Outcome of autologous stem-cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma patients in a centre from Turkey

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to assess the predictors of outcome in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) receiving autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT)

Materials and methods

Fifty-two consecutive patients who received ASCT at the Stem Cell Transplantation Unit of Gazi University Hospital from February 2005 through June 2011 for relapsed or refractory HL were analysed retrospectively

Results

Fifty-one patients could be evaluated after transplantation, as one of the patients died in the early post-transplantation period. Complete remission was obtained in 36 (71%), partial remission in 9 (18%), stable disease in 4 (8%), and progressive disease in 2 (3%) patients. After a median follow-up of 22 (range, 0.5–75) months, 46 (88%) patients were alive. The probability of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and transplantation related mortality at 5 years were 87, 53, and 2%, respectively. Chemosensitive relapse had a positive impact on both OS and PFS

Conclusion

ASCT remains to be the standard treatment of relapsed or refractory HL patients. Chemosensitive relapse is the most important prognostic factor determining the outcome of the ASCT.     

LACE-conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: treatment outcome and risk factor analysis in 67 patients from a single centre

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a recognized treatment option for patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma. We have analysed 67 patients who underwent ASCT after LACE (lomustine (CCNU), cytarabine (Ara-C), cyclophosphamide, etoposide) conditioning for relapsed (n=61) or primary refractory (n=6) Hodgkin's lymphoma. The 100-day treatment-related mortality was 3%. With a median follow-up of 67 months (range 3.3-161.0) the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years were 68 and 64%, respectively. Probabilities for OS and PFS at 5 years for patients with chemosensitive relapse (n=40) were 81 and 78% versus 50 and 35%, respectively, for patients (n=27) with chemoresistant relapse (P=0.012 for OS, P=0.002 for PFS). In multivariate analysis mixed cellularity classical or lymphocyte-depleted classical histology subtype and haemoglobin level of 10 g/dl or less at the time of ASCT were identified as risk factors for worse OS, whereas stage III or IV disease at diagnosis and disease status at ASCT other than complete or partial remission predicted inferior PFS. LACE followed by ASCT is an effective treatment for the majority of patients with chemosensitive relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma and a proportion of chemorefractory patients also benefit.     

Impact of prior rituximab on outcomes of autologous stem‐cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell lymphoma: a multicentre retrospective Spanish group of lymphoma/autologous bone marrow transplant study

The use of highly effective rituximab‐containing therapy for treating diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) makes it more difficult to salvage relapsed or refractory patients. Autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT) is the reference treatment for these patients, but the impact of previous exposure to rituximab on the subsequent results of ASCT remains unknown. We analysed 248 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL or grade 3B follicular lymphoma pre‐treated with rituximab as part of first‐line therapy (R+ group) who received ASCT, in comparison with a control group of 127 patients without previous exposure to rituximab (R? group). The complete remission (CR) rates were similar in both groups. Multivariate analysis identified age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index at diagnosis, extranodal involvement and disease status at transplant, and the number of previous chemotherapy lines as independent factors with a negative influence on CR rate. Compared with R? patients, those in the R+ group had a significantly better progression‐free survival (63% vs. 48% at 5 years) and overall survival (72% vs. 61% at 5 years). This observation was independent of other prognostic factors that affected these outcomes. In conclusion, ASCT is no less effective in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell lymphoma pre‐treated with first‐line rituximab‐containing therapy than in rituximab‐naive patients.     

Outcomes of primary refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with salvage chemotherapy and intention to transplant in the rituximab era

Rituximab‐containing salvage chemotherapy followed by high‐dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT ) in chemosensitive patients remains the standard of care for patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL ). However, its role in those patients achieving less than a complete response to first‐line therapy (primary refractory disease) in the rituximab era is not well defined. We reviewed the outcomes of 82 transplant‐eligible patients with primary refractory DLBCL who underwent salvage therapy with the intent of administering high‐dose therapy and ASCT to patients achieving chemosensitive remission. The estimated 3‐year overall and progression‐free survival for all patients was 38% and 29%, respectively, and 65% and 60% respectively for patients proceeding to stem cell transplant. Long‐term remission was achieved in 45% of patients achieving a partial response (PR) to initial induction therapy and <20% of patients with stable or progression of disease following initial therapy. These results suggest that salvage chemotherapy with the intent of subsequent high‐dose therapy and ASCT remains a feasible strategy in certain patients with primary refractory DLBCL , particularly for those achieving a PR to frontline therapy. The primary barrier to curative therapy in patients with primary refractory disease is resistance to salvage therapy, and future studies should be aimed towards increasing the response rate in this population.     

