Effects of elastic seats on seated body apparent mass responses to vertical whole body vibration

Apparent mass (AM) responses of the body seated with and without a back support on three different elastic seats (flat and contoured polyurethane foam (PUF) and air cushion) and a rigid seat were measured under three levels of vertical vibration (overall rms acceleration: 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 m/s²) in the 0.5 to 20 Hz range. A pressure-sensing system was used to capture biodynamic force at the occupant-seat interface. The results revealed strong effects of visco-elastic and vibration transmissibility characteristics of seats on AM. The response magnitudes with the relatively stiff air seat were generally higher than those with the PUF seats except at low frequencies. The peak magnitude decreased when sitting condition was changed from no back support to a vertical support; the reduction however was more pronounced with the air seat. Further, a relatively higher frequency shift was evident with soft seat compared with stiff elastic seat with increasing excitation.     

Seated body apparent mass response to vertical whole body vibration: Gender and anthropometric effects

The gender and anthropometric effects on apparent mass characteristics of the seated body exposed to vertical vibration are investigated through laboratory measurements. The study was conducted on 31 male and 27 female subjects, exposed to three levels of vertical vibration (0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 m/s² rms acceleration) in the 0.50 to 20 frequency range, while seated without a back support and against a vertical back support. The apparent mass responses were analyzed by grouping datasets in three ranges of mass-, build- and stature-related parameters for the male and female subjects. Comparisons of responses of male and female subjects with comparable anthropometric properties showed distinctly different biodynamic responses of the two genders. The primary resonance frequency of male subjects was significantly (p < 0.001) higher than the female subjects of comparable body mass but the peak magnitude was comparable for both the gender groups. The male subjects showed greater softening with increasing excitation magnitude compared to the female subjects, irrespective of the sitting condition. The male subjects showed significantly higher peak magnitude response than those of the female subjects for the same anthropometric properties, except for the total and lean body mass. The peak magnitude was linearly correlated with the body mass, body mass index, body fat and hip circumference (r² > 0.7), irrespective of the back support and excitation conditions for both the genders.Relevance to the industryThe apparent mass responses of the human body exposed to whole-body vibration form an essential basis for an understanding of mechanical-equivalent properties of the body, developments in frequency-weightings for assessment of exposure risks and anthropodynamic manikins for assessment of seats. The effects of gender and anthropometric parameters on the AM response are vital for seeking better seat designs, and anthropodynamic manikins for assessments of seating for male as well as female workers.     

Study of human–seat interface pressure distribution under vertical vibration

The influence of whole-body vertical vibration on the dynamic human–seat interface pressure is investigated using a flexible grid of pressure sensors. The ischium pressure and the overall pressure distribution at the human–seat interface are evaluated as functions of the magnitude and frequency of vibration excitation, and seated posture and height. The dynamic pressure at the seat surface is measured under sinusoidal vertical vibration of different magnitudes in the 1–10 Hz frequency range. Two methods based on ischium pressure and ischium force are proposed to study the influence of seat height, posture and characteristics of vibration. The results of the study reveal that the amplitude of dynamic pressure component increases with an increase in the excitation amplitude in almost entire frequency range considered in this study. The dynamic components of both the ischium pressure and the ischium force reveal peaks in the 4 to 5 Hz frequency band, the range of primary resonant frequency of the seated human body in the vertical mode. The mean values of the dynamic ischium pressure and the ischium force remain constant, irrespective of the excitation frequency and amplitude. The magnitudes of mean pressure and force at the human–seat interface, however, are dependent upon the seat height and the subject's posture. The inter-subject variability of the static ischium pressure and effective contact area are presented as functions of the subject weight and subject weight-to-height ratio. It was found that heavy subjects tend to induce low ischium pressure as a result of increased effective contact area.

Relevance to industry

Pressure distribution at the human–seat interface has been found to be an important factor affecting the seating comfort and work efficiency of various workers. The study of human–seat interface pressure distribution under vibration is specifically critical to the comfort, work efficiency and health of vehicle drivers, who are regularly exposed to vibration. The results reported in this paper will be useful to study dynamic response of the interface pressure and design vehicle seats.     

