可持续发展只是有限意义上的"可持续"

作为一种发展模式或发展观念 ,可持续发展被明确提出来 ,已经有十几年的时间了。提出可持续发展的模式和观念 ,有它积极意义的一面 ,它使人类能够全面反思人类进入文明史以来 ,特别是工业革命以来的发展历程 ,总结人类发展过程中的经验和教训 ,在面对今后的发展道路和可能出现的问题时 ,能够表现出必要的冷静和理智。可持续发展是来源于西方的词汇 ,它的英语表达由两个词组成 ,即Ｓｕｓｔａｉｎａｂｌｅ和Ｄｅｖｅｌｏｐｍｅｎｔ。在英语中 ,Ｓｕｓｔａｉｎａｂｌｅ是ｃａｐａｂｌｅｏｆｂｅｉｎｇｓｕｓｔａｉｎｅｄｏｒｍａｉｎｔａｉｎｅ…     

现代语境下"天人合一"思想解读

“天人合一”是中国古代思想家对于天人关系的基本认识,主张遵循自然规律．实现人和自然的和谐发展．这一思想对于生态保护与天人关系的协调发展具有重要意义。经济全球化时代。探寻“天人合一”向“天人和谐”可持续发展观的现代性转化的途径,将有助于我们重瓤认识自然,正确把握环境保护与经济发展的辩证关系,培养人类的道德责任意识及科学实践精神,为现代生态伦理学的建立和可持续发展战略的实施提供帮助。     

可持续发展理论在人类认识史上引起的七大变化

可持续发展理论，是人类与自然界和谐发展的理论，是人类于20世纪末在总结成功的实践和失败的教训的基础上形成的一个崭新的发展观念，本文详细论述了可持续发展理论在人类认识史上引起的七大变化。     

人类承载力"K值"影响因素

人类承载力“K值”表示地球能承载人口的极限值。“K值”的影响因素的繁多以及相互间的联系使得“K值”确切数值的计算成为一项非常艰巨的任务。通过分析人类与自然的关系，探讨人类承载力的微观影响因素及其相互关系，从开放生态系统的性质讨论人类承载力的宏观影响因素。从而得出人类承载力受渐变和突变因素的结合控制。以此揭开承载和调控人类种群的机理并预测“K值”的可能发展趋势，达到避免计算“K值”确切数值而又能提出人口增长对策和可持续发展的指导意见的目的。     

优势的权利：全球化和可持续发展

全球化和可持续发展当然是两个不同的概念 ,把它们放在一块儿来说 ,无非是因为它们之间存在那种显而易见的紧密关系。至少 ,人们都认为 ,可持续发展是全球范围的事情 ,它本身就要求全球化的观念和行为 ;而各种全球化的科技手段和运作方式所产生的问题 ,又迫使人们寻找一种可持续发展的办法。一方面 ,人们以不断更新的发达科技支撑着全球化 ,全球化被当成社会文明的不可逆趋向 ;另一方面 ,可持续发展又被当成一种运作良策 ,以图用来克服全球化趋向中的资源短缺和生态破坏。然而应该指出的是 ,就现实情况来看 ,所谓全球化不过是各种不同的国际…     

可持续发展经济学基本理论问题研究的述评

《中国21世纪议程》发布10年以来，中国学术界对可持续发展经济学的基本论问题进行了广泛地研讨，在可持续发展的内涵，可持续发展理论基础的反思，实现途径、实现途径、实现模式和全球化背景下的可持续发展等基础理论问题方面提出了不同的观点，对学术界关于可持续发展基础理论的研究进行综述和评价，对推动可持续发展经济学基础论的研究和学科建设具有十分重要的意义。     

加强可持续发展宣传提高全民可持续发展意识

加强可持续发展宣传提高全民可持续发展意识中国２１世纪议程领导小组组长国家科学技术委员会副主任邓楠一、可持续发展观的提出是人类共同的贡献可持续发展是一种新的发展模式，从本质上说，它是人类发展模式的一次历史性转变，也是人类生产方式、消费方式乃至思维方式和...     

走出"人类中心主义"与"天人合一"观困难

本文讨论了关于追求人与自然和谐的几种理念，分析了人类中心主义和天人合一观缺陷，认为可持续发展观是走出人类中心主义和天人合一观根本途径。     

可持续发展的人文机制：人地关系矛盾反思

人地关系是非线性，非对称的关系；人地矛盾的激是人类利益 劝的结果，核心是人类内部不同利益集团的争夺。可持续发展需要人类自觉调控和法律制约。     

可持续发展下的生态经济学理论透视

生态经济学是一门正在蓬勃发展的新兴交叉学科，可持续发展是生态经济学研究的中心问题。人类对可持续发展问题的极大关注推动了生态经济学的发展。本文从宏观角度分析了可持续发展问题的凸显和生态经济学的兴起，着重指出生态经济学是关于可持续发展的科学的认识；阐述了可持续发展条件与状态的生态经济学理论内涵；论述了生态经济系统的本质特征及其可持续发展评估的核心内容；概括了可持续发展评估与绿色国民经济核算的框架及其目标和衡量方法。     

The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: an empirical analysis

Whether globalization is sustainable is a contested issue. The quantitative literature on the Maastricht Globalization Index (MGI) and the KOF index of globalization shows that globalization contributes positively to economic and human development, environmental performance, mortality, gender equality and physical integrity rights. However, globalization also drives within-country income inequality, especially in developing countries. Evidence on the effects of globalization on the ecological environment does not provide clear patterns; various dimensions of globalization have different effects on various pollutants. This article analyzes the statistical relationship between the most recent MGI (2012 edition) and the ecological dimension of sustainable development. The latter will be operationalized by considering four variants of the Ecological Footprint. The relation between globalization and sustainable development will be controlled for GDP per capita as a proxy for affluence and report the results for Pearson’s correlations and multivariate regressions for up to 171 countries. We conclude that the overall index of globalization significantly increases the Ecological Footprint of consumption, exports and imports. The decomposition of globalization into different domains reveals that apart from the political dimension, all dimensions drive human pressures and demands on the environment. Globalization needs to go into new directions if it is to make a contribution toward all aspects of sustainable development.     

