单层椭球形网壳考虑下部结构减震性能分析

通过大型有限元分析软件ANSYS对40m跨单层椭球形网壳结构进行研究和参数分析.模型中的下部结构采用钢筋混凝土柱,以考虑对网壳的影响,并对单层椭球形网壳是否考虑下部结构的两种计算模型进行了自振振型下的模态比较.文中提出此类网壳屈曲约束支撑的布置方式,等截面替换了网壳内的部分杆件,并对有屈曲约束支撑单层椭球形网壳的减震性能进行分析.结果表明,下部结构对结构整体的影响不可忽略,合理布置约束屈曲支撑的网壳结构减震效果较好.     

局部双层球面网壳新型体系减震性能分析

通过大型有限元分析软件ANSYS对跨度60m的局部双层球面网壳结构进行研究和减震分析。研究局部双层球面网壳的自振特性以及约束屈曲支撑对局部双层球面网壳减震效果的主要影响参数和影响规律。通过考虑约束屈曲支撑不同的设置位置和数量,进行相关的减震参数分析。结果表明,局部双层球面网壳自振频率密集;约束屈曲支撑杆件的布置位置对减震效果有较大的影响;约束屈曲支撑设置的数量应综合考虑。     

多点激励下单层网壳新型减震体系的性能研究

利用Ansys大型有限元软件,建立布置了约束屈曲支撑的K8网壳新型减震体系有限元模型。通过非线性时程分析研究了体系在多点地震动输入下的抗震性能,并通过与普通网壳和其在地震动一致激励下的性能相对比,得出约束屈曲支撑在地震动多点激励性的减震性能,给出这种新型网壳体系的合理理论分析方法。     

约束屈曲支撑在单层网壳减震控制中的应用研究

采用有限元分析程序ANSYS,分别对带有约束屈曲支撑(Bckling Restrained Braces,简称BRBs)的单层柱面网壳、单层球面网壳进行动力时程响应分析,分别考虑了水平及竖向地震作用.比较各种情况下网壳节点位移和杆件内力变化情况,综合研究了约束屈层支撑在四边支承单层柱面网壳和单层球面网壳的适用性,探讨了如何布置约束屈层支撑,分析了约束屈层支撑减震性能.     

屈曲约束支撑在整体双层柱面网壳中的减震性能分析

为了解屈曲约束支撑（BRB）在考虑下部结构的双层柱面网壳中的减震性能,通过大型有限元分析软件ANSYS建立跨度为50 m、下部为钢筋混凝土结构的双层柱面网壳,在该结构中应用屈曲约束支撑对其进行减震分析。计算结果表明:在强震作用下,屈曲约束支撑能够有效地应用在该结构中,其减震效果与使用屈曲约束支撑的数量和位置有关,只有将合适数量的屈曲约束支撑应用在恰当的位置才能取得最好的减震效果。     

设置屈曲约束支撑的斜交网筒结构延性有限元分析

斜交网筒结构具有较大的抗侧刚度,但其延性较差,通过设置屈曲约束支撑可改善斜交网筒结构延性。以30层的斜交网筒结构模型为研究对象,分别对普通斜交网筒结构和设置屈曲约束支撑斜交网筒结构进行静力弹塑性推覆（Pushover）分析。结果表明：屈曲约束支撑可有效改善斜交网筒结构延性。此外,对立面中部、立面角部、底部楼层、上部楼层共4种局部区域布置屈曲约束支撑的方案进行了结构延性分析。局部设置屈曲约束支撑斜交网筒结构的设计应确保斜柱处于弹性工作状态,屈曲约束支撑率先进入塑性耗能状态。建议采用立面中部布置屈曲约束支撑的方案,可实现在保证结构受剪承载力的前提下,较好地改善斜交网筒结构的延性,避免结构发生脆性破坏。     

约束屈曲支撑(BRBs)在单层柱壳振动控制中的应用研究

采用有限元分析程序ANSYS,对单层柱面网壳(包括带约束屈曲支撑(Buckling-Restrained-Brace)的结构及不带BRBs的结构)进行了动力时程响应分析,从柱壳的位移减震率,内力减震率及支撑的耗能情况综合研究BRBs在四边支撑单层柱面网壳结构中的适用性,总结出对工程设计有价值的结论和数据,主要包括如何选用BRBs,如何布置BRBs,BRBs减震性能及影响因素。     

STABILITY STUDY OF SELF-BALANCED PRESTRESSED LATTICED SHELL STRUCTURE

针对单元拼装式自平衡预应力网壳的结构稳定性能尚不明确的研究现状,采用有限元分析的方法对一座大跨度球面网壳结构的稳定性能进行了研究.采用了Block - Lanczos法对网壳结构进行了特征值屈曲分析,并用一致缺陷模态法对网壳结构进行了非线性分析,从而获得大跨度自平衡预应力球面网壳结构稳定性能的规律,相关结论对新型网壳的工程设计具有指导意义.     

两边连接屈曲约束钢板墙边缘构件的受力规律

利用理论分析和有限元方法对两边连接屈曲约束钢板墙边缘构件（梁）的受力规律进行研究,提出了两边连接屈曲约束钢板墙与边缘构件的传力模型和边缘构件内力计算方法。利用等效支撑模型对所提出的边缘构件内力计算方法进行了验证,对不同层数和跨数的框架 屈曲约束钢板墙结构和框架 等效支撑结构进行分析,对梁、柱构件的内力进行了对比,分析了屈曲约束钢板墙布置方式对边缘构件内力、变形的影响。结果表明:所提出的方法能够准确计算屈曲约束钢板墙边缘构件的内力;建议屈曲约束钢板墙的宽度宜设计成大于跨度的1/3,并将屈曲约束钢板墙布置在跨度中间;如果屈曲约束钢板墙的宽度只能小于跨度的1/3,则宜布置在靠近梁端部。     

新型拉索-单层柱面网壳结构的稳定性和参数分析

为了确定新型拉索—单层柱面网壳结构从稳定平衡状态变为不稳定平衡状态的临界荷载和屈曲后性态,利用有限元分析软件ANSYS建立梁单元、杆单元和索单元的组合有限元模型,采用弧长法对新型拉索—单层柱面网壳结构在不同荷载工况下初始缺陷的非线性屈曲进行了弹性大挠度跟踪分析。通过改变结构参数、几何参数等因素,较深入地研究了该新型结构的非线性稳定性能。     

双阶屈服屈曲约束支撑框架小震参数分析

为了弥补常规屈曲约束支撑在多遇地震作用下处于弹性状态,不能发挥消能减震作用的不足,提出了一种将金属套管阻尼器与屈曲约束支撑组合形成的双阶屈服屈曲约束支撑,经试验验证其具有良好、稳定的小震及中大震下的滞回特性。在小震作用下,金属套管阻尼器屈服消能,屈曲约束芯板保持弹性承载。借助有限元软件ETABS建立了一系列双阶屈服屈曲约束支撑框架模型,通过改变支撑与框架刚度比、阻尼器与芯板的轴向刚度关系以及套管阻尼器的屈服比例,对各模型进行小震作用下的动力弹塑性分析,将各模型基底剪力和最大层间位移角与相应的常规屈曲约束支撑框架的分析结果进行对比。结果表明:双阶屈服屈曲约束支撑与支撑芯板的轴向弹性刚度比取2左右,阻尼器屈服比例取0.3左右时,可取得较好的减震效果; 双阶屈服屈曲约束支撑的参数取值改变,对降低结构地震响应的影响趋势不因支撑与框架刚度比不同而改变; 当支撑刚度贡献较大时,相较常规屈曲约束支撑,双阶屈服屈曲约束支撑的设置能降低结构的层间位移角,若要同时降低基底剪力,阻尼器屈服比例不宜高于0.3。     

Pall型摩擦阻尼支撑体系试验研究

鉴于Pall型摩擦阻尼普通支撑会对框架边柱产生附加轴力,考虑采用防屈曲支撑来代替普通支撑,使支撑充分发挥作用,同时不会对边柱产生增长的附加轴力,为防屈曲支撑在Pall型摩擦阻尼支撑体系中的应用奠定基础.由于Pall型摩擦阻尼器滞回特性不受支撑屈曲力影响的特性,故采用普通钢板来代替防屈曲支撑进行Pall型摩擦阻尼支撑体系试验研究,同时对此支撑体系在考虑几何非线性情况下进行有限元AN-SYS仿真分析.对比试验结果和仿真分析结果,表明试验结果与仿真分析结果得出的Pall型摩擦阻尼器摩擦力和支撑内力的变化规律基本相同,为下一步采用防屈曲支撑体系进行试验研究奠定基础.     

人字形无黏结内藏钢板支撑剪力墙拟静力试验研究

通过对6个人字形无黏结内藏钢板支撑剪力墙试件的拟静力试验研究,对无黏结材料及支撑与墙板的间隙、墙板内钢筋配置、墙板端部加强构造以及钢板支撑周围有效宽度范围内采用普通混凝土,其余部分采用轻骨料混凝土的有效宽度墙板等因素对试件滞回性能的影响进行考察。试验结果表明,无黏结材料的均匀包裹、支撑与墙板间留有较小的间隙以及沿支撑轴向加密纵横向钢筋和拉结筋等构造措施,可以显著提高墙板局部抗弯和抗冲切承载力,改善试件的延性和耗能能力。支撑受压失稳时呈多波微幅弯曲变形状态,随压力增大,失稳半波数增多,支撑对墙板的局部冲切作用随之增大,使墙板局部弯曲或冲切破坏。直至破坏前,试件滞回曲线饱满稳定,骨架曲线基本呈现两折线的形式。试验还表明,当其他构造相同时,采用有效宽度墙板的试件和整个墙板均由普通混凝土制成的试件的滞回性能几乎相同,但前者自重轻,有利于墙板的安装和结构抗震。     

Seismic Study of Buckling Restrained Brace System without Concrete Infill

Bracing is the one of the best-known means of seismic retrofitting. Buckling restrained brace (BRB) is a certain type of brace with great efficiency against lateral loading. This paper presents the results of a finite element analysis on a BRB in which casing has no concrete infill. The core segment of this brace is similar to the conventional BRB, but it has a different buckling restraining system. The aim of this paper was to perform a parametric seismic study on the effect of a gap and also the effect of friction between the core and the casing and to evaluate the buckling behavior of these braces in response to changes in the initial shape of the bracing system. The results show that the flexural stiffness of the casing system, regardless of size of the gap, can significantly affect the buckling behavior of bracing.     

Subassemblage test of buckling‐restrained braces with H‐shaped steel core

In this study, a subassemblage test was performed using buckling‐restrained braces with an H‐shaped core element, which have been proven in a previous uniaxial component test to have good performance. The loading protocol prescribed the quasi‐static cyclic pattern with stepwise incremental displacement amplitude. Two different end connections (bolted connection and pin connection) and two different buckling‐restrained mechanisms (concrete‐filled tube and hollow steel tube) were examined as the test parameters. The performance of the specimen was evaluated by comparing the test results with the recommended provisions for buckling‐restrained braces. The test results showed that the compression strength capacity of buckling‐restrained brace (BRB) with in‐filled concrete increased by about 10% compared with BRB without in‐filled concrete. According to test result at same story drift of 2D_bm, structural performance of pin connection specimen without bolt slippage is superior to bolted connection specimen. Also, bolted connection specimens showed similar performance for total energy dissipation and cumulative plastic ductility, regardless of the connection types and the existence of concrete filling. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Wind‐induced vibration control of tall buildings using hybrid buckling‐restrained braces

A buckling‐restrained brace (BRB) is a system with excellent earthquake‐proof performance, but it does not dissipate energies caused by the load from weak earthquakes or winds. A hybrid BRB (H‐BRB), which improved the performance of the BRB, is a type of composite damper system consisting of a BRB and a viscoelastic damper. To explain the wind‐induced vibration control performance of H‐BRB, a 40‐story steel building was designed and used as an analysis model in this study, on the basis of the damping ratio from a structural performance test, using normal steel braces, BRB and H‐BRB. In addition, to evaluate the optimal location of H‐BRB, a time‐history analysis of four models was conducted in the study. For such time‐history analysis, wind‐load data in a 10‐year recurrence interval, which were calculated from the wind tunnel test, were used. The result of the time‐history analysis showed that H‐BRB is effective in improving both the lateral stiffness and serviceability of a building using the existing BRB. It also confirmed that it is most effective to position H‐BRBs mainly on the lower stories. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

自复位摩擦耗能支撑框架的抗震性能分析

自复位摩擦耗能支撑(SCFED)是一种兼具耗能能力与自定心能力的新型支撑。本文将SCFED应用于一9层Benchmark钢框架,采用OpenSEES有限元软件,进行了非线性静力推覆分析(Pushover)和非线性动力时程分析,通过与屈曲约束支撑(BRB)框架结构的对比,研究了SCFED框架结构的抗震性能。结果表明:SCFED框架的最大层间位移角较BRB框架小,且沿楼层高度分布更为均匀;BRB框架平均残余层间位移角约为最大位移角的10%~20%,而SCFED框架的残余位移角仅为最大位移角的1%~2%,表明SCFED能有效控制结构的残余变形;由于SCFED在自复位时的刚度转换较为剧烈,导致SCFED框架的层加速度比BRB框架大。     

带支撑胶合木框架抗震性能试验研究

针对胶合木框架侧向位移不易满足抗震要求这一问题,研究了增设人字形胶合木支撑和铝合金屈曲约束支撑的带支撑胶合木框架的抗震性能。对纯胶合木梁柱框架和3个增设支撑胶合木框架进行了低周反复加载试验,分析了4个胶合木框架试件的水平承载力、耗能能力、刚度退化、转角变形和木支撑应变。结果表明：增设人字形木支撑和铝合金屈曲约束支撑均可以显著提高胶合木框架的承载力、耗能能力和刚度;支撑端部连接形式对胶合木框架的抗震性能有一定影响;增设支撑的3个胶合木框架试件均在支撑或支撑连接处发生破坏,胶合木框架主体并未发生明显损伤,两类支撑均很好地起到了第一道抗震防线的作用,保证了主体框架的安全。胶合木框架数值模拟和木支撑截面尺寸参数分析结果表明,经柱截面尺寸修正后的有限元模型针对框架抗侧刚度和承载力具有较好的预测精度。     

Effect of filler material on local and global behaviour of buckling‐restrained braces

The nonlinear response of buildings has attracted a tremendous amount of attention in recent years. Braces, as lateral force‐resisting elements of a structure, are designed to not only react in the elastic region, but also to exhibit nonlinear response beyond the elastic limit. However, buckling in compression drastically degrades the performance of braces under earthquake loading. Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) have been evolved into very effective systems for severe seismic applications. They prevent buckling in compression through the encasing of core steel into a steel tube and confining infill concrete. The effect of infill material is investigated in this research through the use of experimental tests. Filler material may be concrete, grout or mortar, as well as granular material such as compacted aggregate. Moreover, lightweight concrete or lean concrete may be utilized as filler to reduce the overall structural weight. Furthermore, the need for unbonding material may not arise when sand and gravel mixture is used. Nevertheless, the strength of the aggregate should be such that no buckling or strength deterioration is observed. Parametric studies on BRB characteristics are carried out in this research. Results of cyclic loading tests are then provided for individual cases to characterize the effect of response parameters of BRB assemblages. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Tests of hysteretic behavior for unbonded steel plate brace encased in reinforced concrete panel

Quasi-static tests for ten pieces of the unbonded steel plate brace encased in reinforced concrete panel, which is referred to as the panel buckling-restrained brace (panel BRB), have been carried out. The effects of some constructional details, such as unbonded material, clearance between the panel and the brace, configuration of the steel bar and the edge reinforcement, effective width of the panel, etc., on the hysteretic behavior of the panel BRBs are examined. The results indicate that the panel BRBs with evener unbonded materials, smaller clearance and additional steel bars and ties along the encased braces exhibit better ductility and energy dissipation capacity than the others. The brace under compression appears to exhibit small amplitude flexural buckling with multiple waves, and its ultimate axial force exceeds its yield load capacity significantly due to strain hardening and frictional action. All specimens of panel BRB exhibit a stable performance under the quasi-static loading until local failure of the panel occurs by either flexure or punching shear. The results also reveal that, with the same construction details mentioned above, the hysteretic behavior of the specimens with the effective width panel almost matches that of the specimens with normal weight concrete panel, however, the former kind of panel BRB would be advantageous in the aseismic performance of the buildings because of its lighter weight.