Determination of reference values of apparent mass responses of seated occupants of different body masses under vertical vibration with and without a back support

The biodynamic response of human body seated without a back support and exposed to vertical whole-body vibration have been standardized in ISO 5982 and DIN 45676 in terms of driving-point mechanical impedance and apparent mass. A comparison of ranges defined in two standards, however, reveal considerable differences in both the magnitude and phase. Greater differences are more evident for the three body mass groups, which suggests the lack of adequate reference values of biodynamic responses of seated human subjects of different body masses. In this experimental study, the biodynamic responses of seated humans within three different body mass ranges are characterized under different magnitudes of vibration and three different sitting postures in an attempt to define reference values of apparent mass for applications in mechanical-equivalent model development and anthropodynamic manikin design. Laboratory measurements were performed with adult male subjects of total body mass in the vicinity of 55, 75 and 98 kg (nine subjects for each mass group) seated with and without an inclined back support and exposed to three different magnitudes of white-noise vertical vibration (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m/s² unweighted rms acceleration) in the frequency range between 0.5 and 20 Hz. The measured data were analyzed to derive the mean magnitude and phase responses for the three body masses, posture and excitation conditions. The mean magnitude responses of subjects within three mass groups were compared with idealized ranges defined in ISO 5982 and mean values described in DIN 45676 for no back support condition. The results revealed significant differences between the mean measured and standardized magnitudes, suggesting that the current standardized values do not describe the biodynamic responses of seated occupant of different masses even for the back not supported condition. The mean measured responses revealed most important effect of body mass, irrespective of the sitting posture. The reference values of apparent mass responses of seated body subject to vertical whole-body vibration are thus defined for three mass groups and different back support conditions that may be considered applicable for ranges of excitations considered. The responses of the body seated without a back support, also revealed notable influences of excitation magnitude, particularly on the primary peak frequencies.     

Vibration and comfort HI. Translational vibration of the feet and back

The effects on discomfort of the frequency and direction of the translational vibration of a footrest and flat firm backrest have been studied in two experiments. At frequencies in the range 2.5-63 Hz, the first experiment determined the levels of fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration of the feet of seated subjects which caused them discomfort equivalent to that from 0.8 m/s² r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical vibration of a firm flat seat. The levels of fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration at the back of a seat which were equivalent to 0.8 m/s² r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical seat vibration were determined in the second experiment. The vibration of the feet or back occurred without simultaneous vibration at the seat.

Individual and group equivalent comfort contours are presented. It is concluded that the data provide a useful initial indication of the relative contribution of foot and back vibration to discomfort. Equivalent comfort contours for foot vibration were similar for all three directions of vibration. The contours for vibration of the back show a high sensitivity to fore-and-aft vibration. The results obtained from two additional studies show that vibration from a backrest and other variations in seating conditions can influence subject comfort.     

Finite element modelling of human-seat interactions: vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass when sitting on a rigid seat without backrest and exposed to vertical vibration

Biodynamic models representing distributed human-seat interactions can assist seat design. This study sought to develop a finite element (FE) model representing the soft tissues of the body supported by seating and the vertical in-line apparent mass and the fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass of the seated human body during vertical vibration excitation. The model was developed with rigid parts representing the torso segments, skeletal structures (pelvis and femurs) and deformable parts representing the soft tissues of the buttocks and the thighs. The model had three vibration modes at frequencies less than 15 Hz and provided reasonable vertical in-line apparent mass and fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass. The model can be developed to represent dynamic interactions between the body and a seat over a seat surface (e.g. dynamic pressure distributions and variations in seat transmissibility over the seat surface).     

Modelling and simulation of locomotive driver''s seat vertical suspension vibration isolation system

The paper describes the simulation of a vertical seat suspension system with a variable damper. The model presented describes a real damper with bushings and is an extension of the classical linear SDOF oscillatory system. Transfer functions were identified from laboratory measurements and the mechano-mathematical model produced was validated by field measurements. The seat cushion parameters were identified from laboratory measurements and combined with standardized vertical (z-axis) seated human body models (ISO 5982 and DIN 45676). These models, together with an inert mass human body model, were used to predict the vibration mitigation performance of the seat–occupant system. The results were compared to data obtained from field measurements under real operating conditions. It was found that the use of the inert mass human body model resulted in the smallest differences between predicted and measured system vibration isolation performance for the field excitation in the frequency band up to 4.5 Hz, where most of the vibratory energy was present in the field. Hence this simplified model is suggested for prediction of vibration influence on locomotive driver under field conditions.

