Effects of spectral response function on surface reflectance and NDVI measured with moderate resolution satellite sensors: Extension to AVHRR NOAA-17, 18 and METOP-A

This work extends the previous study of Trishchenko et al. [Trishchenko, A. P., Cihlar, J., & Li, Z. (2002). Effects of spectral response function on surface reflectance and NDVI measured with moderate resolution satellite sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment 81 (1), 1-18] that analyzed the spectral response function (SRF) effect for the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) onboard the NOAA satellites NOAA-6 to NOAA-16 as well as the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), the VEGETATION sensor (VGT) and the Global Imager (GLI). The developed approach is now applied to cover three new AVHRR sensors launched in recent years on NOAA-17, 18, and METOP-A platforms. As in the previous study, the results are provided relative to the reference sensor AVHRR NOAA-9. The differences in reflectance among these three radiometers relative to the AVHRR NOAA-9 are similar to each other and range from − 0.015 to 0.015 (− 20% to + 2% relative) for visible (red) channel, and from − 0.03 to 0.02 (− 5% to 5%) for the near infrared (NIR) channel. The absolute change in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) ranged from − 0.03 to + 0.06. Due to systematic biases of the visible channels toward smaller values and the NIR channels toward slightly larger values, the overall systematic biases for NDVI are positive. The polynomial approximations are provided for the bulk spectral correction with respect to the AVHRR NOAA-9 for consistency with previous study. Analysis was also conducted for the SRF effect only among the AVHRR-3 type of radiometer on NOAA-15, 16, 17, 18 and METOP-A using AVHRR NOAA-18 as a reference. The results show more consistency between sensors with typical correction being under 5% (or 0.01 in absolute values). The AVHRR METOP-A reveals the most different behavior among the AVHRR-3 group with generally positive bias for visible channel (up to + 5%, relative), slightly negative bias for the NIR channel (1%-2% relative), and negative NDVI bias (− 0.02 to + 0.005). Polynomial corrections are also suggested for normalization of AVHRR on NOAA-15, 16, 17 and METOP-A to AVHRR NOAA-18.     

An empirical investigation of cross-sensor relationships of NDVI and red/near-infrared reflectance using EO-1 Hyperion data

Long term observations of global vegetation from multiple satellites require much effort to ensure continuity and compatibility due to differences in sensor characteristics and product generation algorithms. In this study, we focused on the bandpass filter differences and empirically investigated cross-sensor relationships of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and reflectance. The specific objectives were: 1) to understand the systematic trends in cross-sensor relationships of the NDVI and reflectance as a function of spectral bandpasses, 2) to examine/identify the relative importance of the spectral features (i.e., the green peak, red edge, and leaf liquid water absorption regions) in and the mechanism(s) of causing the observed systematic trends, and 3) to evaluate the performance of several empirical cross-calibration methods in modeling the observed systematic trends. A Level 1A Hyperion hyperspectral image acquired over a tropical forest—savanna transitional region in Brazil was processed to simulate atmospherically corrected reflectances and NDVI for various bandpasses, including Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), NOAA-14 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), and Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+). Data were extracted from various land cover types typically found in tropical forest and savanna biomes and used for analyses. Both NDVI and reflectance relationships among the sensors were neither linear nor unique and were found to exhibit complex patterns and bandpass dependencies. The reflectance relationships showed strong land cover dependencies. The NDVI relationships, in contrast, did not show land cover dependencies, but resulted in nonlinear forms. From sensitivity analyses, the green peak (∼550 nm) and red-NIR transitional (680-780 nm) features were identified as the key factors in producing the observed land cover dependencies and nonlinearity in cross-sensor relationships. In particular, differences in the extents to which the red and/or NIR bandpasses included these features significantly influenced the forms and degrees of nonlinearity in the relationships. Translation of MODIS NDVI to “AVHRR-like” NDVI using a weighted average of MODIS green and red bands performed very poorly, resulting in no reduction of overall discrepancy between MODIS and AVHRR NDVI. Cross-calibration of NDVI and reflectance using NDVI-based quadratic functions performed well, reducing their differences to ± .025 units for the NDVI and ± .01 units for the reflectances; however, many of the translation results suffered from bias errors. The present results suggest that distinct translation equations and coefficients need to be developed for every sensor pairs and that land cover-dependency need to be explicitly accounted for to reduce bias errors.     

