Effect of exenatide on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin

This open-label study investigated the effect of exenatide coadministration on the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of digoxin. A total of 21 healthy male subjects received digoxin (day 1, 0.5 mg twice daily; days 2-12, 0.25 mg once daily) and exenatide (days 8-12, 10 microg twice daily). Digoxin plasma and urine concentrations were measured on days 7 and 12. Exenatide coadministration did not change the overall 24-hour steady-state digoxin exposure (AUCtau,ss) and Cmin,ss but caused a 17% decrease in mean plasma digoxin Cmax,ss (1.40 to 1.16 ng/mL) and an increase in digoxin tmax,ss (median increase, 2.5 hours). Although the decrease in digoxin Cmax,ss was statistically significant, peak concentrations were within the therapeutic concentration range in all subjects. Digoxin urinary pharmacokinetic parameters were not altered. Gastrointestinal symptoms, the most common adverse effects of exenatide, decreased over time. Exenatide administration does not cause any changes in digoxin steady-state pharmacokinetics that would be expected to have clinical sequelae; thus, dosage adjustment does not appear warranted, based on pharmacokinetic considerations.     

Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of quetiapine and some of its metabolites in Chinese suffering from schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION Quetiapine (QTP) is a novel atypical antipsychoticwhich is as effective as traditional antipsychotics. Itcauses less extrapyramidal side effects, hyperpro-lactinmia, QT interval prolongation, and agranulocyto-sis than other neuroleptics[1-3]. The commonly usedeffective dose ranged from 25 to 300 mg per day andeven over to 750 mg per day. In vivo, quetiapine sulfoxide (QTP-SF) is the ma-jor inactive metabolite. 7-Hydroxy-quetiapine (QTP-H) and 7-hydroxy-N-dealkyl-quetiap…     

Effect of roxithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin in volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of concomitant administration of roxithromycin on the plasma pharmacokinetics of lovastatin. METHODS: In an open, randomized, crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers received 80 mg lovastatin orally either alone or concomitantly with 300 mg roxithromycin after 5-day pretreatment with roxithromycin 300 mg daily. Plasma concentrations of lovastatin (lactone and acid) were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of lovastatin lactone with and without roxithromycin were maximum concentration (Cmax) 8.49+/-6.80/16.3+/-9.4 ng ml(-1), time to Cmax (tmax) 1.8+/-0.4/1.7+/-0.6 h, terminal plasma half-life (t1/2) 4.3+/-2.0/3.7+/-2.5 h, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) 53+/-60/85+/-67 ng ml(-1) h. The respective parameters of lovastatin acid were Cmax 24.6+/-13.4/17.8+/-11.0 ng ml(-1), tmax 3.7+/-1.1/4.1+/-0.7 h, t1/2 3.2+/-2.5/4.3+/-2.8 h, AUC0-infinity 149+/-123/105+/-58 ng ml(-1) h. Mean bioavailability of lovastatin lactone was lower and that of lovastatin acid was higher with concomitant treatment. However, the differences were significant only with respect to lovastatin lactone (AUC and Cmax) and Cmax of lovastatin acid. CONCLUSION: Roxithromycin does not influence the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin in such a way that dosage adjustment of lovastatin seems to be necessary during co-administration.     

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral levofloxacin in critically ill adults in a medical intensive care unit

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pharmacokinetic disposition of intravenous and oral levofloxacin in critically ill adults. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty critically ill patients in a medical intensive care unit (ICU). INTERVENTIONS: All patients received levofloxacin as part of their routine medical care. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed in 28 patients receiving intravenous levofloxacin. Ten of these patients subsequently were switched to oral levofloxacin and underwent a second pharmacokinetic evaluation during oral therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean +/- SD levofloxacin half-life, clearance at steady state, and volume of distribution in all 28 patients were 8.0 +/- 1.7 hours, 134 +/- 35 ml/minute, and 1.2 +/- 0.3 L/kg, respectively Maximum and minimum serum concentrations (Cmax and Cmin) and area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours (AUC(0-24)) in patients receiving levofloxacin 500 mg intravenously were 7.5 +/- 0.8 mg/L, 1.0 +/- 0.5 mg/L, and 66.1 +/- 15.7 mg x hour/L, respectively Observed Cmax, Cmin, and time at which maximum concentration was achieved after oral doses of levofloxacin 500 mg were 5.5 +/- 1.1 mg/L, 0.8 +/- 0.4 mg/L, and 1.3 +/- 0.4 hours, respectively. These values were significantly different (p < 0.05) from those observed after intravenous dosing in the same patients; other pharmacokinetic parameters were similar. Statistically significant increases (p < 0.05) in Cmax, Cmin, half-life, and AUC(0-24) were found in critically ill patients administered multiple doses of intravenous levofloxacin compared with historical data from healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The dosage regimen of intravenous levofloxacin 500 mg once/day appears adequate for most pathogens found in critically ill patients with normal renal function. Less susceptible pathogens may require an increased daily dose for more optimal therapy. Orally administered levofloxacin appears to be well absorbed in selected ICU patients and has pharmacokinetics similar to those of intravenously administered levofloxacin.     

