Effect of EPDM‐g‐MAH on the morphology and properties of PA6/EPDM/HDPE ternary blends

The formation of core‐shell morphology within the dispersed phase was studied for composite droplet polymer‐blend systems comprising a polyamide‐6 matrix, ethylene‐propylene‐diene terpolymer (EPDM) shell and high density polyethylene (HDPE) core. In this article, the effect of EPDM with different molecular weights on the morphology and properties of the blends were studied. To improve the compatibility of the ternary blends, EPDM was modified by grafting with maleic anhydride (EPDM‐g‐MAH). It was found that core‐shell morphology with EPDM‐g‐MAH as shell and HDPE as core and separated dispersion morphology of EPDM‐g‐MAH and HDPE phase were obtained separately in PA6 matrix with different molecular weights of EPDM‐g‐MAH in the blends. DSC measurement indicated that there may be some co‐crystals in the blends due to the formation of core‐shell structure. Mechanical tests showed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MAH/HDPE ternary blends with the core‐shell morphology exhibited a remarkable rise in the elongation at break. With more perfect core‐shell composite droplets and co‐crystals, the impact strength of the ternary blends could be greatly increased to 51.38 kJ m^?2, almost 10 times higher than that of pure PA6 (5.50 kJ m^?2). POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2013. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Blends of i‐PP and SBS. I. Influence of the in situ compatibilization on the morphology

This article concerns the in situ compatibilization of immiscible isotactic polypropylene/butadiene‐styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymer blends (i‐PP/SBS) by means of a reactive mixture. For this purpose, maleated PP (PP‐MAH) and SBS (SBS‐MAH) were used as functionalized polymers and 4,4′‐diaminediphenylmethane was used as a coupling agent between maleated polymers, resulting in a graft copolymer. Binary blends i‐PP/SBS, nonreactive ternary blends i‐PP/PP‐MAH/SBS, and reactive ternary blends i‐PP/PP‐MAH/SBS‐MAH with varying diamine and anhydride molar ratios were prepared. Torque measurements suggest a graft copolymerization during the melt blending for ternary reactive blends, but the extension of the grafting does not vary with the diamine and anhydride molar ratio, but with the elastomer concentration. The morphology of the blends was investigated by scanning electron microscopy. The morphology of binary and ternary nonreactive blends is similar, exhibiting elastomer domains disperse in the i‐PP matrix, whose sizes increase with elastomer concentration. On the other hand, the elastomer domain size in the ternary reactive blends is practically independent of the blends composition and of the diamine and anhydride molar ratio. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 847–855, 2002     

Mechanical property and morphology comparison between the two blends poly(propylene)/ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer elastomer and poly(propylene)/maleic anhydride‐g‐ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer

The comparison of the mechanical properties between poly(propylene)/ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer elastomer (PP/EPDM) and poly(propylene)/maleic anhydride‐g‐ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer [PP/MEPDM (MAH‐g‐EPDM)] showed that the latter blend has noticeably higher Izod impact strength but lower Young's modulus than the former one. Phase morphology of the two blends was examined by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, indicating that the miscibility of PP/MEPDM was inferior to PP/EPDM. The poor miscibility of PP/MEPDM degrades the nucleation effectiveness of the elastomer on PP. The observations of the impact fracture mode of the two blends and the dispersion state of the elastomers, determined by scanning electron microscopy, showed that PP/EPDM fractured in a brittle mode, whereas PP/MEPDM in a ductile one, and that a finer dispersion of MEPDM was found in the blend PP/MEPDM. These observations indicate that the difference in the dispersion state of elastomer between PP/EPDM and PP/MEPDM results in different fracture modes, and thereby affects the toughness of the two blends. The finer dispersion of MEPDM in the blend of PP/MEPDM was attributed to the part cross‐linking of MEPDM resulting from the grafting reaction of EPDM with maleic anhydride (MAH) in the presence of dicumyl peroxide (DCP). © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2486–2491, 2002     

