Iliocaval Skip Stent Reconstruction Technique for Chronic Bilateral Iliocaval Venous Occlusion

PurposeTo report safety and efficacy of a skip stent technique using nitinol stents in patients with chronic bilateral iliocaval venous occlusions.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of 48 consecutive patients (32 men; mean age, 40.7 years; age range, 18–68 years) with chronic bilateral iliocaval obstructions treated using a nonoverlapping stent technique was conducted at a single center. None of the patients had May-Thurner syndrome. Iliocaval confluence was treated by deploying a nitinol stent in inferior vena cava (IVC) and a nitinol stent in each common iliac vein close to the caval stent. Patency of stents was assessed by duplex US at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and yearly thereafter.ResultsRecanalization and stent reconstruction was technically successful in 47 (98%) patients. The sinus-XL venous stent was used to treat IVC (95 [100%]). Common iliac and external iliac veins were treated with sinus-Venous and VENOVO stents (80 [83%] and 16 [17%] limbs, respectively). External iliac and common femoral veins were treated with sinus-Venous and VENOVO stents (83 [92%] and 7 [18%] limbs, respectively). Early thrombosis (< 30 days) of the iliac vein with stent occurred in 2 limbs. Cumulative primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates at 30 months were 74%, 83%, and 97%.ConclusionsFindings of this study suggest that leaving a skipped lesion at the level of iliocaval confluence may not adversely affect stent patency. Patency rates were comparable with other reported techniques of stent reconstruction at the level of iliocaval confluence.     

No Advantage of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene and Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene–Covered Stents over Uncovered Nitinol Stents for Percutaneous Palliation of Malignant Infrahilar Biliary Obstruction: Results of a Single-Center Prospective Randomized Trial

PurposeTo prove that covered stents are more efficacious than uncovered stents regarding patency, safety, enabling of chemotherapy, and survival in percutaneous palliation of malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction.Materials and MethodsAfter failed endoscopic treatment, 154 patients with obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable infrahilar malignancy were randomly allocated to receive an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and fluorinated ethylene propylene–covered or an uncovered nitinol stent. Occlusion rate, patency, and survival were assessed. Safety and clinical success in terms of chemotherapy were compared.ResultsThree patients were excluded post hoc. Fifteen patients died within 7 d and were excluded from patency analysis. Occlusion rates were 32% (21 of 66) for covered and 29% (20 of 70) for uncovered stents (P = .7). Estimated median patency durations were 308 d (95% confidence interval [CI], 178–438 d) for covered and 442 d (95% CI, 172–712 d) for uncovered stents (P = .1). Serious adverse events (P = 1.0) and 30-day mortality (P = .5) were equivalent between groups. At hospital discharge, median bilirubin reduction of 8 mg/dL was found in both groups (P < .001). In the covered stent group, 35 patients (48%) received palliative chemotherapy, vs 29 (37%) in the uncovered stent group (P = .2). Estimated median survival times were 96 days (95% CI, 68–124 d) with covered stents and 75 days (95% CI, 42–108 d) with uncovered stents (P = .6).ConclusionsIn malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction not amenable to endoscopy, no improvement in patency or survival with percutaneously placed covered stents could be confirmed. Covered and uncovered stent types exhibit similar safety profiles and clinical success rates.     

Treatment of Arm Swelling in Hemodialysis Patients with Ipsilateral Arteriovenous Access and Central Vein Stenosis: Conversion to the Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow Graft versus Stent Deployment

