美的心灵的回归

湖南《当代政法报》记者乔育平从事新闻摄影已有１０多年了，作为中国新闻摄影学会会员、湖南省新闻摄影学会常务理事、湖南省摄影家协会理事的他，曾在中央和省级各大媒体发表了数千件摄影作品。在澳门回归祖国的前后，他用镜头表达了他对澳门的特别感受和对高墙内服刑人员的一片爱心。女囚免费“游澳门”１９９９年１２月１７日，湖南省女子监狱监管区内人头攒动，服刑的女犯们排着整齐的长队缓缓地步入教学大厅，参观梦洁绗缝制品实业公司（简称梦洁公司）在这里举办的喜迎澳门回归乔育平《澳门纪实》摄影展出。女犯们在管教警官的带领下…     

浅析经济法的的功能

经济法是调整国家介入市场过程中产生的各种经济关系的法律规范的总称。不同的法律规范以各自的功能在不同的领域发挥着作用,经济法的功能反映了其区别于其他法律部门的价值,是经济法发挥作用的前提和经济法目的实现的保障。经济法的功能在于保障和规范国家对市场的介入,这种规范和确认对维护市场竞争秩序和促进国民经济持续稳定发展的起到了重要的作用。     

司法的艺术——从古典的到浪漫的

在十八世纪中，无论在大陆法或在英美法，亦不拘什么学派，对于法律有一个最通行观念，便是，法律是先案件而存在的。“法律不溯既往”这个格言，共和的原则和法治的基本概念所要求的。倘若先有案件发生，然后临时设定法律，那么，在人民方面未经受了相当的通知，任凭推事们主观的公道观念临时裁判，这不又是专制了吗？这不又放弃法治而重行人治了吗？     

勇于创新的的祁县三中

山西省祁县三中创办于1978年，占地面积13500平方米，是祁县规模最大的独立初中。学校教学设施齐全，有物理实验室2个，化学实验室2个，生物实验室1个，现代化多功能会议室1个，各种仪器室5个，仪器11936件，电脑室2个，电脑139台，电教硬件229件，软件218G，图书室6个，藏书51886本，体育器材室1个，器材959件，音乐器材191件，美术器材584件，劳技器材305件，班班都有多媒体设备。     

成功的实践 宝贵的财富

廉洁奥运是中国政府向世界作出的庄严承诺。在7年多的奥运筹办过程中，各级党委、政府和奥组委及奥运监督机构认真贯彻落实中央的要求和部署，坚持节俭办奥运、廉洁办奥运的方针，认真履行职责，扎实开展工作，对奥运会筹办工作进行了全方位、全过程、全覆盖监督，取得了显著成绩，全面实现了廉洁奥运目标，为奥运会成功举办提供了有力保证。北京奥运监督工作，得到了党中央、国务院的充分肯定。1月19日，中央纪委、监察部组织召开总结推广廉洁奥运经验座谈会，对总结推广廉洁奥运经验提出了要求。为此本刊记者采写了廉洁办奥运工作纪实专题报道——     

有益的探索科学的创举

人民法院工作主题“公正与效率”是至关重要的。近年来，我国经济与社会的飞速发展，以及依法治国的工作的深入开展，迫切要求各界人民法院对各类案件的审结，达到快速而准确。人民法院为真正实现“公正与效率”的工作目标，不断探索加强监督机制和提高工作效率。广东省江阳中级人民法院，率先大胆应用先进的IT网络系统管理审判工作，创造了一个可行性很强的现代化审判管理模式。抓住机遇，开发网络到阳江市中级人民法院各个审判庭或办公室走一遍，你会发现，这里的计算机几乎比人还要多。阳江市中院除了个别人因分工不需要计算机外，已经…     

生动的比喻深刻的认识

“如果把政府的运作比喻为一个计算机系统的话，监察机关就是政府系统的‘杀毒软件’。”近日，中央纪委副书记、监察部部长兼国家预防腐败局局长马驭在接受中央电视台《共和国部长访谈录》节目采访时，给她挚爱的监察机关做了这样一个全新的比喻。从事纪检监察工作18年的马驭同志，深思熟虑之后的这一比喻，     

自由的迁徙 诗意的栖居

你从哪里来?你又要到哪里去?这种哲学式的诘问曾经让许多人伤痛。更有如孙志刚者，殷红的血扑溅了大地，生命在那一刻脆弱得比不上一张纸。生命烟花般的散去后，户籍的烙印令人愤怒而刻骨的痛。     

变革的时代 无悔的青春

正坐在办公桌前,一天的工作拉开序幕。略微整理思路,手上待办的任务有三件。一是督促某下属单位就近期信访举报反映的问题进行调查核实,并向我们反馈有关情况;二是上午组局领导要对一名同志进行诫勉谈话,需要做好记录;三是下午要去几家银行调取有关材料。又是忙碌而充实的一天。而这正是我们派驻组局很多同志一天工作的缩影。今年来,组局同志工作更忙了,责任更重了,压力更大了,与这种看得见摸得着的变化相伴的,还     

