Treatment of allograft recipients with donor-specific transfusion and anti-CD154 antibody leads to deletion of alloreactive CD8+ T cells and prolonged graft survival in a CTLA4-dependent manner

A two-element protocol consisting of one donor-specific transfusion (DST) plus a brief course of anti-CD154 mAb greatly prolongs the survival of murine islet, skin, and cardiac allografts. To study the mechanism of allograft survival, we determined the fate of tracer populations of alloreactive transgenic CD8+ T cells in a normal microenvironment. We observed that DST plus anti-CD154 mAb prolonged allograft survival and deleted alloreactive transgenic CD8+ T cells. Neither component alone did so. Skin allograft survival was also prolonged in normal recipients treated with anti-CD154 mAb plus a depleting anti-CD8 mAb and in C57BL/6-CD8 knockout mice treated with anti-CD154 mAb monotherapy. We conclude that, in the presence of anti-CD154 mAb, DST leads to an allotolerant state, in part by deleting alloreactive CD8+ T cells. Consistent with this conclusion, blockade of CTLA4, which is known to abrogate the effects of DST and anti-CD154 mAb, prevented the deletion of alloreactive transgenic CD8+ T cells. These results document for the first time that peripheral deletion of alloantigen-specific CD8+ T cells is an important mechanism through which allograft survival can be prolonged by costimulatory blockade. We propose a unifying mechanism to explain allograft prolongation by DST and blockade of costimulation.     

Skin allograft maintenance in a new synchimeric model system of tolerance.

Treatment of mice with a single donor-specific transfusion plus a brief course of anti-CD154 mAb uniformly induces donor-specific transplantation tolerance characterized by the deletion of alloreactive CD8+ T cells. Survival of islet allografts in treated mice is permanent, but skin grafts eventually fail unless recipients are thymectomized. To analyze the mechanisms underlying tolerance induction, maintenance, and failure in euthymic mice we created a new analytical system based on allo-TCR-transgenic hemopoietic chimeric graft recipients. Chimeras were CBA (H-2(k)) mice engrafted with small numbers of syngeneic TCR-transgenic KB5 bone marrow cells. These mice subsequently circulated a self-renewing trace population of anti-H-2(b)-alloreactive CD8+ T cells maturing in a normal microenvironment. With this system, we studied the maintenance of H-2(b) allografts in tolerized mice. We documented that alloreactive CD8+ T cells deleted during tolerance induction slowly returned toward pretreatment levels. Skin allograft rejection in this system occurred in the context of 1) increasing numbers of alloreactive CD8+ cells; 2) a decline in anti-CD154 mAb concentration to levels too low to inhibit costimulatory functions; and 3) activation of the alloreactive CD8+ T cells during graft rejection following deliberate depletion of regulatory CD4+ T cells. Rejection of healed-in allografts in tolerized mice appears to be a dynamic process dependent on the level of residual costimulation blockade, CD4+ regulatory cells, and activated alloreactive CD8+ thymic emigrants that have repopulated the periphery after tolerization.     

Type 1 IFN mediates cross-talk between innate and adaptive immunity that abrogates transplantation tolerance

TLR activation of innate immunity prevents the induction of transplantation tolerance and shortens skin allograft survival in mice treated with costimulation blockade. The mechanism by which TLR signaling mediates this effect has not been clear. We now report that administration of the TLR agonists LPS (TLR4) or polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (TLR3) to mice treated with costimulation blockade prevents alloreactive CD8(+) T cell deletion, primes alloreactive CTLs, and shortens allograft survival. The TLR4- and MyD88-dependent pathways are required for LPS to shorten allograft survival, whereas polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid mediates its effects through a TLR3-independent pathway. These effects are all mediated by signaling through the type 1 IFN (IFN-alphabeta) receptor. Administration of IFN-beta recapitulates the detrimental effects of TLR agonists on transplantation tolerance. We conclude that the type 1 IFN generated as part of an innate immune response to TLR activation can in turn activate adaptive immune responses that abrogate transplantation tolerance. Blocking of type 1 IFN-dependent pathways in patients may improve allograft survival in the presence of exogenous TLR ligands.     