PurposeTo compare outcomes after conversion of arteriovenous (AV) access to Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft vs stent deployment in patients with arm swelling owing to ipsilateral central vein stenosis.Materials and MethodsThis single-center retrospective study comprised 48 patients (19 men, mean age 58 y) with arm swelling ipsilateral to AV access and central vein stenosis over a 13-year period who had clinical follow-up and without prior central stents. Twenty-one patients underwent placement of a HeRO graft with anastomosis of the HeRO graft to the existing graft or fistula, and 27 patients underwent central venous stent deployment. Symptomatic improvement in arm swelling and access patency rates after intervention were ascertained from medical records.ResultsImprovement in swelling within 1 month after HeRO conversion and stent deployment was found in 95% and 89%, respectively (P = .62). Swelling eventually recurred in 16 patients (59%) treated with stents compared with 1 patient (5%) who underwent HeRO conversion (P < .001). Primary access patency was statistically significantly longer after HeRO conversions than stent deployments, with 6- and 12-month primary patency rates of 89% and 72% vs 47% and 11% (P < .001). HeRO conversions also resulted in longer 6- and 12-month secondary access patency rates (95% and 95% vs 79% and 58%, P = .006). Mean number of interventions per 1,000 access days to maintain secondary patency was 2.7 for the HeRO group vs 6.3 for the stent group.ConclusionsAlthough stent deployment and HeRO graft conversion are effective for alleviating arm swelling in the short term in patients receiving hemodialysis with clinically significant arm swelling and functioning AV access, the HeRO graft has more durable results.     

Lower Extremity Venous Stent Placement: A Large Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

PurposeTo study short-term and long-term outcomes of lower extremity venous stents placed at a single center and to characterize changes in vein diameter achieved by stent placement.Materials and MethodsA database of all patients who received lower extremity venous stents between 1996 and 2018 revealed 1,094 stents were placed in 406 patients (172 men, 234 women; median age, 49 y) in 513 limbs, including patients with iliocaval stents (9.4% acute thrombosis, 65.3% chronic thrombosis, 25.3% nonthrombotic lesions). Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were assessed for lower extremity venous stents at 1, 3, and 5 years using Kaplan-Meier analyses and summary statistics. Subset analyses and Cox regression were performed to identify risk factors for patency loss. Vein diameters and Villalta scores before and up to 12 months after stent placement were compared. Complication and mortality rates were calculated.ResultsPrimary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates at 5 years were 57.3%, 77.2%, and 80.9% by Kaplan-Meier methods and 78.6%, 90.3%, and 92.8% by summary statistics. Median follow-up was 199 days (interquartile range, 35.2–712.0 d). Patency rates for the subset of patients (n = 46) with ≥ 5 years of follow-up (mean ± SD 9.1 y ± 3.4) were nearly identical to cohort patency rates at 5 years. Patients with inferior vena cava stent placement (hazard ratio 2.11, P < .0001) or acute thrombosis (hazard ratio 3.65, P < .0001) during the index procedure had significantly increased risk of losing primary patency status. Vein diameters were significantly greater after stent placement. There were no instances of stent fracture, migration, or structural deformities. In patients with chronic deep vein thrombosis, Villalta scores significantly decreased after stent placement (from 15.7 to 7.4, P < .0001). Perioperative mortality was < 1%, and major perioperative complication rate was 3.7%.ConclusionsCavo-ilio-femoral stent placement for venous occlusive disease achieves improvement of vein disease severity scores, increase in treated vein diameters, and satisfactory long-term patency rates.     

Percutaneous Cystic Duct Interventions and Drain Internalization for Calculous Cholecystitis in Patients Ineligible for Surgery

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy drain internalization in patients with calculous cholecystitis who were not surgical candidates.Materials and MethodsPercutaneous cystic duct interventions were attempted in 17 patients (with the intent to place dual cholecystoduodenal stents) who were deemed unfit for surgery and had previously undergone percutaneous cholecystostomies for acute calculous cholecystitis. Baseline demographics, technical success, time from percutaneous cholecystostomy to internalization (dual cholecystoduodenal stent placement), stent patency duration, and adverse event rates were evaluated.ResultsFifteen (88%) of 17 procedures to cross the cystic duct were technically successful. Of these 17 patients, 13 (76%) underwent successful placement of dual cholecystoduodenal stents. Two of these 13 patients (who had successful dual cholecystoduodenal stent placement) needed repeat percutaneous cholecystostomy drains (1 patient had stent migration leading to recurrent cholecystitis, and the other had a perihepatic biloma). The 1-year patency rate was 77% (95% CI, 47%–100%).ConclusionsDual cholecystoduodenal stent placement in nonsurgical patients is a technically feasible treatment option with the goal to remove percutaneous cholecystostomy drains.     

