Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the major causes of cancer death in Europe with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Although surgery cannot guarantee a cure, the 5-year survival does improve to around 10% following resection and increases to 20-30% with adjuvant chemotherapy. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) 1 trial was the first adequately powered, randomized study to assess chemoradiotherapy (CRT), concurrent with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and chemotherapy [5-FU/folinic acid (FA)] in resected pancreatic cancer. There was a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy, but not for adjuvant CRT. Adjuvant CRT also did not improve survival in the EORTC multicenter prospective randomized trial by Klinkenbijl et al. (1999). The phase 3 RTOG 9704 trial compared pre- and postchemoradiation gemcitabine to pre- and postchemoradiation 5-FU. Overall there was no difference in overall survival between the 2 arms. Adjuvant gemcitabine significantly improved disease-free survival and later overall survival compared to surgery alone in the CONKO-001 randomized trial. The ESPAC-3(v2) trial compared adjuvant gemcitabine versus 5-FU/FA. The final 2-year analysis demonstrated median survival from resection of patients treated with 5-FU/FA was 23.0 months (95% CI: 21.1, 25.0) and 23.6 months (95% CI: 21.4, 26.4) for patients treated with gemcitabine. Further randomized studies will assess the role of adjuvant combination chemotherapy (ESPAC-4). The key to the future of adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer will be the identification of novel and effective agents, and better biomarker technology underpinned by translational research which will inform the design of future trials.     

Adjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer using monoclonal antibodies and immune response modifiers

Summary Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with poor survival. At present, no effective adjuvant or palliative therapies are available. Unresponsiveness to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and antihormonal treatment is one of the reasons that pancreatic cancer patients have an overall median survival time of 4–6 mo. This article summarizes clinical trials on immunotherapy of pancreatic cancer using the murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 17-1A and BW 494. In addition, the use of MAb treatment in combination with immune response modifiers is discussed. In four clinical trials, MAb 17-1A was given by iv infusion to 100 patients with pancreatic cancer. In 30 of these patients, antibody treatment was accompanied, by γ-interferon, also given intravenously. Complete response, partial response, and stable disease were reported in 1, 5, and 23 patients, respectively. Passive immunotherapy using the MAb BW 494 was carried out in 148 pancreatic cancer patients in two phase I and two phase II trials. In 1 out of 75 patients a partial response and in 25 out of 74 paitents stable disease were reported. However, in a controlled, randomized trial enrolling, 61 patients following Whipple resection, comparable survival times in patients with, and without MAb BW 494 treatment led to the termination of further clinical trials with this antibody. New clinical studies using humanized MAbs in combination with immune response modifiers should be initiated to, further evaluate immunotherapy as a treatment option in pancreatic cancer.     

Chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the pancreas

Opinions about the value of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer vary from the idea that its use should be abandoned because of lack of proven efficacy and considerable toxicity to the idea that it may produce clinically meaningful responses correlated with improved survival. A systematic review of the available literature-based evidence was undertaken. The results are discussed in relation to supportive evidence from recent studies focusing on patient benefit. Six randomized trials of chemotherapy in advanced disease and two in the adjuvant setting with a no-active treatment group were identified. All eight trials were small, and the methodology was not always what is currently desirable. One of four palliative trials reported during the early 1980s, and both trials completed during the 1990s showed a slight survival benefit with chemotherapy. In one of the trials, quality of life (QoL) was also more often improved after 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy than after best supportive care. Supportive evidence for a slight prolongation of survival and a clinical benefit also comes from trials comparing different drugs. No standard regimen is defined, although one drug, gemcitabine, has been approved in some countries for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The two randomized adjuvant trials included a very small number of patients, and, although a survival benefit was seen, conclusive evidence supporting the use of adjuvant chemo (radio) therapy is still lacking. Chemotherapy has low activity in advanced pancreatic cancer, but it can improve survival and well-being in some patients.     

