Aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2)-344T/C polymorphism and renoprotective response to losartan treatment in diabetic nephropathy

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that an aldosterone synthase gene polymorphism (CYP11B2 -344T/C) is predictive of the blood pressure lowering effect of angiotensin II receptor blockers in essential hypertension. We investigated whether this polymorphism is predictive of reductions in blood pressure and albuminuria and preservation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during short-term and long-term treatment with losartan in 57 hypertensive type-1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After a 4-week washout period, patients received losartan (100 mg o.d.) and were followed for a mean follow-up of 36 months. At baseline, after 2 and 4 months, and every 6 months thereafter, GFR (51Cr-EDTA-clearance), albuminuria and 24-h blood pressure were determined. The CYP11B2 -344T/C polymorphism was determined by standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: The TT, CT and CC genotypes were found in 28 %, 58 % and 14 % of patients, respectively. At baseline albuminuria and blood pressure did not differ between genotype groups. Plasma aldosterone levels (geometric mean (95 % CI)) were similar at baseline: 87 (60-125), 77 (53-112), and 89 (49-161) pg mL(-1) and during follow-up (not significant). After initiation of losartan treatment, comparable mean (SE) reductions in blood pressure and albuminuria were seen in patients with TT, CT and CC genotypes (p >0.6 between groups). After long-term follow-up, there was a tendency towards a difference in systolic blood pressure reduction (p = 0.07, one-way ANOVA), suggesting a poorer response in patients with the CC genotype. No significant difference in rate of decline in GFR (median (range)) was seen between groups (TT, CT, CC): 4.2 (-1.0 to 16.0), 3.2 (-1.6 to 13.8) and 2.6 (-0.1 to 11.0) mL min(-1)year(-1), respectively (p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a previous smaller study of angiotensin II receptor blockade in essential hypertension, we could not confirm that CYP11B2 -344T/C genotypes contribute towards explaining the observed variability in response to treatment with angiotensin II receptor blockers, which could be due to lack of power.     

Beta 1-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and antihypertensive response to metoprolol

OBJECTIVES: Marked interpatient variability exists in blood pressure response to beta-blocker monotherapy. We tested the hypothesis that 2 common polymorphisms in the gene for beta(1)-adrenergic receptor are associated with antihypertensive response to metoprolol in patients with uncomplicated hypertension. METHODS: Forty hypertensive men and women aged 35 to 65 years were studied. Baseline studies included 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Patients took 50 mg metoprolol twice daily with weekly titration to response or 200 mg twice daily. After a minimum of 4 weeks at stable dose, treatment phase 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was repeated. The codon 49 and 389 genotypes for beta(1)-adrenergic receptor were determined by polymerase chain reaction with restriction fragment length polymorphism. Multilinear regression was performed to determine the impact of genotype and other variables on blood pressure response to metoprolol. RESULTS: Patients homozygous for Arg at codon 389 had a nearly 3-fold greater reduction in daytime diastolic blood pressure (-13.3% +/- 8.4% versus -4.5% +/- 8.2%, P =.0018) compared with those who carried the variant allele. The haplotype pair (diplotype) for beta(1)-adrenergic receptor was also a significant predictor of response, with patients having the Ser49Arg389/Ser49Arg389 diplotype demonstrating a decline in blood pressure of 14.7 mm Hg versus 0.5 mm Hg in patients with the Gly49Arg389/Ser49Gly389 diplotype. In multiregression analysis, baseline daytime diastolic blood pressure, codon 389 genotype, and codon 49 genotype were significant predictors of blood pressure after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that beta(1)-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms are important determinants of antihypertensive response to metoprolol. In the future, codon 49 and 389 genotypes or beta(1)-adrenergic receptor haplotypes might be used to predict the diastolic blood pressure response to metoprolol in patients with hypertension.     