Multi-sensor NDVI data continuity: Uncertainties and implications for vegetation monitoring applications

Consistent NDVI time series are paramount in monitoring ecological resources that are being altered by climate and human impacts. An increasing number of natural resource managers use web-based geospatial decision support tools that integrate time series of both historical and current NDVI data derived from multiple sensors to make better informed planning and management decisions. Representative canopy reflectance and NDVI data were simulated for historical, current and future AVHRR, MODIS and VIIRS land surface monitoring satellites to quantify the differences due to sensor-specific characteristics. Cross-sensor NDVI translation equations were developed for surface conditions. The effect of a range of atmospheric conditions (Rayleigh scattering, ozone, aerosol optical thickness, and water vapor content) on the sensor-specific reflectance and NDVI values were evaluated to quantify the uncertainty in the apparent NDVI for each sensor. MODIS and VIIRS NDVI data are minimally affected by the atmospheric water vapor, while AVHRR NDVI data are substantially reduced by water vapor.Although multi-sensor NDVI continuity can be obtained by using the developed cross-sensor translation equations, the interactions between the spectral characteristics of surface vegetation and soil components, sensor-specific spectral band characteristics and atmospheric scattering and absorption windows will introduce uncertainty due to insufficient knowledge about the atmospheric conditions that affect the signal of the Earth's pixels at the time of data acquisitions. Processing strategies and algorithm preferences among data streams are also hindering cross-sensor NDVI continuity.     

Neural networks as a tool for constructing continuous NDVI time series from AVHRR and MODIS

The long term Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR)‐Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) record provides a critical historical perspective on vegetation dynamics necessary for global change research. Despite the proliferation of new sources of global, moderate resolution vegetation datasets, the remote sensing community is still struggling to create datasets derived from multiple sensors that allow the simultaneous use of spectral vegetation for time series analysis. To overcome the non‐stationary aspect of NDVI, we use an artificial neural network (ANN) to map the NDVI indices from AVHRR to those from MODIS using atmospheric, surface type and sensor‐specific inputs to account for the differences between the sensors. The NDVI dynamics and range of MODIS NDVI data at 1° is matched and extended through the AVHRR record. Four years of overlap between the two sensors is used to train a neural network to remove atmospheric and sensor specific effects on the AVHRR NDVI. In this paper, we present the resulting continuous dataset, its relationship to MODIS data, and a validation of the product.     

Evaluation of MODIS and NOAA AVHRR vegetation indices with in situ measurements in a semi‐arid environment

Much effort has been made in recent years to improve the spectral and spatial resolution of satellite sensors to develop improved vegetation indices reflecting surface conditions. In this study satellite vegetation indices from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) are evaluated against two years of in situ measurements of vegetation indices in Senegal. The in situ measurements are obtained using four masts equipped with self‐registrating multispectral radiometers designed for the same wavelengths as the satellite sensor channels. In situ measurements of the MODIS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and AVHRR NDVI are equally sensitive to vegetation; however, the MODIS NDVI is consistently higher than the AVHRR NDVI. The MODIS Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) proved more sensitive to dense vegetation than both AVHRR NDVI and MODIS NDVI. EVI and NDVI based on the MODIS 16‐day constrained view angle maximum value composite (CV‐MVC) product captured the seasonal dynamics of the field observations satisfactorily but a standard 16‐day MVC product estimated from the daily MODIS surface reflectance data without view angle constraints yielded higher correlations between the satellite indices and field measurements (R ² values ranging from 0.74 to 0.98). The standard MVC regressions furthermore approach a 1?:?1 line with in situ measured values compared to the CV‐MVC regressions. The 16‐day MVC AVHRR data did not satisfactorily reflect the variation in the in situ data. Seasonal variation in the in situ measurements is captured reasonably with R ² values of 0.75 in 2001 and 0.64 in 2002, but the dynamic range of the AVHRR satellite data is very low—about a third to a half of the values from in situ measurements. Consequently the in situ vegetation indices were emulated much better by the MODIS indices than by the AVHRR NDVI.     

