Crystallization behavior of PEO in blends of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐(ethylene oxide) block copolymer

The crystallization behavior of two molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide)s (PEO) and their blends with the block copolymer poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide) (P2VP‐b‐PEO) was investigated by polarized optical microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). A sharp decreasing of the spherulite growth rate was observed with the increasing of the copolymer content in the blend. The addition of P2VP‐b‐PEO to PEO increases the degradation temperature becoming the thermal stability of the blend very similar to that of the block copolymer P2VP‐b‐PEO. Glass transition temperatures, T_g, for PEO/P2VP‐b‐PEO blends were intermediate between those of the pure components and the value increased as the content of PEO homopolymer decreased in the blend. AFM images showed spherulites with lamellar crystal morphology for the homopolymer PEO. Lamellar crystal morphology with sheaf‐like lamellar arrangement was observed for 80 wt% PEO(200M) and a lamellar crystal morphology with grain aggregation was observed for 50 and 20 wt% blends. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of PEO was progressively retarded as the copolymer content in the blend increased, since the copolymer hinders the molecular mobility in the miscible amorphous phase. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Poly(ϵ-caprolactone)/poly(ethylene oxide) diblock copolymer II. Nonisothermal crystallization and melting behavior

The nonisothermal crystallization behavior and melting process of the poly(ϵ-caprolactone) (PCL)/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) diblock copolymer in which the weight fraction of the PCL block is 0.80 has been studied by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Only the PCL block is crystallizable, the PEO block with 0.20 weight fraction cannot crystallize. The kinetics of the PCL/PEO diblock copolymer under nonisothermal crystallization conditions has been analyzed by Ozawa's equation. The experimental data shows no agreement with Ozawa's theoretical predictions in the whole crystallization process, especially in the later stage. A parameter, kinetic crystallinity, is used to characterize the crystallizability of the PCL/PEO diblock copolymer. The amorphous and microphase separating PEO block has a great influence on the crystallization of the PCL block. It bonds chemically with the PCL block, reduces crystallization entropy, and provides nucleating sites for the PCL block crystallization. The existence of the PEO block leads to the occurrence of the two melting peaks of the PCL/PEO diblock copolymer during melting process after nonisothermal crystallization. The comparison of nonisothermal crystallization of the PCL/PEO diblock copolymer, PCL/PEO blend, and PCL and PEO homopolymers has been made. It showed a lower crystallinity of the PCL/PEO diblock copolymer than that of others and a faster crystallization rate of the PCL/PEO diblock copolymer than that of the PCL homopolymer, but a slower crystallization rate than that of the PCL/PEO blend. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 63: 1793–1804, 1997     

Crystallization kinetics of new copoly(ethylene terephthalate-imide)s

Crystallization kinetics of copoly(ethyleneterephthalate-imide)s (PETIs) of various imide contents were studied by the DSC technique. The results of isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics studies showed a consistent trend in that the crystallization of all copolyesterimides comprised a primary stage and secondary stage, and that the crystallization mechanism was a three-dimensional growth with athermal nucleation. The crystallization rate of PETIs first increased and then decreased as the content of imide units in the copolyesterimides increased. This indicates that the imide units in the copolymer decreased the chain-packing regularity of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and the same units also enhanced the copolymer chain rigidity. The copolyesterimide with 0.2 mol% imide unit content showed a dramatic increase of the crystallization rate, and exhibited the highest crystallization rate of all the studied compositions. Studies of isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics, showed that small amounts of imide units in the the backbone act as nucleating agents during the crystallization process of copolyesterimides.     

Miscibility and crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(ε-caprolactone) blends

Blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), both semicrystalline polymers, were prepared by co-dissolving the two polyesters in chloroform and casting the mixture. Phase contrast microscopy was used to probe the miscibility of PEOB/PCL blends. Experimental results indicated that PEO was immiscible with PCL because the melt was biphasic. Crystallization of PEO/PCL blends was studied by differential scanning calorimetry and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The crystallization rate of PEO decreased with the increase of PCL in the blends while the crystallization mechanism did not change. In the case of the isothermal crystallization of PCL, the crystallization mechanism did not change, and the change in the crystallization rate was not very big, or almost constant with the addition of PEO, compared with the change of the crystallization rate of PEO.     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and their copolymers poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate) (PBET) containing 70/30, 65/35 and 60/40 molar ratios of 1,4‐butanediol/ethylene glycol were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at crystallization temperatures (T_c) which were 35–90 °C below equilibrium melting temperature . Although these copolymers contain both monomers in high proportion, DSC data revealed for copolymer crystallization behaviour. The reason for such copolymers being able to crystallize could be due to the similar chemical structures of 1,4‐butanediol and ethylene glycol. DSC results for isothermal crystallization revealed that random copolymers had a lower degree of crystallinity and lower crystallite growth rate than those of homopolymers. DSC heating scans, after completion of isothermal crystallization, showed triple melting endotherms for all these polyesters, similar to those of other polymers as reported in the literature. The crystallization isotherms followed the Avrami equation with an exponent n of 2–2.5 for PET and 2.5–3.0 for PBT and PBETs. Analyses of the Lauritzen–Hoffman equation for DSC isothermal crystallization data revealed that PBT and PET had higher growth rate constant G_o, and nucleation constant K_g than those of PBET copolymers. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Non-isothermal Crystallization of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) with Poly(oxybenzoate-p-trimethylene terephthalate) Copolymer