Targeting LFA-1 and cd154 suppresses the in vivo activation and development of cytolytic (cd4-Independent) CD8+ T cells

Short-term immunotherapy targeting both LFA-1 and CD40/CD154 costimulation produces synergistic effects such that long-term allograft survival is achieved in the majority of recipients. This immunotherapeutic strategy has been reported to induce the development of CD4+ regulatory T cells. In the current study, the mechanisms by which this immunotherapeutic strategy prevents CD8+ T cell-dependent hepatocyte rejection in CD4 knockout mice were examined. Combined blockade of LFA-1 and CD40/CD154 costimulation did not influence the overall number or composition of inflammatory cells infiltrating the liver where transplanted hepatocytes engraft. Expression of T cell activation markers CD43, CD69, and adhesion molecule CD103 by liver-infiltrating cells was suppressed in treated mice with long-term hepatocellular allograft survival compared to liver-infiltrating cells of untreated rejector mice. Short-term immunotherapy with anti-LFA-1 and anti-CD154 mAb also abrogated the in vivo development of alloreactive CD8+ cytotoxic T cell effectors. Treated mice with long-term hepatocyte allograft survival did not reject hepatocellular allografts despite adoptive transfer of naive CD8+ T cells. Unexpectedly, treated mice with long-term hepatocellular allograft survival demonstrated prominent donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity responses, which were increased in comparison to untreated hepatocyte rejectors. Collectively, these findings support the conclusion that short-term immunotherapy with anti-LFA-1 and anti-CD154 mAbs induces long-term survival of hepatocellular allografts by interfering with CD8+ T cell activation and development of CTL effector function. In addition, these recipients with long-term hepatocellular allograft acceptance show evidence of immunoregulation which is not due to immune deletion or ignorance and is associated with early development of a novel CD8+CD25high cell population in the liver.     

Activation of alloreactive CD8+ T cells operates via CD4-dependent and CD4-independent mechanisms and is CD154 blockade sensitive

CD154, one of the most extensively studied T cell costimulation molecules, represents a promising therapeutic target in organ transplantation. However, the immunological mechanisms of CD154 blockade that result in allograft protection, particularly in the context of alloreactive CD4/CD8 T cell activation, remain to be elucidated. We now report on the profound inhibition of alloreactive CD8(+) T cells by CD154 blockade via both CD4-dependent and CD4-independent activation pathways. Using CD154 KO recipients that are defective in alloreactive CD8(+) T cell activation and unable to reject cardiac allografts, we were able to restore CD8 activation and graft rejection by adoptively transferring CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells from wild-type syngeneic donor mice. CD4-independent activation of alloreactive CD8(+) T cells was confirmed following treatment of wild-type recipients with CD4-depleting mAb, and by using CD4 KO mice. Comparable levels of alloreactive CD8(+) T cell activation was induced by allogenic skin engraftment in both animal groups. CD154 blockade inhibited CD4-independent alloreactive CD8(+) T cell activation. Furthermore, we analyzed whether disruption of CD154 signaling affects cardiac allograft survival in skin-sensitized CD4 KO and CD8 KO recipients. A better survival rate was observed consistently in CD4 KO, as compared with CD8 KO recipients. Our results document CD4-dependent and CD4-independent activation pathways for alloreactive CD8(+) T cells that are both sensitive to CD154 blockade. Indeed, CD154 blockade was effective in preventing CD8(+) T cell-mediated cardiac allograft rejection.     

CD4+ T regulatory cell induction and function in transplant recipients after CD154 blockade is TLR4 independent

Although the role of CD4(+) T regulatory cells (Treg) in transplantation tolerance has been established, putative mechanisms of Treg induction and function in vivo remain unclear. TLR4 signaling has been implicated in the regulation of CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg functions recently. In this study, we first examined the role of recipient TLR4 in the acquisition of operational CD4(+) Treg following CD154 blockade in a murine cardiac transplant model. Then, we determined whether TLR4 activation in allograft tolerant recipients would reverse alloimmune suppression mediated by CD4(+) Treg. We document that donor-specific immune tolerance was readily induced in TLR4-deficient recipients by a single dose of anti-CD154 mAb, similar to wild-type counterparts. The function and phenotype of CD4(+) Treg in both wild-type and TLR4 knockout long-term hosts was demonstrated by a series of depletion experiments examining their ability to suppress the rejection of secondary donor-type test skin grafts and to inhibit alloreactive CD8(+) T cell activation in vivo. Furthermore, TLR4 activation in tolerant recipients following exogenous LPS infusion in conjunction with donor-type skin graft challenge, failed to break Treg-mediated immune suppression. In conclusion, our data reveals a distinctive property of CD4(+) Treg in tolerant allograft recipients, whose induction and function are independent of TLR4 signaling.     