A study on the effects of SEBS‐g‐MAH on the phase morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/polycarbonate/SEBS ternary polymer blends

In this work, five ternary blends based on 70% by weight (wt %) of polypropylene (PP) with 30% wt of polycarbonate (PC)/poly(styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene)(SEBS) dispersed phase consists of 15 wt % PC and 15 wt % reactive (maleic anhydride grafted) and nonreactive SEBS mixtures at various ratios were prepared in a co‐rotating twin screw extruder. scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs showed that the blends containing only nonreactive SEBS exhibited a fine dispersion of core‐shell particles. With decreasing the SEBS/SEBS‐g‐Maleic Anhydride (MAH) weight ratio, the morphology changed from the core‐shell particles to a mixed of core‐shell, rod‐like and individual particles. This variation in phase morphology affected the thermal and mechanical properties of the blends. DSC results showed that the blends containing only nonreactive SEBS exhibited a minimum in degree of crystallinity due to the homogeneous nucleation of core‐shell particles. Mechanical testing showed that in the SEBS/SEBS‐g‐MAH weight ratio of 50/50, the modulus and impact strength increased compared with the PP matrix while the yield stress had minimum difference with that of PP matrix. These effects could be attributed to the formation of those especial microstructures revealed by the SEM studies. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Compatibility of reactively compatibilized polyamide 11 (nylon 11)/polyethylene (PE) alloys

The compatibility of nylon 11/polyethylene (PE) alloys on addition of reactive maleated ethylene‐propylene‐diene copolymer (EPDM‐graft‐MAH) was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, morphological observations and rheology. The decrease in the differential volume of the melting temperature of nylon 11 and PE with increasing compatibilizer suggests that the addition of EPDM‐graft‐MAH affects the crystalline behavior of nylon 11 and PE. The decreased particle size of the dispersed phase also confirmed the improvement in the compatibility. The rheological behavior revealed that the addition of the compatibilizer enhanced the apparent viscosity of the melting blends, which resulted from the increasing interaction between the chains due to the improvement in compatibility of nylon 11 and PE. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of core‐shell morphology evolution on the rheology,crystallization, and mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE ternary blend

In this article, polyamide 6 (PA6), maleic anhydride grafted ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer (EPDM‐g‐MA), high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) were simultaneously added into an internal mixer to melt‐mixing for different periods. The relationship between morphology and rheological behaviors, crystallization, mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blends were studied. The phase morphology observation revealed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE (70/15/15 wt %) blend is constituted from PA6 matrix in which is dispersed core‐shell droplets of HDPE core encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase and indicated that the mixing time played a crucial role on the evolution of the core‐shell morphology. Rheological measurement manifested that the complex viscosity and storage modulus of ternary blends were notable higher than the pure polymer blends and binary blends which ascribed different phase morphology. Moreover, the maximum notched impact strength of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blend was 80.7 KJ/m² and this value was 10–11 times higher than that of pure PA6. Particularly, differential scanning calorimetry results indicated that the bulk crystallization temperature of HDPE (114.6°C) was partly weakened and a new crystallization peak appeared at a lower temperature of around 102.2°C as a result of co‐crystal of HDPE and EPDM‐g‐MA. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Morphological structure and surface properties of maleated ethylene propylene diene monomer/organoclay nanocomposites

The phase morphology and surface properties of some maleated ethylene propylene‐diene/organoclay nanocomposites (EPDM‐g‐MA/OC) were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and contact angle measurements. The effect of organoclay and/or compatibilizing agent [maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (PP‐g‐MA)] on the properties of the EPDM‐g‐MA nanocomposites was investigated. The quality and uniformity of nanoclay dispersion were analyzed by SEM and AFM images. The experimental results showed an intercalate structure and biphasic morphology for the binary blends based on EPDM and clay. The surface properties of the studied composites are significantly influenced by the presence of a compatibilizing agent—PP‐g‐MA. POLYM. COMPOS., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of the compatibilizer on the morphology and properties of dynamically cured PP/POE/epoxy blends