Evaluation of earth observation based long term vegetation trends — Intercomparing NDVI time series trend analysis consistency of Sahel from AVHRR GIMMS, Terra MODIS and SPOT VGT data

AVHRR (Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer) GIMMS (Global Inventory Modelling and Mapping Studies) NDVI (Normalized Difference vegetation Index) data is available from 1981 to present time. The global coverage 8 km resolution 15-day composite data set has been used for numerous local to global scale vegetation time series studies during recent years. Several aspects however potentially introduce noise in the NDVI data set due to the AVHRR sensor design and data processing. More recent NDVI data sets from both Terra MODIS and SPOT VGT data are considered an improvement over AVHRR and these products in theory provide a possibility to evaluate the accuracy of GIMMS NDVI time series trend analysis for the overlapping period of available data. In this study the accuracy of the GIMMS NDVI time series trend analysis is evaluated by comparison with the 1 km resolution Terra MODIS (MOD13A2) 16-day composite NDVI data, the SPOT Vegetation (VGT) 10-day composite (S10) NDVI data and in situ measurements of a test site in Dahra, Senegal. Linear least squares regression trend analysis on eight years of GIMMS annual average NDVI (2000-2007) has been compared to Terra MODIS (1 km and 8 km resampled) and SPOT VGT NDVI data 1 km (2000-2007). The three data products do not exhibit identical patterns of NDVI trends. SPOT VGT NDVI data are characterised by higher positive regression slopes over the 8-year period as compared to Terra MODIS and AVHRR GIMMS NDVI data, possibly caused by a change in channels 1 and 2 spectral response functions from SPOT VGT1 to SPOT VGT2 in 2003. Trend analysis of AVHRR GIMMS NDVI exhibits a regression slope range in better agreement with Terra MODIS NDVI for semi-arid areas. However, GIMMS NDVI shows a tendency towards higher positive regression slope values than Terra MODIS in more humid areas. Validation of the different NDVI data products against continuous in situ NDVI measurements for the period 2002-2007 in the semi-arid Senegal revealed a good agreement between in situ measurements and all satellite based NDVI products. Using Terra MODIS NDVI as a reference, it is concluded that AVHRR GIMMS coarse resolution NDVI data set is well-suited for long term vegetation studies of the Sahel-Sudanian areas receiving < 1000 mm rainfall, whereas interpretation of GIMMS NDVI trends in more humid areas of the Sudanian-Guinean zones should be done with certain reservations.     

Systematic corrections of AVHRR image composites for temporal studies

For quantitative studies of vegetation dynamics, satellite data need to be corrected for spurious effects. In this study, we have applied several changes to an earlier advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) processing methodology (ABC3; [Remote Sens. Environ. 60 (1997) 35; J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 102 (1997) 29625; Can. J. Remote Sens. 23 (1997) 163]), to better represent the various physical processes causing contamination of the AVHRR measurements. These included published recent estimates of the NOAA-11 and NOAA-14 AVHRR calibration trajectories for channels 1 and 2; the best available estimates for the water vapour, aerosol and ozone amounts at the time of AVHRR data acquisition; an improved bidirectional reflectance algorithm that also takes into consideration surface topography; and an improved image screening algorithm for contaminated pixels. Unlike the previous study that compared the composite images to a single-date AVHRR image, we employed coincident TM images to approximate the AVHRR pixel field of view during the data acquisition. Compared to ABC3, the modified procedure ABC3V2 was found to improve the accuracy of AVHRR pixel reflectance estimates, both in the sensitivity (slope) of the regression and in r². The improvements were especially significant in AVHRR channel 1. In comparison with reference values derived from two full TM scenes, the corrected AVHRR surface reflectance estimates had average standard errors values of ±0.009 for AVHRR C1, ±0.019 for C2, and ±0.04 for NDVI; the corresponding r² values were 0.55, 0.80, and 0.50, respectively. The changes in ABC3V2 were not able to completely remove interannual variability for land cover types with little or no vegetation cover, which would be expected to remain stable over time, and they increased the interannual variability of mixed forest and grassland. These results are attributed to a combination of increased sensitivity to interannual dynamics on one hand, and the inability to remove all sources of noise for barren or sparsely vegetated northern land cover types on the other.     