Relevance to the industry

The developed model using various seated human body models in the vertical direction revealed that an inert mass instead of the human body model may be sufficient for reliable prediction of seat vibration mitigation properties in rail vehicles. The developed model and findings reported here assisted in development of an improved locomotive driver's seat.     

Transmission of roll and pitch seat vibration to the head

A series of experiments has investigated the transmission of roll and pitch seat vibration to the heads of seated subjects. Head motion was measured in all six axes using a light-weight bite-bar while seated subjects were exposed to random motion at frequencies of up to 5 Hz at 1.0 rad.s ^?2 r.m.s. Subjects sat on a rigid flat seat in two body postures: ‘back-on’ (back in contact with backrest) and ‘back-off’ (no backrest contact). The influence of the position of the centre of rotation was also investigated.

Motion at the head occurred mostly in the lateral, roll and yaw axes during exposure to roll seat vibration and in the fore-and-aft, vertical and pitch axes during exposure to pitch seat vibration. A reduction in the magnitude of head motion occurred when the subjects sat in a 'back-off' posture compared with a 'back-on' posture. Varying the position of the centre of rotation along the lateral axis during roll seat vibration affected vertical and pitch head motion: least head motion occurred when the centre of rotation was in line with the subject's mid-sagittal plane. Varying the position of the centre of rotation along the vertical axis during roll seat vibration affected head motion in the mid-coronal plane: roll head motion decreased as the position of the centre of rotation was raised from below the seat surface to above the seat surface. Varying the centre of rotation (along the fore-and-aft and vertical axes) during pitch seat vibration altered head motion in the mid-sagittal plane. Head motion increased with increasing distance of the centre of rotation in front or behind the subject's ischial tuberosities and increased as the seat was raised from below the centre of rotation to above the centre of rotation.     

(Abstracts)Changing Industrial Demands

Abstract

The frequency dependence of discomfort caused by vertical mechanical shocks has been investigated with 20 seated males exposed to upward and downward shocks at 13 fundamental frequencies (1–16 Hz) and 18 magnitudes (±0.12 to ±8.3 ms^?2). The rate of growth of discomfort with increasing shock magnitude depended on the fundamental frequency of the shocks, so the frequency dependence of equivalent comfort contours (for both vertical acceleration and vertical force measured at the seat) varied with shock magnitude. The rate of growth of discomfort was similar for acceleration and force, upward and downward shocks, and lower and higher magnitude shocks. The frequency dependence of discomfort from shocks differs from that of sinusoidal vibrations having the same fundamental frequencies. This arises in part from the frequency content of the shock. Frequency weighting W_b in BS 6841:1987 and ISO 2631-1:1997 provided reasonable estimates of the discomfort caused by the shocks investigated in this study.

Practitioner Summary: No single frequency weighting can accurately predict the discomfort caused by mechanical shocks over wide ranges of shock magnitude, but vibration dose values with frequency weighting W_b provide reasonable estimates of discomfort caused by shocks similar to those investigated in this study with peak accelerations well below 1 g.     

Vibration and comfort I. Translational seat vibration

A series of studies of discomfort caused by multi-axis vibration at the seat, feet and back of seated persons is described. This first paper reports on studies with translational seat vibration. Two experiments concerned with the effects of level, frequency and direction of the translational vibration of a firm flat seat are reported.

At octave centre frequencies from 1 to 63 Hz the first experiment determined the levels of fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical seat vibration which caused discomfort equivalent to 0.5 and l.25m/s²r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical seat vibration. In the second experiment, comfort contours equivalent to 0.8m/s²r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical seat vibration and subject transmissibilities were determined from 18 males and 18 females at preferred third-octave centre frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz. In both studies the feet of subjects were not vibrated and there was no backrest.

It was concluded that the shapes of equivalent comfort contours need not normally depend on vibration level. The forms of both individual and group equivalent comfort contours and seat-to-head transmissibilities are presented. Significant correlations were found between subject characteristics (size and transmissibility) and subject relative discomfort. The males and females produced similar equivalent comfort contours.