Effects of delapril in combination with indapamide on blood pressure and left ventricular mass in elderly hypertensive patients

We present a single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of the effects on blood pressure and left ventricular mass and of the safety of a combined antihypertensive treatment with delapril, a new nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and indapamide, a sulfonamide diuretic. We studied 28 elderly patients aged 65-85 years (mean age, 69 +/- 1) with sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 160-200/95-115 mm Hg (at the end of the placebo period). After a 2-week placebo run-in, patients took 30 mg delapril in combination with 1.25 mg indapamide once daily for 24 weeks. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure was monitored and M- and B-mode echocardiography were performed before and after 24 weeks of treatment. Blood pressure decreased from 156 +/- 1.5/101 +/- 1 mm Hg before treatment to 133 +/- 1/73 +/- 1 mm Hg after treatment. The total blood pressure burden also decreased; the percentage of measurements with a systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg decreased from 48.7% +/- 5%/31.5% +/- 4.3% to 23.5% +/- 4%/20.5% +/- 2.9% (p < 0.0005 and p < 0.05). The area under the curve of the 24-hour blood pressure decreased from 250 +/- 41/103 +/- 21 mm Hg to 97 +/- 21/37 +/- 8.5 mm Hg (p < 0.001 and p < 0.005). The left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in the 15 patients with pretreatment left ventricular hypertrophy was reduced after therapy from 167.5 +/- 8.5 g/m 2 to 152.2 +/- 7.6 g/m 2 (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between percent changes of the area under the curve of the 24-hour diastolic blood pressure and percent changes of LVMI (r = 0.6; p < 0. 05) in the 15 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Only 2 patients reported side effects: 1 developed skin rash and 1 developed headache. The safety of the treatment was confirmed by laboratory tests. In elderly hypertensive patients, the combination of delapril and indapamide at low doses reduced blood pressure and had favorable effects on LVMI with few side effects.     

Effects of systemic endothelin A receptor antagonism in various vascular beds in men: in vivo interactions of the major blood pressure-regulating systems and associations with the GNB3 C825T polymorphism

OBJECTIVE: We used the orally available endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonist darusentan to characterize interactions between the major blood pressure-regulating systems in healthy men. Mediators of the endothelin system, the sympathetic nervous system, and the renin-angiotensin system act via G protein-coupled receptors with a possible involvement of the G-protein beta3 subunit (GNB3) C825T polymorphism. We studied the influence of this polymorphism on the responses to ETA antagonism in the presence of endothelin 1 (ET-1), norepinephrine (NA), and angiotensin II (ANGII). METHODS: Thirty-seven individuals were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with 100 mg darusentan. Systemic hemodynamics and plasma ET-1, NA, and ANGII concentrations were assessed. Local studies were performed in the dorsal hand veins (n=18) and skin microcirculation (n=12), respectively. RESULTS: Darusentan lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressure ( P <.001 versus placebo) without any differences according to genotype (mean maximum Delta systolic blood pressure, -7 +/- 2 mmHg for CT/TT versus -5 +/- 3 mmHg for CC, P=.37; mean maximum Delta diastolic blood pressure, -3 +/- 2 mmHg for CT/TT versus -4 +/- 2 mmHg for CC, P=.96). Venoconstriction to ET-1 and NA was not affected by ET A blockade in either group; however, carriers of the 825T allele demonstrated a markedly enhanced venoconstriction to ET-1 and NA (median effective concentration [ED50] for ET-1 after darusentan [placebo]: 2.5 +/- 0.2 pmol/min for CT/TT [2.7 +/- 0.3 pmol/min], P=.42; 3.9 +/- 0.6 pmol/min for CC [4.6 +/- 0.3 pmol/min], P=.42; P=.046 [P=.0005] for CT/TT versus CC) (ED50 for NA after darusentan [placebo]: 5.2 +/- 1.2 ng/min for CT/TT [7.3 +/- 1.2 ng/min], P=.20; 32.9 +/- 7.1 ng/min for CC [19.7 +/- 5.5 ng/min], P=.75; P=.0008 [P=.026] for CT/TT versus CC). Darusentan dilated veins at baseline in CC homozygous subjects (+0.21 +/- 0.05 mm, P=.004 versus placebo). Systemic ET A antagonism inhibited constriction to ET-1 and also to NA and ANGII in the skin microcirculation without differences according to genotype (ET-1, P=.017 for all individuals versus placebo; NA, P=.0005; and ANGII, P=.002). CONCLUSION: GNB3 C825T allele carrier status did not influence systemic hemodynamic or local vascular responses to ET A blockade with darusentan in young, healthy men. However, it determined venoconstriction to exogenous ET-1 and NA. Darusentan markedly inhibited not only ET-1-induced but also NA-induced and ANGII-induced vasoconstriction in the skin microcirculation. In contrast, it had no effects on either ET-1-mediated or NA-mediated venoconstriction, indicating that, in the presence of high local ET-1 concentrations, constrictive endothelin B receptors may be of greater importance in the venous vasculature than has been recognized so far.     