NOAA-AVHRR data processing for the mapping of vegetation cover

The NOAA-AVHRR images have been widely used for global studies due to their low cost, suitable wavebands and high temporal resolution. Data from the AVHRR sensor (Bands 1 and 2) transformed to the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) are the most common product used in global land cover studies. The purpose of this Letter is to present the vegetation, soil, and shade fraction images derived from AVHRR, in addition to NDVI, to monitor land cover. Six AVHRR images from the period of 21 to 26 June 1993 were composed and used to obtain the above mentioned products over Sa o Paulo State, in the south-east of Brazil. Vegetation fraction component values were strongly correlated with NDVI values ( r 0.95; n 60). Also, the fraction image presented a good agreement with the available global vegetation map of Sao Paulo State derived from Landsat TM images.     

Agreement evaluation of AVHRR and MODIS 16‐day composite NDVI data sets

Satellite‐derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data have been used extensively to detect and monitor vegetation conditions at regional and global levels. A combination of NDVI data sets derived from AVHRR and MODIS can be used to construct a long NDVI time series that may also be extended to VIIRS. Comparative analysis of NDVI data derived from AVHRR and MODIS is critical to understanding the data continuity through the time series. In this study, the AVHRR and MODIS 16‐day composite NDVI products were compared using regression and agreement analysis methods. The analysis shows a high agreement between the AVHRR‐NDVI and MODIS‐NDVI observed from 2002 and 2003 for the conterminous United States, but the difference between the two data sets is appreciable. Twenty per cent of the total difference between the two data sets is due to systematic difference, with the remainder due to unsystematic difference. The systematic difference can be eliminated with a linear regression‐based transformation between two data sets, and the unsystematic difference can be reduced partially by applying spatial filters to the data. We conclude that the continuity of NDVI time series from AVHRR to MODIS is satisfactory, but a linear transformation between the two sets is recommended.     

Impact of orthorectification and spatial sampling on maximum NDVI composite data in mountain regions

Topography and accuracy of image geometric registration significantly affect the quality of satellite data, since pixels are displaced depending on surface elevation and viewing geometry. This effect should be corrected for through the process of accurate image navigation and orthorectification in order to meet the geolocation accuracy for systematic observations specified by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) requirements for satellite climate data records. We investigated the impact of orthorectification on the accuracy of maximum Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) composite data for a mountain region in north-western Canada at various spatial resolutions (1 km, 4 km, 5 km, and 8 km). Data from AVHRR on board NOAA-11 (1989 and 1990) and NOAA-16 (2001, 2002, and 2003) processed using a system called CAPS (Canadian AVHRR Processing System) for the month of August were considered. Results demonstrate the significant impact of orthorectification on the quality of composite NDVI data in mountainous terrain. Differences between orthorectified and non-orthorectified NDVI composites (ΔNDVI) adopted both large positive and negative values, with the 1% and 99% percentiles of ΔNDVI at 1 km resolution spanning values between − 0.16 < ΔNDVI < 0.09. Differences were generally reduced to smaller numbers for coarser resolution data, but systematic positive biases for non-orthorectified composites were obtained at all spatial resolutions, ranging from 0.02 (1 km) to 0.004 (8 km). Analyzing the power spectra of maximum NDVI composites at 1 km resolution, large differences between orthorectified and non-orthorectified AVHRR data were identified at spatial scales between 4 km and 10 km. Validation of NOAA-16 AVHRR NDVI with MODIS NDVI composites revealed higher correlation coefficients (by up to 0.1) for orthorectified composites relative to the non-orthorectified case. Uncertainties due to the AVHRR Global Area Coverage (GAC) sampling scheme introduce an average positive bias of 0.02 ± 0.03 at maximum NDVI composite level that translates into an average relative bias of 10.6% ± 19.1 for sparsely vegetated mountain regions. This can at least partially explain the systematic average positive biases we observed relative to our results in AVHRR GAC-based composites from the Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) and Polar Pathfinder (PPF) datasets (0.19 and 0.05, respectively). With regard to the generation of AVHRR long-term climate data records, results suggest that orthorectification should be an integral part of AVHRR pre-processing, since neglecting the terrain displacement effect may lead to important biases and additional noise in time series at various spatial scales.     

