Spondylolisthesis in childhood and adolescence

Isthmic spondylolisthesis occurs in 4.4% of children. In general it is a benign condition. The majority of individuals with mild or moderate isthmic vertebral slip remain free of symptoms or get only mild symptoms. In children and adolescents with mild slip, primary treatment of pain symptoms is non-operative. Young children before the growth spurt need radiological follow-up for documentation of possible slip progression. If the slip exceeds 25% in a child, segmental fusion to prevent further progression should be considered. Uninstrumented posterolateral fusion is the method of choice for treatment of pain symptoms not responding to conservative measures in slips up to 50%. In severe slips (> 50%), anterior or combined fusion is necessary to prevent further progression of lumbosacral kyphosis. The clinical and subjective results of in situ fusion in this age group are satisfactory in 80-90% of cases. Slip reduction is possible. It requires internal fixation and is connected with a higher risk of complications. The results of slip reduction have not yet been shown to be superior to results after in situ fusion. It may be performed in cases of spondyloptosis with severe impairment of function and sagittal malalignment of the spine.     

Posterolateral fusion for radicular pain in isthmic spondylolisthesis

Reported is the outcome for 25 patients in whom spondylolisthesis with radicular pain was treated by posterolateral fusion alone (Group A). These outcomes are compared with those obtained in 23 other patients with the same symptomatology and spondylolisthesis treated by root release and posterolateral fusion (Group B). Most patients had Grade I or II isthmic spondylolisthesis. Results were assessed functionally and radiographically with an average followup of 32 months. Posterolateral fusion in situ provided excellent or good results in 88% of patients according to the modified classification of Stauffer and Coventry. In Group A, radicular pain at exertion disappeared in 92% of patients, and radicular pain at rest disappeared in 88%. In Group B, radicular pain at exertion disappeared in 65% of patients, and radicular pain at rest disappeared in 70%. There was no significant statistical difference between the 2 groups. Resection of the loose lamina and root decompression do not seem to be mandatory. The overall fusion rate was 81%. Instrumentation in case of instability and the use of allografts are advised.     

Analysis and treatment of poor outcomes following in situ arthrodesis in adolescent spondylolisthesis

In situ lumbosacral arthrodesis in the treatment of adolescent spondylolisthesis was evaluated in 39 patients. The clinical outcome an average of 4.7 years later was considered excellent or good in 82% of the cases based on their pain and gait. The quality of the fusion mass correlated with outcome. Those patients with the most severe kyphosis (slip angle) had the greatest chance of a poor result. Four patients required reoperation for pseudarthrosis or symptomatic compression of the cauda equina. Three of these were successfully treated with repeat arthrodesis or decompression with sacroplasty or both.     

Decompression in the surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis: advantages of a conservative approach in 290 patients

The management of degenerative spondylolisthesis with laminectomy alone or laminectomy with fusion remains controversial. From the early 1970s to 1996, 290 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis were treated with 249 laminectomies and 41 fenestration procedures over an average of 3.2 levels. One level olisthesis was encountered in 250 patients, and two levels of slip in 40. Patients averaged 67 years of age, and were followed an average of 10 years. Using Prolo's outcome scale, 69% of patients exhibited excellent, 13% good, 12% fair, and 6% poor outcomes. Secondary decompressions with fusions for increased olisthy/instability (five patients) and recurrent stenosis/disc disease/instability (three patients) required one posterolateral "in situ" fusion and seven Texas Scottish Rite Hospital instrumented procedures. Decompression alone successfully managed degenerative spondylolisthesis in 290 patients treated over 3 decades, because only 8 (2.7%) required secondary fusion.     

Spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents

A study of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in 142 children and adolescents is reported. In twelve of the seventy-nine patients followed for over a year the affected vertebra slipped further by 10 per cent or more. Increasing slip occurred mainly during the adolescent growth spurt, and was greater when spinal bifida or other vertebral anomalies were present. If at presentation the slip is less than 30 per cent then further slip beyond 30 per cent is unlikely. Decompression posteriorly is advised when signs of nerve pressure are present. Indications for spinal fusion are suggested; the intertransverse method of fusion was used in sixty-nine patients.     