CD4 T cell-mediated alloresistance to fully MHC-mismatched allogeneic bone marrow engraftment is dependent on CD40-CD40 ligand interactions, and lasting T cell tolerance is induced by bone marrow transplantation with initial blockade of this pathway

Costimulatory blockade can be used to promote allogeneic marrow engraftment and tolerance induction, but on its own is not 100% reliable. We sought to determine whether one or the other of the CD4 or CD8 T cell subsets of the recipient was primarily responsible for resistance to allogeneic marrow engraftment in mice receiving costimulatory blockade, and to use this information to develop a more reliable, minimal conditioning regimen for induction of mixed chimerism and transplantation tolerance. We demonstrate that a single anti-CD40 ligand mAb treatment is sufficient to completely overcome CD4 cell-mediated resistance to allogeneic marrow engraftment and rapidly induce CD4 cell tolerance, but does not reliably overcome CD8 CTL-mediated alloresistance. The data suggest that costimulation, which activates alloreactive CTL, is insufficient to activate alloreactive CD4 cells when the CD40 pathway is blocked. The addition of host CD8 T cell depletion to anti-CD40 ligand treatment reliably allows the induction of mixed chimerism and donor-specific skin graft tolerance in 3 Gy-irradiated mice receiving fully MHC-mismatched bone marrow grafts. Thus, despite the existence of multiple costimulatory pathways and pathways of APC activation, our studies demonstrate an absolute dependence on CD40-mediated events for CD4 cell-mediated rejection of allogeneic marrow. Exposure to donor bone marrow allows rapid tolerization of alloreactive CD4 cells when the CD40 pathway is blocked, leading to permanent marrow engraftment and intrathymic tolerization of T cells that develop subsequently.     

CTLA-4 engagement and regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells independently control CD8+-mediated responses under costimulation blockade

Blockade of costimulatory signals is a promising therapeutic target to prevent allograft rejection. In this study, we sought to characterize to what extent CTLA-4 engagement contributes to the development of transplantation tolerance under the cover of CD40/CD40L and CD28/CD86 blockade. In vitro, we found that inhibition of the primary alloresponse and induction of alloantigen hyporesponsiveness by costimulation blockade was abrogated by anti-CTLA-4 mAb. In addition, regulatory CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells (T(REG)) were confirmed to play a critical role in the induction of hyporesponsiveness by anti-CD40L and anti-CD86 mAb. Our data indicated that CTLA-4 engagement is not required for activation or suppressor function of T(REG). Instead, in the absence of either CTLA-4 signaling or T(REG), CD8(+) T cell division was enhanced, whereas the inhibition of CD4(+) T cell division by costimulation blockade remained largely unaffected. In vivo, the administration of additional anti-CTLA-4 mAb abrogated anti-CD40L- and anti-CD86 mAb-induced cardiac allograft survival. Correspondingly, rejection was accompanied by enhanced allograft infiltration of CD8(+) cells. We conclude that CTLA-4 signaling and T(REG) independently cooperate in the inhibition of CD8(+) T cell expansion under costimulation blockade.     

Critical role of CD4 help in CD154 blockade-resistant memory CD8 T cell activation and allograft rejection in sensitized recipients

Allograft rejection in sensitized recipients remains the major problem in clinical organ transplantation. We have developed a donor-type skin-sensitized mouse cardiac allograft model (BALB/c-->C57BL/6) in which both rejection (<5 days) and alloreactive CD8 activation are resistant to CD154 blockade. First, we attempted to elucidate why CD154 blockade fails to protect cardiac grafts in sensitized recipients. The gene array analysis has revealed that treatment with anti-CD154 mAb (MR1) had distinctive impact on host immunity in naive vs sensitized animals. Unlike in naive counterparts, host sensitization mitigated the impact of CD154 blockade on critical immune signaling pathways. Indeed, we identified 3234 genes in cardiac grafts that were down-regulated by MR1 in naive (at least 5-fold), but remained unaffected in sensitized hosts. Moreover, MR1 treatment failed to prevent accumulation of CD4 T cells in cardiac allografts of sensitized recipients. Then, to determine the role of CD4 help in CD154 blockade-resistant immune response, we used CD4-depleting and CD4-blocking Ab, in conjunction with MR1 treatment. Our data revealed that CD154 blockade-resistant CD8 activation in sensitized mice was dependent on CD4 T cells. In the absence of CD4 help, CD154 blockade prevented differentiation of alloreactive CD8 T cells into CTL effector/memory cells and abrogated acute rejection (cardiac graft survival for >30 days), paralleled by selective target gene depression at the graft site. These results provide the rationale to probe potential synergy of adjunctive therapy targeting CD4 and CD154 to overcome graft rejection in sensitized recipients.     