Dynamic vulcanization was successfully applied to epoxy resin reinforced polypropylene (PP)/ethylene‐octene copolymer (POE) blends, and the effects of different compatibilizers on the morphology and properties of dynamically cured PP/POE/epoxy blends were studied. The results show that dynamically cured PP/POE/epoxy blends compatibilized with maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (MAH‐g‐PP) have a three‐phase structure consisting of POE and epoxy particles dispersed in the PP continuous phase, and these blends had improved tensile strength and flexural modulus. While using maleic anhydride‐grafted POE (MAH‐g‐POE) as a compatibilizer, the structure of the core‐shell complex phase and the PP continuous phase showed that epoxy particles could be embedded in MAH‐g‐POE in the blends, and gave rise to an increase in impact strength, while retaining a certain strength and modulus. DSC analysis showed that the epoxy particles in the blends compatibilized with MAH‐g‐PP were more efficient nucleating agents for PP than they were in the blends compatibilized with MAH‐g‐POE. WAXD analysis shows that compatibilization do not disturb the crystalline structure of PP in the blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Effects of fillers,maleated ethylene propylene diene diene rubber,and maleated ethylene octene copolymer on phase morphology and oil resistance in natural rubber/nitrile rubber blends

The phase morphology and oil resistance of 20/80 NR/NBR blends filled with different types of fillers and copolymers were investigated. In the case of filler effect, N220, N330, and N660 carbon blacks with different particle sizes were used. Additionally, the blends filled with nonblack‐reinforcing fillers, that is, precipitated and silane‐treated silica, were investigated. To study the compatibilization effect, maleated ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM‐g‐MA) and maleated ethylene octene copolymer (EOR‐g‐MA) were added to the blends. The results revealed that the addition of filler, either carbon black or silica, to the blend caused a drastic decrease in NR dispersed phase size. Carbon blacks with different particle sizes did not produce any significant difference in NR dispersed phase size under the optical microscope. Silica‐filled blends showed lower resistance to oil than did the carbon black–filled blends. In addition, it was determined that neither EOR‐g‐MA nor EPDM‐g‐MA could act as a compatibilizer for the blend system studied. The oil resistance of the blends with EPDM‐g‐MA is strongly affected by the overall polarity of the blend. In the case of EOR‐g‐MA, the oil resistance of the blends is significantly governed by both overall polarity of the blend and phase morphology. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1156–1162, 2003     

Toughening of PP/EPDM blend by compatibilization

To improve the mechanical properties of blends of polypropylene (PP) and terpolymer of ethylene–propylene–diene (EPDM), a triblock copolymer, (PP‐g‐MAH)‐co‐[PA‐6,6]‐co‐(EPDM‐g‐MAH), was synthesized by coupling reaction of maleic anhydride (MAH)‐grafted PP (PP‐g‐MAH), EPDM‐g‐MAH, and PA‐6,6. The newly prepared block copolymer brought about a physical interlocking between the blend components, and imparted a compatibilizing effect to the blends. Introducing the block copolymer to the blends up to 5 wt % lead to formation of a β‐form crystal. The wide‐angle X‐ray diffractograms measured in the region of 2θ between 10° and 50° ascertained that incorporating the block copolymer gave a new peak at 2θ = 15.8°. The new peak was assigned to the (300) plane spacings of the β‐hexagonal crystal structure. In addition, the block copolymer notably improved the low‐temperature impact property of the PP/EPDM blends. The optimum usage level of the compatibilizer proved to be 0.5 wt %. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 1267–1274, 2000     

Mechanical,thermal, and morphological characteristics of compatibilized and dynamically vulcanized polyoxymethylene/ethylene propylene diene terpolymer blends