Severe primary HIV-1 infection among black persons in Barbados

The purpose of this long-term follow-up was (1) to investigate disc changes in the olisthetic segment in patients treated conservatively, (2) to compare disc changes above the slipped vertebra in conservatively treated patients with those in operatively treated patients, and (3) to establish possible relations of disc changes to the degree of the slip and to subjective back pain symptoms of the patients. The subjects were 227 patients with isthmic L5 olisthesis diagnosed under 20 years of age (mean 13.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 15.4 (range 5-30) years. Of these, 145 patients had been treated with segmental fusion and 82 had been treated conservatively. At follow-up, standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs as well as flexion/extension views of the lumbar spine were taken. Disc degeneration was graded semiquantitatively: 0 = normal disc height, 1 = decrease of disc height < 50%, 2 = decrease > or = 50%, and 3 = obliteration of the disc. In the conservatively treated patients degeneration of the olisthetic disc was distributed by grade as follows: O: n = 38, 1: n = 24, 2: n = 14, 3: n = 6. No motion at all was observed in the olisthetic segment in 40 patients (48%) with a mean slip of 30%, segmental motion of 4 degrees-18 degrees was found in 42 patients with a mean slip of 14%. There was a statistically significant association of the degree of slip to the severity of disc degeneration and non-mobility of the segment. Grade 1 degeneration of the L4/5 disc occurred in 25.6% of the conservatively treated patients and in 32% of 48 patients treated with L5-S1 fusion. This correlated with the severity of the slip, but not with pain symptoms or pathologic segmental mobility at the time of follow-up. Out of 84 patients with L4-S1 fusion, in 17% grade 1 degeneration of the L3/4 disc was observed, and 3 out of 13 patients (23%) with L3-S1 fusion had grade 1 degeneration of the disc above the fusion. The disc changes had no correlation with subjective pain symptoms. It is concluded that the natural course of isthmic spondylolisthesis is associated with disc degeneration and spontaneous stabilization of the olisthetic segment. Fusion operations do not significantly increase the rate of disc degeneration in the adjacent disc above the fusion after a mean postoperative follow-up of 13.8 years. No correlation between the number of degenerated discs or the degree of degeneration and subjective low back pain symptoms was found.     

Predictors of outcome in patients with chronic back pain and low-grade spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors influencing symptom relief after uninstrumented posterolateral spinal fusion with or without decompression in adult patients with chronic back pain and previously asymptomatic low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The role of previously asymptomatic low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in chronic adult low back pain is unclear. Operative intervention in this setting is controversial. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive adult patients with chronic low back pain and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis first detected during routine work-up of new onset low back pain underwent spinal fusion with or without decompression. The influence of active worker's compensation or litigation claims, radicular pain, concomitant laminectomy, age, gender, fusion to L4, intervertebral disc bulge, and pseudarthrosis were investigated. RESULTS: All 13 patients involved in worker's compensation claims or pending litigation had fair or poor results. Nine of 11 patients without such issues had good or excellent results. Although the strong association of worker's compensation with poor results made it difficult to assess the importance of other risk factors, the data suggest that good results may be more likely in patients with radiculopathy who undergo laminectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation, although limited by a number of factors including small sample size and retrospective, unblinded review, suggests that active worker's compensation and litigation issues are associated strongly with poor results of operative management for chronic low back pain in adult patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis.     