The influence of a poly(oxybenzoate-p-trimethylene terephthalate) copolymer, designated T64, on the non-isothermal crystallization process of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was investigated. All samples were prepared by solution blending in a 60/40 by weight phenol/tetrachloroethane solvent at 50°C. The solidification process strongly depended on cooling rate and composition of system. The crystallization rate of blends was estimated by crystallization rate parameter (CRP) and crystallization rate coefficient (CRC). From these results of CRP and CRC, it was predicted that the overall non-isothermal crystallization rate of PET would be accelerated by blending with 1–15 wt% of T64. The acceleration of PET crystallization rate was most pronounced in the PET/T64 blends with 5 wt% T64. The observed changes in crystallization behavior are explained by the effect of the physical state of the copolyester during PET crystallization as well as the amount of copolymer in the blends. An Ozawa plot was used to analyze the data of non-isothermal crystallization. The obvious curvature in the plot indicated that the Ozawa model could not fit the PET/T64 blend system well, and there was an abrupt change in the slope of the Ozawa plot at a critical cooling rate.     

Microstructure and crystallization of melt‐mixed poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene isophthalate) blends

Physical blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene isophthalate) (PEI), abbreviated PET/PEI (80/20) blends, and of PET and a random poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate) copolymer containing 40% ethylene isophthalate (PET₆₀I₄₀), abbreviated PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends, were melt‐mixed at 270°C for different reactive blending times to give a series of copolymers containing 20 mol % of ethylene isophthalic units with different degrees of randomness. ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy precisely determined the microstructure of the blends. The thermal and mechanical properties of the blends were evaluated by DSC and tensile assays, and the obtained results were compared with those obtained for PET and a statistically random PETI copolymer with the same composition. The microstructure of the blends gradually changed from a physical blend into a block copolymer, and finally into a random copolymer with the advance of transreaction time. The melting temperature and enthalpy of the blends decreased with the progress of melt‐mixing. Isothermal crystallization studies carried out on molten samples revealed the same trend for the crystallization rate. The effect of reaction time on crystallizability was more pronounced in the case of the PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends. The Young's modulus of the melt‐mixed blends was comparable to that of PET, whereas the maximum tensile stress decreased with respect to that of PET. All blend samples showed a noticeable brittleness. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3076–3086, 2003     

On the nature of multiple melting in poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and its copolymers with cyclohexylene dimethylene terephthalate (PET/CT)

The multiple melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) homopolymers of different molecular weights and its cyclohexylene dimethylene (PET/CT) copolymers was studied by time-resolved simultaneous small-angle X-ray scattering/wide-angle X-ray scattering diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry techniques using a heating rate of 2 °C/min after isothermal crystallization at 200 °C for 30 min. The copolymer containing random incorporation of 1,4-cyclohexylene dimethylene terephthalate monomer cannot be cocrystallized with the ethylene terephthalate moiety. Isothermally crystallized samples were found to possess primary and secondary crystals. The statistical distribution of the primary crystals was found to be broad compared to that of the secondary crystals. During heating, the following mechanisms were assumed to explain the multiple melting behavior. The first endotherm is related to the non-reversing melting of very thin and defective secondary crystals formed during the late stages of crystallization. The second endotherm is associated with the melting of secondary crystals and partial melting of less stable primary crystals. The third endotherm is associated with the melting of the remaining stable primary crystals and the recrystallized crystals. Due to their large statistical distribution, the primary crystals melt in a broad temperature range, which includes both second and third melting endotherms. The amounts of secondary, primary and recrystallized crystals, being molten in each endotherm, are different in various PET samples, depending on variables such as isothermal crystallization temperature, time, molecular weight and co-monomer content.     