我的母亲我的国

正只见它曲折灌溉的悲喜,却消失在一片亘古的荒漠,这才知道我的全部努力,不过完成了普通的生活。——穆旦人的一生奔波劳苦,为申说并不确定的主张、描摹道听途说的场景破费笔墨周折,为家人留下的文字反而少之又少。其实现实远比小说复杂,平凡家庭背后都有不平凡的故事,身边人的悲欢离合便是我们能真切触摸的时代记忆。一九五六年农历六月初一,豫西北的偏僻村落诞生了我的母亲。这一年,党的八大开启了社会主义建设的新征程,翻身工农也憋足劲赶超英美。之后便开始了反右斗争,外公     

CEPA若干法律问题研究

香港与内地签署两岸CEPA ,对两地经济影响甚大。CEPA签署后 ,同为世界贸易组织成员方的内地和香港 ,要正确处理WTO与CEPA的关系。同样 ,CEPA也是对一国两制的创新和发展 ,其对大陆与台湾的经贸关系也带来一定的影响。     

论CEPA下内地与香港之间的反倾销法律问题

CEPA是我国参与区域经济一体化的重要步骤,其第七条规定内地与香港之间互不实施反倾销措施。香港自由港的地位使在CEPA零关税下来自第三方的产品可能涌入内地进行低价倾销,即CEPA下的中国内地与香港之间存在发生倾销的贸易风险。CEPA及我国的反倾销法律制度主要依据原产地规则对此进行了防范,但依然存在漏洞,应该加以完善。     

中國委託公證人制度爲CEPA實施提供法律保障

2003年，内地舆香港簽署了《内地舆香港關於建立更緊密經贸關係的安排》（以下簡稱CEPA），之後又陸續簽署了七個補充協議。随著CEPA的簽署和實施，委讬公證人制度作爲保障CEPA依法實施的一项重要法律制度正式纳入CEPA框架。CEPA是内地舆香港之簡簽署的自由贸易協議，是内地對外簽署、全面實施的第一個自由贸易協議，     

论中国和平发展与国际法的交互影响和作用

A peaceful and harmonious world is an important social basis for China’s peaceful development, and international law lays a legal foundation and guarantee for building such a world. In the “village of globe” with co-existence and economic globalization, international law provides China a peaceful development with legal certainty in external environment of peace and security, fair and equal international competitive order, and international cooperation; and on the other hand, it puts on an increasing legal restraint on the internal and external strategies of China’s peaceful development. At the same time, the peaceful development of China deems to make a great contribution to the world, which are the main subject of international law in peace and development, as well as to human rights, rule of law and democracy, which are the universal values pursued by international law. Zeng Lingliang, Ph.D of law, is presently a dean and professor in the Faculty of Law in University of Macau. He is an awardee of the Cheung Kong Scholars Award Program and Jean Monnet Chair of European Union Law in Wuhan University, and one of the first three individuals nominated by the China government on the list of panelists in the WTO. He has published many articles on WTO issues, EU law and international law, and his influenced monographs are European Communities and Modern International Law (1992) and its revised edition—European Union and Modern International Law (1994), Law of World Trade Organization (1996), International Law and China in the Early 21 ^st Century (2005) and the Essentials of EU Law—in the New Perspective of the Treaty on the Constitution for Europe (2007).     

文化产品、版权保护与贸易规则

Cultural products are commodities with cultural contents, which are neither equivalent to cultural relics nor ordinary articles. Such dual natures bring forth divergences in trade policy, mandating the generality and particularity of trade rules. The WTO rules lay more emphases on free trade while the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization put more stress on the free exchange and diversity of cultures. Nations enjoy cultural sovereignty over their cultural policies and administrative measures. The rules of intellectual property rights also influence trade in cultural products. To develop trade in cultural products, science and technologies shall be employed to create diversified and competitive products of distinct cultural values. Han Liyu, Ph.D, is an associate professor of law, and director of International Law Teaching and Research at Renmin University of China, Vice Secretary-General of WTO Section in China Law Society, and member of China’s International Economic Law Society. Mr. Han teaches and does research on international economic law and WTO law, publishing several monographs and articles on the US trade law and the WTO law. For many times, Mr. Han did research as visiting scholar in American universities and UNIDROIT. Mr. Han got a post-graduate diploma in Common Law from Hong Kong University.     