Rainfall and vegetation monitoring in the Savanna Zone of the Democratic Republic of Sudan using the NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer

NOAA-6 and NOAA-7 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) global-area coverage (4?km ground resolution) data were obtained at three-day intervals throughout each of the four-month periods covering the 1980, 1983 and 1984 growing seasons, between latitudes 10° and 22° North in the Democratic Republic of Sudan. Daily rainfall data for twelve meteorological stations spanning the Savanna Zone were analysed. Rainfall in Sudan during 1980 was below normal, but in 1983 and 1984 there were moderate and severe droughts. The satellite data were used to calculate normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values from the visible and near-infrared bands of the satellite data. These were processed into ten-day composite data sets using the AVHRR thermal-infrared channel as a cloud screen and a temporal compositing procedure that reduces cloud contamination and selects viewing angles closest to nadir.

The ten-day composite NDVI values and the integrals of NDVI for each growing season were found to be closely correlated with rainfall. The constants of regressions between NDVI and rainfall were lower in 1983 and 1984 than in 1980, which suggests there was reduced water-use efficiency by the rangeland vegetation in drought years. It was found that July and August NDVI values were closely related to the integrated NDVI values; hence early- and mid-season NDVI data could be used to predict annual primary production. Images showing the geographical distribution of values of NDVI prepared for the three years clearly illustrate the effects of the 1983 and 1984 droughts, compared with the higher rainfall of 1980. The precision of the relationship between rainfall and the vegetation indices for the meteorological stations encourages the view that NOAA AVHRR GAC composite NDVI values can be used to monitor effective rainfall in the Savanna Zone of the Democratic Republic of Sudan     

Assessment of multitemporal compositing techniques of MODIS and AVHRR images for burned land mapping

The performance of several criteria to generate multitemporal composites of daily Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) images for burned land mapping was tested using data acquired over the Iberian Peninsula in 2001, 2003 and 2004. The experiment was based on four tests that assessed the discriminability between burned and unburned areas, the presence of artifacts (clouds and clouds shadows), the verticality of the sensor viewing angle, and the spatial coherency of the composite images. Seven different compositing techniques were tested, based on maximizing normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and brightness/surface temperature, and minimizing reflectance and sensor zenith angles. The composite criterions that provide the most accurate images for burned land mapping were based on maximizing brightness/surface temperatures, either as the only criterion or in conjunction with minimizing sensor zenith angle or near infrared (NIR) reflectance. These composites present high discrimination capacity between burned and unburned areas, remove most clouds and cloud shadows, offer high spatial coherency and present middle-to-low sensor zenith angles. Traditional compositing criterion based on maximizing NDVI values provided poor results in most tests. Finally, standard NASA MODIS composite provides close to nadir observation angles, and good spatial coherency, but it offered lower discrimination between burned and unburned areas that those composites based on thermal data.     

Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band

The enhanced vegetation index (EVI) was developed as a standard satellite vegetation product for the Terra and Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometers (MODIS). EVI provides improved sensitivity in high biomass regions while minimizing soil and atmosphere influences, however, is limited to sensor systems designed with a blue band, in addition to the red and near-infrared bands, making it difficult to generate long-term EVI time series as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) counterpart. The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate a 2-band EVI (EVI2), without a blue band, which has the best similarity with the 3-band EVI, particularly when atmospheric effects are insignificant and data quality is good. A linearity-adjustment factor β is proposed and coupled with the soil-adjustment factor L used in the soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) to develop EVI2. A global land cover dataset of Terra MODIS data extracted over land community validation and FLUXNET test sites is used to develop the optimal parameter (L, β and G) values in EVI2 equation and achieve the best similarity between EVI and EVI2. The similarity between the two indices is evaluated and demonstrated with temporal profiles of vegetation dynamics at local and global scales. Our results demonstrate that the differences between EVI and EVI2 are insignificant (within ± 0.02) over a very large sample of snow/ice-free land cover types, phenologies, and scales when atmospheric influences are insignificant, enabling EVI2 as an acceptable and accurate substitute of EVI. EVI2 can be used for sensors without a blue band, such as the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), and may reveal different vegetation dynamics in comparison with the current AVHRR NDVI dataset. However, cross-sensor continuity relationships for EVI2 remain to be studied.     

