.6 to 2.3]; p = 0.26), gender (p = 0.66), diagnosis (p = 0.11), and follow up (mean difference 12.9 [95% CI-22.7 to 48.62]; p = 0.46). There was a difference between groups regarding the length of the resection, which was greater in patients treated with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula (18 ± 5 cm) than in those treated with a massive bone allograft alone (15 ± 4 cm) (mean difference -3.09 [95% CI -5.7 to -0.4]; p = 0.02). Complications related to the procedure like infection, neurovascular compromise, and graft-related complication, such as fracture and nonunion of massive bone allograft or vascularized free fibula and implant breakage, were analyzed by chart review of these patients by an orthopaedic surgeon with experience in musculoskeletal oncology. Survival of the reconstructions that had no graft or implant replacement was the endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier test was performed for a survival analysis of the reconstruction. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThe surgery was longer in patients treated with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula than in patients treated with a massive bone allograft alone (10 ± 0.09 and 4 ± 0.77 hours, respectively; mean difference -6.8 [95% CI -7.1 to -6.4]; p = 0.001). Twelve of 25 patients treated with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula had one or more complication: allograft fracture (seven), nonunion (four), and infection (four). Twelve of 21 patients treated with massive bone allograft alone had the following complications: allograft fracture (five), nonunion (six), and infection (one). The mean functional results were 26 ± 4 in patients with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula and 27 ± 2 in patients with a massive bone allograft alone (mean difference 0.75 [95% CI -10.6 to 2.57]; p = 0.39). With the numbers we had, we could not detect a difference in survival of the reconstruction between patients with a massive bone allograft and free vascularized fibula and those with a massive bone allograft alone (84% [95% CI 75% to 93%] and 87% [95% CI 80% to 94%], respectively; p = 0.89).ConclusionWe found no difference in the survival of reconstructions between patients treated with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula and patients who underwent reconstruction with a massive bone allograft alone. Based on this experience, our belief is that we should reconstruct these femoral intercalary defects with an allograft alone and use a vascularized fibula to salvage the allograft only if a fracture or nonunion occurs. This approach would have resulted in about half of the patients we treated not undergoing the more invasive, difficult, and risky vascularized procedure.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.     

Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prostheses for tumors

The functional results of standard reconstruction prostheses are impaired by instability because of poor muscular reinsertion, especially of the gluteal muscles. In 21 patients, composite hip prostheses including proximal femoral allografts were used after primary malignant tumor resection. Ten reconstructions used combined bone-tendon allografts that allowed reinsertion of the gluteal muscles to the allograft tendons. None of the 21 patients had dislocation or infection. Ten patients died within 2 years of surgery without complications requiring reoperations. The mean followup in the 11 other patients was 10 years. Eight patients had reoperation: four for loosening (two at 3 years, two at 11 and 12 years), and four had autologous graftings for nonunion of the trochanter or of the distal graft-bone interface. Evaluation of function in the 11 patients with follow-ups ranging from 4 to 15 years showed an average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 77%. Satisfactory strength of the abductor muscles was achieved by reinsertion of the trochanter or by suture of the patients gluteal muscles with the combined tendon-bone allograft. At long-term, radiologically, the bony allograft showed no change in five patients, very mild resorption in five, and severe resorption in one. Stem fixation was excellent in 10 patients and fair in one. Comparison between the functional results of reconstruction prostheses versus composite prostheses showed a significant improvement with the composite prosthesis. In the authors' institution, at 10 years, the mechanical survival of composite prostheses was 81%, as compared with only 65% for reconstruction prostheses.     

Endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant upper extremity tumors

Between December 1980 and December 1992, 59 patients underwent 60 reconstructions with endoprostheses after resection of malignant tumors in the upper extremity. There were 32 male patients and 27 female patients, with a mean age of 33 years (range, 3-83 years). The type of reconstruction was based on the location of the primary tumor site. The histologic diagnoses included osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and fibrosarcoma of bone. Most of the patients had Stage IIB disease (N = 38), as established by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society classification. An additional six patients had metastatic tumors to the upper extremity. Twenty-seven of 59 patients died of disease progression. Two patients died of other causes (chronic leukemia, human immunodeficiency virus infection). The 30 survivors had a mean followup of 90 months (range, 60-170 months). The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional analysis for the patients with a minimum 2-year followup (N = 41) averaged 74%. Sixteen of the 59 (27%) patients had local complications. Problems related to mechanical failure and infection were managed successfully with second operation. Amputation was rare, occurring in three of 60 (5%) patients and was related only to local recurrence. Endoprosthetic reconstructions of the upper extremity after tumor resections have proven to be successful.     