Ketanserin, a novel 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist: monotherapy in essential hypertension

Blood pressure and heart rate, supine and standing, were studied in patients with essential hypertension during 8 weeks of oral therapy with two dosage schedules of ketanserin, 40 mg once and twice daily. Ketanserin caused significant reductions in both supine and standing blood pressure but no significant alterations in heart rate in both groups of patients. Measurements of blood pressure and heart rate over a 24 h period during steady state conditions revealed that maximal blood pressure reduction was correlated with time to peak plasma concentrations. Steady state plasma concentrations of ketanserin were significantly higher in the patients receiving 40 mg twice daily compared to 40 mg once daily. In the group with once daily treatment, tmax was 1.2 +/- 0.17 h, Css 13 +/- 4.3 ng/ml, Cmax 137 +/- 19.6 ng/ml and t1/2, z h. 9.6 +/- 1.27 h.     

Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of mycophenolic acid in stable lung transplant recipients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use is increasing in solid organ transplantation. Mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of MMF, is highly protein bound and only free MPA is pharmacologically active. The average MPA free fraction in healthy adult individuals, stable renal transplant recipients, and heart transplant recipients is approximately 2 to 3%. However, no data are currently available on MPA protein binding in stable lung transplant recipients and little is known regarding MPA's pharmacokinetic characteristics after lung transplantation. The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile and protein binding of MPA in this patient population. Seven patients were entered into the study. On administration of a steady-state morning MMF dose, blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 12 hours post-dose. Total MPA concentrations were measured by a validated HPLC method with UV detection and followed by ultrafiltration of pooled samples for free MPA concentrations. Area under the curve (AUC), peak concentration (Cmax), time to peak concentration (Tmax), trough concentration (Cmin), free fraction (f), and free MPA AUC were calculated by traditional pharmacokinetic methods. Patient characteristics included; 3 males and 4 females, an average of 4.4 years post-lung transplant (range, 0.3-11.5 yr), mean (+/- SD) age of 50 +/- 10 years and weight 69 +/- 20 kg. Mean albumin concentration was 37 +/- 3 g/L and serum creatinine was 142 +/- 49 micromol/L. All patients were on cyclosporine and prednisone. MMF dosage ranged from 1 to 3 g daily (35.5 +/- 14.1 mg/kg/d; range, 15.2-60.0 mg/kg/d). Mean (+/- SD) AUC was 45.78 +/- 18.35 microg.h/mL (range, 16.56-74.22 microg.h/mL), Cmax was 17.37 +/- 7.69 microg/mL (range, 4.92-26.63 microg/mL), Tmax was 1.2 +/- 0.4 hours (range, 1.0-2.0 h), Cmin was 3.12 +/- 1.41 microg/mL (range, 1.47-4.82 microg/mL), f was 2.90 +/- 0.56% (range, 2.00-3.40%), and free MPA AUC was 1.29 +/- 0.50 microg.h/mL (range, 0.54-1.88 microg.h/mL). This is the first study to determine these pharmacokinetic characteristics of MPA in the lung transplant population. Further studies should focus on identification of MMF dosing strategies that optimize immunosuppressive efficacy and minimize toxicity in lung allograft recipients.     