Prospective,Multicenter Clinical Study of the Covera Vascular Covered Stent in the Treatment of Stenosis at the Graft-Vein Anastomosis of Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Access Grafts

PurposeTo study the use of the self-expanding Covera covered stent for the treatment of stenotic lesions at the venous anastomosis of hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVGs).Materials and MethodsA total of 110 patients with AVG venous anastomotic stenosis of ≥50% and access dysfunction were treated at 14 centers in the United States using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty followed by covered stent placement. The primary end points were 30-day safety and 6-month target lesion primary patency (TLPP). The secondary measures included access circuit primary patency, circuit cumulative patency, and the number of reinterventions through 24 months.ResultsFreedom from a primary safety event at 30 days was 96.4% while the 6-month TLPP rate was 70.3%. Seventy-five patients completed 24-month follow-up (68.2%). The TLPP rates were 54.2% at 365 days and 36.9% at 730 days while the access circuit primary patency rates were 16.7% at 365 days and 7.8% at 730 days (Kaplan-Meier analysis). The access circuit cumulative patency rates were 85.4% at 12 months and 73.6% at 24 months. The number of reinterventions to maintain the patency of the access circuit was 3.6 ± 3.1 at 24 months (1.6 ± 1.9 at the target lesion).ConclusionsUse of the Covera covered stent for hemodialysis graft-vein anastomotic stenosis provided a safe treatment option with a TLPP rate of 70.3% at 6 months and TLPP and cumulative access circuit patency rates of 36.9% and 73.6% at 2 years.     

Stent Graft Placement for the Treatment of Hepatic Artery Injury in Patients with Cancer: Primary Patency and Clinical Outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, primary patency, and clinical outcomes of hepatic artery stent graft (SG) placement for vascular injuries.Materials and MethodsPatients treated with hepatic arterial SG placement for vascular injuries between September 2018 and September 2021 were reviewed. Data on demographic characteristics, indication, stent graft characteristics, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, clinical success rate, complications, and type of follow-up imaging were collected. Follow-up images were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers to assess primary patency. A time-to-event analysis was performed. The median duration of stent graft patency was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors related to stent graft patency.ResultsThirty-five patients were treated with hepatic arterial SG placement, 11 for postoperative bleeds and 24 for hepatic artery infusion pump catheter–related complications. Clinical success was achieved in 32 (91%) patients (95% CI, 77–98). The median primary patency was 87 days (95% CI, 73–293). Stent grafts of ≥6-mm diameter retained patency for a longer duration than that with stent grafts of smaller diameters (6 mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14–0.88; P = .026; and 7+ mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.83; P = .023). Anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimen was not associated with increased stent graft patency duration (P > .05). Only minor complications were reported in 2 (5.7%) patients.ConclusionsStent grafts can be used safely and effectively to treat injuries of the hepatic artery. Stent graft diameters of ≥6 mm seem to provide more durable patency.     

Five-Year Outcomes of the Bioresorbable Peripheral Remedy Stent in the Treatment of Iliac Artery Disease