The role of the CD134-CD134 ligand costimulatory pathway in alloimmune responses in vivo

The CD134-CD134 ligand (CD134L) costimulatory pathway has been shown to be critical for both T and B cell activation; however, its role in regulating the alloimmune response remains unexplored. Furthermore, its interactions with other costimulatory pathways and immunosuppressive agents are unclear. We investigated the effect of CD134-CD134L pathway blockade on allograft rejection in fully MHC-mismatched rat cardiac and skin transplantation models. CD134L blockade alone did not prolong graft survival compared with that of untreated recipients, and in combination with donor-specific transfusion, cyclosporine, or rapamycin, was less effective than B7 blockade in prolonging allograft survival. However, in combination with B7 blockade, long-term allograft survival was achieved in all recipients (>200 days). Moreover, this was synergistic in reducing the frequency of IFN-gamma-producing alloreactive lymphocytes and inhibiting the generation of activated/effector lymphocytes. Most impressively, this combination prevented rejection in a presensitized model using adoptive transfer of primed lymphocytes into athymic heart transplant recipients. In comparison to untreated recipients (mean survival time (MST): 5.3 +/- 0.5 days), anti-CD134L mAb alone modestly prolonged allograft survival (MST: 14 +/- 2.8 days) as did CTLA4Ig (MST: 21.5 +/- 1.7 days), but all grafts were rejected within 24 days. Importantly, combined blockade further and significantly prolonged allograft survival (MST: 75.3 +/- 12.7 days) and prevented the expansion and/or persistence of primed/effector alloreactive T cells. Our data suggest that CD134-CD134L is a critical pathway in alloimmune responses, especially recall/primed responses, and is synergistic with CD28-B7 in mediating T cell effector responses during allograft rejection. Understanding the mechanisms of collaboration between these different pathways is important for the development of novel strategies to promote long-term allograft survival.     

The role of the IL-2 pathway in costimulation blockade-resistant rejection of allografts.

Blockade of the CD40 and CD28 costimulatory pathways significantly prolongs allograft survival; however, certain strains of mice (i.e., C57BL/6) are relatively resistant to the effects of combined CD40/CD28 blockade. We have previously shown that the costimulation blockade-resistant phenotype can be attributed to a subset of CD8+ T cells and is independent of CD4+ T cell-mediated help. Here we explore the role of the IL-2 pathway in this process using mAbs against the high affinity IL-2R, CD25, and IL-2 in prolonging skin allograft survival in mice receiving combined CD40/CD28 blockade. We have also investigated the effects of treatment on effector function by assessment of cytotoxicity and the generation of IFN-gamma-producing cells in response to allogeneic stimulators as well as proliferation in an in vivo graft-vs-host disease model. We find that additional blockade of either CD25 or IL-2 significantly extends allograft survival beyond that in mice receiving costimulation blockade alone. This correlates with diminished frequencies of IFN-gamma-producing allospecific T cells and reduced CTL activity. Anti-CD25 therapy also synergizes with CD40/CD28 blockade in suppressing proliferative responses. Interestingly, depletion of CD4+ T cells, but not CD8+ cells, prevents prolongation in allograft survival, suggesting an IL-2-independent role for regulation in extended survival.     