Association of the C-344T polymorphism of CYP11B2 gene with essential hypertension in Hani and Yi minorities of China

BACKGROUND: Aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of aldosterone. Recently, a C-344T polymorphism in the promoter region of the CYP11B2 gene has been reported to be in association with high blood pressure. We investigated the association between this polymorphism and essential hypertension in Hani (n=305 individuals) and Yi (n=233 individuals) minorities of China. METHODS: CYP11B2 genotyping with polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism was performed in 267 normotensive subjects and 271 essential hypertensive subjects. At the same time, the T(-344)C polymorphism detection in 33 subjects was also performed by sequencing. RESULT: The frequency of CYP11B2 C-344T genotype in normotensive controls and essential hypertensive cohort in Hani population were TT: 0.729 vs. 0.610; CT + CC: 0.271 vs. 0.390, respectively. The frequency of CYP11B2 C-344T genotype in normotensive controls and essential hypertensive cohort in Yi population were TT: 0.612 vs. 0.475; CT + CC: 0.388 vs. 0.525, respectively. The frequency of CC + CT genotype in the essential hypertensive group was significantly higher than that in the normotensive controls in both Hani and Yi populations (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The -344C allele of the CYP11B2 may play a role in genetic predisposition to developing essential hypertension in Hani and Yi minorities of China.     

Usefulness of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide in moderately severe essential hypertension.

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor moexipril alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide versus hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with stage II and III essential hypertension. This was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial that evaluated moexipril (15 and 30 mg once daily), hydrochlorothiazide (25 and 50 mg once daily), and combinations of the drugs (15 mg moexipril/25 mg hydrochlorothiazide and 30 mg moexipril/50 mg hydrochlorothiazide) in 272 hypertensive patients whose seated diastolic blood pressure (BP) was 100 to 114 mm Hg. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from baseline in seated diastolic BP at the end of the dosing period. Secondary efficacy measures included changes in systolic BP and standing BP. The lower doses of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide reduced diastolic BP similarly (-8.0 +/- 1.4 versus -8.1 +/- 1.4 mm Hg; p = NS) as did higher doses of the monotherapeutic regimens (moexipril, -9.7 +/- 1.2 mm Hg versus hydrochlorothiazide, -11.0 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, p = NS). Combinations of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide reduced diastolic BP significantly more than either monotherapy (lower doses, -16.0 +/- 1.4 mm Hg; p < 0.001; higher doses, -17.9 +/- 1.2 mm Hg; p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for the systolic BP. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 0% for the moexipril monotherapy patients and 3% to 5% in patients on diuretic or combination treatment. These data demonstrate that 15 and 30 mg moexipril once daily lower BP similarly to hydrochlorothiazide in patients with stage II and III hypertension. There is also an additive effect when combining the two agents that lowers BP more significantly than either monotherapy.     

The link between angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with COPD

OBJECTIVE: The insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. In patients with primary pulmonary hypertension, the homozygous ACE DD genotype is more prevalent than the non-DD genotype. However, the relationship of ACE gene polymorphism to secondary pulmonary hypertension remains unclear, and ethnicity may be one of the factors that can modulate the effects of ACE genotypes reported in different studies. We hypothesized that in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) the presence of the D allele in the ACE gene polymorphism is associated with increased pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bodyplethysmography was used to assess lung function in 66 consecutive patients with COPD; pulmonary artery pressures were determined using echocardiography. ACE gene I/D polymorphism was identified with the polymerase chain reaction. 118 healthy persons served as the control group. All patients and controls were Caucasian. Genotype II was identified in 15 patients with COPD, genotype ID in 31 and genotype DD in 20. In the control group, genotype II was identified in 19 persons, genotype ID in 68 and genotype DD in 31. The distribution of ACE gene polymorphism did not differ between patients and the control group. RESULTS: In patients with COPD, no differences were seen between the three genotype groups in mean age, smoking history, hemoglobin concentrations or ventilometric or blood gas variables. Both systolic and mean Ppa differed significantly between the II, ID and DD groups (Systolic Ppa: 24.4 +/- 2.2 versus 31.3 +/- 2.5 and 36.7 +/- 3.9 mm Hg, respectively, ANOVA, p < 0.05; Mean Ppa: 13.0 +/- 1.5 versus 17.5 +/- 1.4 and 21.2 +/- 2.8 mm Hg, respectively, ANOVA, p < 0.05). In multiple linear regression analysis, the I/D ACE gene polymorphism (p < 0.05), SaO2 (p < 0.05) and the duration of COPD (p < 0.02) were independent predictors of systolic and mean Ppa. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that I/D ACE gene polymorphism is linked to pulmonary artery pressure in Caucasian patients with COPD.     