PurposeTo evaluate the 5-year performance of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold, the Remedy stent, for the treatment of iliac artery atherosclerotic disease.Materials and MethodsThis prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study evaluated 97 patients (97 lesions) with symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II A/B iliac artery lesions for 5 years after stent placement. The primary efficacy end point was 12-month primary patency compared with the prespecified standard derived from historical data with metallic stents, and the primary safety end point was the occurrence of major adverse clinical events within 5 years. All angiographic and computed tomography angiographic findings were evaluated by an independent core laboratory for quantitative vessel analysis.ResultsThe 12-month primary patency rate was 88.6% (95% CI, 80.1%–94.4%), which was lower than the prespecified standard. No significant difference was noted between the diameter stenosis at 9 and 12 months. There were no device- or procedure-related deaths, major amputation, or distal embolization during the follow-up period. The ankle-brachial index maintained significant improvement through the 5-year period compared with that at baseline. The Kaplan–Meier estimates of freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiovascular events, and major adverse cardiovascular and limb events were 95.8%, 91.7%, and 87.5% at 12 months and 85.4%, 72.1%, and 62.5% at 5 years, respectively.ConclusionsThe 5-year follow-up outcomes, including freedom from TLR, of the Remedy stent in iliac artery lesions were satisfactory, with a good safety profile. Nevertheless, the 12-month primary patency did not meet the expected standard compared with that of contemporary metallic stents.     

Midterm and Long-Term Outcomes following Dedicated Endovenous Nitinol Stent Placement for Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction: Three- to 5-Year Results of the VIRTUS Study

PurposeTo assess the midterm patency and long-term safety of placement of a dedicated venous stent (Vici Venous Stent System) for the treatment of venous lesions of the iliofemoral outflow tract.Materials and MethodsPatients with unilateral obstructive disease of the iliofemoral veins and a Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological class of 3 or higher or a Venous Clinical Severity Score of 2 or greater were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, single-arm study at 23 sites in the United States and Europe. The patients were followed up for 36 months after the index procedure for the assessment of patency and up to 60 months for the assessment of safety. The clinical outcomes in 11 patients with a stent fracture were assessed.ResultsA total of 200 patients enrolled in 2 cohorts (ie, feasibility cohort, n = 30; pivotal cohort, n = 170) were combined for this analysis. The overall 36-month primary patency rate was 71.7% (86/120), and the 36-month primary patency rate was 96.4% (27/28) for the nonthrombotic group and 64.1% (59/92) for the postthrombotic group. The freedom from major adverse events was 81.2% (53/65) through 60 months. The 60-month Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 84.3%. In 9 of the 11 patients who had a stent fracture (1 patient with nonthrombotic etiology and 10 patients with postthrombotic etiology) identified at 12 months, the stents extended into the common femoral vein. The TVR rates and clinical outcomes were similar between patients with and without a stent fracture.ConclusionsThe results of the VIRTUS study demonstrated good midterm patency and long-term safety following the placement of a dedicated venous stent for iliofemoral obstruction.     

Endovascular Lymphatic Decompression via Thoracic Duct Stent Placement for Refractory Ascites in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Pilot Study

PurposeTo evaluate the technical and clinical success of endovascular lymphatic decompression via thoracic duct (TD) stent placement in patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites.Materials and MethodsNine patients (6 men and 3 women; median age, 66 [interquartile range {IQR}, 65–68] years; range, 62–78 years) who underwent TD stent placement for refractory ascites with contraindications for liver transplantation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation were included in this retrospective study. TD stent placement was performed under local anesthesia using retrograde access from the venous system. Self-expanding stents from 5 to 8 mm in diameter were used and extended into the subclavian vein by approximately 1 cm. Technical (correct positioning of the stent) and clinical success (no more requirement of paracentesis) were evaluated. In addition, the safety of the procedure and TD pressure evolution were evaluated.ResultsThe technical success rate was 100%, and 3 (33%) patients reported clinical success. Five (56%) patients reported 7 minor adverse events (Grade I), among which 2 TD perforations were induced by stent angioplasty, with no clinical manifestation or treatment required. The median TD pressure decreased from 19 mm Hg (IQR, 11–24 mm Hg) at the beginning of the procedure to 6 mm Hg (IQR, 5–11 mm Hg) after TD stent placement. The median survival time after the procedure was 7.1 months.ConclusionsEndovascular lymphatic decompression via TD stent placement is feasible and safe and was effective on ascites in some patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites.     