Critical role of OX40 in CD28 and CD154-independent rejection

Blocking both CD28 and CD154 costimulatory pathways can induce transplant tolerance in some, but not all, transplant models. Under stringent conditions, however, this protocol often completely fails to block allograft rejection. The precise nature of such CD28/CD154 blockade-resistant rejection is largely unknown. In the present study we developed a new model in which both CD28 and CD154, two conventional T cell costimulatory molecules, are genetically knocked out (i.e., CD28/CD154 double-knockout (DKO) mice) and used this model to examine the role of novel costimulatory molecule-inducible costimulator (ICOS), OX40, 4-1BB, and CD27 in mediating CD28/CD154-independent rejection. We found that CD28/CD154 DKO mice vigorously rejected fully MHC-mismatched DBA/2 skin allografts (mean survival time, 12 days; n = 6) compared with the wild-type controls (mean survival time, 8 days; n = 7). OX40 costimulation is critically important in skin allograft rejection in this model, as blocking the OX40/OX40 ligand pathway, but not the ICOS/ICOS ligand, 4-1BB/4-1BBL, or CD27/CD70 pathway, markedly prolonged skin allograft survival in CD28/CD154 DKO mice. The critical role of OX40 costimulation in CD28/CD154-independent rejection is further confirmed in wild-type C57BL/6 mice, as blocking the OX40/OX40 ligand pathway in combination with CD28/CD154 blockade induced long term skin allograft survival (>100 days; n = 5). Our study revealed a key cellular mechanism of rejection and identified OX40 as a critical alternative costimulatory molecule in CD28/CD154-independent rejection.     

CD154 blockade alters innate immune cell recruitment and programs alloreactive CD8+ T cells into KLRG-1(high) short-lived effector T cells

CD154/CD40 blockade combined with donor specific transfusion remains one of the most effective therapies in prolonging allograft survival. Despite this, the mechanisms by which these pathways synergize to prevent rejection are not completely understood. Utilizing a BALB/c (H2-K(d)) to B6 (H2-K(b)) fully allogeneic skin transplant model system, we performed a detailed longitudinal analysis of the kinetics and magnitude of CD8(+) T cell expansion and differentiation in the presence of CD154/CD40 pathway blockade. Results demonstrated that treatment with anti-CD154 vs. DST had distinct and opposing effects on activated CD44(high) CD62L(low) CD8(+) T cells in skin graft recipients. Specifically, CD154 blockade delayed alloreactive CD8(+) T cell responses, while DST accelerated them. DST inhibited the differentiation of alloreactive CD8(+) T cells into multi-cytokine producing effectors, while CD40/CD154 blockade led to the diminution of the KLRG-1(low) long-lived memory precursor population compared with either untreated or DST treated animals. Moreover, only CD154 blockade effectively inhibited CXCL1 expression and neutrophil recruitment into the graft. When combined, anti-CD154 and DST acted synergistically to profoundly diminish the absolute number of IFN-γ producing alloreactive CD8(+) T cells, and intra-graft expression of inflammatory chemokines. These findings demonstrate that the previously described ability of anti-CD154 and DST to result in alloreactive T cell deletion involves both delayed kinetics of T cell expansion and differentiation and inhibited development of KLRG-1(low) memory precursor cells.     

Characterization of virus-mediated inhibition of mixed chimerism and allospecific tolerance.

Simultaneous blockade of the CD28 and CD40 T cell costimulatory pathways has been shown to effectively promote skin allograft survival in mice. Furthermore, blockade of one or both of these pathways has played a central role in the development of strategies to induce mixed hematopoietic chimerism and allospecific tolerance. It has recently been observed that the beneficial effects of CD40 blockade and donor splenocytes in prolonging skin graft survival can be abrogated by some viral infections, including lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). In this study, we show that LCMV infection prevents prolonged allograft survival following CD28/CD40 combined blockade. We further show that LCMV prevents the induction of allospecific tolerance and mixed hematopoietic chimerism, while delay of infection for 3-4 wk posttransplant has no effect on tolerance induction. Because of reports of anti-H-2(d) activity following LCMV infection, we assayed the ability of LCMV-specific T cells to respond to alloantigen at a single cell level. Although we confirm that LCMV infection induces the generation of alloreactive cells, we also demonstrate that LCMV-specific T cells do not divide in response to alloantigen. The alloresponse suppressed by costimulation blockade is restored by LCMV infection and correlates with increased dendritic cell maturation. We hypothesize that the costimulation blockade-resistant rejection mediated by LCMV could be partly attributable to the up-regulation of alternative costimulatory pathways subsequent to LCMV-induced dendritic cell maturation.     