Plasma tenoxicam concentrations after single and multiple oral doses

The pharmacokinetics of single- and multiple-dose administration of tenoxicam 20 mg were evaluated in 8 healthy males. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) after the first dose was 2.76 +/- 0.48 micrograms/ml (mean +/- s.d.) and the time to reach Cmax (Tmax) was 5.0 +/- 3.0 h. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) after a single administration of tenoxicam was 242.5 +/- 73.5 micrograms x h/ml. The elimination half-life (t1/2) was 66.3 +/- 15.8 h and the plasma concentration at 24 hours after dosing (Cmin) was 1.84 +/- 0.33 micrograms/ml. Steady-state plasma concentrations of tenoxicam were virtually reached after 10 consecutive daily doses. At steady-state, Cmax averaged 13.63 +/- 3.33 micrograms/ml and Tmax remained 5.0 +/- 3.0 hours. AUC within a dosing interval at steady-state was 262.2 +/- 67.0 micrograms x h/ml, Cminss was 9.67 +/- 3.25 micrograms/ml, and t1/2 averaged 74.2 +/- 13.3 h. The average fluctuation during multiple-dose administration was 26.8 +/- 8.0% and the accumulation ratio was 5.82 +/- 0.60. Steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters predicted from the first-dose data slightly underestimated observed values, but the results supported the assumption of linear pharmacokinetics during multiple-dose tenoxicam administration.     

A comparative pharmacokinetic study of conventional propranolol and long acting preparation of propranolol in patients with cirrhosis and normal controls.

1 Six male patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and seven normal control subjects were each given 80 mg twice daily of conventional propranolol for 1 week and 160 mg once daily of a long acting preparation (LA) of propranolol for 1 week. 2 Plasma propranolol levels were measured at regular intervals on the first and seventh days of both weeks and also following an acute intravenous infusion of 10 mg propranolol on a separate occasion. 3 After the single intravenous dose the elimination half-life tended to be prolonged in the cirrhotic group (median 7.15 h) compared with controls (median 2.92 h) (P = 0.055). 4 After multiple oral dosing with 80 mg twice daily of conventional propranolol the steady-state plasma concentration (Css), area under the curve (AUC tau), peak concentration (Cmax) and trough concentration (Cmin) were significantly higher in cirrhotic patients and the peak: trough ratio (Cmax/Cmin) was significantly lower than controls. 5 After multiple oral dosing with 160 mg LA once daily Cmin was significantly higher than Cmax/min significantly lower in cirrhotic patients; Css, AUC and Cmax were higher than controls but not statistically different. 6 Within both subject groups the bioavailability of 80 mg twice daily of conventional propranolol tended to be greater than 160 mg LA once daily. Cmax was significantly higher in both groups and Css higher in the cirrhotic group with conventional propranolol. 7 In the cirrhotic group the mean reduction in supine heart rate in the steady state was 31.8% with conventional 80 mg twice daily propranolol and 23.75% with 160 mg LA once daily.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

多剂量口服硝苯地平缓释片的药动学及生物等效性研究

目的研究多剂量口服硝苯地平缓释片在人体内的药动学特点和两种硝苯地平缓释片的生物等效性.方法22名健康男性志愿者采用双周期交叉、自身对照试验设计.以尼群地平为内标,采用高效液相色谱-大气压化学源-质谱联用(HPLC-MS)的方法,测定人血浆中硝苯地平的浓度.将22名受试者的经时血药浓度录入DAS(ver 1.0)程序,得到药代动力学参数,并进行统计分析和生物等效性评价.结果多剂量口服 20 mg×7 d 受试和参比制剂后血浆中硝苯地平的Cmax分别为 52.5±27.4、54.0±31.2 ng·ml-1,Cmin分别为 5.4±4.1、6.2±5.9 ng·ml-1,Cav分别为 16.8±9.2、19.3±12.4 ng·ml-1,Tmax分别为 3.7±0.9、4.1±1.1 h,t1/2分别为 8.9±4.9、8.5±3.1 h,AUC0-τ分别为 403.4±221.0、461.9±296.6 ng·h·ml-1,AUC0-36h分别为 444.4±256.1、503.1±330.9 ng·h·ml-1,AUC0-∞分别为 482.1±268.9、542.3±348.4 ng·h·ml-1 ,DF分别为(299.8±117.7)%、(279.2±97.5)%.Tmax进行非参数秩和检验,Cmax、Cmin、Cav、DF、AUC0-τ、AUC0-36h、AUC0-∞经对数转换后做方差分析,并经双向单侧t检验,两制剂的Tmax、Cmax、Cmin、Cav、DF、AUC0-τ、AUC0-36h、AUC0-∞均无显著性差异(P＞0.05),受试制剂的Cav、DF、AUC0-36h、AUC0-τ、AUC0-∞的90%可信限落在参比制剂的80%～125%范围内;Cmax、Cmin的90%可信限落在参比制剂的70%～143%范围内.两种制剂的相对生物利用度为(100.6±38.6)%(AUC0-36h,T/AUC0-36h,R×100%).结论两种制剂具有生物等效性.     