Dynamically vulcanized blends of polyoxymethylene (POM) and ethylene propylene diene terpolymer (EPDM) with and without compatibilizer were prepared by melt mixing in a twin screw extruder. Maleic anhydride (MAH) grafted EPDM (EPDM‐g‐MAH) has been used as a compatibilizer. Dicumyl peroxide was used for vulcanizing the elastomer phase in the blends. Mechanical, dynamical mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of the blend systems have been investigated as a function of blend composition and compatibilizer content. The impact strength of both dynamically vulcanized blends and compatibilized/dynamically vulcanized blends increases with increase in elastomer content with decrease in tensile strength. Dynamic mechanical analysis shows decrease in tanδ values as the elastomer and compatibilizer content increased. Thermograms obtained from differential scanning calorimetric studies reveal that compatibilized blends have lower T_m values compared to dynamically vulcanized blends, which confirms strong interaction between the plastic and elastomer phase. Scanning electron microscopic observations on impact fractured surface indicate reduction in particle size of elastomer phase and its high level of dispersion in the POM matrix. In the case of compatibilized blends high degree of interaction between the component polymers has been observed. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:934–942, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Dynamic mechanical properties of polypropylene‐g‐maleic anhydride and ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer blends: Effect of blend preparation methods

In this work, we attempted two different ways of processing to improve interfacial adhesion of polypropylene (PP) and ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer (EPDM) by introducing maleic anhydride (MAH); In one way, the in situ grafting and dynamic vulcanization (ISGV) were performed simultaneously from PP and EPDM with MAH in the presence of dicumyl peroxide (DCP) in an intensive mixer. In another way, PP was first grafted with MAH and then the PP‐g‐MAH was blended with EPDM in the intensive mixer in the presence of DCP by the dynamic vulcanization (DV). It was found that the glass transition temperatures (T_gs) of both PP and EPDM phases were shifted to higher temperature as the EPDM content increased for the blends prepared by both IGSV and DV methods, mainly due to the crosslinking of EPDM. The higher T_gs and larger storage moduli were observed for the blends prepared by the ISGV method than those prepared by the DV method, while the morphology showed that the size reduction of dispersed particles in latter blends was larger than that of the former blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 2777–2784, 2000     

Toughening effects of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers with different vinyl acetate content and viscosity on nylon 1010 blends

Nylon 1010 blends with ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) and maleated ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MAH) were prepared through melt blending. The vinyl acetate (VA) content and viscosity of EVA significantly affected the notched impact strength of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends. The nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH blends with high notched impact strength (over 60 kJ/m²) were obtained when the VA content in EVA ranged from 28 to 60 wt%. The effect of VA content on the notched impact strength of blends was related to the glass transition temperature for EVA with high VA content and crystallinity for EVA with low VA content. For nylon blends with EVA with the same VA content, low viscosity of EVA led to high notched impact strength. Fracture morphology of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends showed that blends with ductile fracture behavior usually had large matrix plastic deformation, which was the main energy dissipation mechanism. A relationship between the notched impact strength and the morphology of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends was well correlated by the interparticle distance model. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Influence of phase modifiers on morphology and properties of thermoplastic elastomers prepared from ethylene propylene diene rubber and isotactic polypropylene

A series of thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) were prepared from a binary blend of ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM) and isotactic polypropylene (iPP) using different types of phase modifiers. The influence of sulphonated EPDM, maleated EPDM, styrene‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐styrene block copolymer, maleated PP, and acrylated PP as phase modifiers showed improved physico‐mechanical properties (like maximum stress, elongation at break, moduli, and tension set). Scanning electron and atomic force microscopy studies revealed better morphologies obtained with these phase modified EPDM‐iPP blends. The dependence of the phase modifier type and concentration was optimized with respect to the improvement in physical properties and morphology of the blends. Physical properties, dynamic mechanical properties, and morphology of these blends were explained with the help of interaction parameter, melt viscosity, and crystallinity of the blends. Theoretical modeling showed that Kerner, Ishai‐Cohen, and Paul models predicted the right morphology–property correlation for the prepared TPEs. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Blends of i‐PP and SBS. II. Influence of in situ compatibilization on the mechanical properties