The Effects of Protrusion into the Outflow Vein on Outcomes of Stent Grafts Used to Treat Cephalic Arch Stenoses in Dysfunctional Brachiocephalic Fistulae

PurposeTo assess long-term patency rates of cephalic arch stent grafts in brachiocephalic fistulae and the importance of device position.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed 152 patients with dysfunctional brachiocephalic fistulae and cephalic arch stenosis treated with stent grafts (Viabahn; W. L. Gore) at a single tertiary center between 2012 and 2021. The median age was 67.5 years (range, 25–91 years), and the median follow-up period was 637 days (range, 3–3,368 days). A grading system of protrusion was applied: (a) Grade 0, no protrusion; (b) Grade 1, perpendicular; and (c) Grade 2, in-line protrusion. Subsequent fistulograms were available in 133 (88%) of the 152 patients and were assessed for central vein stenosis within 10 mm of the stent graft. Clinical records were assessed for sequelae of stent graft protrusion. Stent graft primary and cumulative circuit patencies were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsProtrusion was documented in 106 (70%) stent grafts—56 Grade 1 and 50 Grade 2. Central vein stenosis was seen in 1 (2%) case of no protrusion (Grade 0) and 38 (40%) cases of protrusion (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in stenosis between Grade 1 and 2 protrusion (P = .15). No adverse clinical sequelae occurred in 147 (97%) patients. Eight patients had a new access subsequently formed in the same arm, and 3 of these 8 patients developed symptoms due to the previous stent graft protrusion (all Grade 2). The primary patency rates of the stent-grafts at 6 and 12 months were 73% and 50%, respectively. The cumulative access circuit patency rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 84%, 72%, and 54%, respectively.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that protrusion of a cephalic arch stent graft into the central vein is safe and only clinically relevant when a subsequent ipsilateral access is created.     

Evaluation of Technical Success,Efficacy, and Safety of Portomesenteric Venous Intervention following Nontransplant Hepatobiliary or Pancreatic Surgery

PurposeTo evaluate technical success, efficacy and safety of portomesenteric venous (PMV) intervention for PMV stenosis or occlusion following nontransplant hepatobiliary or pancreatic (HPB) surgery.Materials and MethodsA retrospective review identified 42 patients (mean age 60 y) with PMV stenosis (n = 33; 79%) or occlusion (n = 9; 21%) who underwent attempted PMV intervention following HPB surgery between June 1, 2011, and April 1, 2018. Main outcomes were technical success, primary patency rates, and complications. Technical success was compared by venous pathology and primary PMV patency based on anticoagulation status after the procedure using Fisher exact test. Rates of primary patency by stent group were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsTechnical success was 91% (n = 38/42) and significantly higher in patients with stenosis (n = 33/33; 100%) vs occlusion (n = 5/9; 56%) (P = .001). Primary presenting symptom resolved in 28 (87%) patients, including 6 (100%) patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. At mean imaging follow-up of 8.6 months ± 8.8, primary stent patency was 76%. There was no significant difference in primary stent patency based on anticoagulation status after the procedure (P = .48). There were 2 (4.8%) periprocedural complications.ConclusionsPortomesenteric venoplasty and stent placement following nontransplant HPB surgery is safe with a high rate of technical success if performed before chronic occlusion.     