经济全球化背景下国际可持续发展进程的政治外交效应

本文以发展中国家和发达国家两大集团作为研究的基本单元，对国际可持续发展战略实施中产生的政治外交效应进行了初步分析。试图揭示经济全球化背景下国际可持续发展进程对世界经济社会和政治外交格局带来的影响和挑战，并就发展中国家开展国际可持续发展合作提出了对策建议。     

The impact of economic,social, and political globalization and democracy on life expectancy in low-income countries: are sustainable development goals contradictory?

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals announced by the United Nations are important guides for the development processes of developing countries. However, achieving all of these goals is only possible if the goals are consistent with each other. It has been observed in the literature that possible contradictions between these goals are ignored. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate whether two sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the UN are contradictory or supporting each other in low-income countries. These SDGs are “Good Health and Well-Being” (SDG3) and “Partnerships for the Goals” (SDG17). For this purpose, the role of globalization and democracy in life expectancy is empirically investigated in 16 low-income countries over the period 1970–2017. While globalization has been used as an indicator of the partnership between countries, democracy has been used as an indicator of accountability and cooperation between governments and societies. According to estimations of the continuous-updated fully modified (CUP-FM) and bias-adjusted ordinary least squares (BA-OLS), globalization and its subcomponents such as economic, social, and political globalization affect life expectancy positively. Democracy also increases life expectancy in those countries. The GDP per capita is also used as a control variable. Our results show that a higher level of per capita income is positively associated with higher levels of life expectancy. In conclusion, no contradiction was found between SDG3 and SDG17 in those countries. Achieving a healthier society requires economic, social, and political integration between governments and societies.

     

Logic of Citizen Participation in Sustainable Development

Abstract

Sustainable development, a concept which has been built with the sustainability of economic progression as a main thrust, has been a widely preferred model to traditional developmental models. However, the real meaning of what sustainable development is and should include has been an object of debate. On the one hand, differing from traditional economic developmental models, economic progress does not necessitate the practice of ‘sustainable development’. On the other hand, current levels of science and technology are still unable to solve several problems that arise with economic development. Sustainable development has transferred the responsibility of environmental destruction to that of developing countries. Lastly, instead of utilizing the best technology and leadership into formulating excellent environmental- protection policies, it is more important to create widespread awareness to the public on the need to protect the environment and thereby engage their participation in decision-making to actually realize what is truly ‘sustainable development’.     

长江三角洲地区经济可持续发展问题初探

长江三角洲地区是我国重要的经济核心区。改革开放以来,尤其是浦东开发开放以来,该地区保持着高于全国平均发展水平的速度快速发展,对全国经济起到了强有力的拉动作用。21世纪将面临全球经济一体化及产业国际转移的时机,该地区也面临着新的发展机遇与挑战：一方面,地区综合竞争力不断增强,城市化水平日益提高,外商来此投资的热潮不减,区域间的交流与合作不断增多;但另一方面,企业自主创新能力不高,能源缺乏,交通紧张,生态环境受到严重破坏等问题也日益显著,影响着地区经济发展的可持续性。从长江三角洲地区经济发展面临的主要问题入手,从协调社会、经济、环境之间的关系角度,探讨了解决问题的途径。     

可持续发展原则下的经济全球化构建

经济全球化的趋势不可避免,它的发展阶段和特征表明,建立在可持续发展原则下的经济全球化,才能维系人类文明的健康发展。     

Actively Dealing with Climate Change and Striving to Strengthen the Capability of Sustainable Development

Either from the perspective of the finite supply capacity of global resources and energy,or from the perspective of global environment restrictive conditions,developing countries can not repeat the old development road of developed countries,either in view of the international pressure China is currently facing,or in view of China’s own resources endowment and stages of development,we must actively face such a challenge of climate change.We must recognize that the issue of climate change may be a great restraint to the present and future eco-social development,and may also be an important driving force and new opportunity to push forward the transformation of development pattern,to take a new road of industrialization and to realize sustainable development.This demands us,on the one hand,to take the Scientific Outlook of Development as the guide to make efforts to control the emission of greenhouse gases and continuously increase the capability of adapting to climatic change,and set up the overall plan to respond to climate change of our country,and on the other hand,we should unswervingly take the road of sustainable development,save energy,optimize energy structure and strengthen biological protection in slowing and adapting to climate change.     

测度可持续发展的资本指标体系

本文运用人地关系协调分析法与经济分析法，特别是与柯布－道格拉斯生产函数相结合，提出了可持续的人均国内生产总值概念，探讨了发展中人文资本、自然资本相互协调、相互依存的关系特征，在此基础上建立了测度可持续发展的资本指标系统。