Evaluation of drug therapy for treatment of hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department

Oral nifedipine (N) and clonidine (C) are often used in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies; however, until recently, there were no comparative studies using the same patient population. The authors reviewed the records of hypertensive patients treated in the emergency department between October 1, 1987 and September 30, 1988. Selected patients had a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of greater than 115 mm Hg without evidence of acute end organ damage. Patients were stratified into three treatment groups: N, C, and group 3 (G3). G3 received a variety of drug therapies but not exclusively N or C. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), DBP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), percent decrease in MAP (%MAP), time to lower blood pressure, admissions, and discharges were evaluated. Efficacy and safety were defined as reaching a DBP less than 110 mm Hg but %MAP of no greater than either 25% or 40%, respectively. Thirty-five N, 32 C, and 27 G3 patients were identified with no statistical difference between groups in race, gender, pretreatment SBP, DBP, or MAP. N, C, and G3 significantly reduced SBP, DBP, and MAP (P less than .01). Comparing N, C, and G3, no differences were observed in %MAP, admissions, discharges, efficacy, or safety. Time required to decrease blood pressure differed between all three groups (44 +/- 32 N v 77 +/- 57 C v 152 +/- 94 min G3) (p less than .05). These results indicate that N, C, and a variety of drug therapies are equally effective and safe in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies.     

A randomized,double-blind,controlled trial of vitamin C in the management of hypertension and lipids

The effect of vitamin C on blood pressure is not well established. This is a randomized, double-blind control trial. Eligible patients were followed for 8 months. Patients were randomized to 500, 1000, or 2000 mg vitamin C. During each visit, a history including medication change was obtained and standardized blood pressure measurements were performed. A 1-week dietary diary was filled out before each visit. Multiple regression analysis and subsequent multiple comparisons were used for data analysis. Fifty-four patients satisfied our criteria and agreed to participate. Thirty-one patients (mean age, 62 +/- 2 years; 52% men, 90% whites) were randomized to the three doses of vitamin C. Overall compliance was 48 +/- 2%. Both mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) decreased during the vitamin C supplementation phase [mean SBP dropped by 4.5 +/- 1.8 mm Hg (P <.05) and DBP by 2.8 +/- 1.2 mm Hg (P <.05)]. There was no difference between the three vitamin C groups (P =.48). This effect was significant for only 1 month of supplementation, but the trend persisted. There was no reported intolerance to vitamin C. There was no change in lipid levels after 6 months of treatment. Vitamin C supplementation lowers blood pressure in mildly hypertensive patients. There is no additional benefit for a higher dose than 500 mg daily. The effect of vitamin C is most likely to be only short term.     

Aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2)­344T/C polymorphism and renoprotective response to losartan treatment in diabetic nephropathy

Objective. It has been suggested that an aldosterone synthase gene polymorphism (CYP11B2 ­344T/C) is predictive of the blood pressure lowering effect of angiotensin II receptor blockers in essential hypertension. We investigated whether this polymorphism is predictive of reductions in blood pressure and albuminuria and preservation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during short‐term and long‐term treatment with losartan in 57 hypertensive type‐1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. Material and methods. After a 4‐week washout period, patients received losartan (100 mg o.d.) and were followed for a mean follow‐up of 36 months. At baseline, after 2 and 4 months, and every 6 months thereafter, GFR (⁵¹Cr‐EDTA‐clearance), albuminuria and 24‐h blood pressure were determined. The CYP11B2 ­344T/C polymorphism was determined by standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results. The TT, CT and CC genotypes were found in 28 %, 58 % and 14 % of patients, respectively. At baseline albuminuria and blood pressure did not differ between genotype groups. Plasma aldosterone levels (geometric mean (95 % CI)) were similar at baseline: 87 (60–125), 77 (53–112), and 89 (49–161) pg mL^?1 and during follow‐up (not significant). After initiation of losartan treatment, comparable mean (SE) reductions in blood pressure and albuminuria were seen in patients with TT, CT and CC genotypes (p >0.6 between groups). After long‐term follow‐up, there was a tendency towards a difference in systolic blood pressure reduction (p = 0.07, one‐way ANOVA), suggesting a poorer response in patients with the CC genotype. No significant difference in rate of decline in GFR (median (range)) was seen between groups (TT, CT, CC): 4.2 (?1.0 to 16.0), 3.2 (?1.6 to 13.8) and 2.6 (?0.1 to 11.0) mL min^?1year^?1, respectively (p = 0.5). Conclusions. Compared to a previous smaller study of angiotensin II receptor blockade in essential hypertension, we could not confirm that CYP11B2 ­344T/C genotypes contribute towards explaining the observed variability in response to treatment with angiotensin II receptor blockers, which could be due to lack of power.     

Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 gene A/G polymorphism and elevated blood pressure in Chinese patients with metabolic syndrome

To establish whether angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) gene A/G single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with hypertension in Chinese patients with metabolic syndrome. The study was conducted in 353 patients with metabolic syndrome. The alleles of the ACE2 A/G polymorphism, which is located on the X chromosome, were detected using polymerase chain reaction and subsequent cleavage by Alu I restriction endonuclease. G allele frequencies in patients with metabolic syndrome were 36.6% in female subjects and 43.4% in male subjects, respectively. Female patients with metabolic syndrome who carry the GG genotype had a significantly higher diastolic blood pressure compared with other genotypes. Multivariate logistic regression showed that female gender (P = 0.019) and carrying only the G allele (odds ratio 2.83 [95% CI 1.36 to 5.91]; P = 0.005) were significantly associated with increased diastolic blood pressure. It is concluded that the ACE2 A/G polymorphism is associated with hypertension in patients with metabolic syndrome.     

Alcohol-induced arterial hypertension and genetic polymorphism of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes

AIM: To study arterial pressure (AP) and heart rate (HR) in patients suffering from alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) with relation to genetic polymorphism of alcohol dehydrogenase-2 (ADG2) and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (AlDG2). MATERIAL AND METHODS: AP and HR were analysed for 36 alcoholics (83 hospitalizations, including repeated ones) with genotypes ADG2 and AIDG2 at admission to and discharge from narcological hospital. RESULTS: ADG2 genotypes distribution was the following: ADG2-1/1--61.1% (n = 22); ADG2-1/2--36.1% (n = 13); ADG2-2/2--2.8% 9n = 1). All the patients had a genotype AIDG2-1/1. A hypertensive reaction occurred in 75.9% inpatients with AWS. At admission, patients with genotype ADG2-1/1 had significantly higher systolic AP and HR vs those with allele ADG2-2: 146.6 +/- 17.0 mmHg against 141.2 +/- 14.9 mmHg, 95.6 +/- 13.9 b/min vs 88.5 +/- 12.2 b/min, respectively. In homozygous genotype ADG2-1/1 AP and HR were higher than in heterozygotes: SAP 152.3 +/- 12.9 mm Hg vs 145.2 +/- 16.2 mm Hg, pulse pressure 57.2 +/- 11.9 vs 50.0 +/- 15.1 mm Hg, HR 96.8 +/- 13.4 b/min vs 87.7 +/- 12.0 b/min. The groups had similar mean diastolic pressure. At discharge, AWS standard therapy resulted in a significant lowering of AP and HR in the study group. Mean values of the parameters in groups with different genotypes did not differe at discharge. CONCLUSION: Population of alcoholics from the Moscow Region had allele polymorphism ADG2. Genetic polymorphism AlDG2 is not typical for this group. Hypertensive reaction was registered in the majority of alcoholics in AWS. Higher systolic, pulse pressure and heart rate were significantly higher in the AWS group with genotype ADG2-1/1. Controlled alcohol withdrawal entails a significant reduction of AP and HR.     