Thymidylate synthase and thymidine phosphorylase gene expression as predictive parameters for the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer

AIM: To investigate the prognostic role of thymidylate synthase (TS) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) mRNA levels in T3 or T4 gastric cancer treated with 5-fluorouraci-based adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with T3 or T4 gastric cancer received systemic 5-fluorouraci-based adjuvant chemotherapy, and intratumoral expression of TS and TP in 51 gastric cancer tissue samples was tested by real- time quantitative PCR. RESULTS: The median disease-free survival (DFS) time was 10.2 mo in the patients. There were no significant differences in DFS between the groups with high and low levels of TP. However, the group with low level of TS had a longer DFS (14.4 mo vs 8.3 mo, P = 0.017). The median overall survival (OS) time was 18.5 mo, and there were significant differences in OS between the groups with high and low levels of TS or TP (for TS, 17.0 mo vs 21.3 mo, P = 0.010; for TP, 16.6 mo vs 22.5 mo, P = 0.009). Moreover, the coupled low expression of these two genes was strongly associated with a longer survival time of patients as compared with that of a single gene. CONCLUSION: Expression of TS and TP mRNA is a useful predictive parameter for the survival of postoperative gastric cancer patients after 5-fluorouracil- based adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer: Time for phase Ⅲ testing?

This paper discusses the rationale for phaseⅢtesting of neoadjuvant therapy in patients affected by resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.The therapeutic management of patients affected by resectable pancreatic cancer is particularly troublesome due to the aggressiveness of the disease and to the limited efficacy and sometimes unfavourable risk-benefit ratio of the available therapeutic tools.Conflicting data on the role of adjuvant chemoradiation have been reported,while adjuvant single-agent chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival(OS)when compared to surgery alone. However,the OS figures for adjuvant chemotherapy remain disappointing.In effect,pancreatic cancer exhibits a prominent tendency to recur after a brief median time interval from surgery and extra-pancreatic dissemination represents the predominant pattern of disease failure.Neoadjuvant treatment has a strong rationale in this disease but limited information on the efficacy of this approach is available from single arm trials with low levels of evidence.Thus,in spite of two decades of investigation there is currently no evidence to support the routine use of pre-surgical therapy in clinical practice. To foster knowledge on the optimal management of this disease,and to produce evidence-based treatment guidelines,there is no alternative to well designed randomized trials.Systemic chemotherapy is a candidate for testing because it is supported by a more robust rationale than chemoradiation.Combination chemotherapy regimens with elevated activity in advanced disease warrant investigation.Caution would suggest the running of an exploratory phaseⅡrandomized trial before embarking on a large phase Ⅲ study.     

Systemic treatment of oesophageal cancer

Most patients with oesophageal cancer present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. In an effort to improve the results of surgery in patients with operable disease, strategies to incorporate radiotherapy and chemotherapy, preoperatively (neoadjuvant) and postoperatively (adjuvant), have been extensively investigated in numerous clinical trials. Meta-analyses of neoadjuvant trials did not demonstrate a survival advantage for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Although local control seems to be improved with neoadjuvant treatment, the currently used chemotherapeutic agents are simply not effective enough to eradicate micro-metastatic disease. Patients who undergo neoadjuvant treatment and achieve a histologically confirmed complete response have a significant better survival than those who do not achieve such a response. Although neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is able to induce a higher rate of complete pathological responses compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (25-30% vs 5-15%), this advantage is counteracted by a higher incidence of operative mortality. In patients with metastatic disease there is no evidence that chemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and anthracyclins) improves survival. Several new agents such as taxanes, irinotecan and vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin and carboplatin have shown promising activity in neoadjuvant settings and as palliative treatment of metastatic oesophageal cancer. However, the benefit of these new drugs in the treatment of oesophageal cancer has to be confirmed in randomized trials.     

Survival of patients with localized diffuse histiocytic lymphoma

Twenty-eight patients with previously untreated diffuse histiocytic lymphoma (DHL) were identified to be in pathologic stage (PS) I (11), IE (3), II (8), or IIE (6) by exploratory laparotomy and splenectomy. Six patients were treated with total nodal radiotherapy; 14 with an extended mantle; 5 with an inverted Y or whole abdomen; and 3 with an involved field. Twenty-six patients achieved a complete remission (93%) and 2 patients had persistent local disease. The median survival and disease-free survival and for the complete response group are 56 and 51.5 mo, respectively. Ten of the 11 stage I or IE patients had supradiaphragmatic lymph node disease. Patients with stage I or IE disease (n = 14) demonstrated a median survival of 72.5 mo and a median disease-free survival of 69.5 mo; there was 1 disease-related death. Patients with stage II or IIE disease (n = 14) demonstrated a median survival of 33 mo and median disease-free survival of 29.5 mo; there were 10 relapses or deaths. Patients in stages I, IE, II, or IIE with infradiaphragmatic disease (n = 7) had a median survival of 36 mo, while patients with supradiaphragmatic presentation (n = 21) demonstrated median survival of 68 mo (p = 0.37). The data indicate that patients with diffuse histiocytic lymphoma with stage I supradiaphragmatic lymph node disease are curable using radiotherapy alone, achieving a 93% 11-yr actuarial disease-free survival. Patients with stage II or IIE diseases are not readily curable with radiation therapy alone, achieving a 33% 11-yr actuarial disease-free survival; radiotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone should be considered for this group.     