Rituximab and ICE as second-line therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Patients with relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve complete response (CR) before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) generally have better outcomes than those who achieve only partial response (PR). We investigated whether adding rituximab to the ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy regimen (RICE) could increase the CR rate of patients with DLBCL under consideration for ASCT. Thirty-six eligible patients were treated with RICE, and 34 received all 3 planned cycles. The CR rate was 53%, significantly better than the 27% CR rate (P =.01) achieved among 147 similar consecutive historical control patients with DLBCL treated with ICE; the PR rate was 25%. Febrile neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity; it occurred in 7.5% of delivered cycles. No patient had RICE-related toxicity that precluded ASCT. The median number of CD34(+) cells per kilogram mobilized was 6.3 x 10(6). Progression-free survival rates of patients who underwent transplantation after RICE were marginally better than those of 95 consecutive historical control patients who underwent transplantation after ICE (54% vs 43% at 2 years; P =.25). RICE appears to induce very high CR rates in patients with relapsed and refractory DLBCL; however, further studies are necessary to determine whether this treatment regimen will improve outcomes after ASCT.     

Crucial microscopic features leading to diagnosis of cobalamin C deficiency in a new‐born

In the positron emission tomography (PET) era, traditional prognostic factors may not apply for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Moreover, little is known about prognostic factors in patients transplanted for transformed indolent lymphoma (TIL). We conducted a retrospective study of 143 patients with R/R DLBCL and TIL who were transplanted in the last decade and had a post‐salvage PET scan. We examined prognostic factors in both groups, and constructed a prognostic score for DLBCL patients. For patients with DLBCL, post‐salvage PET response was an important prognostic factor. Advanced age and symptomatic relapse were also significantly associated with outcome. A simple score could stratify patients into three risk groups with 4‐year post‐ASCT overall survival of 84%, 59%, and 10%, and 4‐year progression‐free survival of 67%, 41% and 0% (P < 0·0001 for both). However, none of those factors (including PET response to salvage) appeared relevant for patients with TIL, despite their comparable overall outcome. Our prognostic score for DLBCL patients undergoing ASCT may be useful for prognostication, for stratification in clinical trials, and to motivate the design of new strategies for patients in the high‐risk group, who may not derive benefit from standard ASCT.     

Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index predicts autologous stem cell transplantation outcome for patients with relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Second-line chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) cures less than half of the patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Prognostic models capable of predicting outcome are essential. In 3 sequential clinical trials, conducted from January 1993 to August 2000, we treated 150 patients with relapsed or primary refractory DLBCL with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy followed by HDT/ASCT for patients with chemosensitive disease. We evaluated the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index at the initiation of second-line therapy (sAAIPI) as a predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). At a median follow-up of 4 years, the PFS and OS are 28% and 34% by intention to treat and 39% and 45% for only those patients with chemosensitive disease. Three risk groups with different PFS and OS were identified by the sAAIPI: low risk (0 factors), 70% and 74%; intermediate risk (1 factor), 39% and 49%; and high risk (2 or 3 factors), 16% and 18% (P <.001 for both PFS and OS). The sAAIPI also predicts the PFS and OS for patients with ICEchemosensitive disease: low risk, 69% and 83%; intermediate risk, 46% and 55%; and high risk, 25% and 26% (P <.001 PFS and OS). The sAAIPI predicts outcome for patients with relapsed or primary refractory DLBCL in both intent-to-treat and chemosensitive populations. This powerful prognostic instrument should be used to evaluate new treatment approaches and to compare results of different regimens.     