Information on the computerized application of the method of constant stimuli which was developed for the series of experiments is presented together with a consideration of alternative methods of determining the central tendency of the data. A method of assessing the effect of vibrator distortion on judgements of equivalent discomfort is also defined.     

Using a pneumatic support to correct sitting posture for prolonged periods: A study using airline seats

Prolonged sitting with spine flexion has been linked to low back disorders. A variety of mechanisms account for this based on biomechanical and neurological variables. Airline seats typically cause pronounced lumbar flexion due to their hollowed seat back design. A pneumatic support, placed between the seat back and the lumbar spine, was tested to see if lumbar flexion was reduced. Results showed that when the seats were positioned in the upright position, 15 of 20 participants experienced reduced lumbar flexion (by 15° on average) with the support. The study was repeated on the five non-responders with the seatback set in the reclined position. This resulted in another four experiencing less lumbar flexion. Since seated flexion is associated with disc stress, reducing flexion with the support reduced lumbar stress. Spine flexion that results from prolonged sitting is associated with disc stress and pain. The pneumatic support tested here reduced spine flexion. While it is not known why airline seats are designed with no lumbar support, which causes excessive lumbar flexion while seated, the pneumatic support corrected this deficit. Reclining the seatback enhanced this effect.     

The effects of the duration on the subjective discomfort of a rigid seat and a cushioned automobile seat

The subjective discomfort caused by the seat would affect the judgements of discomfort for the seated subjects. However, there have been few studies concerned with the discomfort on the rigid seat in static states, especially for a relatively long duration. This paper investigated the subjective discomfort caused by a rigid seat and a cushioned automobile seat for an hour. Twelve students (eight males and four females) rated the overall discomfort on a category-ratio scale and the local body discomfort on a 6-point rating scale every 10 min caused by two seats in two separate days. The static discomfort increased with increasing time, and the rigid seat caused greater discomfort than the cushioned seat. The local discomfort on the back dominated on the automobile seat, whereas the local discomfort on the buttock area dominated on the rigid seat. We established the empirical equations to predict the relations between the discomfort and duration of the two types of seats, for benchmark in the future studies on vibration and noise discomfort.     

Characterisation of the human-seat coupling in response to vibration

Characterising the coupling between the occupant and vehicle seat is necessary to understand the transmission of vehicle seat vibration to the human body. In this study, the vibration characteristics of the human body coupled with a vehicle seat were identified in frequencies up to 100 Hz. Transmissibilities of three volunteers seated on two different vehicle seats were measured under multi-axial random vibration excitation. The results revealed that the human-seat system vibration was dominated by the human body and foam below 10 Hz. Major coupling between the human body and the vehicle seat-structure was observed in the frequency range of 10–60 Hz. There was local coupling of the system dominated by local resonances of seat frame and seat surface above 60 Hz. Moreover, the transmissibility measured on the seat surface between the human and seat foam is suggested to be a good method of capturing human-seat system resonances rather than that measured on the human body in high frequencies above 10 Hz.Practitioner Summary: The coupling characteristics of the combined human body and vehicle seat system has not yet been fully understood in frequencies of 0.5–100 Hz. This study shows the human-seat system has distinctive dynamic coupling characteristics in three different frequency regions: below 10 Hz, 10–60 Hz, and above 60 Hz.     

The vibration of inclined backrests: perception and discomfort of vibration applied parallel to the back in the z-axis of the body

This study determined how backrest inclination and the frequency of vibration influence the perception and discomfort of vibration applied parallel to the back (vertical vibration when sitting upright, horizontal vibration when recumbent). Subjects experienced backrest vibration at frequencies in the range 2.5 to 25 Hz at vibration magnitudes up to 24 dB above threshold. Absolute thresholds, equivalent comfort contours, and the principal locations for feeling vibration were determined with four backrest inclinations: 0° (upright), 30°, 60° and 90° (recumbent). With all backrest inclinations, acceleration thresholds and equivalent comfort contours were similar and increased with increasing frequency at 6 dB per octave (i.e. velocity constant). It is concluded that backrest inclination has little effect on the frequency dependence of thresholds and equivalent comfort contours for vibration applied along the back, and that the W _d frequency weighting in current standards is appropriate for evaluating z-axis vibration of the back at all backrest inclinations.