This article concerns the in situ compatibilization of immiscible isotatic polypropylene/styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer blends (i‐PP/SBS) by use of a reactive mixture. For this purpose, maleated PP (PP–MAH) and SBS (SBS–MAH) were used as functionalized polymers and 4,4′‐diaminediphenylmethane was used as a coupling agent between maleated polymers, resulting in a graft copolymer. Binary blends of i‐PP/SBS, nonreactive ternary blends of i‐PP/PP–MAH/SBS, and reactive ternary blends of i‐PP/PP–MAH/SBS–MAH with varying diamine/anhydride molar ratios were prepared. The mechanical properties of the blends were determined by tensile and impact‐resistance tests. The optimum improvement in the mechanical properties was found when the diamine/anhydride molar ratio in the ternary reactive blends was 0.5/1. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 516–522, 2003     

Influence of Copolymer Composition and Curing on Toughness of Isotactic Polypropene Blended Together with Metallocene‐EPDM and Ethene/Propene/Vinylcyclohexane Terpolymers

Ethene/propene terpolymers containing either 1‐vinylcylohexene‐4 (VCHen) or vinylcyclohexane (VCHan) as termonomer component were prepared using MAO‐activated rac‐Me₂Si(2‐MeBenz[e]Ind)₂ZrCl₂ (MBI). Propene content was varied between 26 and 72 wt.‐% with less than 1 mol‐% termonomer incorporation. Blends containing 85 vol.‐% isotactic polypropene (i‐PP) and 15 vol.‐% of the two EP terpolymer families were prepared by melt‐compounding in a twin‐screw kneader at 200°C to examine the role of sulfur‐mediated crosslinking of the unsaturated EPDM terpolymer phase in comparison to the corresponding blends containing non‐crosslinked saturated EP/VCHan terpolymers. The observed glass temperature (T_g) depression of the T_g of EP(D)M phases with respect to the T_g of the corresponding bulk EP(D)M was attributed to the presence of thermally induced stresses in both blend systems. Blends of i‐PP with crosslinked EPDM showed smaller T_g depression with respect to those of iPP/EPM blends containing non‐crosslinked EP and EPM dispersed phases. Morphology differences were detected for i‐PP/EPM and dynamically vulcanized i‐PP/EPDM blends by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM). The crosslinked i‐PP/EPDM blends exhibited significantly improved low temperature toughness as compared to the corresponding non‐crosslinked i‐PP/EPM blends. Curing of the EPDM elastomer phase in i‐PP/EPDM (85 vol.‐%/15 vol.‐%) blends afforded significantly improved toughness/stiffness balance and a wider toughness window with respect to the corresponding i‐PP/EPM and i‐PP/EP blends without sulfur‐cured rubber phases.     

Supramolecular thermoplastic elastomer with thermally scratch repairable effect from 3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole crosslinked maleated polyethylene‐octene elastomer/nylon 12 blends

In this study, nylon 12 (5–25 wt %) was melt blended with a supramolecular thermally repairable thermoplastic elastomer (ATA‐POE), which was generated by crosslinking of maleated polyethylene‐octene elastomer (mPOE) with 3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole (ATA), in an internal mixer. The effect of nylon 12 content on the phase morphology, thermomechanical properties, and thermally triggered scratch repairing effects of the ATA‐POE/nylon 12 blends was investigated. Scanning electron microscopy results showed that nylon 12 formed a dispersed phase with submicron scale in a continuous ATA‐POE phase. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry analysis revealed that there are extensive hydrogen bonding interactions between the ATA‐POE and nylon 12 in the blends, which was manifested by a decrease in the melting temperature of each polymer component. Tensile and dynamic mechanical test showed that tensile modulus increased with increasing nylon 12 contents in the blend with maintaining fairly high elastic recoverability. Furthermore, the blends containing up to 20 wt % of nylon 12 showed good scratch repairing effects when they are heated above melting temperature of the ATA‐POE phase in the blend. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41511.     