High‐dose CD20‐targeted radioimmunotherapy‐based autologous transplantation improves outcomes for persistent mantle cell lymphoma

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) can improve outcomes for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients, yet relapses are frequent. We hypothesized that high‐dose anti‐CD20 radioimmunotherapy (RIT)‐based conditioning could improve results in this setting. We thus assessed 162 consecutive patients with MCL at our centre undergoing ASCT following high‐dose RIT‐based (n = 61) or standard (n = 101) conditioning. RIT patients were less likely to be in first remission (48% vs. 72%; P = 0·002), be in complete remission (CR) (26% vs. 61%; P < 0·001) and have chemosensitive disease (84% vs. 96%; P = 0·006). RIT‐based conditioning was associated with a reduced risk of treatment failure [hazard ratio (HR) 0·40; P = 0·001] and mortality (HR 0·49; P = 0·01) after adjusting for these imbalances. This difference increased as disease status worsened (from CR to partial remission to stable/progressive disease), with respective HRs of 1·14, 0·53 and 0·04 for mortality, and 0·66, 0·36 and 0·14 for treatment failure. RIT‐based conditioning appears to improve outcome following ASCT for MCL patients unable to achieve CR after controlling for imbalances in important risk factors. These data support the further study of RIT and radiation‐based strategies in a risk‐adapted approach to ASCT for persistent MCL.     

Disease staging with positron emission tomography or gallium scanning and use of rituximab predict outcome for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with autologous stem cell transplantation

Tumor status, as determined by positron emission tomography or gallium scanning (PET/G), may be an important predictor of outcome for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). ASCT conditioning regimens that include rituximab may reduce the rate of relapse. We evaluated the influence of rituximab on overall and progression-free survival in patients with DLBCL based on PET/G status before ASCT. A retrospective review of all patients with chemosensitive DLBCL who underwent ASCT in the context of research protocols at our institution between 1995 and 2005 was performed. Our study included 174 patients. Disease status before ASCT, according to PET/G, was negative in 136 patients (78%), positive in 29 patients (17%), and unknown in nine patients (5%). PET/G status and rituximab use were the only factors predictive of progression-free survival in multivariate analyses: the hazard ratios for relapse were 2·9 for PET/G-positive versus -negative patients ( P  <   0·001) and 0·4 for rituximab versus no rituximab use ( P  =   0·001). We conclude that evidence of disease on PET/G scanning prior to transplantation is associated with an increased risk for relapse after ASCT. Transplantation regimens containing rituximab can reduce this risk, regardless of PET/G status.     

Late non-relapse mortality among adult autologous stem cell transplant recipients: a nation-wide analysis of 1,482 patients transplanted in 1990-2003

Data on the incidence and causes of late (>100 d) non-relapse mortality (NRM) in autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) recipients is limited. We have analysed NRM in a cohort of 1,482 adult patients who received ASCT in 1990-2003 in six Finnish transplant centres. The most common diagnoses included non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (n = 542), multiple myeloma (MM) (n = 528), breast cancer (n = 132); Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) (n = 86) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) (n = 63). Until September 2005, 646 patients (44%) have died. Late NRM was observed in 68 patients (4.6% of ASCT recipients; 11% of all deaths). There were 38 males and 30 females with a median age of 58 yr (20-69) at the time of ASCT. The median time to NRM was 27 months from ASCT (3-112). The risk of NRM was highest in patients with CLL (9.5%) and those with HL (8.1%) followed by MM and NHL (4.9% and 4.8%, respectively). The risk of late NRM was comparable in patients who received total body irradiation (TBI) and those who received chemotherapy-only regimens (6.7% vs. 4.3%). Another malignancy was the most common cause of late NRM (24 patients, 35% of late NRM). Twelve patients (0.8% of ASCT recipients) have died due to secondary haematological malignancy. Altogether 22 patients (32% of late NRM) died from infectious causes. Malignancies and late infections are important causes of NRM after ASCT. These facts point out the importance of prolonged follow-up in ASCT recipients.     