Factors Influencing in-Stent Occlusion after Femoropopliteal Artery Stent Placement with Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation

PurposeTo investigate the rate and predictors of in-stent occlusion by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) following femoropopliteal artery stent placement.Materials and MethodsFrom July 2012 to June 2016, this study retrospectively investigated 191 cases of de novo femoropopliteal artery lesions (lesion length, 170 ± 97 mm; chronic total occlusion, 51%) evaluated by IVUS in 162 patients with peripheral artery disease (with critical limb ischemia of 27%) who underwent endovascular therapy using self-expanding nitinol stents. Examination by IVUS was performed to record data for vessel characteristics immediately after wire crossing and at the end of the procedure. The primary outcome measurement was the occurrence of in-stent occlusion, defined as the absence of blood flow at the treatment site by duplex ultrasonography. Predictors for in-stent occlusion were also evaluated by multivariate analysis.ResultsIn-stent occlusion was observed in 15% (n = 28) of lesions, and the mean follow-up time was 19 ± 13 months. After multivariate analysis, it was found that plaque burden ≥60% after stent placement (P < .001), female gender (P = .002), and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II classification C and D lesions (P = .047) were significantly associated with the occurrence of in-stent occlusion.ConclusionsPlaque burden ≥60% after stent placement, female gender, and TASC II classification C/D lesions were significantly associated with the occurrence of in-stent occlusion after femoropopliteal artery stent placement as evaluated by IVUS.     

In Situ Laser Stent Graft Fenestration of the Left Subclavian Artery during Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection with Limited Proximal Landing Zones: 5-Year Outcomes

PurposeTo assess safety and feasibility of in situ laser stent graft fenestration to revascularize the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with limited proximal landing zones with 5 years of follow-up.Materials and MethodsIn a single-center retrospective study, 130 patients with TBAD with limited proximal landing zones (≤ 1.5 cm) underwent in situ laser stent graft fenestration revascularizing the LSA during TEVAR from April 2014 to April 2019. Outcomes were assessed by CT angiography and clinic visits, including technical success rate, operative time, LSA patency, ischemic events, and late aorta-related complications during follow-up.ResultsMean age of patients was 53 y (range, 33–73 y). Primary technical success rate was 96.9% (126/130). Three chimney stents were placed instead of fenestration, and 1 LSA fenestration was combined with a left common carotid artery (LCCA) chimney stent. Mean operative time was 53 min ± 28 with fluoroscopy time of 40 min ± 15. There were no neurologic complications and no deaths, with a mean duration of hospital stay of 9 d (range, 5–21 d). At a mean follow-up of 42 mo (range, 5–60 mo), there was a 97% primary LSA patency. Four patients had a type I endoleak, which disappeared during follow-up. One LCCA became occluded after 6 months. No type II or III endoleaks were found. Retrograde type A aortic dissection and stent graft–induced new distal entry were not found during follow-up.ConclusionsIn situ laser fenestration to revascularize the LSA during TEVAR of TBAD with limited proximal landing zones was efficient, safe, and feasible based on 5-year follow-up.     

Percutaneous Treatment of Benign Biliary Anastomotic Strictures: Retrievable Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent with Fixation String Versus Large-Bore Catheters

PurposeTo retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of a covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) with a transhepatic fixation string and a large-bore catheter for benign biliary anastomotic stricture after hepatobiliary surgery.Materials and MethodsFrom March 2012 to June 2017, 49 patients with benign biliary anastomotic strictures, untreatable with endoscopy, were included. Twenty-three patients (catheter group) were treated with a large-bore catheter (with progressive catheter upsizing to 16–18 Fr), whereas 26 patients (stent group) were treated by CSEMS (10-mm stent) placement. Technical success, clinical success, primary patency, recurrent strictures, complication rate, and catheter or stent indwelling time were compared between the groups.ResultsTechnical success and clinical success were achieved in all patients. In the stent group, stent retrieval was successful in all patients. The overall complication rate was 24.5% (catheter group vs. stent group, 30.4% vs. 19.2%; P = .363). Stent migration occurred in 1 patient during follow-up (1/26, 3.8%). The mean indwelling time was 10.3 ± 3.0 months (range, 8–16 months; median, 10 months) in the catheter group and 4.0 ± 1.2 months (range, 3–7 months; median, 4 months) in the stent group (P < .001). Recurrent strictures occurred in 10 (43.5%) patients in the catheter group and 4 (15.4%) patients in the stent group (P = .030). The 1- and 3-year primary patency rates were 82.6% and 69.3% in the catheter group and 92.3% and 84.4% in the stent group (P = .042).ConclusionsPercutaneous placement of a retrievable CSEMS showed superior intermediate-term outcomes over a large-bore catheter in patients with benign biliary anastomotic strictures.     