The CD154-CD40 T cell costimulation pathway is required for host sensitization of CD8(+) T cells by skin grafts via direct antigen presentation

Although the CD154-CD40 T cell costimulation pathway has been shown to mediate alloimmune responses in normal recipients, little is known about its role in sensitized hosts. In this work, by using novel models of cardiac allograft rejection in skin-sensitized CD154- and CD40-deficient mice, we reaffirm the key role of CD154-CD40 signaling in host sensitization to alloantigen in vivo. First, we identified CD8(+) T cells as principal effectors in executing accelerated rejection in our model. Disruption of CD154-CD40 signaling in recipients at the T cell side (CD154-deficient) but not at the APC side (CD40-deficient) abrogated accelerated (<2 days) rejection and resulted in long-term (>100 days) graft survival. This suggests that the CD154-dependent mechanism in host CD8(+) T cell sensitization operates via the direct Ag presentation. Then, in comparative studies of alloimmune responses in CD154-deficient and wild-type recipients, we showed that, although alloreactive B cell responses were inhibited, alloreactive T cell responses were down-regulated selectively in the CD8(+) T cell compartment, leaving CD4(+) T cells largely unaffected. This unique alteration in host alloreactivity, seen not only in peripheral lymphocytes but also in allograft infiltrate, may represent the key mechanism by which disruption of CD154-CD40 signaling prevents sensitization to alloantigen in vivo and leads to long-term allograft survival.     

A novel alloantigen-specific CD8+PD1+ regulatory T cell induced by ICOS-B7h blockade in vivo

Delayed ICOS-B7h signal blockade promotes significant prolongation of cardiac allograft survival in wild-type but not in CD8-deficient C57BL/6 recipients of fully MHC-mismatched BALB/c heart allografts, suggesting the possible generation of CD8(+) regulatory T cells in vivo. We now show that the administration of a blocking anti-ICOS mAb results in the generation of regulatory CD8(+) T cells. These cells can transfer protection and prolong the survival of donor-specific BALB/c, but not third party C3H, heart grafts in CD8-deficient C57BL/6 recipients. This is unique to ICOS-B7h blockade, because B7 blockade by CTLA4-Ig prolongs graft survival in CD8-deficient mice and does not result in the generation of regulatory CD8(+) T cells. Those cells localize to the graft, produce both IFN-gamma and IL-4 after allostimulation in vitro, prohibit the expansion of alloreactive CD4(+) T cells, and appear to mediate a Th2 switch of recipient CD4(+) T cells after adoptive transfer in vivo. Finally, these cells are not confined to the CD28-negative population but express programmed death 1, a molecule required for their regulatory function in vivo. CD8(+)PD1(+) T cells suppress alloreactive CD4(+) T cells but do not inhibit the functions by alloreactive CD8(+) T cells in vitro. These results describe a novel allospecific regulatory CD8(+)PD1(+) T cell induced by ICOS-B7h blockade in vivo.     

Blockade of CD40-mediated signaling is sufficient for inducing islet but not skin transplantation tolerance

Treatment of mice with a single donor-specific transfusion (DST) plus a brief course of anti-CD154 mAb to block CD40-mediated signaling uniformly induces donor-specific transplantation tolerance. Survival of islet allografts in treated mice is permanent, but skin grafts eventually fail unless recipients are thymectomized. The nature of the cellular mechanisms involved and the basis for the difference in survival of islet vs skin allografts are not known. In this study, we used CD40 knockout mice to investigate the role of CD40-mediated signaling in each component of the tolerance induction protocol: the DST, the graft, and the host. When CD40-mediated signaling was eliminated in only the DST or the graft, islet allografts were rapidly rejected. However, when CD40 signaling was eliminated in the host, approximately 40% of the islet allografts survived. When CD40 signaling was eliminated in the DST, the graft, and the host, islet grafts survived long term (>84 days), whereas skin allografts were rapidly rejected ( approximately 13 days). We conclude that transplantation tolerance induction in mice treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb requires blockade of CD40-mediated signaling in the DST, the graft, and the host. Blockade of CD40-mediated signaling is necessary and sufficient for inducing islet allograft tolerance and is necessary but not sufficient for long-term skin allograft survival. We speculate that a requirement for regulatory CD4(+) T cells in skin allograft recipients could account for this differential response to tolerance induction.     

