桩承式加筋路堤张力膜效应模型试验研究

在桩承式加筋路堤设计计算及工程实践中,筋材的受力计算是具有争议且亟待解决的问题,然而,现有的研究很少关注桩承式加筋路堤中筋材应变的空间分布形式和三维模式下筋材的受力特征。采用自行研制的设备,以桩间距为变量,针对桩承式加筋路堤中筋材张力膜效应进行了物理模拟试验。试验中通过气压施加荷载,对筋材竖向变形和不同位置筋材应变进行观测。结果表明,张力膜效应下筋材应变和受力很不均匀。正方形布桩情形下,加筋材料的空间变形形态可采用空间抛物面与抛物柱面的组合来模拟。正方形布桩情形下假定筋材上所有荷载全部由相邻桩之间的4条筋带承担,得到的筋材受力计算值明显偏大。在模拟试验结果基础上,初步提出了考虑筋材三维空间变形的拉力计算方法。     

桩承式加筋路堤三维土拱效应试验研究

桩承式加筋路堤受力性状比较复杂,土拱效应对路堤的承载变形性状具有重要影响。通过三维土拱效应模型试验,研究桩-土相对位移、路堤高度、桩帽净间距和水平加筋体拉伸强度等因素对桩土应力比及路堤沉降的影响。结果表明：土拱效应发挥程度与桩-土相对位移密切相关,存在一个临界桩-土相对位移使得桩土应力比达到最大值,该临界桩-土相对位移约为6～8 mm。路堤高度与桩帽净间距之比越大,桩土应力比越大,路堤顶面差异沉降越小;桩帽宽度与桩帽净间距之比越大,桩土应力比越大,路堤顶面差异沉降越小。设置水平加筋体能有效提高桩土应力比并减小路堤顶面沉降;路堤越低,水平加筋体对桩土应力比的提高作用及对路面沉降的减小作用越明显;水平加筋体拉伸强度越高,这种作用越明显。桩承式加筋路堤三维土拱效应等沉面高度与桩帽净间距之比约为3.5。     

桩承式路堤土拱效应发挥过程研究

通过三维模型试验对桩承式路堤中土拱效应发挥过程进行了研究,重点分析了不同桩顶盖板尺寸、不同加筋方式下应力折减系数与差异沉降之间的关系。结果表明,土拱效应随变形的增加而发挥;加筋材料的设置减小了差异沉降,削弱了填土中的土拱效应,荷载向桩顶的传递是土拱效应和拉膜效应共同作用的结果。采用有限元法对桩间距、填土高度等未能在模型试验中考虑的关键因素进行了参数敏感性分析,总结了土拱效应发挥过程的相关规律。根据有限元计算结果、试验数据和文献中收集到的实测资料,提出用土拱效应发挥系数和归一化位移来描述土拱效应的发挥过程,建议二者之间采用双曲线方程模拟,从而在设计中体现土拱效应随位移的发展,并满足路堤填土、加筋材料和地基之间的变形协调要求。     

Elastoplastic multiphase model for simulating the response of piled raft foundations subject to combined loadings

A multiphase model and corresponding computational time‐saving finite element code is proposed in this paper for predicting the settlements experienced by a piled raft foundation when subject to the combined action of vertical and lateral loadings. This model, which is formulated in the framework of an elastoplastic behaviour for the soil and the reinforcing piles as well, explicitly accounts for the shear and flexural behaviour of the latter. Starting from a simple analytical example where all the concepts attached to this model are clearly illustrated, the main stages leading to its finite element implementation are then presented. The numerical tool thus elaborated, is applied to the simulation of a pile‐reinforced strip foundation submitted to a horizontally applied seismic load in addition to a permanent vertical load. One of the key results of such a simulation in terms of design recommendation, lies in the conclusion that, while the shear and flexural contributions of the reinforcement play quite a negligible role in the case of a vertical load (as compared with their axial resistance), they remain absolutely essential for withstanding the seismic lateral loading. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Stability analysis of membrane‐reinforced curved earth retaining walls,using a multiphase approach

The stability analysis of curved earth retaining walls, stabilized by reinforcing membranes, is investigated by means of a multiphase model developed in the framework of the yield design approach. This model is an extension of that previously developed for soils reinforced by linear inclusions. It combines the advantage of a homogenization approach in terms of improved computational efficiency, with its capability to account for a specific soil–reinforcement failure condition, in a rational and systematic way. Application of this model is performed on the illustrative example of a cylindrical‐reinforced retaining wall by means of the kinematic approach of yield design, which provides upper bound estimates for the retaining wall stability factor. Nondimensional charts are finally presented assessing the influence of relevant parameters such as the curvature of the wall, the length of the reinforcing membranes or the reinforcement pull‐out resistance. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