Retrieval and validation of land surface temperature (LST) from NOAA AVHRR thermal images of Gujarat,India

A study was undertaken to retrieve land (soil-vegetation complex) surface temperature (LST) over a 100 km 2 100 km area in Gujarat (India) using thermal bands (channel 4 and 5) and estimated emissivity from atmospherically corrected NDVI, derived from NOAA-14 AVHRR data. The LST values were compared with near synchronous soil and air temperature measurements over five sites in December and May 1997 during Land Surface Processes Experiment (LASPEX) in Gujarat, India. The estimated LST of a semi-arid mixed agricultural barren landscape at 10.00 GMT was found to vary from 302 to 305.6 K on 13 December 1997 (winter) and from 317.5 to 328.5 K at 08.30 GMT on 15 May 1997 (Summer). During December, the LST values were near midway between air temperature (AT) and soil surface temperature (ST) with mean bias of m 2.9 K and 7.0 K respectively. However, in May, the LST values were found to be closer to ST, which may be due to lower fractional vegetation cover and NDVI.     

A global 1° by 1° NDVI data set for climate studies derived from the GIMMS continental NDVI data

A nine-year (1982–1990) global normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data set with a spatial resolution of 1° by 1° and a temporal resolution of one month was compiled for use in climate studies. This data set was derived from higher resolution (5–8 km) monthly continental NDVI data sets that have been processed and archived by the Global Inventory Monitoring and Modelling Studies (GIMMS) group at NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center. The continental GIMMS NDVI data sets were calculated from Global Area Coverage (GAC) data collected at daily intervals by the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) onboard the NOAA-7, -9 and -11 satellites

The global 1° by 1° NDVI data set was produced to calculate land surface parameters for use within general circulation model J of the atmosphere (GCM). In view of this quantitative application, an evaluation is given of the representation by the NDVI data of the spectral properties of vegetation at the landsurface. Errors are defined as deviations from measurements obtained under standard conditions, i.e., conditions at the-top-of-the-atmosphere with no clouds, clear atmosphere, near-nadir viewing angles, overhead Sun, and invariant soil background. The discussion includes an assessment of (1) the data collected and processed onboard the AVHRR; (2) processing of the AVHRR data into the continental GIMMS NDVI data sets; (3) resampling of the continental data sets to a 1° by 1° data set; and (4) propagation of inconsistencies and biases from (1), (2) and (3) into the 1° by 1° global NDVI data. Examples are shown of the temporal and spatial variations in spectral properties of vegetation contained in the 1° by 1° NDVI data, and these are compared with the dynamics of biophysical parameters derived from land cover classes that were used in previous climate studies.     

On the relationship between monthly mean and maximum-value composite normalized vegetation indices

Abstract

A relationship between the maximum-value composite and monthly mean normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) is derived statistically using data over the U.S. Great Plains during 1986. The monthly mean NDVI is obtained using a simple nine-day compositing technique based on the specifics of the scan patterns of the NOAA-9 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR). The results indicate that these two quantities are closely related over grassland and forest during the growing season. It is suggested that in such areas a monthly mean NDVI can be roughly approximated by 80 per cent of the monthly maximum NDVI, the latter being a standard satellite data product. The derived relationship was validated using data for the growing season of 1987.     

An assessment of AVHRR/NDVI-ecoclimatological relations in Nebraska,U.S.A.

Research designed to better define relations between 1-km multitemporal AVHRR-derived NDVI data and selected climatological parameters, soil hydrological properties and land cover characteristics is summarized. Bi-weekly maximum value composite NDVI data and concurrently measured meteorological data acquired in 1990 and 1991 for Nebraska were utilized to study relations between NDVI and accumulated growing degree days,soil temperature, precipitation and potential evapotranspiration. Temporal change in NDVI was found to be closely linked with the temperature regime. NDVI-precipitation and NDVI-potential evapotranspiration relations exhibited time lags, although the length of lag varied with land cover type, precipitation, and soil hydrologic properties. NDVI response to precipitation was stronger in natural grasslands and grassland/wet meadows than in areas of irrigated cropland and mixed crop/ grass. NDVI-climate relations were strongest where vegetation was developed on soils with low root zone available water capacity and high permeability. Relations derived by using NDVI values over 3 pixel by 3 pixel windows showed little difference from those using single 1 km pixel. This may reflect both the relatively homogeneous land cover characteristics of the study area and the effect of off-nadir viewing geometry on AVHRR data acquisition.     