Investigation of crystallization behavior in dynamically vulcanized EPDM–nylon copolymer blends

A thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV) of a ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer (EPDM) and nylon copolymer (PA) was prepared by dynamic vulcanization. Maleic anhydride (MAH)–grafted EPDM (EPDM–g–MAH), MAH‐grafted EPR (EPR–g–MAH), and chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) were used as compatibilizers. The effect of dynamic vulcanization and compatibilizer on the crystallization behavior of PA was investigated. Differential scanning calorimeter measurement results showed no pronounced shift in the crystallization temperature for PA in EPDM–PA TPV compared to that for PA in the neat state, whereas the crystallization temperature increased after adding compatibilizer. The decrease in the crystallinity of TPVs was a result of the crystallization occurring in confined spaces between rubber particles. The equilibrium melting temperature (Tm⁰) of the PA copolymer was measured and was determined to be 157°C. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of PA in the neat and TPV states also was investigated. The crystallization rate was highest in the compatibilized TPV and lowest in the neat PA, whereas it was intermediate in the uncompatibilized TPV unvulcanized blends. Compared with unvulcanized EPDM–PA blends, the dynamic vulcanization process seemed to cause an obvious increase in the crystallization rate of the PA copolymer, especially when a suitable compatibilizer was used. This occurred because the dynamic vulcanization introduced fine crosslinked rubber particles that could act as heterogeneous nucleating centers. In addition, the use of a suitable compatibilizer permitted the formation of finely dispersed vulcanized rubber particles and therefore increased the density of the nucleating centers. The complex morphology of the blends was investigated by atomic force microscopy to evaluate the effect of compatibilizer on the size of the dispersed rubber particles. Compared with the morphology of TPVs with the same dosage of EPDM–g–MAH compatibilizer, the morphology of TPVs using EPR–g–MAH as compatibilizer showed much smaller dispersed rubber particles, which may have contributed to the higher crystallization rate. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 824–829, 2003     

Toughening of PA6 nanocomposites by reactive acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene core–shell rubber particles

The effect of addition of organoclay and the reactive ABS‐g‐MA core‐shell particles on the mechanical properties and morphology of blends of polyamide (PA6) were reported. The reactive rubber particles with core‐shell structure were selected as modifier instead of conventional reactive bulk rubber. The microstructure of the ternary nanocomposites was characterized by X‐ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Impact strength and stress–strain behavior of blends were measured as a function of organoclay content and core/shell ratio of ABS‐g‐MA. The organoclay plates affected the interfacial adhesion between polyamide and the core‐shell particles because of a shielding effect of organclay on the interacting of amine end groups of PA6 with the MA groups of ABS‐g‐MA. The poor dispersion behavior of ternary nanocomposites was observed when the core/shell ratio is 80/20, and with an increase of organoclay content, the core/shell dispersed phase size increased. Blends based on the maleated elastomer with the core/shell ratio 60/40 gave a more beneficial balance of toughness versus stiffness. POLYM. COMPOS., 35:864–871, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Compatibilization and properties of SAN/EPDM blends with the addition of coagents

SAN and EPDM are not miscible. In this work, the dry blending of SAN and EPDM using Centrex (acrylonitrile/EPDM/styrene graft copolymer) and EPMMA (EPDM‐g‐Mah) as coagents was studied. Centrex content was used at 6–20 wt %. EPMMA content in the mixture was 20 wt %. The effects of coagent type and content on the mechanical properties and morphology were investigated. SEM micrographs of SAN/EPDM/Centrex and SAN/EPDM/EPMMA blends showed that both Centrex and EPMMA have an effective role in forming a finer morphology. For the ternary blends, the addition of coagent resulted in a significant reduction in the size of the dispersed phase. The mechanical properties of SAN/EPDM/coagent blends were improved significantly in comparison to the simple SAN/EPDM blends. SAN/EPDM/Centrex blends showed higher stress‐at‐break and SAN/EPDM/EPMMA blends showed higher impact strength. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008