桩承式路堤土拱效应的试验和数值研究

对桩承式路堤中的土拱效应进行了三维模型试验研究。根据试验结果,分析了应力折减系数大小和填土中的竖向应力分布特点。对比分析了实测值与Terzaghi方法和Hewlett & Randolph方法计算值之间的差异,验证了各方法的适用性。采用三维有限元对模型试验进行了数值模拟,重点分析了路堤填土的大主应力方向、应力水平和沉降模式等几个关键问题。试验和数值结果表明,Terzaghi方法与Hewlett、Randolph方法给出的应力折减系数数值接近,但填土中竖向应力分布模式截然不同,且与实测值有所区别。若在Terzaghi方法中采用合适的滑动面形状,得到的计算结果与实测值较吻合,能够反映竖向应力沿深度分布的特点     

加筋路堤稳定性综合分析方法

软土路基上加筋路堤的稳定性可以采用圆弧滑动极限平衡法进行分析,加筋路堤的破坏可以归纳为圆弧内加筋的破坏、圆弧外加筋的破坏以及加筋路堤的整体破坏.提出了计算加筋路堤稳定系数K的3个不同的稳定系数表达式,分别称之为圆弧内部稳定系数Kn、圆弧外部稳定系数Kw和整体稳定系数Kz,加筋路堤稳定系数K取其中的最小值.采用该方法对一加筋路堤破坏实例进行稳定性综合分析,得到的对应于最小稳定系数的滑移面与实际滑移面比较吻合.     

A multiphase approach for evaluating the horizontal and rocking impedances of pile group foundations

This paper advocates the use of a multiphase model, already developed for static or quasi‐static geotechnical engineering problems, for simulating the behaviour of piled raft foundations subject to horizontal as well as rocking dynamic solicitations. It is shown that such a model, implemented in a FEM code, yields appropriate predictions for the foundation impedance characteristics, provided that shear and bending effects in the piles are taken into account, thus corroborating the findings of the asymptotic homogenization theory. Besides, it is notably pointed out that such a multiphase‐based computational tool makes it possible to assess the dynamic behaviour of pile groups in a much quicker way than when using direct numerical simulations, which may face oversized problems when large pile groups are concerned. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

带桩筏基系统的弹塑性分析与设计方法研究

采用ABAQUS有限元程序中的线性扩展D-P模型对带桩筏基下的地基土进行弹塑性模拟,建立了带桩筏基系统的ABAQUS程序三维有限元模型。经比较各种桩、筏基础的内力与沉降关系计算结果,得到了带桩筏基的一些工作特性。在此基础上结合《建筑地基基础设计规范》(GB5007-2002),改进了传统的复合桩基设计方法,讨论了“三阶段”设计理念的可行性,并将其应用于工程实例。分析结果表明,改进的复合桩基设计方法和“三阶段”设计方法较常规设计方法更加经济合理。     

桩承式围堤对邻近桥梁桩基的影响分析

桩承式围堤是将上部围堤或堆载荷重通过桩筏基础传递到深层较硬的土层,以减少由于围堤或堆载对邻近桩基产生负摩阻力和侧向推力的一种围堤式构筑物。采用基于Mindlin应力解的桩伐基础简化分析方法、弹性和弹塑性三维数值模拟了嘉兴港海盐港区围堤对杭州湾跨海大桥产生的负摩阻力和侧向推力。通过上述3种方法的分析比较,结果表明,采用的简化分析方法与弹性和弹塑性三维数值模拟结果吻合较好,可作为桩承式围堤结构基础的分析和设计方法。     

桩承式路堤土拱形成及荷载传递机制离散元分析

土拱效应是桩承式路堤中影响荷载传递的关键因素。基于前人的室内模型试验,建立了桩承式路堤离散元（DEM）数值分析模型。基于路堤中应力偏转规律对土拱随桩土相对位移的形成规律进行了分析。在该基础上提出了合理拱轴线土拱模型,并引入荷载传递系数? 对土拱与土拱下方路堤填料间的荷载传递进行量化分析。模拟结果表明,桩土相对位移引起路堤中应力主方向发生偏转并形成虚拟土拱;土拱形态及高度随桩土相对位移的变化而变化,最大拱高约0.8倍桩净间距;? 随土拱高度的增加呈对数关系减小。     