1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study analyzed the influence of transpedicular instrumented on the operative treatment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the addition of transpedicular instrumented improves the clinical outcome and fusion rate of patients undergoing posterolateral fusion after decompression for spinal stenosis with concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Decompression is often necessary in the treatment of symptomatic patients who have degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Results of recent studies demonstrated that outcomes are significantly improved if posterolateral arthrodesis is performed at the listhesed level. A meta-analysis of the literature concluded that adjunctive spinal instrumentation for this procedure can enhance the fusion rate, although the effect on clinical outcome remains uncertain. METHODS: Seventy-six patients who had symptomatic spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were prospectively studied. All patients underwent posterior decompression with concomitant posterolateral intertransverse process arthrodesis. The patients were randomized to a segmental transpedicular instrumented or noninstrumented group. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were available for a 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcome was excellent or good in 76% of the patients in whom instrumentation was placed and in 85% of those in whom no instrumentation was placed (P = 0.45). Successful arthrodesis occurred in 82% of the instrumented cases versus 45% of the noninstrumented cases (P = 0.0015). Overall, successful fusion did not influence patient outcome (P = 0.435). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing single-level posterolateral fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis, the use of pedicle screws may lead to a higher fusion rate, but clinical outcome shows no improvement in pain in the back and lower limbs.     

Microdecompression and uninstrumented single-level fusion for spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was completed on 21 patients who had a "least invasive" (one or two level) microdecompression and uninstrumented single-segment lumbar fusion for spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a "least invasive" approach to lumbar spinal canal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis would yield acceptable results. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The prevailing surgical technique for symptomatic spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis is a wide midline decompression and instrumented fusion. METHODS: On an average of 38 months postoperatively, 21 patients were personally assessed on four scores: 1) their overall satisfaction with the outcome of surgery, 2) an analog back and leg pain scale, 3) a functional evaluation scale, and 4) Ferguson (upshot) anterior-posterior lumbosacral and lateral flexion-extension radiographs. RESULTS: The overall satisfactory outcome on all four scales was 16 (76%) of 21. Twenty of twenty-one patients had relief of their claudicant leg pain; the overall fusion rate was 18 (86%) of 21. Two of three patients with a pseudarthrosis had a successful outcome on the patient-oriented outcome (1, 2, and 3) scales (excluding the radiograph scale), and one was a failure. One patient with a solid fusion was a failure because of continuing back pain. One patient with a solid fusion was a failure because of continuing leg pain. The overall satisfactory outcome on the nonradiographic scales was 18 of 21, for an 86% patient satisfaction rate. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, a "least invasive" surgical approach to lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal canal stenosis causing claudicant leg pain produced acceptable results.     

Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study analyzing 76 patients treated by decompression, pedicle screw instrumentation, and fusion for spondylolytic spondyiolisthesis with symptomatic spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To verify the advantages of adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to the usual posterolateral fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Stabilization after decompression of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis is difficult because of a lack of fusional bone bases, gap between the transverse process bases, and incompetent anterior disc support. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion offers anterior support, reduction, and a broad fusion base. METHODS: Forty patients were treated with posterolateral fusion, and 36 were treated with additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion. They were compared for union, reduction of the deformity, and clinical results. RESULTS: The patients were followed up for more than 2 years. Nonunion was observed in three patients who underwent posterolateral fusion (7.5%), and no cases of nonunion was found in patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Reduction of slippage was 28.3% in those who underwent posterolateral fusion and 41.6% in those who had posterior lumbar interbody fusion (P = 0.05). In the posterolateral fusion group, eight patients (20%) had recurrence of deformity, with loss of reduction more than 50%. Hardware failures occurred in two patients who had posterolateral fusion. There was no major neurologic complications in both groups. Both groups had satisfactory results in more than 90% of patients, with marked improvement of claudication. However, subjective improvement of back pain by Kirkaldy-Willis criteria revealed differences in the excellent results. An excellent result was reported by 45% in the posterolateral fusion group and by 75% in posterior lumbar interbody fusion group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of posterior lumbar interbody fusion to posterolateral fusion after a complete decompression and pedicle screw fixation is a recommended procedure for the treatment of spondylolytic spondylolishesis with spinal stenosis.     