Immobilization of poly(ethylene oxide) on poly(ethylene terephthalate) using a plasma polymerization process

Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) has been covalently immobilized on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) films using a radio frequency glow discharge polymer deposition process, followed by chemical coupling. Amino or hydroxyl groups were introduced onto the surface of the PET by exposing the films to allylamine and allyl alcohol plasmas. These functional groups were activated with cyanuric chloride, and then they were reacted with PEO. ESCA and water contact angle studies were used to characterize the surfaces of these films during the different stages of the reaction. The films containing the higher molecular weight PEO exhibited an increase in the ? C? O? peak of the C_ls ESCA spectrum and an increase in oxygen content on the film surfaces. Increasing the molecular weight of the PEO attached to the PET also resulted in an increased wettability of the films.     

Crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was studied by the methods of small angle light scattering, depolarized light intensity and density measurements. Spherulite growth rates and the overall rates of crystallization were determined at various temperatures. A detailed analysis of the crystallization course has been made with special emphasis on the early stages of crystallization. The results indicate that a significant amount of crystallization takes place in the extraspherulitie material during isothermal crystallization.     

Thermal and crystallization characteristics of poly(ethylene terephthalate) with poly(oxybenzoate‐p‐trimethylene terephthalate) copolymer

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was blended with two different poly(oxybenzoate‐p‐trimethylene terephthalate) copolymers, designated T28 and T64, with the level of copolymer varying from 1 to 15 wt %. All samples were prepared by solution blending in a 60/40 (by weight) phenol/tetrachloroethane solvent at 50°C. The crystallization behavior of the samples was studied by DSC. The results indicate that both T28 and T64 accelerated the crystallization rate of PET in a manner similar to that of a nucleating agent. The acceleration of PET crystallization rate was most pronounced in the PET/T64 blends with a maximum level at 5 wt % of T64. The melting temperatures for the blends are comparable to that of pure PET. The observed changes in crystallization behavior are explained by the effect of the physical state of the copolyester during PET crystallization as well as the amount of copolymer in the blends. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 1599–1606, 2002     

Sequence analysis and fiber properties of a blend of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐4,4′‐bibenzoate)

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐4,4′‐ bibenzoate) (PETBB) are prepared by coextrusion. Analysis by ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy shows that little transesterification occurs during the blending process. Additional heat treatment of the blend leads to more transesterification and a corresponding increase in the degree of randomness, R. Analysis by differential scanning calorimetry shows that the as‐extruded blend is semicrystalline, unlike PETBB15, a random copolymer with the same composition as the non‐ random blend. Additional heat treatment of the blend leads to a decrease in the melting point, T_m, and an increase in glass transition temperature, T_g. The T_m and T_g of the blend reach minimum and maximum values, respectively, after 15 min at 270°C, at which point the blend has not been fully randomized. The blend has a lower crystallization rate than PET and PETBB55 (a copolymer containing 55 mol % bibenzoate). The PET/PETBB55 (70/30 w/w) blend shows a secondary endothermic peak at 15°C above an isothermal crystallization temperature. The secondary peak was confirmed to be the melting of small and/or imperfect crystals resulting from secondary crystallization. The blend exhibits the crystal structure of PET. Tensile properties of the fibers prepared from the blend are comparable to those of PET fiber, whereas PETBB55 fibers display higher performance. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1793–1803, 2004     

The crystallization behaviors of copolymeric flame‐retardant poly(ethylene terephthalate) with organophosphorus

The crystallization behaviors of copolymeric flame‐retardant poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) with organophosphorus were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results indicated that the degree of tacticity of molecular chain of PET declined due to the presence of organophosphorus which had an important impact on isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization behaviors apparently. In the process of isothermal crystallization, the more organophosphorus the samples contained, the faster the samples crystallized and it resulted from the special structure of PET copolymer with organophosphorus in it. The equilibrium melting temperature of PET decreased from 284.87 to 260.72°C as the content of organophosphorus increased from 0 to 0.96 wt%, whereas in the process of nonisothermal crystallization, the Avrami exponent n decreased with the growth of the content of organophosphorus, and the addition of organophosphorus made the nucleation mechanism and the growing geometry less complicated. POLYM. COMPOS., 34:867–876, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were investigated by DSC as functions of crystallization temperature, blend composition, and PET and PEN source. Isothermal crystallization kinetics were evaluated in terms of the Avrami equation. The Avrami exponent (n) is different for PET, PEN, and the blends, indicating different crystallization mechanisms occurring in blends than those in pure PET and PEN. Activation energies of crystallization were calculated from the rate constants, using an Arrhenius‐type expression. Regime theory was used to elucidate the crystallization course of PET/PEN blends as well as that of unblended PET and PEN. The transition from regime II to regime III was clearly observed for each blend sample as the crystallization temperature was decreased. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 23–37, 2001     