Comparison between Suprapapillary and Transpapillary Uncovered Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Placement for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

PurposeTo compare the effectiveness, adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and patient survival with suprapapillary and transpapillary uncovered self-expandable metallic stent placement for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective study of 54 patients with inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent placement between January 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021, was conducted. According to stent location, the patients were classified into 2 groups: suprapapillary (S) and transpapillary (T). Demographic data, Bismuth-Corlette classification, type and location of the stent, laboratory data, postprocedural AEs, procedural success, stent occlusion, reintervention rate, and mortality were compared between the groups.ResultsStent placement was suprapapillary in 13 (24.1%) patients and transpapillary in 41 (75.9%) patients. Mean age was higher in Group T (78 vs 70.5 years; P = .046). Stent occlusion rates were similar in the 2 groups (Group S, 23.8%; Group T, 19.5%), as were AE rates, the most common being cholangitis (Group S, 23.1%; Group T, 24.4%). There were no significant differences in revision rate (Group S, 7.7%; Group T, 12.2%) and 30-day mortality rate (Group S, 15.4%; Group T, 19.5%). Ninety-day mortality rate was statistically significantly higher in Group T (46.3% vs 15.4%; P = .046). Preprocedural bilirubin level was higher in Group T, as were postprocedural leukocyte and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.ConclusionsSuprapapillary and transpapillary stent placement procedures were similar in terms of procedural success, occlusion rate, revision rate, postprocedural AEs, and 30-day mortality. Ninety-day mortality rate and postprocedural leukocyte and CRP levels were higher in Group T, although these patients were also older and had higher preprocedural bilirubin levels.     

Comparison of Anticoagulation Regimens Following Stent Placement for Nonthrombotic Lower Extremity Venous Disease

PurposeTo determine whether subtherapeutic anticoagulation regimens are noninferior to therapeutic anticoagulation regimens following stent placement for nonthrombotic lower extremity venous disease.Materials and MethodsFifty-one consecutive patients (88% women; mean age, 44 years) who underwent stent placement for nonthrombotic lower extremity venous disease between 2002 and 2016 were retrospectively identified. The patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who received prophylactic enoxaparin or no anticoagulation (subtherapeutic) after the procedure and those who received therapeutic doses of anticoagulation with enoxaparin, warfarin, and/or rivaroxaban (therapeutic) after the procedure. Baseline demographic characteristics, procedure characteristics, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using the Student t test, Fisher exact test, and χ² test. The subtherapeutic and therapeutic anticoagulation groups did not differ significantly in the baseline demographic characteristics (eg, sex, race, and age) or procedure characteristics (eg, number of stents placed, stent brand, stent diameter, etc).ResultsThe mean clinical follow-up time was 4.4 years (range, 0–16.3 years). There were no thrombotic adverse events or luminal obstructions due to in-stent restenosis in either group. There were 5 minor bleeding adverse effects in the therapeutic group and no bleeding adverse effects in the subtherapeutic group (P = .051). There were no statistically significant differences in subjective symptom improvement (P = .75).ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort, the subtherapeutic and therapeutic anticoagulation regimens produced equivalent outcomes in terms of adverse event rates, reintervention rates, and symptomatic improvement, suggesting that therapeutic doses of anticoagulation do not improve outcomes compared with subtherapeutic anticoagulation regimens following nonthrombotic venous stent placement.     