Investigation of pharmacokinetic data of hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin and the flavonoids quercetin and isorhamnetin revealed from single and multiple oral dose studies with a hypericum extract containing tablet in healthy male volunteers

Hypericins, hyperforin and flavonoids are discussed as the main components contributing to the antidepressant action of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum). Therefore, the objective of the two open phase I clinical trials was to obtain pharmacokinetic data of these constituents from a hypericum extract containing tablet: hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin, the flavonoid aglycone quercetin, and its methylated form isorhamnetin. Each trial included 18 healthy male volunteers who received the test preparation, containing 900 mg dry extract of St John's wort (STW 3-VI, Laif 900), either as a single oral dose or as a multiple once daily dose over a period of 14 days. Concentration/time curves were determined for the five constituents, for 48 h after single dosing and for 24 h on day 14 at the end of 2 weeks of continuous daily dosing. After single dose intake, the key pharmacokinetic parameters were determined as follows: Hypericin: Area under the curve (AUC(0-infinity)) = 78.33 h x ng/ml, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) = 3.8 ng/ml, time to reach Cmax (tmax) = 7.9 h, and elimination half-life (t1/2) = 18.71 h; pseudohypericin: AUC(0-infinity) = 97.28 h x ng/ml, Cmax = 10.2 ng/ml, tmax = 2.7 h, t1/2 = 17.19 h; hyperforin: AUC(0-infinity) = 1550.4 h x ng/ml, Cmax = 122.0 ng/ml, tmax = 4.5 h, t1/2 = 17.47 h. Quercetin and isorhamnetin showed two peaks of maximum plasma concentration separated by about 3-3.5 h. Quercetin: AUC(0-infinity) = 417.38 h x ng/ml, Cmax (1) = 89.5 ng/ml, tmax (1) = 1.0 h, Cma (2) = 79.1 ng/ml, tmax (2) = 4.4 h, t1/2 = 2.6 h; isorhamnetin: AUC(0-infinity) = 155.72 h x ng/ml, Cmax (1) = 12.5 ng/ml, tmax (1) = 1.4 h, Cmax (2) = 14.6 ng/ml, tmax (2) = 4.5 h, t1/2 = 5.61 h. Under steady state conditions reached during multiple dose administration similar results were obtained. Further pharmacokinetic characteristics calculated from the obtained data were the mean residence time (MRT), the lag-time, the peak-trough fluctuation (PTF), the lowest observed plasma concentration (Cmin), and the average plasma concentration (Cav). The data obtained for the five consitituents generally corresponded well with values previously published. The trial preparation was well tolerated.     

Double dummy comparison between once and twice daily dosing with modified-release carbamazepine in epileptic patients.

1. Fourteen patients with refractory epilepsy on a twice daily regimen of modified-release carbamazepine (CBZ-MR. Tegretol Retard. Ciba Pharmaceuticals) completed a balanced, double-blind, double dummy, random order, crossover comparison of 8 weeks treatment with once (o.d.) and twice daily (b.d.) dosing. In order to obtain a profile of serum CBZ concentrations over 24 h on once daily dosing, patients were randomised to taking it in the morning (o.d. a.m.) or evening (o.d. p.m.) for 4 weeks. Each treatment was taken with a placebo of the other and total tablet numbers were matched. Blood sampling was undertaken 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after the morning tablets at the end of each 4 week treatment period. 2. Overall, trough serum drug concentrations (Cmin) were lower with once daily dosing (Cmin: b.d. 7.5 mg l-1, o.d. 6.5 mg l-1, P < 0.05, 95% CI of the difference -1.3 to -0.1), but no significant differences were found in average (Cav) or peak (Cmax) concentrations, AUC values or fluctuations in CBZ concentrations. 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters for CBZ 10.11 epoxide, the active metabolite of CBZ did not differ significantly between the dosage schedules. 4. Seizure control was similar during once and twice daily dosing with CBZ-MR (median seizures/month (range): b.d. 1 (0-14.5), o.d. 0.5 (0-11), NS, 95% CI of the difference -1.8 to + 0.25). 5. There were no differences in psychomotor performance between the treatment periods. 6. More patients (n = 11) preferred treatment (P < 0.05) with once daily than twice daily dosing (n = 3) with CBZ-MR. 7. Once daily dosing with CBZ-MR should be possible in the majority of patients receiving the drug as monotherapy.     