Analysis of the underlying cellular mechanisms of anti-CD154-induced graft tolerance: the interplay of clonal anergy and immune regulation

Although it has been shown that CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (T(reg)) contribute to long-term graft acceptance, their impact on the effector compartment and the mechanism by which they exert suppression in vivo remain unresolved. Using a CD4(+) TCR transgenic model for graft tolerance, we have unveiled the independent contributions of anergy and active suppression to the fate of immune and tolerant alloreactive T cells in vivo. First, it is shown that anti-CD154-induced tolerance resulted in the abortive expansion of the alloreactive, effector T cell pool. Second, commensurate with reduced expansion, there was a loss of cytokine production, activation marker expression, and absence of memory T cell markers. All these parameters defined the tolerant alloreactive T cells and correlated with the inability to mediate graft rejection. Third, the tolerant alloreactive T cell phenotype that is induced by CD154 was reversed by the in vivo depletion of T(reg). Reversal of the tolerant phenotype was followed by rapid rejection of the allograft. Fourth, in addition to T(reg) depletion, costimulation of the tolerant alloreactive T cells or activation of the APC compartment also reverted alloreactive T cell tolerance and restored an activated phenotype. Finally, it is shown that the suppression is long-lived, and in the absence of anti-CD154 and donor-specific transfusion, these T(reg) can chronically suppress effector cell responses, allowing long-lived graft acceptance.     

T cells primed by Leishmania major infection cross-react with alloantigens and alter the course of allograft rejection

Alloreactive T lymphocytes can be primed through direct presentation of donor MHC:peptide complexes on graft cells and through indirect presentation of donor-derived determinants expressed by recipient APCs. The large numbers of determinants on an allograft and the high frequency of the alloreactive repertoire has further led to speculation that exposure to environmental Ags may prime T cells that cross-react with alloantigens. We sought to develop a model in which to test this hypothesis. We found that CD4(+) T cells obtained from C57BL/6 (B6) mice that clinically resolved Leishmania major infection exhibited statistically significant cross-reactivity toward P/J (H-2(p)) Ags compared with the response to other haplotypes. B6 animals that were previously infected with L. major specifically rejected P/J skin grafts with second set kinetics compared with naive animals. Although donor-specific transfusion combined with costimulatory blockade (anti-CD40 ligand Ab) induced prolonged graft survival in naive animals, the same treatment was ineffective in mice previously infected with L. major. The studies demonstrate that cross-reactive priming of alloreactive T cells can occur and provide direct evidence that such T cells can have a significant impact on the outcome of an allograft. The results have important implications for human transplant recipients whose immune repertoires may contain cross-reactively primed allospecific T cells.     

Heterologous Immunity Triggered by a Single,Latent Virus in Mus musculus: Combined Costimulation- and Adhesion- Blockade Decrease Rejection

The mechanisms underlying latent-virus-mediated heterologous immunity, and subsequent transplant rejection, especially in the setting of T cell costimulation blockade, remain undetermined. To address this, we have utilized MHV68 to develop a rodent model of latent virus-induced heterologous alloimmunity. MHV68 infection was correlated with multimodal immune deviation, which included increased secretion of CXCL9 and CXCL10, and with the expansion of a CD8^dim T cell population. CD8^dim T cells exhibited decreased expression of multiple costimulation molecules and increased expression of two adhesion molecules, LFA-1 and VLA-4. In the setting of MHV68 latency, recipients demonstrated accelerated costimulation blockade-resistant rejection of skin allografts compared to non-infected animals (MST 13.5 d in infected animals vs 22 d in non-infected animals, p<.0001). In contrast, the duration of graft acceptance was equivalent between non-infected and infected animals when treated with combined anti-LFA-1/anti-VLA-4 adhesion blockade (MST 24 d for non-infected and 27 d for infected, p = n.s.). The combination of CTLA-4-Ig/anti-CD154-based costimulation blockade+anti-LFA-1/anti-VLA-4-based adhesion blockade led to prolonged graft acceptance in both non-infected and infected cohorts (MST>100 d for both, p<.0001 versus costimulation blockade for either). While in the non-infected cohort, either CTLA-4-Ig or anti-CD154 alone could effectively pair with adhesion blockade to prolong allograft acceptance, in infected animals, the prolonged acceptance of skin grafts could only be recapitulated when anti-LFA-1 and anti-VLA-4 antibodies were combined with anti-CD154 (without CTLA-4-Ig, MST>100 d). Graft acceptance was significantly impaired when CTLA-4-Ig alone (no anti-CD154) was combined with adhesion blockade (MST 41 d). These results suggest that in the setting of MHV68 infection, synergy occurs predominantly between adhesion pathways and CD154-based costimulation, and that combined targeting of both pathways may be required to overcome the increased risk of rejection that occurs in the setting of latent-virus-mediated immune deviation.