Cerebral blood flow during the acute therapy of severe hypertension with oral clonidine

A major risk associated with the acute treatment of severe hypertension is a reduction in cerebral blood flow (CBF) with ischemic injury to the central nervous system. The authors studied CBF before and after the acute treatment of severe hypertension (diastolic blood pressure greater than 115 mm Hg) with clonidine in 13 patients. One patient did not reach goal blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure 105 mm Hg or a decrease by 30 mm Hg) after clonidine alone. In the remaining 12 patients, oral clonidine reduced supine blood pressure from 201.7 +/- 5.0/126.3 +/- 2.1 mm Hg to 149.4 +/- 5.3/96.8 +/- 1.7 mm Hg over an average time period of 85 +/- 7 minutes. Although mean CBF for the group did not change (72.6 +/- 4.2 v 73.7 +/- 3.5 mL/100 mg/min), a significant (greater than 10%) change occurred in 9 of the 12 patients (5 increases and 4 reductions). The magnitude and direction of the change were dependent upon initial CBF (r = -0.65, P less than .05); patients with low pretreatment CBF experienced an increase, whereas those with high initial flow exhibited a decrease. No significant adverse effects were observed. These data confirm previous reports that clonidine is effective in the acute treatment of severe hypertension and demonstrate that its effects on CBF are determined by the pretreatment levels of flow.     

The gain-of-function G389R variant of the beta1-adrenoceptor does not influence blood pressure or heart rate response to beta-blockade in hypertensive subjects.

Mutation scanning of the beta1-adrenoceptor gene has identified a polymorphism, G389R, that markedly affects G-protein coupling of the receptor and resulting cAMP production. We have investigated the effect of this functionally active polymorphism on clinical response to beta-adrenoceptor blockade. Two cohorts of untreated hypertensive patients randomly assigned to a beta1-selective beta-blocker at the start of antihypertensive therapy were studied retrospectively to see if the G389R polymorphism influenced the response in terms of blood pressure and heart rate. The blood pressure and heart rate responses to treatment were assessed 4 weeks later and compared with the G389R genotype, ascertained by PCR/restriction fragment length polymorphism. The falls in blood pressure and heart rate for the first group (n = 92) by genotype were: GG, 20.1 +/- 3.5/13.9 +/- 2.7 mmHg (systolic/diastolic blood pressure), 18.4 +/- 2.2 beats/min; GR, 20.0 +/- 2.2/15.0 +/- 1.3 mmHg, 16.5 +/- 1.5 beats/min; RR, 20.8 +/- 2.3/13.4 +/- 1.1 mmHg, 16.0 +/- 1.4 beats/min. For the second group (n = 55) the corresponding falls were: GG, 17.0 +/- 4.3/11.2 +/- 3.4 mmHg, 12.0 +/- 3.5 beats/min; GR, 16.6 +/- 1.8/14.4 +/- 1.1 mmHg, 13.1 +/- 2.1 beats/min; RR, 18.0 +/- 1.6/13.0 +/- 1.4 mmHg, 14.4 +/- 1.4 beats/min. The G389R genotype also failed to have a significant effect on pretreatment blood pressure or heart rate in either group. These data suggest that, despite clear functional differences between the G389R receptor variants expressed in vitro, the polymorphism does not affect the haemodynamic response of hypertensive subjects to chronic beta1-adrenoceptor blockade.     

Enalaprilat, an intravenous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in hypertensive crises

The effect of enalaprilat (MK-422), a newly synthesized, intravenous, nonsulfhydryl, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, was studied in seven patients with either severe or malignant hypertension. All subjects initially received a 1 mg bolus injection of enalaprilat followed in 30 minutes by 10 mg. Five subjects received an additional 40 mg. Mean (+/- SE) pretreatment blood pressure for the group was 226 +/- 9/141 +/- 7 mm Hg. Five minutes after the 1 mg enalaprilat dose, blood pressure decreased to 211 +/- 10/131 +/- 9 mm Hg and further fell to 201 +/- 14/123 +/- 11 mm Hg at 30 minutes. The maximal reduction in blood pressure to 169 +/- 14/112 +/- 10 mm Hg occurred 30 minutes after the 10 mg dose. No further blood pressure reduction was observed in those subjects who received the additional 40 mg dose. Within the entire group, five subjects exhibited sustained blood pressure reduction. No adverse side effects or symptomatic hypotension occurred in any subject.     