Investigation of the bioavailability of hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin and the flavonoids quercetin and isorhamnetin following single and multiple oral dosing of a hypericum extract containing tablet

The objective of these two open phase I clinical trials was the investigation of the bioavailability of five constituents from a hypericum extract containing tablet, which are discussed as the components contributing to the antidepressant action. Each trial included 18 healthy male volunteers who received the test preparation, containing 612 mg dry extract of St John's wort (STW-3, Laif 600), either as a single oral dose or as a multiple once daily dose over a period of 14 days. Concentration/time curves were determined for hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin, the flavonoid aglycone quercetin, and its methylated form isorhamnetin for 48 h after single dosing and for 24 h on day 14 at the end of 2 weeks of continuous daily dosing. After single dose intake, the key pharmacokinetic parameters were determined as follows: hypericin: area under the curve (AUC(0-infinity)) = 75.96 h x ng/ml, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) = 3.14 ng/ml, time to reach Cmax (t(max)) = 8.1 h, and elimination half-life (t1/2) = 23.76 h; pseudohypericin: AUC(0-infinity) = 93.03 h x ng/ml, Cmax = 8.50 ng/ml, t(max) = 3.0 h, t1/2 = 25.39 h; hyperforin: AUC(0-max) = 1009.0 h x ng/ml, Cmax = 83.5 nglml, t(max) = 4.4 h, t1/2 = 19.64 h. Quercetin and isohamnetin showed two peaks of maximum plasma concentration separated by about 4 h. Quercetin: AUC(0-infinity) = 318,7 h x ng/ml, Cmax (1) = 47.7 ng/ml, t(max) (1) = 1.17 h, Cmax (2) = 43.8 ng/ml, t(max) (2) = 5.47 h, t1/2 = 4.16 h; isorhamnetin: AUC(0-infinity) = 98.0 h x ng/ml, Cmax (1) = 7.6 ng/ml, t(max) (1) = 1.53 h, Cmax (2) = 9.0 ng/ml, t(max), (2) = 6.42 h, t1/2 = 4.45 h. Under steady state conditions reached during multiple dose administration similar results were obtained. Further pharmacokinetic characteristics calculated from the obtained data were the mean residence time (MRT), the lag-time, the peak-trough fluctuation (PTF), the lowest observed plasma concentration (Cmin), and the average plasma concentration (Cav). The data obtained for hypericin, pseudohypericin and hyperforin generally corresponded well with values previously published, with some deviations observed for the extent of absorption of hypericin and the time course of absorption and elimination of hyperforin. The kinetic characteristics of the hypericum flavonoids are reported here for the first time. The trial preparation was well tolerated.     