Reduction and stabilization without laminectomy for unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis: a preliminary report

Fifty-two patients with unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with the "AO internal fixator" and posterolateral fusion were reviewed. The major purpose of this study is to observe whether this pedicle fixation system could adequately decompress the nervous system tissue by the restoration of the spinal canal and, hence, replace the conventional decompressive laminectomy for the treatment of this disease entity. The results were satisfactory, showing that 92% of the patients with radicular pain, 89% of the patients with low back pain, and 86% of the patients with intermittent claudication improved postoperatively. Observing the results, only two groups of patients with unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis are not suitable for this treatment modality. The first group consists of those patients who have a spondylolisthesis with borderline instability. The second group consists of those patients who have a positive Lasèque's sign.     

Defects of pars interarticularis in athletes: a protocol for nonoperative treatment

The purpose of this study was to report the results of a specific treatment protocol for athletes with spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine. A retrospective study with recent follow-up was performed on 82 patients treated with restriction of activity, bracing, and physical therapy. All of the patients were involved in sports at first onset of symptoms. Sixty-six patients were boys and 16 were girls. Activities involving repetitive hyperextension and/or extension rotation of the lumbar spine were described as painful in 98% of the patients. Of the 62 patients with spondylolysis, 53 (85%) had an L5 defect and nine (15%) an L4 defect (90% of these 62 patients' defects were located in the most caudad mobile vertebra). Thirty-seven patients had bilateral pars defects, and 25 had unilateral defects. Eight patients had normal roentgenograms, but these eight had abnormal bone scans. Nine patients with spondylolysis underwent posterolateral fusion. Average follow-up was 4.2 years. Fifty-two (84%) had excellent results, eight had good results, and two had fair results. Twenty patients had a spondylolisthesis: 12 were grade I, six were grade II, and two were grade III. Twelve patients (60%) required surgery; 9 had excellent results, one had good results, one had a fair result, and one had a poor result. Pars defects must be suspected in the differential of low back pain in young athletes. Oblique radiographs are frequently diagnostic; however, if the history and examination are suggestive despite normal plain films, a bone scan should be obtained. Nonoperative management of pars defects is frequently successful.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Survivorship analysis of DKS instrumentation in the treatment of spondylolisthesis

This retrospective study analyzed the survivorship of DKS instrumentation and the clinical outcomes in 185 patients with spondylolisthesis. These patients were treated with Zielke DKS instrumentation for a mean followup period of 3.5 years. Eight (4.3%) patients had late removal of implants, 25 (14%) had rod breakage, three (1.7%) had screw breakage, and 16 (8.7%) had nut loosening. The survivor rate of DKS instrumentation was 96% within 3 months after operation, 80% at 2 years, and 61% at 5 years after surgery. One hundred sixty-three (88%) patients had solid posterolateral fusion, and 167 (90%) patients had good to excellent results. Adjacent instability developed in 18 (9.7%) patients. Although Zielke DKS instrumentation has a smaller rod and relatively insecure locking system between the rod and screw, it is an effective implant for the treatment of spondylolisthesis.     

Methods in the evaluation of medical students]

BACKGROUND: Delayed diagnosis, a high rate of histologically undifferentiated types of tumors, and rapid disease progression are frequently cited as the main reasons for the poor prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients. An improved prognosis has been anticipated for young gastric cancer patients because of recent improvements in digestive tract diagnostic techniques. This retrospective study was designed to determine whether these trends have had an impact on young Japanese patients with gastric cancer, and to further elucidate differences in clinicopathologic features between elderly and young patients. METHODS: From 1984 to 1995, 1654 patients with gastric cancer were admitted to our hospital. Of these, 86 patients (5.2%) were less than 40 years of age (young group). The clinicopathologic features of this young group were reviewed retrospectively, using hospital records, and compared with those of older patients (n = 499 [29.4%], 60 to 69 years of age). RESULTS: The young group contained significantly higher percentages of female patients, epigastric pain symptoms, depressed superficial type lesions, mucosal invasion, and poorly differentiated histology; percentages of hepatic metastasis and venous invasion were lower. Survival rates for all patients and for the resected cases were significantly better in the young group (p = 0.035 and 0.017 respectively). The percentage of early stage stomach cancers for the group less than 40 years of age was 49.0% in 1984-89, but had risen to 60.9% by 1990-95. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis has improved the prognosis of young gastric cancer patients. Furthermore, these data show a recent shift in stage distribution; additional prognostic improvement is anticipated for young patients with early gastric cancer.     