Does Adding Femoral Lengthening at the Time of Rotation Hip Transposition After Periacetabular Tumor Resection Allow for Restoration of Limb Length and Function? Interim Results of a Modified Hip Transposition Procedure

BackgroundReconstruction after pelvic tumor resection of the acetabulum is challenging. Previous methods of hip transposition after acetabular resection have the advantages of reducing wound complications and infections of the allograft or metal endoprosthesis but were associated with substantial limb length discrepancy. We therefore developed a modification of this procedure, rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening, to address limb length, and we wished to evaluate its effectiveness in terms of complications and functional outcomes.Questions/purposesIn this study, we asked: (1) What were the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores after this reconstruction method was used? (2) What complications occurred after this reconstruction method was used? (3) What proportion of patients achieved solid arthrodesis (as opposed to pseudarthrosis) with the sacrum and solid union of the femur? (4) What were the results with respect to limb length after a minimum follow-up of 2 years?MethodsFrom 2011 to 2017, 83 patients with an aggressive benign or primary malignant tumor involving the acetabulum were treated in our institution. Of those, 23% (19 of 83) were treated with rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening and were considered for this retrospective study; 15 were available at a minimum follow-up of 2 years (median [range], 49 months [24 to 97 months]), and four died of lung metastases before 2 years. No patients were lost to follow-up before 2 years. During the period in question, the general indications for this approach were primary nonmetastatic malignant bone tumor or a locally aggressive benign bone tumor that could not be treated adequately with curettage. There were seven men and 12 women with a median age of 43 years. Nine patients underwent Zones I + II resection, eight patients had Zones I + II + III resection, and two received Zones II + III resection. After tumor resection, rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening reconstruction was performed, which included two steps. The first step was to lengthen the femur with the insertion of an allograft. Two methods were used to achieve limb lengthening: a “Z” osteotomy and a transverse osteotomy. The second step was to take the hip transposition and rotate the femoral head posteriorly 10° to 20°. The median (range) operative time was 510 minutes (330 to 925 minutes). The median intraoperative blood loss was 4000 mL (1800 to 7000 mL). We performed a chart review on the 15 available patients for clinical and radiographic assessment of functional outcomes and complications. Arthrodesis and leg length discrepancy were evaluated radiographically.ResultsThe median (range) Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 21 points (17 to 30). Eleven of 19 patients developed procedure-related complications, including six patients with allograft nonunion, two with deep infection, two with delayed skin healing, and one with a hematoma. Two patients had minor additional surgical interventions without the removal of any implants. Local recurrences developed in four patients, and all four died of disease. All seven patients treated with a Z osteotomy had bone union. Among the eight patients with transverse osteotomy, bone union did not occur in six patients. After hip transposition, stable iliofemoral arthrodesis was achieved in seven patients. Pseudarthrosis developed in the remaining eight patients. The median (range) lower limb length discrepancy at the last follow-up visit or death was 8 mm (1 to 42 mm).ConclusionAlthough complex and challenging, rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening reconstruction with a Z osteotomy provides acceptable functional outcomes with complications that are within expectations for resection of pelvic tumors involving the acetabulum. Because of the magnitude and complexity of this technique, we believe it should be used primarily for patients with a favorable prognosis, both locally and systemically. This innovative procedure may be useful to other surgeons if larger numbers of patients and longer-term follow-up confirm our results.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic study.     

Allograft reconstruction after resection of malignant tumors of the scapula

The oncologic and functional outcomes of six patients who had scapular allograft reconstruction after scapulectomy for malignant tumors were reviewed. Five patients had Stage IIB and one patient had Stage IB tumors. Total scapulectomy was done in five patients, and partial scapulectomy (glenoid and neck) was done in one patient. Frozen glycerolized scapular allografts were implanted and fixed with plates and screws. The scapular muscles were reattached to the allograft. Tendon reconstruction to replace the excised muscles was done in two patients. The patients were followed up for an average of 3.8 years (range, 2-6 years). Cosmesis, elbow, and hand function were good in all patients. There were no infections, nonunions, or shoulder dislocations. One patient fractured the body of the allograft after a fall. One patient had local recurrence and had scapulectomy 5 years postoperatively. Two patients died 3 and 5 years postoperatively with lung metastases but with functioning grafts. The mean functional result using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score was 82 (range, 77-87). In this series, scapular allograft reconstruction restored cosmesis, shoulder stability, and function. Preservation or reconstruction of rotator cuff muscles is recommended.     