Tazarotene does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a norethindrone/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between oral tazarotene and an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone 1mg and ethinylestradiol 0.035 mg (Ortho-Novum 1/35).DESIGN: Two separate open-label, parallel-group, single-centre, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies.PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy women (age 20-55 years) completed Study I, with a duration of 64 days during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Ortho-Novum 1/35 was taken once daily from study day 0 (first cycle day 1) to day 61 (third cycle day 6), and oral tazarotene 1.1 mg was coadministered daily from study day 34 (second cycle day 7) to day 61. Twenty-nine healthy women (age 20-44 years) completed Study II, with a duration of 75 days during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Ortho-Novum 1/35 was taken once daily from study day 0 (first cycle day 1) to day 74 (third cycle day 19), and oral tazarotene 6 mg was coadministered daily from study day 48 (second cycle day 21) to day 74. In both studies, the pharmacokinetics of tazarotenic acid on study day 61 (third cycle day 6) were evaluated from plasma tazarotenic acid concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma norethindrone and ethinylestradiol were compared before and after tazarotene administration (cycle day 6 of the second and third cycles, respectively). Serum luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were compared before and after tazarotene administration (cycle days 2, 4 and 6 of the second and third cycles, respectively). In Study II, serum progesterone concentrations were also determined on cycle days 18 and 20 of the second and third cycles. Tazarotenic acid was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ethinylestradiol and norethindrone were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. LH and FSH were assayed by microparticle enzyme immunoassay in Study I and by double-antibody radioimmunoassay in Study II. Progesterone was determined by solid-phase radioimmunoassay.RESULTS: In Study I (tazarotene 1.1 mg), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 24 hours (AUC24) and the peak concentration in plasma (Cmax) for tazarotenic acid were 121 +/- 27 microg. h/L and 28.9 +/- 9.4 microg/L (mean +/- SD), respectively. In Study II (tazarotene 6 mg), AUC24 and Cmax for tazarotenic acid were 379 +/- 78 microg. h/L and 111 +/- 37 microg/L (mean +/- SD), respectively. In both studies, for both norethindrone and ethinylestradiol, the 90% CIs of AUC24 and Cmax on cycle day 6 before and after tazarotene administration were within the 80-125% boundary. In Study I, the 90% CIs of serum FSH and LH concentrations on cycle day 4 were within the 80-125% boundary. FSH and LH concentrations on cycle day 6 were marginally/partially outside the 80-125% boundary as a result of high variability. However, the mean FSH and LH serum concentrations on cycle day 6 of the third cycle were lower than those of the second cycle. In Study II, the 90% CIs of serum FSH, LH and progesterone concentrations were all within the 80-125% boundary, except for LH on cycle day 2. LH concentrations on cycle day 2 were marginally/partially outside the 80-125% boundary as a result of high variability. However, the mean serum LH concentration on cycle day 2 of the third cycle was lower than that of the second cycle.CONCLUSIONS: Oral tazarotene up to 6 mg once daily does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of Ortho-Novum 1/35.     

Bioequivalence of a novel high-dose oral formulation of alpha-dihydroergocryptine

The plasma pharmacokinetics of alpha-dihydroergocryptine (DHEC, CAS 14271-05-7) were investigated in 24 patients with Parkinson disease after the administration of repeated oral doses of 40 mg DHEC twice daily by means of a novel 40 mg DHEC tablet (Almirid 40 mg test T) and an established 20 mg DHEC tablet (Almirid 20 mg - reference R). The trial was conducted according to a randomised, controlled, open, within-subject cross-over design; steady-state was established by means of a stepwise up-titration from 5 to 40 mg b.i.d. from day D01 to D19; investigational treatments (40 mg DHEC b.i.d. by means of formulation R and T) were administered on day D20 and D21 according to a randomised, period-balanced within-subject cross-over; treatment with DHEC was down-titrated in stepwise fashion from day D22 to D34. Morning doses of 2 x 20 mg DHEC (reference) yielded a fast and relatively short lasting peak with a geometric mean Cmax of 2157 pg/mL (CV: 0.978) after a median tmax of 1.00 h. Cmin throughout the first 12 h was on average 189 pg/mL (CV: 0.908). There was a quite distinct diurnal effect: evening doses of 2 x 20 mg DHEC (treatment R), yielded a relatively lower exposure with geometric mean Cmax, Cav- and Cmin-values of 800 pg/mL (CV: 0.870), 389 pg/mL (0.813) and 177 pg/mL (CV: 0.942). In contrast, there was relatively little within-subject distinction between the two formulations: for the day profile after the morning dose, the estimated ratios of the true means (Pr:R) for Cmax Cmin and Cav were 1.18 (90% CI: 0.96 to 1.43 - CVm: 0.394), 0.96 (90% CI: 0.86 to 1.09 - CVm: 0.230) and 1.06 (90% CI: 0.93 to 1.21 - CVm: 0.254); for the night profile after the evening dose, the estimated ratio of the true means (muT:muR) for Cmax, Cmin and Cav were 1.11 (90% CI: 0.91 to 1.35 - CVm: 0.395), 1.07 (90% CI: 0.95 to 1.20 - CVm: 0.232) and 1.07 (90% CI: 0.95 to 1.20 - CVm: 0.220). In view of important medical-ethical constraints not to expose an unreasonably high number of subjects, these findings could be accepted as a sufficient demonstration of bioequivalence.     