Comparison between Antegrade versus Retrograde Ureteral Stent Placement for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction

PurposeTo compare the technical success of antegrade uteral stent (AUS) and retrograde ureteral stent (RUS) placements in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) and to determine the predictors of technical failure of RUS.Materials and MethodsThis study retrospectively included 61 AUS placements (44 patients) performed under fluoroscopic guidance and 76 RUS placements (55 patients) performed under cystoscopic guidance in patients with MUO from January 2019 to December 2020. Technical success rates of the 2 techniques were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. Logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors for technical failures.ResultsTechnical success was achieved in 98.4% of the AUS group and 47.4% of the RUS group. After stabilized IPTW, the technical success rate was higher in the AUS group than in the RUS group (adjusted risk difference, 49.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 35.4%–63.1%). The independent predictors for technical failure of the RUS procedure were age of ≥65 years (odds ratio [OR], 5.56; 95% CI, 1.73–21.27), ureteral orifice invasion (OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.46–13.46), and extrinsic cancer (OR, 15.58; 95% CI, 2.92–111.81).ConclusionsThe technical success rate of AUS placement was higher than that of RUS placement in patients with MUO. RUS failure was associated with age of ≥65 years, cancer with ureteral orifice invasion, and extrinsic ureteral obstruction.     

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Interventions in More than 500 patients with Budd–Chiari Syndrome

PurposeTo assess and compare the long-term outcomes of various endovascular interventions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study, 510 consecutive patients with BCS who had undergone a total of 618 endovascular procedures from January 2001 to December 2019 were included. Details of the type of endovascular intervention, technical success, clinical success, patency rate, complications, and survival outcomes were analyzed.ResultsThe overall technical success rate was 96% (593 of 618 procedures; 500 in treatment-naïve patients and 93 repeat interventions for recurrent disease). Endovascular procedures included recanalization procedures (angioplasty and stent placement) in 355 patients (71%) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in 145 (29%). Major postprocedure complications occurred in 14 patients (2.8%). Vascular/stent restenosis occurred in 95 patients (19%), and successful repeat intervention was performed in 82 of those 95 (86.3%). An additional 11 of these 82 (13.4%) underwent a third intervention for restenosis. In the recanalization and TIPS groups, the 1- and 5-y cumulative patency rates were 87% and 74% and 95% and 68%, respectively. The 1- and 5-y survival rates were 96% and 89% and 90% and 76%, respectively.ConclusionsEndovascular interventions for BCS are feasible and safe in the majority of patients, with excellent short- and long-term patency and survival rates.     

Predictors of Disease Recurrence after Venoplasty and Stent Placement for May–Thurner Syndrome

PurposeTo identify factors independently associated with disease recurrence after venoplasty and stent placement for May–Thurner syndrome (MTS).Materials and MethodsFifty-nine consecutive patients (age, 47 y ± 15; 93% female) were identified who had undergone endovascular stent placement for MTS. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic data, risk factors for venous thrombosis, comorbidities, and venous inflow or outflow at first follow-up (3 wk to 6 mo after treatment). Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of symptom recurrence or repeat intervention, and multivariate analysis of variance and receiver operator characteristic curve analysis were used to assess relationships between degrees of in-stent stenosis and other variables in the 73% of patients with available cross-sectional imaging. Median follow up was 20.7 months (interquartile range, 4.7–49.5 mo).ResultsAll procedures were technically successful. Disease recurrence, defined as symptom recurrence following initial postprocedural resolution, was observed in 38% of patients. No preprocedural variable was found to be independently predictive of disease recurrence; however, poor venous inflow or outflow were both strongly associated with recurrent disease, with adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of 38.02 (3.76–384.20; P = .002) and 7.00 (1.15–42.71; P = .04), respectively. Higher degrees of in-stent stenosis were also associated with symptom recurrence, with an area under the curve of 0.93 (P = .000002) and 39%–41% stenosis being 78%–83% sensitive and 88%–92% specific for symptom recurrence.ConclusionsThese results suggest that cross-sectional imaging can help differentiate patients in whom closer follow-up may be warranted after venoplasty and stent placement for MTS and also guide counseling regarding prognosis.