Abnormal Adrenal Responsiveness and Angiotensin II Dependency in High Renin Essential Hypertension

Adrenal responsiveness to angiotensin II (AII) and the diastolic blood pressure responses to saralasin were studied in 19 patients with high renin essential hypertension (HREH) on a 10-meq Na(+)/100 meq K(+) diet. The increment in plasma renin activity (PRA) between supine and upright positions was used as an estimate of the acute stimulation of the adrenal gland by endogenous AII; the normal increment in plasma aldosterone divided by the increment in PRA was >3.8. 7 of 19 had abnormal upright posture responses with significantly greater mean PRA increments (24+/-6 ng/ml per h) and significantly smaller plasma aldosterone increments 47 +/- 16 ng/dl) (P < 0.036) compared to the increments observed in HREH patients with normal adrenal responsiveness (PRA = 15 +/- 1 ng/ml per h; plasma aldosterone = 87 +/- 17 ng/dl). When AII was infused at doses of 0.1-3 ng/kg per min, only patients with normal posture responses had normal plasma aldosterone increments; plasma aldosterone levels failed to significantly increase even at the highest infusion rate in the patients with the abnormal upright posture responses. The AII competitive inhibitor, saralasin (0.3-30 mug/kg per min) was then infused to study the occurrence of angiotensinogenic hypertension in both HREH subgroups. The mean decline in diastolic blood pressure to saralasin in the subnormal adrenal responsive patients (-15 +/- 3 mm Hg) was significantly greater than in the normal adrenal responsive group (-3 +/- 2 mm Hg) (P < 0.02).It is concluded that patients with HREH are not a homogeneous population; approximately one-third have AII-dependent hypertension. In these patients, the mechanism responsible for the elevated renin and blood pressure could be a compensatory increase secondary to decreased adrenal responsiveness to AII. In the remainder, the high PRA levels have little, if any, causal role in the pathogenesis of the hypertension but could reflect a marker of other pathophysiologic processes.     

Evaluation of isradipine (PN 200-110) in mild to moderate hypertension

The efficacy and safety of isradipine (PN 200-110), a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, was evaluated in 87 hypertensive patients in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized multicenter trial. After a 3-week single-blind washout phase, isradipine (or matching placebo) was administered for 4 weeks, beginning at 2.5 mg b.i.d. with increments of 2.5 mg b.i.d. at weekly intervals if supine diastolic blood pressure remained greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg. At the end of 1 week average supine blood pressure in the isradipine group (n = 45) fell from a baseline of 156 +/- 13/104 +/- 4 mm Hg to 146 +/- 14/97 +/- 7 mm Hg. By week 4 blood pressure was reduced by 19/14 mm Hg compared with 4/5 mm Hg in the placebo group (P less than 0.001 between groups). Supine and standing pulse rates were slightly increased initially with isradipine therapy but returned to baseline with increasing isradipine doses. Blood pressure responses at week 4 were good or excellent (supine diastolic less than or equal to 90 mm Hg or greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg decrease from baseline) in 87% of isradipine-treated patients and in 26% of placebo-treated patients. Headache, edema, abdominal discomfort, and constipation occurred slightly more frequently in isradipine-treated patients than in placebo-treated control subjects. The results indicate that isradipine, administered as monotherapy in doses of 2.5 to 10 mg b.i.d., is safe and effective in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.     

Peripheral dopaminergic blockade for the treatment of diabetic orthostatic hypotension

This study was designed to evaluate the effects of domperidone, a peripheral dopaminergic antagonist, in diabetic patients with symptomatic orthostatic hypotension. Nine patients were admitted to the hospital, placed on a diet containing 150 mEq sodium, and studied for periods of 4 hours, on different days, in the following conditions: (1) supine position, (2) upright posture (UP), (3) UP after 10 mg domperidone, intravenously in bolus, and (4) UP after 3 days of domperidone, 30 mg orally. Before domperidone the mean blood pressure observed in supine position of 132 +/- 37/75 +/- 6 mm Hg fell to 75 +/- 22/57 +/- 13 mm Hg after 2 hours in UP. Acute domperidone did not change the blood pressure response to UP. After 3 days of oral domperidone and in UP for 2 hours, the mean blood pressure value of 89 +/- 21/61 +/- 8 mm Hg was higher than that before domperidone (p less than 0.05), with relief of symptoms in all patients. This blood pressure response to UP has been maintained in six patients who completed 6 months of therapy. No differences were observed in plasma renin activity, aldosterone, sodium, and potassium and in 4-hour urinary excretion of aldosterone, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine, determined during the UP tests. Administration of domperidone for 3 days reduced the falls in creatinine clearance and the urinary excretion of sodium and potassium induced by UP but did not alter the blood pressure and aldosterone dose-response curves to angiotensin II. Although the mechanism of action is not defined, it is concluded that domperidone is effective for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension in patients with diabetes.     