Determination of azelnidipine by LC-ESI-MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in healthy Chinese volunteers

A simple, rapid and sensitive high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS) assay for determination of azelnidipine in human plasma using perospirone as the internal standard (IS) was established. After adjustment to a basic pH with sodium hydroxide solution, plasma samples were extracted with diethyl ether and separated on a C18 column with a mobile phase of methanol-5 mM ammonium acetate solution (90:10, v/v). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.20 ng/ml. After administration of a single dose of azelnidipine 8mg and 16 mg, respectively; the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 h to 96 h (AUC(0-96) were (186 +/- 47) ng ml(-1) h, (429 +/- 145) ng ml(-1) h, respectively; clearance rate (CL/F) were (45.94 +/- 11.61), (42.11 +/- 14.23) L/h, respectively; peak plasma concentration Cmax were (8.66 +/- 1.15), (19.17 +/- 4.13) ng/ml, respectively; apparent volume of distribution (Vd) were (1749 +/- 964), (2480 +/- 2212) L, respectively; time to Cmax (Tmax) were (2.8 +/- 1.2), (3.0 +/- 0.9) h, respectively; elimination half-life (t(1/2beta)) were (22.8 +/- 2.4), (23.5 +/- 4.2) h, respectively; and MRT were (25.7 +/- 1.3), (26.2 +/- 2.2) h, respectively; The essential pharmacokinetic parameters after oral multiple doses (8 mg, q.d.) were as follows: (Cmax) ss, (15.04 +/- 2.27) ng/ml; (Tmax) ss, (2.38 +/- 0.92) h; (Cmin) ss, (3.83 +/- 0.94) ng/ml; C(av), (7.05 +/- 1.54) ng/ml; DF, (1.62 +/- 0.26); AUCss, (169.19 +/- 36.87) ng ml(-1) h.     

Intrapulmonary pharmacodynamics of high-dose levofloxacin in subjects with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The objective of this study was to determine the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenously administered levofloxacin in subjects with stable chronic lung disease. Three doses of 1000 mg levofloxacin were administered once daily to 16 adult subjects divided into four groups of 4 subjects each. Standardised bronchoscopy and timed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were performed at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h following administration of the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to drug administration, at the end of the last infusion (maximum concentration (Cmax)) and at the time of BAL. Levofloxacin was measured using a high-performance liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric (HPLC/MS/MS) technique. Plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar cell (AC) pharmacokinetics were derived using non-compartmental methods. Cmax/MIC(90) and area under the concentration-time curve for 0-24 h after the last dose (AUC(0-24 h)/MIC(90) ratios were calculated for respiratory pathogens with minimum inhibitory concentrations for 90% of the organisms (MIC(90)) of 0.03-2 microg/mL. The Cmax (mean+/-standard deviation), AUC(0-24h) and half-life were, respectively, 9.2+/-2.7 microg/mL, 130 microg h/mL and 8.7 h for plasma, 22.8+/-12.9 microg/mL, 260 microg h/mL and 7.0 h for ELF and 76.3+/-28.7 microg/mL, 1492 microg h/mL and 49.5 h for ACs. Levofloxacin concentrations were quantitatively greater in ACs than in ELF or plasma at all time points, however only the differences between AC concentration and ELF or plasma concentrations in the 4-h and 8-h time groups were statistically significant. Cmax/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios in ELF were, respectively, 11.4 and 130 for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 22.8 and 260 for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 91.2 and 1040 for Chlamydia pneumoniae and 760 and 8667 for Haemophilus influenzae. In ACs the ratios were 38.2 and 746 for M. pneumoniae, 76.3 and 1492 for S. pneumoniae, 305 and 5968 for C. pneumoniae and 2543 and 49 733 for H. influenzae. In conclusion, Cmax/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for once-daily administration of a 1000 mg dose of levofloxacin and are favourable for the treatment of respiratory infection in patients with chronic lung disease.     

Pharmacokinetic consideration on administration regimen of lamivudine in japanese patients infected with HIV-1

OBJECTIVE: The typical regimen for lamivudine is 150 mg bis in die (bid). However, pharmacokinetic values of lamivudine will differ among individual patients. In addition, few studies regarding the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in the Japanese people have so far been reported. Therefore, we have aimed to examine the variation in the pharmacokinetic values of lamiduvine present in six Japanese patients with HIV-1 infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lamivudine concentrations were measured in three hemophiliacs (HIV-1-asymptomatic carrier, AC) and three non-hemophiliacs (2 of these patients were AC and one had AIDS-related complex, ARC). In order to simulate the lamivudine plasma concentrations found in chronic oral administration, we added an absorption compartment to the two-compartment model. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD of Tmax, Cmax, AUC(0 - infinity) and t1/2beta were 1.2 +/- 0.5 (hours), 1,280 +/- 267 (ng/ml), 6,778 +/- 2,763 (ng x h/ml), and 10.3 +/- 4.7 (hours), respectively. Although these values were comparable on average to those previously reported, there were noticeable differences with respect to the various time courses of drug plasma concentration among each patient. CONCLUSION: Computations speculated that the trough and peak plasma concentrations as well as the AUC at steady-state change significantly depending on each patient. It suggests that individual pharmacokinetic values of lamivudine should be determined before deciding the optimal administration dose for specific patients.     