Adjuvant treatment in biliary tract cancer: to treat or not to treat?

Biliary tract cancer is a rare malignant tumor. There is limited knowledge about biology and natural history of this disease and considerable uncertainty remains regarding its optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management. The role of adjuvant therapy is object of debate and controversy. Although resection is identified as the most effective and the only potentially curative treatment, there is no consensus on the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy on the high incidence of disease recurrence and on survival. This is mainly due to the rarity of this disease and the consequent difficulty in performing randomized trials. The only two prospectively controlled trials concluded that adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve survival. Most of the retrospective trials, which had limited sample size and included heterogeneous patients population and non-standardized therapies, suggested a marginal benefit of chemoradiotherapy in reducing locoregional recurrence and an uncertain impact on survival. Well-designed multi-institutional randomized trials are necessary to clarify the role of adjuvant therapy. Two ongoing phase III trials may provide relevant information.     

Adjuvant therapy for margin positive pancreatic cancer: A propensity score matched analysis

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation is often recommended for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We sought to examine the impact of these therapies on R1 resected pancreatic cancer.MethodsUtilizing the National Cancer Database we identified patients who underwent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma. Patients were stratified by resection status and adjuvant therapy.ResultsWe identified 28,440 patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Patients with tumor size >2 cm were more likely to undergo R1 resections, p < 0.001. Adjuvant therapy improved survival in all patients with median and 5-year survival: adjuvant chemotherapy (21.7 months, 17.45%), chemoradiation (23.3 months, 20.9%) vs no adjuvant therapy (19.5 months, 19.1%), p < 0.001. In the R1 resection cohort survival was also improved with adjuvant therapy with chemoradiation demonstrating the most significant improvement: adjuvant chemotherapy (15.9 months, 6.5%), chemoradiation (18.7 months, 11.2%) vs no adjuvant therapy (12.5 months, 8.7%), p < 0.001. Chemoradiation but not adjuvant chemotherapy improved survival in the R1 node negative, p < 0.004, and node positive, p < 0.001. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefited survival in R1 node positive patients, p < 0.001.ConclusionsPatients with pancreatic cancer who undergo R1 resection have significant improvement in survival when treated with adjuvant chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, benefits were greater in those receiving adjuvant chemoradiation.     

Adjuvant treatments for resectable pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat successfully. The majority of patients present with unresectable advanced-stage cancer, and only 20% of patients can undergo resection. Even if surgical resection is performed, the recurrence rate is high and the survival rate after surgery is poor. Therefore, effective adjuvant therapy is needed to improve the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. Until now, no universally accepted standard adjuvant therapy for this disease has been available: chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy is considered the optimal therapy in the United States, while chemotherapy alone is the current standard in Europe. However, recent randomized controlled trials (RTOG [Radiation Therapy Oncology Group] 9704; CONKO [Charité Onkologie]-001; and a Japanese study) have suggested a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. This article will review the clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for this disease, including the results of recent trials.     

Radiotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

In the last two decades, we have witnessed revolutionary advances in pancreatic imaging as well as increased availability of megavoltage radiotherapy equipment and sophisticated radiotherapy planning devices. Several advances in the radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer have been made for the patient with resectable disease. Postoperative radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy confers a survival advantage after 'curative' resection. Preoperative and intraoperative intraoperative radiotherapy may do the same, but this requires further evaluation. Preoperative irradiation may improve the resectability rate, but the clinical data are still very limited. For locally unresectable disease, PHD radiotherapy with adjuvant 5-FU should now be the standard treatment in suitable cases with a median survival time of about one year. High LET radiation beams have failed to produce improved survival in two prospective randomized studies. Intraoperative radiotherapy is an effective means of pain control and enhances control of local disease, but has not been shown to improve survival rate significantly. Interstitial radiotherapy also improves local control, but it is associated with a high mortality rate and an even higher major complication rate. Wide-area radiation therapy and preoperative radiotherapy both seem to show promise in this group of patients. Patients with metastatic disease should be treated palliatively on an individual basis.     