Finite element simulations of the behavior of piled‐raft foundations using a multiphase model

Finite element simulations of the behavior of a piled raft foundation have been carried out using a multiphase model conceived as an improved homogenization approach. According to this model, the ground reinforced by a group of piles is treated as a homogeneous continuous medium. In this approach, no specific interface elements are necessary to account for the mechanical interaction between the piles and the ground: this interaction is described by means of two scalar parameters, one stiffness parameter and one which can easily be derived from the maximum ground‐pile friction. The implementation of the model into a finite element code provides an efficient tool for the analysis of the influence of the pile number or length on the settlement and bearing capacity of a square piled raft foundation and of the way the total applied load is shared between the raft and the piles. Results are compared with a standard 3D finite element analysis. The comparison highlights the fact that the proposed approach remains to be improved to account for tip resistance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

城市垃圾填埋场的地震响应及稳定性分析

对典型构型填埋场的二维地震响应进行了详细计算,目的是考察不同强度地震动作用下填埋场的稳定性,评价影响填埋场稳定性的主要因素,及各因素之间的相对重要性。计算结果显示：（1）覆盖层的稳定性主要依赖于垃圾土的材料属性、填埋场高度、输入地震动的频谱特性、以及场地条件等参数;（2）衬垫层的稳定性取决于输入地震动的加速度峰值、卓越周期和填埋场的基本自振周期。     

Simple superposition approach for dynamic analysis of piled embedded footings

The effectiveness and accuracy of the superposition method in assessing the dynamic stiffness and damping coefficients (impedance functions) of embedded footings supported by vertical piles in homogeneous viscoelastic soil is addressed. To this end, the impedances of piled embedded footings are compared to those obtained by superposing the impedance functions of the corresponding pile groups and embedded footings treated separately, with the magnitude of the relative average differences being around 10–30%. The results are presented in a set of dimensionless graphs and simple expressions that can be used to estimate the dynamic stiffness and damping of piled embedded footings, provided that the impedance functions of the two individual components are known. This is precisely the reason why the superposition approach studied here is appealing, because such impedance functions for both embedded footings and pile groups are available for a wide range of cases. How to estimate the kinematic response functions of the system when those of the individual components are known is also discussed. To address the problem, parametric analyses performed using a 3D frequency‐domain elastodynamic BEM‐FEM formulation are presented for different pile–soil stiffness contrasts, embedment depths, pile‐to‐pile separations and excitation frequencies. Vertical, horizontal, rocking, and cross‐coupled horizontal‐rocking impedance functions, together with translational and rotational kinematic response functions, are discussed. The results suggest that the superposition concept, in conjunction with a correction strategy as that presented herein, can be employed in geotechnical design. For kinematic effects, the response functions of the embedded footing are found to provide reasonable estimates of the system's behaviour. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A simplified analysis method for piled raft foundations in non‐homogeneous soils

A simplified method of numerical analysis based on elasticity theory has been developed for the analysis of axially and laterally loaded piled raft foundations embedded in non‐homogeneous soils and incorporated into a computer program “PRAB”. In this method, a hybrid model is employed in which the flexible raft is modelled as thin plates and the piles as elastic beams and the soil is treated as springs. The interactions between structural members, pile–soil–pile, pile–soil–raft and raft–soil–raft interactions, are approximated based on Mindlin's solutions for both vertical and lateral forces with consideration of non‐homogeneous soils. The validity of the proposed method is verified through comparisons with some published solutions for single piles, pile groups and capped pile groups in non‐homogeneous soils. Thereafter, the solutions from this approach for the analysis of axially and laterally loaded 4‐pile pile groups and 4‐pile piled rafts embedded in finite homogeneous and non‐homogeneous soil layers are compared with those from three‐dimensional finite element analysis. Good agreement between the present approach and the more rigorous finite element approach is demonstrated. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A simplified analysis method for piled raft and pile group foundations with batter piles