Pharmacokinetic monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplanted patients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressant drug used in association with cyclosporin and oral corticosteroids to prevent acute rejection following renal allograft transplantation. MMF is an ester pro-drug of mycophenolic acid (MFA), the true active species, into which it is completely transformed after oral administration. The recommended initial dose to prevent kidney transplant rejection is 2 g/day irrespective of body weight, 1 g twice daily. The goal of this study was to correlate dosage (fixed or by body weight) and toxic effects to some non-compartmental values such as peak level (Cmax), time to peak level (Tmax) and trough level (Cmin). In a small number of patients who had already reached the plasma steady state, we found a large inter-patient variability, while the same qualitative pharmacokinetic profile (as Tmax) was conserved. At plasma trough level > 4 microg/ml some serious toxic effects were observed, whereas at Cmin < 2 microg/ml, there were some cases of interstitial rejection. There was also a negative correlation between dosage and body weight, suggesting that dosages related to body weight might be better than fixed ones. Finally, monitoring plasma level of drug from transplantation to at least 12 months after surgery, at fixed MFA dosage, a small but significant decline of MFA plasma levels was found.     

家犬单剂量和多剂量口服阿昔莫司缓释制剂的药代动力学和生物等效性研究

目的研究阿昔莫司缓释片在家犬体内单剂量和多剂量的药代动力学和生物等效性。方法测定6只家犬单剂量和多剂量口服缓释片和普通胶囊后的血药浓度。结果阿昔莫司的药-时曲线符合非隔室模型。单剂量给药后，缓释片和普通胶囊的AUC分别为(158±30)和(147±37) μg·h·mL^-1；T_max分别为(4.3±0.8)和(2.6±1.3) h；C_max分别为(29±6)和(42±10) μg·mL^-1；T_1/2分别为(2.3±0.7)和(1.60±0.10) h；MRT分别为(6.0±0.8)和(3.9±0.7) h；F_r为(108±16)%。多剂量给药后，缓释片和普通胶囊的AUC分别为(209±23)和(195±26) μg·h·mL^-1；T_max分别为(6.3±0.8)和(3.4±1.5) h；C_max分别为(27±4)和(36±5) μg·mL^-1；Cmin分别为(2.2±1.0)和(0.20±0.20) μg·mL^-1；C_av分别为(8.7±1.0)和(8.1±1.1) μg·mL^-1；FI分别为(293±73)%和(448±91)%；F_r为(114±19)%。结论单剂量实验的双单侧检验结果表明：缓释片和普通胶囊生物等效；缓释片具有良好的缓释效果。多剂量实验结果表明：缓释片和普通胶囊生物等效；缓释片的波动系数优于普通胶囊。     

Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between lansoprazole or pantoprazole and theophylline

AIM: To study the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between lansoprazole or pantoprazole and theophylline at steady state. METHODS: Theophylline 200 mg extended-release formulation was administered twice daily on days 1-11 to 30 healthy, non-smoking males. On days 5-11, 15 subjects received concomitant lansoprazole 30 mg once daily (o.d.) and 15 subjects received concomitant pantoprazole 40 mg o.d. RESULTS: No significant changes in the steady-state theophylline maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), minimum plasma concentration (Cmin), area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 12-h dosing interval (AUC0-12), or apparent total oral clearance (CL/F) were observed within the two treatment groups when theophylline was administered alone or in combination with lansoprazole or pantoprazole. In addition, no significant differences in the changes of steady-state theophylline pharmacokinetics from day 4 to day 11 were noted between the two treatment groups. Treatment with theophylline in combination with either lansoprazole or pantoprazole was well tolerated. All adverse events were transient and rated mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of either lansoprazole or pantoprazole in healthy subjects does not significantly affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of theophylline at the therapeutic doses tested.