A variant 2677A allele of the MDR1 gene affects fexofenadine disposition

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There have been considerable disagreements regarding the influence of MDR1 (ABCB1) polymorphisms on the disposition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrates. We speculated that the unknown function of the A allele of exon 21 G2677T/A (Ala893Ser/Thr) provides one of the reasons for the contradictory results. This study was performed to clarify the effects of major MDR1 gene polymorphisms, including a variant A allele in exon 21, on fexofenadine pharmacokinetics. METHODS: We investigated the occurrence of 3 high-frequency single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in exons 12 (C1236T), 21 (G2677T/A), and 26 (C3435T) of the MDR1 gene in 232 healthy Koreans, using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method, and performed haplotype analysis on these 3 SNPs. A single oral dose of 180 mg fexofenadine hydrochloride was administered to 33 healthy Korean male volunteers, who were divided into 6 groups based on the MDR1 genotype for the G2677T/A polymorphism in exon 21 and the C3435T polymorphism in exon 26. RESULTS: A strong linkage disequilibrium was observed among the 3 SNPs. The frequencies of the 4 major haplotypes, 1236C-2677A-3435C, C-G-C, T-G-C, and T-T-T, were 16.4%, 18.6%, 21.6%, and 32.2%, respectively. Fexofenadine disposition varied considerably among the groups. In the 2677AA/3435CC genotype group (n=3), the values of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours [AUC(0-24)] were significantly lower (P=.014) than those of the other 5 genotype groups (GG/CC, GT/CT, TT/TT, GA/CC, and TA/CT). As compared with the 2677GG/3435CC subjects, the AUC(0-24) values were 17% lower in the 2677AA/3435CC subjects and 47% higher in the 2677TT/3435TT subjects (GG/CC versus AA/CC versus TT/TT, 4017 +/- 1137 ng . h/mL versus 3315 +/- 958 ng . h/mL versus 5934 +/- 2,064 ng . h/mL; P=.018). By stratification for genotypes at position 3435, homozygous 3435TT subjects were found to have significantly higher AUC(0-24) (P=.024) and maximum plasma concentration (P=.040) values than CC subjects [AUC(0-24), 5934 +/- 2064 ng . h/mL versus 3998 +/- 1241 ng . h/mL; maximum plasma concentration, 958 +/- 408 ng/mL versus 673 +/- 242 ng/mL]. CONCLUSIONS: The plasma concentrations of fexofenadine after a single oral administration were lower in 2677AA/3435CC subjects than in subjects with the other 5 genotype combinations of the SNPs of G2677T/A and C3435T. These findings confirm the importance of analyzing MDR1 haplotypes and provide a plausible explanation for the conflicting results regarding the effect of MDR1 polymorphisms on the disposition of P-gp substrates.     

Long-term safety and efficacy of the selective aldosterone blocker eplerenone in patients with essential hypertension

BACKGROUND: Even within the normal range, aldosterone levels are linked to end-organ toxicity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers does not sufficiently reduce plasma aldosterone levels. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess the long-term safety profile and efficacy of the selective aldosterone blocker eplerenone. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled trial in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 1-week washout of previous antihypertensive medications, eplerenone was initiated at 50 mg once daily; the dose was titrated to a maximum of 200 mg/d to achieve a diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and a systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg. Thereafter, another antihypertensive agent could be added and titrated once, or another agent could be substituted for eplerenone. Eplerenone treatment was continued for up to 14 months in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-six patients were enrolled in the study. Their adjusted mean blood pressure (BP) at baseline was 150/96 mm Hg. The majority (80.4%) were white; 51.5% were male and 48.5% were female; 62.3% were between the ages of 45 and 64 years and 21.7% were aged >64 years. Three hundred eighty-five patients (65.7%) completed the study; 98 (16.7%) were withdrawn due to treatment failure (only 4.8% of them after month 4), and 40 (6.8%) were withdrawn due to treatment-emergent adverse events. Four hundred thirty-three of 582 (74.4%) patients in the intent-to-treat population achieved BP control during eplerenone treatment: 261 (44.8%) received eplerenone monotherapy and 172 (30.0%) received eplerenone plus another antihypertensive agent. CONCLUSIONS: Eplerenone therapy was effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension over a 14-month period, either as monotherapy or in combination with another antihypertensive agent. Use of eplerenone was well tolerated in the population studied.