Variation in NDVI values with change in spatial resolution for semi-arid savanna vegetation: a case study in northwestern South Africa

Natural vegetation and crop-greening patterns in semi-arid savannas are commonly monitored using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values from low spatial resolution sensors such as the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) (1 km, 4 km) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (250 m, 500 m). However, because semi-arid savannas characteristically have scattered tree cover, the NDVI values at low spatial resolution suffer from the effect of aggregation of near-infrared and red energy from adjacent vegetated and non-vegetated cover types. This effect is seldom taken into consideration or quantified in NDVI analyses of the vegetation of semi-arid lands. This study examined the effect of pixel size on NDVI values of land-cover features for a semi-arid area, using the 1000 m, 250 m and 10 m pixel sizes. A rainy season Système Pour l'Observation de la Terre 5 (SPOT 5) High Resolution Geometric (HRG) image at 10 m spatial resolution was utilized. Following radiometric and geometric preprocessing, the 10 m pixel size of the image was aggregated to 250 m and 1000 m to simulate imagery at these pixel sizes, and then NDVI images at the spatial resolution scales of 10 m (NDVI_{10 m}), 250 m (NDVI_{250 m}), and 1000 m (NDVI_{1000 m}) derived from the respective images. The simulation of the NDVI_{250 m} image was validated against a concurrent 16 day MODIS NDVI composite (MOD13Q1) image, and the accuracy derived from the validation was generalized to the NDVI_{1000 m} image. With change from low to high spatial resolution, extreme magnitude NDVI values shifted towards the centre (mode) of the resulting approximately Gaussian NDVI distributions. There was a statistically significant difference in NDVI values at the three pixel sizes. Low spatial magnitude vegetation sites (woodland, cropland) had reductions of up to 28% in NDVI value between the NDVI_{10 m} and NDVI_{1000 m} scales. The results indicate that vegetation monitoring using low spatial resolution imagery in semi-arid savannas may only be indicative and needs to be supplemented by higher spatial resolution imagery.     

NOAA-AVHRR NDVI decomposition and subpixel classification using linear mixing in the Argentinean Pampa

Crop Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) time profiles and crop acreage estimates were derived from the application of linear mixture modelling to Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data over a test area in the southern part of the Pampa region, Argentina. Bands 1 and 2 from seven AVHRR scenes (June to January 1991) were combined to produce fraction images of winter crops, summer crops and pastures. A Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) scene of the region was classified and superimposed to the AVHRR Local Area Coverage (LAC) data by means of a correlation technique. Each class signature was extracted by regressing the AVHRR response on the cover types proportions, estimated from Landsat-TM data, over sets of calibration windows. The crop NDVI profiles were hence derived from the class signatures in bands 1 and 2. These profiles appeared consistent with the cover types, but variability depending on the set of windows was noted. The assessment of the class signatures was indirectly accomplished through the subpixel classifications of the AVHRR data, performed using the different sets of class spectra. Although some discrepancies between AVHRR and Landsat–TM estimates were observed at the individual window level, the classification results compared quite well on a regional scale with Landsat–TM estimates: crop acreage was estimated to an overall accuracy ranging from 89 to 95 per cent according to the spectra used in the classification. Definitely, the proposed methodology should permit a better exploitation of the temporal resolution of AVHRR data in both the areas of yield prediction and vegetation classification. Furthermore, the perational application of such a methodology for crop monitoring will undoubtedlybe facilitated with the coming sensor systems such as the ModerateResolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), the SPOT Vegetation Monitoring Instrument or the ‘Satelite Argentino Cientifico’ (SAC–C).     

Improved calibration coefficients for NOAA-14 AVHRR visible and near-infrared channels

An analysis of the calibration coefficients used to describe sensor degradation in channels 1 and 2 of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) on the NOAA-14 spacecraft is presented. The radiometrically stable permanent ice sheet of central Antarctica is used as a calibration target to characterize sensor performance. Published calibration coefficients and the coefficients imbedded in the NOAA Level 1b data stream for the period January 1995 to November 1998 are shown to be deficient in correcting for the degradation of the sensor with time since launch. Calibration formulae constructed from NOAA-9 reflectances are used to derive improved calibration coefficients for the AVHRR visible and near-infrared channels for NOAA-14. Channel 1 reflectances for the Greenland ice sheet derived using the new coefficients are consistent with those derived previously using NOAA-9 AVHRR. In addition, improved reference AVHRR channel 2 reflectances for Greenland are derived from NOAA-14 observations. It is recommended that the coefficients derived in this study be used to calibrate reflectances for NOAA-14 AVHRR channels 1 and 2.