Endoscopic biliary drainage for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer with obstructive jaundice who are to undergo gemcitabine chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION Pancreatic cancer is one of the most intractable mali- gnancies of the digestive tract and has a dismal prognosis. Such cancer in most patients is in an advanced stage when they first visit medical facilities, and management of obstructive ja…     

Non-surgical treatments of esophageal cancers

INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative mortality, only slight improvements in the 5-year survival of patients with esophageal cancer have been observed in the last 20 years. Many patients with apparently localized cancer will have recurrences or metastatic disease despite surgery with curative resection. Consequently, multimodal therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, were introduced. This review outlines and critically analyzes current non-surgical treatments, including palliative care. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: Esophageal cancers appear to be chemosensitive but the median duration of response is short and toxicity consistent, especially in metastatic disease. Consequently, palliative chemotherapy should be offered preferably within a clinical trial. Chemotherapy as the only adjuvant treatment cannot be recommended outside clinical trials. Radiotherapy alone as a curative treatment has been proven to be inferior to chemoradiotherapy in inoperable tumors. Some data support the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy, but randomized trials are conflicting. A pathological complete response has been identified as a favorable prognostic factor for survival. Self-expanding esophageal metal stents are a simple and effective palliative treatment of malignant dysphagia and can be considered as the reference treatment in patients with obstruction of the lower esophagus or with fistula. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: Taxanes should be evaluated in randomized studies using chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. Progress in radiotherapy, such as accelerated fractionation, greater radiation dose, and the addition of brachytherapy, will increase locoregional control and probably survival. The role of secondary surgery in patients responding to chemoradiotherapy still needs to be answered.     

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

The outlook for patients with pancreatic cancer has been grim. There have been major advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, leading to a dramatic reduction in post-operative mortality from the development of high volume specialized centres. This stimulated the study of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in pancreatic cancer including chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. Initial protocols have been based on the original but rather small GITSG study first reported in 1985. There have been two large European trials totalling over 600 patients (EORTC and ESPAC-1) that do not support the use of chemoradiation as adjuvant therapy. A second major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial (541 patients randomized) was some but not conclusive evidence for a survival benefit associated with chemotherapy. A third major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial was that the quality of life was not affected by the use of adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone. The ESPAC-3 trial aims to assess the definitive use of adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial of 990 patients.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Relevant randomized trials and meta-analyses, published as articles or abstracts, were identified through electronic and hand searches by two reviewers. RESULTS: Seven meta-analyses and 26 randomized trials comparing surgery with or without chemotherapy met the pre-defined eligibility criteria for the review. The meta-analyses all showed a survival advantage for platinum- or UFT-based postoperative chemotherapy, although the results did not always achieve statistical significance. The results of individual trials were inconsistent, although recent trials have detected a large survival advantage with postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy. Differences in trial design, patient characteristics, disease stage, use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimen may explain the variation in results. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy improves survival compared with surgery alone in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. In patients fit for chemotherapy, the survival benefits strongly outweigh the adverse effects of the treatment.     

Adjuvante und neoadjuvante therapie des rektumkarzinoms

The Consensus Conference of the German Cancer Society (CAO/AIO/ARO, 1.7. 1998) has recently updated recommendations for patients with rectal cancer. Instead of a former reservation regarding the indication of adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer the actual version of the consensus particularly emphasizes the tole of postoperative radiochemotherapy for stage-II/III tumors. This article reviews the most recent and ongoing trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer. To avoid local recurrence is the most important aspect in the primary treatment of rectal cancer. In some series, e. g. the results of the Surgical Department of the University of Erlangen, a significant correlation between local control and survival was noted. The final results of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial with 1168 randomized patients not only confirmed the potential of radiotherapy to reduce local recurrence-rate, but also demonstrated a significant survival advantage for patients receiving short-course preoperative radiation therapy. Postoperative combination therapy is usual in the United States and in most European countries since the publication of two randomized trials of the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) and the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The survival advantage resulting from an adjuvant radiotherapy with conventional doses and concurrent fluorouracil-based chemotherapy as compared to surgery alone was recently confirmed in a Norwegian trial. Protracted venous 5-fluorouracil infusion should further improve treatment results. Numerous phase-ll studies have demonstrated the efficacy of preoperative radiochemotherapy with high rates of pathological response. Thus, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is recommended for patients with locally advanced tumor primarily not amenable to curative surgery. Prospective randomized trials are ongoing to clarify the tole of preoperative versus postoperative combined treatment for patients with resectable rectal cancer. Radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer is recommended as standard treatment outside clinical trials for Stage II/III patients after curative treatment and for patients with T4-tumor prior to surgery. The optimal use of chemotherapy and the sequence of treatment modalities remains to be elucidated.     

Survival analysis according to treatment modality in pancreatic cancer patient]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pancreatic cancer is the 5(th) leading cause of cancer death in Korea and its incidence is increasing. At present, surgical resection offers the best chance of cure. However, most of pancreatic cancers are already unresectable at initial diagnosis. Thus, the majority of patients depend on chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or supportive care. We investigated the effect of treatment modalities on the survival in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Between September 1994 and May 2003, one hundred and fifty four patients with pancreatic cancer were treated by surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or conservative management. The clinical datas were analyzed retrospectively for survival according to stage and treatment modality. RESULTS: Overall median survival time was 5.7 months and 1 year survival rate was 18.3%. In patients with stage I to III disease, the median survival time was 13.9 months in surgery group, 10.2 months in radiation group, and 6.1 months in supportive care group (p%lt;0.01). Survival rate according to treatment modality was significantly different among groups. In patients with stage IV disease, the median survival time was 6.1 months in radiation therapy group, 7.1 months in chemotherapy group, and 2.7 months in supportive care group. Overall survival was significantly higher in treatment groups than in supportive care group (p<0.01), but there was no difference in survival between chemotherapy group and radiotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage I to III pancreatic cancer, surgery can improve median survival. In patients with stage IV, either chemotherapy or radiotherapy can prolong survival compared to supportive care. These results suggest that more active treatment of pancreatic cancer even in advanced stage will be needed to prolong the survival.     

Systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer

Patients with pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis although systemic treatment has slightly improved the outcome for those with advanced pancreatic cancer, The approach to a patient with pancreatic cancer remains a great challenge. Patients often present with advanced disease and many are already in poor general condition at the time of diagnosis. Today, surgery remains the only curative therapeutic option. A small number of pancreatic adenocarcinomas, however, are resectable and relapses after surgery are very frequent. The reference treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer is gemcitabine. The median survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who are treated with gemcitabine is approximately 6 months and only approximately 20% of patients will be alive at 1 year. Combinations of gemcitabine with new cytotoxic agents and with novel targeted agents hold the promise for improving the outcome. Randomized phase III studies are, however, still ongoing. Since most patients will relapse after complete surgical resection of pancreatic cancer, a search for a better adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment is important. Although several randomized studies have suggested an improved outcome for a postoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy, the role of an adjuvant treatment remains today controversial. Randomized phase III studies are ongoing. A neoadjuvant strategy might therefore also play a role, but phase III studies are lacking. The systematic evaluation of new drugs in well designed clinical trials and the search for new molecular targets for treatment are crucial in our aim to improve the outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer.     

The case for adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a difficult cancer to treat effectively. Only a small proportion of patients are suitable for resection. The long-term survival following resection alone is between 10 and 18%. Adjuvant therapy aims to improve this outcome. There have been five fully reported adjuvant trials in pancreatic cancer. The largest study is the ESPAC-1 trial which demonstrated a significant survival benefit for 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and no survival benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. A meta-analysis of these trials has confirmed the survival benefit for chemotherapy and thus adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended as the standard of care following pancreatic resection. There are further large studies which will also help to further define the optimum adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.     

Chemotherapy of colorectal cancer

Several randomized trials have shown superior response rates for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with folinic acid as compared to 5-FU alone. Both treatment regimens are well tolerated and generally can be applied in an outpatient setting. To date no other tested drug combination as methyl-CCNU (M), vincristine (O) and 5-FU (MOF), cisplatin and 5-FU (DDP/5-FU) or methotrexate and 5-FU (MTX/5-FU) showed any clear advantage over 5-FU alone. Regional infusion therapy for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer has not been proven superior as yet to systemic therapy with respect to overall survival. Regional chemotherapy is still considered an experimental approach and should only be performed within controlled trials. New results of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with the MOF-schedule for colorectal cancer with Dukes stage B and C demonstrated an improvement in disease-free survival and overall survival for patients, who had undergone resection with curative intent. Trials are under way to examine, whether 5-FU combined with folinic acid is superior to the more toxic MOF-regimen in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. Eligible patients should only be treated within prospective randomized trials.