Statement of Relevance: To minimise the vibration discomfort of seated people, it is necessary to understand how discomfort varies with backrest inclination. It is concluded that the vibration on backrests can be measured using a pad between the backrest and the back, so that it reclines with the backrest, and the measured vibration evaluated without correcting for the backrest inclination.     

The impact of office chair features on lumbar lordosis,intervertebral joint and sacral tilt angles: a radiographic assessment

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine which office chair feature is better at improving spine posture in sitting. Method: Participants (n = 28) were radiographed in standing, maximum flexion and seated in four chair conditions: control, lumbar support, seat pan tilt and backrest with scapular relief. Measures of lumbar lordosis, intervertebral joint angles and sacral tilt were compared between conditions and sex. Results: Sitting consisted of approximately 70% of maximum range of spine flexion. No differences in lumbar flexion were found between the chair features or control. Significantly more anterior pelvic rotation was found with the lumbar support (p = 0.0028) and seat pan tilt (p < 0.0001). Males had significantly more anterior pelvic rotation and extended intervertebral joint angles through L1–L3 in all conditions (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: No one feature was statistically superior with respect to minimising spine flexion, however, seat pan tilt resulted in significantly improved pelvic posture.

Practitioner Summary: Seat pan tilt, and to some extent lumbar supports, appear to improve seated postures. However, sitting, regardless of chair features used, still involves near end range flexion of the spine. This will increase stresses to the spine and could be a potential injury generator during prolonged seated exposures.     

Free shoulder space requirements in the design of high backrests

The objective of this study was to determine the influence of scapular support on the effects of lumbar support and to prove that a high and straight backrest is inappropriate. In literature the importance of a lumbar support is noted, although data about optimal dimensions is an under-researched topic and in earlier studies on force distribution and muscle activity the backrest had a fixed form. The lumbar support is needed to maintain the lumbar lordosis but no studies deal with the question of the precise dimensions of the backrest at shoulder level. With a specially designed apparatus, forces on shoulder and seat were measured separately, and the force on the pelvis calculated, while varying seat and backrest inclination within the range from 0° to 17°. Seat-to-backrest angle (at the level of lumbar support) was kept constant at 90°. The distance between the tangent to the lumbar support and the parallel tangent to the scapular support was varied from 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 cm. This distance is called the free shoulder space. Electromyography was measured at the erector spinae at the levels of the L1, T8 and T5 vertebrae. For all seat angles, a free shoulder space of d=0 cm resulted in the highest back muscle activity. In agreement with the biomechanical model, EMG activity reduced with an increase of seat tilt and increase of free shoulder space. With increasing free shoulder space, a larger part of the total backrest force was carried by the lumbar support. This study shows that a high and straight backrest overrules lumbar support. Offering free shoulder space of at least 6 cm reduces back muscle activity and allows for lumbar support.     

Transmission of vertical vibration through a seat: Effect of thickness of foam cushions at the seat pan and the backrest

The perception of vehicle ride comfort is influenced by the dynamic performance of full-depth foam used in many vehicle seats. The effects of the thickness of foam on the dynamic stiffness (i.e., stiffness and damping as a function of frequency) of foam cushions with three thicknesses (60, 80, and 100 mm), and the vibration transmitted through these cushions at the seat pan and the backrest were measured with 12 subjects (6 males and 6 females). With increasing thickness, the stiffness and the damping of the foam decreased. With increasing thickness of foam at the seat pan, the resonance frequencies around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the seat pan cushion and the backrest cushion decreased. For the conditions investigated, it is concluded that the thickness of foam at a vertical backrest has little effect on the vertical in-line or fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the foam at either the seat pan or the backrest. The frequencies of the primary resonances around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line transmissibility and the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of foam at the seat pan were highly correlated. Compared to sitting on a rigid seat pan with a foam backrest, sitting with foam at both the seat pan and the backrest reduced the resonance frequency in the vertical in-line transmissibility of the backrest foam and increased the associated transmissibility at resonance, while the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the backrest was little affected. Compared to sitting without a backrest, sitting with a rigid vertical backrest increased the resonance frequency of the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the seat pan cushion and increased the transmissibility at resonance.Relevance to industryThe transmissibility of a seat is determined by the dynamic properties of the occupant of the seat and the dynamic properties of the seat. This study shows how the thicknesses of foam at a seat pan and foam at a backrest affect the in-line and cross-axis transmissibilities of the foams at the seat pan and the backrest. The findings have application to the design of vehicle seats to minimise the transmission of vibration to the body.     