Vascularised fibular grafts as a salvage procedure in failed intercalary reconstructions after bone tumour resection of the femur

Vascularised fibular grafts (VFGs) are widely used for primary reconstruction of long bones after bone tumour resections. The biological properties of VFGs are such that they can be a useful option even in failed intercalary reconstructions. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the results and the morbidity of VFGs as a salvage procedure in failed previous reconstructions after intercalary bone tumour resection of the femur. Our series included 12 patients, treated from April 1989 to March 2005, with an average age of 23 years (range 10–43 years) at presentation. The initial diagnosis was osteosarcoma in 10 cases and Ewing's sarcoma in two cases. All patients received chemotherapy and none received radiation therapy. Seven patients received VFG as biologic augmentation in intercalary allograft non-union and in the other five patients, a combination of allograft and VFG was used to replace a cement spacer with hardware failure (four patients) and a failed intercalary prosthesis (one patient). Three patients died during follow-up, in all cases because of metastatic disease. At an average follow-up of 147 months (range 11–260 months), the remaining nine patients were continuously disease-free. Complete healing of the osteotomy of both allograft and VFG was observed in 10 patients at final follow-up. Two major complications were observed that required surgical revision, eventually healing in one case and leading to a poor functional outcome in one case. Significant hypertrophy of the VFG was detected in seven of nine evaluable patients. At final follow-up the mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS)’93 functional score of the nine evaluable patients was 90% (range 66–100%). These results indicate that VFG is a valid salvage procedure in failed intercalary reconstructions of the femur after bone resection.     

Use of distal femoral osteoarticular allografts in limb salvage surgery

BACKGROUND: As diagnostic and therapeutic techniques improve, patients with a musculoskeletal sarcoma should expect longer survival, fewer complications and side effects, and an improved quality of life. Functional longevity of the reconstruction after resection of the tumor becomes a major concern, especially in young and physically active patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the mid-term and long-term survival of reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft in a series of patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of eighty reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft following resection of a bone tumor in seventy-six patients. The mean duration of follow-up was eighty-two months. The rates of survival of the allograft and the joint surface were estimated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Functional and radiographic results were documented according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system at the time of the latest follow-up. RESULTS: Five patients were lost to follow-up, leaving seventy-five allografts in seventy-one patients available for study. Thirteen patients (thirteen allografts) died of tumor-related causes without allograft failure before a two-year radiographic follow-up could be performed. Of the remaining sixty-two allografts, fourteen failed: six failed as a result of infection; four, because of local recurrence; one, because of massive resorption; and three, as a result of fracture. At the time of final follow-up, at a mean of 125 months, forty-eight allografts were still in place. The overall rate of allograft survival was 78% at both five and ten years, and the rate of allograft survival without the need for resurfacing with a knee prosthesis was 71% at both five and ten years. With the numbers available, age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were not found to have a significant effect on the overall allograft survival rates. The patients who retained the original allograft had good or excellent functional and radiographic results. CONCLUSIONS: The life expectancy for most patients with a highly aggressive or malignant tumor in the distal part of the femur is now several decades. In this study, we found a high rate of survival of distal femoral allograft reconstructions at both five and ten years.     

Functional outcomes and complications of reconstruction of the proximal humerus after intra‐articular tumor resection

Objective: To evaluate functional outcomes and complications of reconstruction of the proximal humerus after intra‐articular tumor resection. Methods: Twenty‐five patients who underwent Malawer I type resection and reconstruction of the proximal humerus for treatment of malignant or invasive benign tumors from August 1999 to August 2005 were evaluated. A variety of reconstructive procedures, including modular tumor prosthesis, osteoarticular allograft, and allograft‐prosthetic composite (APC), were performed after resection of tumor. Oncological and radiographic parameters were evaluated. The modified Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) evaluation system was used to assess limb functional outcome. Results: The study group consisted of 10 male and 15 female patients, among which there were 20 malignant and 5 benign tumors. Restoration of shoulder function was achieved with a prosthesis in 6 patients, osteoarticular allograft in 12, and allograft‐prosthesis composite in 7. At a mean of 48 months follow‐up, 2 patients had died of disease. Two patients had local recurrence and 2 had metastatic disease. On the basis of the modified MSTS functional evaluation, the mean scores were 22.50 in the modular prosthesis group, 24.58 in the osteoarticular allograft group, and 27.00 in APC group, respectively. Joint instability and subluxation were serious complications affecting shoulder function in 10 patients. Conclusion: Reconstruction of the proximal humerus is an option that provides good relief of pain and preserves manual dexterity. Functional outcomes are better for APC and allograft than for modular prosthesis, due to retention of the rotation cuff. Complications in the APC group were less than in the allograft one.