Crystallization of poly(tetramethylene succinate) in blends with poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) and poly(ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization behavior of polymer blends of poly(tetramethylene succinate) (PTMS) with poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) or poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was investigated with differential scanning calorimetry under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions. The blends were prepared by solution casting and precipitation, respectively. The constituent polymers were semicrystalline materials and crystallized nearly independently in the blends. The addition of the second component to PTMS showed that PCL did not significantly influence the crystallinity of the constituents in the blends under isothermal conditions, whereas the crystallization of PTMS was slightly suppressed by crystalline PET. Nonisothermal crystallization under constant cooling rates was examined in terms of a quasi‐isothermal Avrami approach. In blends, the rates of crystallization were differently influenced by the second component. The rate of the constituent that crystallized at the higher temperature was barely influenced by the second component being in the molten state, whereas the rate of the second component, crystallizing when the first component was already crystalline, was altered differently under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 149–160, 2004     

Phase Behaviour of Poly(ethylene oxide)/Poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) Blends

Thermal behaviour and morphology of blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (SMA) prepared by the coprecipitation technique were studied by means of differential scanning calorimetry, optical microscopy and thermogravimetry. SMA containing 25wt% maleic anhydride (MA) was found to be miscible with PEO when the SMA content was greater than 80%. The melting temperature and crystallinity depended on the composition of the blend. SMA appears to segregate interlamellarly during the isothermal crystallization of PEO. The thermal stability of blends was enhanced and was higher than that of pure PEO and SMA. © of SCI.     

PEN/PET共混物结晶行为研究

用差示扫描量热法(DSC)研究了不同共混比例PEN/PET共混物的熔体结晶行为,并进行了等温结晶动力学测定。结果表明:随着两种组分向中间比例(50/50)靠近,共混物的熔融温度越低,结晶速率也越慢。     

Properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene naphthalate) blends

Blends composed of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) as the majority component and poly(ethylene naphthalate)(PEN) as the minority component were melt-mixed in a single screw extruder at various PET/PEN compound ratios. Tensile and flexural test results reveal a good PET/PEN composition dependence, indicating that the compatibility of the blends is effective in a macrodomain. In thermal tests, single transitions for T_g, T_m and T_c (crystallization temperature), respectively, are observed from DSC as well as single T_g from DMA except for 50/50 blends. These results suggests that the compatibility is sufficient down to the submicron level. Moreover, isothermal DSC tests along with Avrami analysis indicate that PET's crystallization is significantly retarded when blended with PEN. Results in this study demonstrate that PEN is a highly promising additive to improve PET's spinnability at high speeds.     

Crystallization of 2‐methyl‐1,3‐propanediol substituted poly(ethylene terephthalate). I. Thermal behavior and isothermal crystallization

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to evaluate the thermal behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) copolymers containing 2‐methyl‐1,3‐propanediol as a comonomer unit. The addition of comonomer reduces the melting temperature and decreases the range between the glass transition and melting point. The rate of crystallization is also decreased with the addition of this comonomer. In this case it appears that the more flexible glycol group does not significantly increase crystallization rates by promoting chain folding during crystallization, as has been suggested for some other glycol‐modified PET copolyesters. The melting behavior following isothermal crystallization was examined using a Hoffman–Weeks approach, showing very good linearity for all copolymers tested, and predicted an equilibrium melting temperature (T_m⁰) of 280.0°C for PET homopolymer, in agreement with literature values. The remaining copolymers showed a marked decrease in T_m⁰ with increasing copolymer composition. The results of this study support the claim that these comonomers are excluded from the polymer crystal during growth. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 2592–2603, 2006     

Non‐isothermal crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide)/silver nanoplate composites

The non‐isothermal crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/silver nanoplate composites was studied using differential scanning calorimetry. The non‐isothermal crystallization was analyzed by combining the Avrami and Ozawa equations. It was found that the Avrami exponent for neat PEO ranges from 2.51 to 2.53, whereas it ranges from 2.54 to 3.16 for its composites, indicating that the spherical crystal morphology does not change with the addition of nanoplates. However, the rate determination of crystal growth transfers from diffusion to nucleation. The crystallization half‐time showed an increase with the addition of silver nanoplates in PEO, indicating that the overall crystallization rate of PEO decreases with the addition of nanoplates. However, the nucleation activity is larger than unity in the composites and the value increases with an increase in the nanoplate content. This behavior implies that the nanoplates act as anti‐nucleating agents to hinder nucleation. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry