牛病毒性腹泻病毒基因组快速进化表现出来的遗传多样性

牛病毒性腹泻病毒（Bovine viral diarrhea virus, BVDV）基因组的高突变性和同源/异源重组性导致其成为一种较难防控的家畜病原体。目前普遍接受的两种基因型是BVDV-1和BVDV-2，其中基因1型含有21个亚型而基因2型含有4个亚型。在流行态势上，BVDV-1无论在遗传多样性还是分离毒株的数量上均高于BVDV-2。虽然BVDV-1和BVDV-2在基因组遗传特征上存在明显的遗传差异，但是其基因组内部特定区域在遗传进化上存在着密切关联。除了病毒基因组自身高变异的特性外，同源/异源RNA重组在BVDV遗传变异进程中也发挥着重要的作用。借助这些遗传进化的途径，BVDV在世界各地的流行传播可以用“随心所欲”来形容。BVDV的流行特征总体表现为基因1型的毒株为主要流行毒株，各基因亚型之间交替更迭并呈现遗传多样性。鉴于BVDV遗传进化的多变性和复杂性，紧密追踪主要流行基因亚型的更迭以及收集不同基因亚型的特征性遗传信息对于制定切实有效的BVDV防控措施具有实际意义。     

系统发生分析发现牛病毒性腹泻病病毒新基因亚型

本研究对我国首次分离获得的牛源牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)毒株Changchun 184(CC-184)和猪源牛病毒性腹泻病毒ZM-95进行了遗传衍化关系研究.选择主要抗原E2基因为研究对象,首先应用RT-PCR及套式PCR克隆得到CC-184和ZM-95的E2片段,通过序列测定发现CC-184和ZM-95 E2基因长度分别为1,122bp和1,125bp,各自编码374和375个氨基酸残基.核酸序列同源性比较和系统发生分析表明2株病毒均属于BVDV-1,CC-184与Osloss亲缘关系最近,都属于已有的b基因亚型,其E2基因同源性达91.8%.而ZM-95的E2基因有一个特征性的变异区,包含一个密码子序列插入,这一变异区编码了一段有别于其他瘟病毒的五肽氨基酸序列HYKKK.结果还表明ZM-95与BVDV-1现有的5个基因亚型的亲缘关系均较远,E2基因同源性最高(与Oregonc24v)只有72.4%.而BVDV 1亚型内毒株间的同源性大于85%,亚型间的同源性在69%～75%之间,充分说明ZM-95是BVDV-1中一个新发现的基因亚型.通常认为猪源BVDV来源于牛,应该与牛源BVDV有十分近的遗传关系,但是本研究发现ZM-95与其他已知牛源BVDV较低的基因同源性说明猪源BVDV还具有独立的遗传衍化与传播来源的可能性.     

系统发生分析发现牛病毒性腹泻病病毒新基因亚型

本研究对我国首次分离获得的牛源牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)毒株Changchun 184(CC-184)和猪源牛病毒 性腹泻病毒ZM-95进行了遗传衍化关系研究。选择主要抗原E2基因为研究对象,首先应用RT-PCR及套式PCR 克隆得到CC-184和ZM-95的E2片段,通过序列测定发现CC-184和ZM-95 E2基因长度分别为1,122bp和1, 125bp,各自编码374和375个氨基酸残基。核酸序列同源性比较和系统发生分析表明2株病毒均属于BVDV-1, CC-184与Osloss亲缘关系最近,都属于已有的b基因亚型,其E2基因同源性达91．8％。而ZM-95的E2基因有 一个特征性的变异区,包含一个密码子序列插入,这一变异区编码了一段有别于其他瘟病毒的五肽氨基酸序列 HYKKK。结果还表明ZM-95与BVDV-1现有的5个基因亚型的亲缘关系均较远,E2基因同源性最高(与Oregon c24v)只有72．4％。而BVDV-1亚型内毒株间的同源性大于85％,亚型间的同源性在69％～75％之间,充分说明 ZM-95是BVDV-1中一个新发现的基因亚型。通常认为猪源BVDV来源于牛,应该与牛源BVDV有十分近的遗 传关系,但是本研究发现ZM-95与其他已知牛源BVDV较低的基因同源性说明猪源BVDV还具有独立的遗传衍 化与传播来源的可能性。     

牛病毒性腹泻病毒1型病毒样颗粒的制备及其对豚鼠的免疫原性分析

为了获得预防牛病毒性腹泻病毒1型(bovine viral diarrhea virus 1,BVDV-1)感染的病毒样颗粒,扩增C-Ems-E1-E2编码区段并克隆至pFastBacDaul载体,转化大肠杆菌DH10Bac感受态细胞与Bacmid重组获得Bacmid-BVDV-1,转染至Sf9细胞,获得重组杆状病毒B...     

黄病毒NS2-3/NS3蛋白的结构与功能

猪瘟病毒(Classical swine fever virus,CSFV)、牛病毒性腹泻病病毒(Bovine viral diarrhea virus,BVDV)和羊边界病病毒(Border disease virus,BDV)共同组成黄病毒科(Flaviviridae)的瘟病毒属(Pestivirus)。近年来,对该属病毒的核酸序列、蛋白结构、基因组片段及其表达产物功能     

牛病毒性腹泻病毒分子生物学特性研究进展

牛病毒性腹泻病毒(Bovine viral diarrhea virus,BVDV)是引起牛黏膜病的病原,该病原给养牛业造成重大的损失,致病机理十分复杂。与丙肝病毒同属黄病毒科,二者有很高的同源性,所以被用作HCV的模式病毒。其基因组为一单股正链RNA分子,编码4种结构蛋白和8种非结构蛋白,这些蛋白质在病毒的复制、翻译及与宿主细胞的相互作用中发挥重要作用。随着对该病毒及同属的其他病毒研究的深入,人们对该病毒的致病机制、免疫逃避、遗传特性等方面有了一定的认识。本文综述了该病毒及其同科病毒编码的蛋白质的主要功能,为该病的防治及其他病毒的深入研究提供参考依据。     

牛病毒性腹泻病毒P125基因重要区的比较与分析

牛病毒性腹泻病毒(bovine viral diarrhea virus,BVDV)为黄病毒科瘟病毒属中的成员。根据在细胞培养物中是否产生病变,可将BVDV分为致细胞病变(CP)和非致细胞病变     

囊泡相关膜蛋白A调控牛病毒性腹泻病毒复制

[背景]牛病毒性腹泻病毒(bovine viral diarrhea virus,BVDV)是致犊牛腹泻的重要病原之一,而目前BVDV与宿主因子互作机理研究较少,成为限制BVDV防控的重要原因。[目的]探明囊泡相关膜蛋白A (vesicle-associated membrane protein A,VAPA)对BVDV复制的影响。[方法]根据GenBank中VAPA基因,使用Benchling和CHOPCHOP等平台设计靶向VAPA的向导RNA(small guide RNA,sgRNA),融合后克隆至慢病毒lentiCRISPR v2载体中,包装慢病毒后感染牛肾细胞(Madin-Darby bovine kidney,MDBK),使用嘌呤霉素连续筛选5代,使用Western Blot检测VAPA蛋白敲除(knockout,KO)情况;BVDV感染VAPA KO细胞不同时间后,收集细胞提取总RNA,并将等质量的RNA反转录成cDNA,使用实时荧光定量PCR (real-time quantitative PCR,RT-qPCR)和免疫荧光分析(immunofluorescence a...     

牛病毒性腹泻病毒单克隆抗体的研究

牛病毒性腹泻——粘膜病是世界性广泛流行的奶牛和肉牛的传染病。其病原为牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV),属于披膜病毒科的瘟病毒属,它的许多生物学特性至今还不很清楚。本试验建立了12株分泌抗BVDV的单克隆抗体(McAb)杂交瘤细胞株,并结合免疫转移电泳法和放射免疫沉淀法,初步研究了BVDV的多肽。     

Function of bovine CD46 as a cellular receptor for bovine viral diarrhea virus is determined by complement control protein 1

The pestivirus bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) was shown to bind to the bovine CD46 molecule, which subsequently promotes entry of the virus. To assess the receptor usage of BVDV type 1 (BVDV-1) and BVDV-2, 30 BVDV isolates including clinical samples were assayed for their sensitivity to anti-CD46 antibodies. With a single exception the infectivity of all tested strains of BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 was inhibited by anti-CD46 antibodies, which indicates the general usage of CD46 as a BVDV receptor. Molecular analysis of the interaction between CD46 and the BVD virion was performed by mapping the virus binding site on the CD46 molecule. Single complement control protein modules (CCPs) within the bovine CD46 were either deleted or replaced by analogous CCPs of porcine CD46, which does not bind BVDV. While the epitopes recognized by anti-CD46 monoclonal antibodies which block BVDV infection were attributed to CCP1 and CCP2, in functional assays only CCP1 turned out to be essential for BVDV binding and infection. Within CCP1 two short peptides on antiparallel beta strands were identified as crucial for the binding of BVDV. Exchanges of these two peptide sequences were sufficient for a loss of function in bovine CD46 as well as a gain of function in porcine CD46. Determination of the size constraints of CD46 revealed that a minimum length of four CCPs is essential for receptor function. An increase of the distance between the virus binding domain and the plasma membrane by insertion of one to six CCPs of bovine C4 binding protein exhibited only a minor influence on susceptibility to BVDV.     

Entry of bovine viral diarrhea virus into ovine cells occurs through clathrin-dependent endocytosis and low pH-dependent fusion

Although mechanisms of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) entry into bovine cells have been elucidated, little is known concerning pestivirus entry and receptor usage in ovine cells. In this study, we determined the entry mechanisms of BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 in sheep fetal thymus cells. Both BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 infections were inhibited completely by chlorpromazine, β-methyl cyclodextrin, sucrose, bafilomycin A1, chloroquine, and ammonium chloride. Simultaneous presence of reducing agent and low pH resulted in marked loss of BVDV infectivity. Moreover, BVDV was unable to fuse with ovine cell membrane by the presence of reducing agent or low pH alone, while combination of both led to fusion at low efficiency. Furthermore, sheep fetal thymus cells acutely infected with BVDV-1 or BVDV-2 were found protected from heterologous BVDV infection. Taken together, our results showed for the first time that entry of both BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 into ovine cells occurred through clathrin-dependent endocytosis, endosomal acidification, and low pH-dependent fusion following an activation step, besides suggesting the involvement of a common ovine cellular receptor during attachment and entry.     

Giraffe strain of pestivirus: its taxonomic status based on the 5'-untranslated region

The 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) of the 'Giraffe' strain of pestivirus was sequenced for comparison with those of other pestiviruses from cattle, sheep, goats, and swine. A phylogenetic tree constructed with these strains suggested that the 'Giraffe' strain was allocated to a new taxon. This observation was also confirmed by a newly proposed method based on palindromic nucleotide substitutions (PNS) at the three variable regions in the 5'-UTR. Other reported pestivirus strains isolated from deer were assigned as bovine viral disease virus (BVDV)-1 according to the PNS as well as phylogenetic analysis, suggesting that BVDV-1 strains can cross-infect deer as well as cattle, sheep, goats, and swine, and that wild deer may serve as a reservoir of BVDV-1. We also identified the genovar of a deer isolate, SH9/11, as BVDV-1c by the PNS method.     

BVDV and innate immunity.

Infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is prevalent in the cattle population worldwide. The virus exists in two biotypes, cytopathic and non-cytopathic, depending on the effect of the viruses on cultured cells. BVDV may cause transient and persistent infections which differ fundamentally in the host's antiviral immune response. Transient infection may be due to both cytopathic and non-cytopathic biotypes of BVDV and leads to a specific immune response. In contrast, only non-cytopathic BVD viruses can establish persistent infection as a result of infection of the embryo early in its development. Persistent infection is characterized by immunotolerance specific for the infecting viral strain. In this paper we discuss the role of innate immune responses in the two types of infection. In general, both transient and persistent infections are associated with an increased frequency of secondary infections. Associated with the increased risk of such infections are, among others, impaired bacteria killing and decreased chemotaxis. Interestingly, non-cytopathic BVDV fails to induce interferon type I in cultured bovine macrophages whereas cytopathic biotypes readily trigger this response. Cells infected with non-cytopathic BVDV are also resistant to induction of interferon by double stranded RNA, a potent interferon inducer signalling the presence of viral replication in the cell. Thus, non-cytopathic BVDV may dispose of a mechanism suppressing a key element of the antiviral defence of the innate immune system. Since interferon is also important in the activation of the adaptive immune response, suppression of this signal may be essential for the establishment of persistent infection and immunotolerance.     

Prevalence Study and Genetic Typing of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) in Four Bovine Species in China

To determine the nationwide status of persistent BVDV infection in different bovine species in China and compare different test methods, a total of 1379 serum samples from clinical healthy dairy cattle, beef cattle, yaks (Bos grunniens), and water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) were collected in eight provinces of China from 2010 to 2013. The samples were analyzed using commercial antibody (Ab) and antigen (Ag) detection kits, and RT-PCR based on the 5’-UTR and Npro gene sequencing. Results showed that the overall positive rates for BVDV Ab, Ag and RT-PCR detection were 58.09% (801/1379), 1.39% (14/1010), and 22.64% (146/645), respectively, while the individual positive rates varied among regions, species, and farms. The average Ab-positive rates for dairy cattle, beef cattle, yaks, and water buffalo were 89.49% (298/333), 63.27% (248/392), 45.38% (236/520), and 14.18% (19/134), respectively, while the Ag-positive rates were 0.00% (0/116), 0.77% (3/392), 0.82% (3/368), and 5.97% (8/134), respectively, and the nucleic acid-positive rates detected by RT-PCR were 32.06% (42/131), 13.00% (26/200), 28.89% (52/180), and 19.40% (26/134), respectively. In addition, the RT-PCR products were sequenced and 124 5’-UTR sequences were obtained. Phylogenetic analysis of the 5’-UTR sequences indicated that all of the 124 BVDV-positive samples were BVDV-1 and subtyped into either BVDV-1b (33.06%), BVDV-1m (49.19%), or a new cluster, designated as BVDV-1u (17.74%). Phylogenetic analysis based on Npro sequences confirmed this novel subtype. In conclusion, this study revealed the prevalence of BVDV-1 in bovine species in China and the dominant subtypes. The high proportion of bovines with detectable viral nucleic acids in the sera, even in the presence of high Ab levels, revealed a serious threat to bovine health.     

Febrile response and decrease in circulating lymphocytes following acute infection of white-tailed deer fawns with either a BVDV1 or a BVDV2 strain

Although commonly associated with infection in cattle, bovine viral diarrhea viruses (BVDV) also replicate in many domestic and wildlife species, including cervids. Bovine viral diarrhea viruses have been isolated from a number of cervids, including mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), red deer (Cervus elaphus), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and mouse deer (Tragulus javanicus), but little information is available regarding clinical presentation and progression of infection in these species. In preliminary studies of experimental infection of deer with BVDV, researchers noted seroconversion but no clinical signs. In this study, we infected white-tailed deer fawns that were negative for BVDV and for antibodies against BVDV, with either a type 1 or a type 2 BVDV that had been isolated from white-tailed deer. Fawns were monitored for changes in basal temperature, circulating lymphocytes, and platelets. The clinical progression following inoculation in these fawns was similar to that seen with BVDV infections in cattle and included fever and depletion of circulating lymphocytes. Because free-ranging cervid populations are frequently in contact with domestic cattle in the United States, possible transfer of BVDV between cattle and cervids has significant implications for proposed BVDV control programs.     

Laboratory diagnosis of bovine viral diarrhea virus

The control and eventual eradication of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) have been defined as objectives to reduce the economic losses due to the presence of this virus in the cattle population. These goals could not be envisioned without the significant achievements in the diagnostic procedures employed to detect the infection in its various manifestations. The tests that are currently available are fully capable of supporting the ACVIM consensus statement for the control and eradication of BVDV. In point of fact diagnostic testing is the essential component of any control program. What is now currently lacking is full implementation of the ACVIM recommendations.     

Prevalence of antibodies to IBR and BVD viruses in dairy cows with reproductive disorders

We determined the prevalence of antibodies to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus (IBRV) and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) in sera of dairy cows on 4 different farms in the Republic of Croatia. A high percentage (60.8%) of cows had various reproductive disorders. The results showed that seroprevalence of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) was 85.8% and that of bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) was 79.2% in tested cows. Antibodies to both viruses were found in 80.8% of cows with reproductive disorders but in only 46.8% of cows without reproductive disorders. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.01), and indicated a connection between reproductive disorders and simultaneous infections with IBR and BVD viruses in dairy cows.