The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion

STUDY DESIGN: The clinical and radiographic effect of a lumbar or lumbosacral fusion was studied in 42 patients who had undergone a posterolateral fusion with an average follow-up of 22.6 years. OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term effects of posterolateral lumbar or lumbosacral fusion on the cephalad two motion segments (transition zone). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is commonly held that accelerated degeneration occurs in the motion segments adjacent to a fusion. Most studies are of short-term, anecdotal, uncontrolled reports that pay particular attention only to the first motion segment immediately cephalad to the fusion. METHODS: Forty-two patients who had previously undergone a posterolateral lumbar or lumbosacral fusion underwent radiographic and clinical evaluation. Rate of fusion, range of motion, osteophytes, degenerative spondylolisthesis, retrolisthesis, facet arthrosis, disc ossification, dynamic instability, and disc space height were all studied and statistically compared with an age- and gender-matched control group. The patient's self-reported clinical outcome was also recorded. RESULTS: Degenerative changes occurred at the second level above the fused levels with a frequency equal to those occurring in the first level. There was no statistical difference between the study group and the cohort group in the presence of radiographic changes within the transition zone. In those patients undergoing fusion for degenerative processes, 75% reported a good to excellent outcome, whereas 84% of those undergoing fusion for spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis reported a good to excellent outcome. CONCLUSION: Radiographic changes occur within the transition zone cephalad to a lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. However, these changes are also seen in control subjects who have had no surgery.     

High resting energy expenditure in normal-weight bulimics and its normalization with control of eating behaviour

Combined anterior and posterior fusion with posterior instrumentation may be indicated in the treatment of select cases of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. The instrumentation, however, is expensive and usually bulky, occasionally requiring removal. In an effort to avoid these problems, an L5-S1 paralaminar screw technique was developed for posterior stabilization after an L5-S1 anterior interbody fusion. The technique involves the placement of cortical screws from the base of the articular process of S1 to the pedicle of L5. This study evaluates the anatomic applications and clinical results of this technique. The relationship between the screw and L5 nerve root was examined using five cadaveric specimens with olisthesis of 0, 25, 50, and 75%. This work demonstrates that the screws can only be inserted safely if an L5-S1 olisthesis of at least 25% is present. If < 25%, the screws will either impinge on or directly injure the L5 nerve root. In the clinical study, the outcomes of 20 patients who had an isthmic spondylolisthesis of 25-81% and were treated with partial reduction, L5-S1 anterior interbody fusion, and L5-S1 posterior paralaminar screw fixation were reviewed. Nineteen patients had adequate posterior stabilization to completely heal an L5-S1 anterior interbody fusion without loss of the correction. In one patient, a pseudarthrosis occurred secondary to poor surgical technique of both anterior and posterior fusions. This patient required an additional L4-S1 posterior fusion 9 months later and had a good clinical outcome. No other complications due to screw placement occurred. We conclude that this procedure can be used safely and reliably for the posterior stabilization of L5-S1 after stable anterior L5-S1 interbody fusion in residual slips of at least 25%. Prerequisites are proper patient compliance and low weight. Compared with other posterior instrumentation systems, this screw fixation is inexpensive and does not require implant removal. The disadvantages of the method are the degree of difficulty of the procedure and the limited clinical application to cases of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with corrected residual slips of 25 to 50-60%. The procedure is technically demanding and should be limited to those surgeons who are comfortable with the method.     

Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis and sports

Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis occur predominantly in the lower lumbar spine. Besides congenital defects such as predisposition of spondylolysis the correlation between competitive sports activities and an increased incidence of spondylolysis is proved. In early stages, complete healing can be achieved by conservative treatment (abstinence from sports activities for 3 months, orthesis). Persistence of pain, neurologic symptoms and progression of vertebral slipping are indications for operative treatment (reconstruction of the isthmus, dorso-ventral spondylodesis). The exercise tolerance depends on the extent of instability, progression of vertebral slipping and clinical symptoms. The limits of exercise tolerance vary among the individual athletes and require the decision of the physician. Backstroke swimming, abdominal and back muscle strengthening exercises, and types of sport involving smooth movements are advisable. Sports education in school is possible without restriction in patients with stable spondylolysis and in those with spondylolisthesis without unfavourable concomitant factors.     

Treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents

The treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children depends on the severity of clinical symptoms, pathologic anatomy, and prognosis. Simple spondylolysis can be cured by immobilization alone in selected cases, or by surgery when it remains symptomatic and resistant to nonoperative treatment. The majority of cases are asymptomatic and require no treatment. Spondylolisthesis is classified into 2 types based on the magnitude of the lumbosacral angle: spondylolisthesis with a horizontal sacrum (lumbosacral angle > or = 100 degrees), which seldom requires surgical treatment, usually responds to orthotic management, and generally shows little progression; spondylolisthesis with a vertical sacrum (lumbosacral angle < 100 degrees) which is always progressive, can produce neurologic impairment and cosmetic and functional disability, and requires surgical treatment. In 17 cases the author has reduced the latter deformity by gradual traction in hyperextension followed by cast immobilization, then stabilized the reduction by posterolateral fusion performed through the cast without instrumentation and without opening the spinal canal. When the lumbosacral angle is not improved to 100 degrees or more by hyperextension and traction, an anterior console interbody fusion is added before the posterolateral fusion.     

Mutagenicity of 6-sulfooxymethylbenzo[a]pyrene in Salmonella typhimurium and Chinese hamster V79 cells

STUDY DESIGN: To report on the preliminary results of preparing and reconstructing the pars interarticularis with a cable-screw construct. The success of previous techniques to repair the pars defect has been variable. OBJECTIVES: To assess the results of a new technique for stabilizing the pars interarticularis, using the strongest materials, pedicle screws, and cables in the strongest bony elements--the pedicle and lamina. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous techniques have been inadequate structurally to stabilize the pars interarticularis effectively, or the techniques were difficult to perform. Placing a screw across the defect was technically difficult and took away from the surface area of the fusion. The Scott technique used wiring between the transverse process and spinous process; and in the Morscher Technique, a hook screw was used to repair the pars defect--a technically difficult procedure, using bulky hardware. METHODS: Patients with pars interarticularis defects were carefully selected for this technique if they had primarily low back pain that did not respond to conservative treatment. The eligible patient had Grade I or less spondylolisthesis, little or no desiccation detectable on magnetic resonance imaging, and pain reproduced with injection of the pars defect. Surgical technique involved placing a special pedicle cable-screw into the pedicle of the involved vertebra. A double cable was passed underneath the lamina, threaded through the hole of the pedicle screw, and wrapped around the spinous process. The cables were simultaneously tensioned and crimped. A tricortical bone graft was compressed between the pedicle and lamina. RESULTS: Seven patients had this technique with a follow-up of 25.5 months (range, 19-37 months). The mean age was 20.5 years (range, 12-32 years), and the mean duration of symptoms was 31 months. All patients had severe pain before surgery that prevented participation in sports and normal daily activities. After surgery, results in five were rated as excellent and in two as good, according to the Prolo score. There were no failures of the cable-screw constructs, and all of the defects appear to have united solidly. CONCLUSION: The cable-screw construct uses the strongest anchors (the pedicle and the lamina) and uses compression obtained with cables to stabilize the pars interarticularis. Early results indicate that this is a safe and effective technique for this difficult problem.