Car driving with and without a movable back support: Effect on transmission of vibration through the trunk and on its consequences for muscle activation and spinal shrinkage

The aim of this study was to test the effect of a movable backrest on vibration transmission through the trunk during driving and on the physiological consequences thereof. Eleven healthy male subjects drove for about 1 h on normal roads with a movable and with a fixed backrest while surface electromyography (EMG) was measured at the level of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) and vertical accelerations were measured at the seat, backrest and at the spine at the levels of the second sacral vertebra (S2) and seventh cervical vertebra (C7). The movable backrest significantly reduced accelerations at C7 by up to 11.9% at the 5 Hz frequency band. The movable backrest also significantly reduced the coherence and transmission between S2 and C7 accelerations, but not the differential motion between these sensors. EMG at both sides of L5 was on average 28% lower when using the movable backrest. Spinal shrinkage was unaffected by backrest type. It is concluded that a movable backrest reduces the transmission of vibration through the trunk and that it reduces low back EMG. Car driving is associated with the risk of developing low back pain and this may be related to exposure to whole body vibration. This study found an effect of a simple ergonomics measure on the transmission of vibration through the trunk as well as on back muscle activation.     

Difference thresholds for the perception of whole-body vertical vibration: dependence on the frequency and magnitude of vibration

When seeking to reduce vibration in transport it is useful to know how much reduction is needed for the improvement to be noticeable. This experimental study investigated whether relative difference thresholds for the perception of whole-body vertical vibration by seated persons depend on the frequency or magnitude of vibration. Relative difference thresholds for sinusoidal seat vibration were determined for 12 males at three vibration magnitudes and eight frequencies (2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, 315 Hz) using the three-down-one-up method in conjunction with a two-interval-forced-choice procedure. The median relative difference thresholds were in the range 9.5% to 20.3%. There appeared to be a frequency-dependence at the lowest vibration magnitude, such that higher frequencies had higher difference thresholds. The relative difference thresholds depended on the vibration magnitude only at 2.5 and 315 Hz. The influence of both vibration frequency and vibration magnitude on the measured difference thresholds suggests that vision (at 2.5 Hz) and hearing (at 315 Hz) contributed to the perception of changes in vibration magnitude.     

Assessments of two dynamic manikins for laboratory testing of seats under whole-body vibration

The aptness of two anthropodynamic manikins for assessing vibration isolation effectiveness of suspension seats is evaluated through laboratory measurements. The evaluations were performed using five different suspension seats exposed to idealized white noise (0.5–20 Hz) and target vehicle excitations along the vertical axis using a whole-body vehicular vibration simulator. The measurements were performed to derive acceleration transmissibility and seat effective amplitude transmissibility (SEAT) characteristics of seats loaded with: human subjects of body masses in the vicinity of 55, 75 and 98 kg; manikins configured to same masses; and equivalent rigid masses. The dynamic responses of the manikins were also measured under different magnitudes of white-noise excitations and expressed in terms of apparent mass. The relative applicability of the manikins for selected seats was evaluated by comparing the measures with those obtained for the seat–human and seat–mass systems. The comparisons suggested that the SEAT measures attained with manikins are comparable with those obtained with equivalent rigid mass, irrespective of the body mass, for the low natural frequency seats (2 Hz) considered in the study. Both the manikins and the equivalent rigid masses, however, provided an overestimate of isolation effectiveness of seats, when compared to those with human subjects. The manikins resulted in better estimates of SEAT values for high natural frequency seats than the rigid mass. The dynamic responses of manikins were also compared with the ranges of standardized values reported in ISO-5982 and DIN-45676. The results revealed considerable differences between the biodynamic responses of manikins and the standardized ranges.