A simplified method of numerical analysis has been developed to estimate the deformation and load distribution of piled raft foundations subjected to vertical, lateral, and moment loads, using a hybrid model in which the flexible raft is modelled as thin plates and the piles as elastic beams and the soil is treated as springs. Both the vertical and lateral resistances of the piles as well as the raft base are incorporated into the model. Pile–soil–pile, pile–soil–raft and raft–soil–raft interactions are taken into account based on Mindlin's solutions for both vertical and lateral forces. The validity of the proposed method is verified through comparisons with several existing methods for single piles, pile groups and piled rafts. Workable design charts are given for the estimation of the lateral displacement and the load distribution of piled rafts from the stiffnesses of the raft alone and the pile group alone. Additionally, parametric studies were carried out concerning batter pile foundations. It was found that the use of batter piles can efficiently improve the deformation characteristics of pile foundations subjected to lateral loads. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A simplified analysis method for piled raft foundations subjected to ground movements induced by tunnelling

A simplified method of numerical analysis has been developed to estimate the deformation and load distribution of piled raft foundations subjected to ground movements induced by tunnelling and incorporated into a computer program ‘PRAB’. In this method, a hybrid model is employed in which the flexible raft is modelled as thin plates, the piles as elastic beams, and the soil is treated as interactive springs. The interactions between structural members, pile–soil–pile, pile–soil–raft and raft–soil–raft interactions, are modelled based on Mindlin's solutions for both vertical and lateral forces. The validity of the proposed method is verified through comparisons with some published solutions for single piles and pile groups subjected to ground movements induced by tunnelling. Thereafter, the solutions from this approach for the analysis of a pile group and a piled raft subjected to ground movements induced by tunnelling are compared with those from three‐dimensional finite difference program. Good agreements between these solutions are demonstrated. The method is then used for a parametric study of single piles, pile groups and piled rafts subjected to ground movements induced by tunnelling. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

岩溶区高速公路路堤及溶洞顶板稳定性数值分析

采用大型通用有限元软件ABAQUS对某室内模型试验进行了数值模拟,验证了三维有限元法进行洞室结构稳定性分析的可靠性。结合永武（永安-武平）高速公路A11合同段岩溶地质资料,将溶洞近似为与实际相近的椭球状,建立岩溶区路堤的三维有限元模型,分析溶洞顶板厚度、填方高度、溶洞位置以及溶洞充填状况对路堤及溶洞顶板稳定性的影响。为与现行顶板安全厚度确定方法进行比较,进行二维平面应变有限元分析。研究表明,对于较完整的顶板岩层,按顶板受拉破坏稳定安全系数为4确定的安全厚度过于保守,按梁板理论弯曲受拉破坏确定的安全厚度也偏于保守,是由于实际顶板岩层并不完全符合梁板理论的简化假设,而以有限元分析所得最大弯矩按梁板弯曲受拉破坏确定的安全厚度最为经济;实际工程中三维效应明显的溶洞,现行理论简化和二维数值分析法都较为粗糙,宜采用三维数值分析法。通过对上述问题的分析,为该高速公路岩溶区填方路段的设计和溶洞的处治与否提出指导性意见,已创造较好的经济效益和社会效益,可供类似工程应用时参考。     

基于变形的土石坝地震风险分析

土石坝抗震安全的设计一般立足于预防结构的倒塌,如何使土石坝结构地震破损控制在可接受的风险水平是一个值得研究的重要课题。应用地震风险分析理论,建立了土石坝地震风险分析方法,包括地震危险性分析、地震易损性分析和地震灾害损失评估3个方面。在场地地震危险性分析基础上,将基于性能的抗震设计思想应用于土石坝结构地震易损性分析中,以土石坝坝顶相对沉陷为评价指标,划分土石坝震损等级,最后结合地震经济损失分析,建立了土石坝地震风险计算模型,在技术和经济上对土石坝地震破损风险进行分析计算。以某高土石坝为例,用该模型对大坝的震害和经济损失进行了预测分析,其结论可为土石坝安全评价及投资决策等提供依据。     

Multiphase model for inclusion‐reinforced geostructures: Application to rock‐bolted tunnels and piled raft foundations

A multiphase model is proposed to describe the mechanical behaviour of geomaterials reinforced by linear inclusions. This macroscopic approach considers the reinforced soil or rock mass as the superposition of continuous media. Equations of motion and constitutive laws of the model are first derived. Its implementation in a finite element computer code is then detailed. A modified implicit algorithm for elastoplastic problems is proposed. The model and its implementation are fully validated for rock‐bolted tunnels (comparison with scale model experiments) and piled raft foundations (comparison with the classical ‘hybrid method’). The Messeturm case history is finally presented to assess the handiness of the approach for real structures. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.