两岸经济制度性一体化的路径选择

中国作为WTO的成员,在国内达成并执行区域性经贸安排,既有法律上的适当性,又具有经济上的可行性。CEPA的模式作为两岸四地经济一体化的路径选择,具有经济层面的重要意义。借鉴国际上FTA的经验,将会对两岸四地经济贸易合作的进一步发展带来新的发展机遇。这种渐进式的经济一体化路径,必将有助于促进祖国的统一和强盛。     

《中华人民共和国反垄断法》析评

The Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China has provided to prohibit monopoly agreements and abuse of dominant market position, control concentration of business operators and fight against administrative monopoly. The transformation of China’s economic system is incomplete, and the Anti-Monopoly Law has many flaws. At the initial stage of enforcing the Anti-Monopoly Law, severe challenges will occur in legislative purposes, enforcement authorities, fighting against administrative monopoly and handling of the relationship between anti-monopoly enforcement and industry supervision. Thus, the promulgation of the Anti-Monopoly Law is only the first step in the legislation on anti-monopoly. Wang Xiaoye held a bachelor’s degree of philosophy from Inner Mongolian Normal University (1981), LL.M. from Renmin University of China (1984) and Doctor Juris magna cum laude from the University Hamburg (1993). Since 1984, she works at the Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). From 1988 to 1993, she studied in Germany based on Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Private Law. As visiting scholar she spent a year at Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Intellectual Property and Competition Law, and a year at Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Social Law in Munich. In 2004, she was invited to the US by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. In 2005, she was invited to the European Union Visitors Program, and awarded a Fulbright Scholarship to spend a year at the Chicago-Kent College of Law. Prof. Wang works in the areas of economic law, international economic law, and focuses on competition law. Her publications include: Monopoly and Competition in the Chinese Economy — A conception for merger control in China in view of the American and German practices (J C B Mohr, 1993); Monopoly Problem in the Merger of Enterprises (Law Press, 1996); On Competition Law (China’s Legal Publishing House, 1999); Competition Law of European Community (China’s Legal Publishing House, 2001); Economic Law (Social Sciences Academic Press, 2005); Competition Law (Social Sciences Academic Press, 2007). She also has over 200 papers published in Chinese, German and English languages. Prof. Wang has served as vice president of National Association for Economic Law of China, the head of the Consultant Committee for WTO Trade and Competition Policy of the Ministry of Commerce, and member of the Expert Advisory Board for Anti-Monopoly Legislation of the State Council and the National People’s Congress. In her honor, she once lectured on competition law for the Standing Committee of the Ninth and Tenth People’s Congress. In international academic activities, she is a founding member of Academic Society for Competition Law (ASCOLA) and of the Asian Competition Forum, and member of International Advisory Board of the CUTS C-CIER. She lectured on Chinese law at ABA, IBA, IPBA, ACF, Harvard University, Columbia University, Washington University (St. Louis), New York University, KFTC, Chatham House, LIDC, IDRC and other institutions.     

Development of the Nationality Law of China

With the deepening of globalization, many provisions in the Nationality Law of China promulgated in 1980 are already out of time and some provisions are easy to trigger dual nationalities. Consequently, while sticking to the basic principle of the Nationality Law, certain provisions of the Nationality Law of China should be gradually improved according to the present situation of international and domestic development, and the implementing guidelines for the Nationality Law should be introduced to construct a relatively complete legal system to adjust and regulate various relationships of nationality. Song Xixiang, majoring in international law, Hong Kong and Macao law, is a professor of law and the dean of Law School of Shanghai International Studies University. Now, he is also a doctoral candidate of Wuhan University. Meanwhile, Prof. Song is an executive director of the China Society of Private International Law and of the China Society of International Law and of the China Society of International Economical Law, etc. Moreover, he is a vice chairman of Hong Kong and Macao and Taiwan Law Association.     

刍议CEPA中的“服务提供者”

2007年6月29日。香港回归十周年前夕，《内地与香港关於建立更紧密经贸关系的安排》（CEPA）的《补充协议四》签署，使内地对香港服务贸易的开放领域达到38个，开放措施达到192项，这标志着两地服务贸易自由化发展到一个更高的程度。实际上，从2004年首个协议开始实施至今。服务贸易就一直是CEPA的重点领域，而目前在这方面取得的成就。也颇令人瞩目。保障CEPA服务领域各项开放措施落实的一个前提，是要判定哪些主体有资格享受CEPA下的优惠待遇。即要对适格的“服务提供者”进行身份识别。据最新的一项统计，截至2007年5月，已有超过1070份《香港服务提供者证明书》的申请获得批准，共签发约1780份证明书，涉及的行业广泛包括了运输及物流、分销、广告及建筑服务等。可见，准确认定符合条件的服务提供者，是实施CEPA的一项重要内容。     

香港与中央的“违宪审查”协调

在香港基本法的设计中 ,中央与香港均拥有基本法解释权及审查权。如果两者不能在权限、管辖、程序及释义方面达成一定的默契 ,就会引发宪制危机。本文在分析两地法治传统和宪制模式的差异以及香港基本法对“违宪审查权”的制度设计后 ,提出中央和香港应本着相互理解和宽容的原则 ,按照中国宪法体制与英美法制传统相结合的思路 ,在基本法所设计的中央与特区分权的制度框架内进行协调 ,以避免和化解这种冲突。