Autologous transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Autologous transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for chemosensitive relapsed or primary refractory aggressive lymphoma, but little is known about its efficacy in the subset of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). We undertook a retrospective review of patients with PTCL who underwent ASCT for relapsed or refractory disease after responding to second-line therapy, excluding patients with indolent histologies and those with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expressing anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The results of 24 patients with PTCL were compared with those of 86 consecutive patients with chemosensitive relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). With a median follow-up time of 6 years for surviving patients with PTCL and DLBCL, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for PTCL and DLBCL patients were 24% and 34% respectively (P = 0.14); the corresponding overall survival (OS) rates were 33% and 39% respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to time to disease progression or survival after progression. The second-line age-adjusted international prognostic index was the only variable prognostic for PFS and OS in a multivariate analysis. The outcome of ASCT for patients with chemosensitive relapsed or primary refractory PTCL is similar to that for patients with DLBCL.     

Autologous stem cell transplantation in children with severe progressive systemic or polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: long-term follow-up of a prospective clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of intensive immunosuppression followed by T cell-depleted autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for induction of disease remission in children with refractory progressive juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Twenty-two patients with progressive refractory JIA were followed up over a median period of 80 months after pretreatment with intensive immunosuppression followed by ASCT in a multicenter, prospective, phase II clinical trial. Hematopoietic stem cells were harvested from the patients' bone marrow, depleted of T cells, and kept frozen until used for ASCT. Pretreatment of patients consisted of a combination of antithymocyte globulin, cyclophosphamide, and low-dose total body irradiation. Patients were followed up for ASCT-related complications, recovery of hematologic and immune system parameters, and disease outcomes. RESULTS: Reconstitution of hematologic values to normal range was rapid. Recovery of immune system parameters, especially normalization of CD4+, CD45RA+ naive T cells, was delayed, occurring at >/=6 months after ASCT. The prolonged period of immune deficiency resulted in a large number of viral infections and may have contributed to the development of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), leading to death, in 2 patients. After ASCT, 8 of the 20 evaluable patients reached complete clinical remission of their JIA, 7 were partial responders, and 5 experienced a relapse of their disease (occurring 7 years after ASCT in 1 patient). Later during followup, 2 of the patients whose disease relapsed died from infections that developed after restarting immunosuppressive medication. CONCLUSION: Intensive immunosuppression followed by ASCT resulted in sustained complete remission or marked improvement in 15 of 22 patients with progressive refractory JIA. The procedure, however, is associated with significant morbidity and risk of mortality due to prolonged and severe depression of T cell immunity. After fatal complications due to MAS were observed in some patients, the protocol was amended in 1999, to ensure less profound depletion of T cells, better control of systemic disease before transplantation, antiviral prophylaxis after transplantation, and slow tapering of corticosteroids. Following these protocol modifications, no additional ASCT-related deaths were observed among the 11 patients who received the modified treatment.     

The impact of histologic grade on the outcome of high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for follicular lymphoma

The impact of the follicular lymphoma (FL) histologic grade on outcomes after high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown. We evaluated 219 consecutive patients with grades 1-3 FL who underwent HDT and ASCT at our center. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was estimated for each grade after controlling for other predictive factors. The number of patients with grades 1, 2 and 3 FL was 106 (48%), 75 (34%) and 38 (17%), respectively. Five-year outcome estimates for the entire cohort included 60% OS, 39% PFS and 46% relapse (median follow-up=7.8 years). PFS and relapse were nearly identical among patients with grade 3 FL versus grades 1-2 FL after adjusting for other contributing factors (hazard ratio (HR)=0.90, P=0.68; HR=1.07, P=0.80, respectively). The hazard for mortality (HR=0.70, P=0.23) and NRM (HR=0.33, P=0.07) was non-significantly lower among patients with grade 3 FL compared to patients with grades 1-2 disease. Factors associated with inferior PFS included elevated lactate dehydrogenase (HR=1.52, P=0.03), chemoresistance (HR=1.82, P=0.02), > or =2 prior therapies (HR=1.8, P=0.03) and prior radiation (HR=1.99, P=0.003). These data suggest that the histologic grade of FL does not impact PFS or relapse following HDT and ASCT.     

Managing relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

Despite a high curability rate, some patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) fail to respond to, or relapse after, primary conventional treatment. This review aims to identify prognostic factors at relapse and guidelines for treatment in relapsed HL. Patients with relapsed HL should be identified according to their prognostic factors at relapse (duration of remission and extranodal disease or stage). This enables relapsing patients to be separated in to three different prognostic groups; primary refractory patients should be included in the unfavourable group because of their poor prognosis. All relapsed HL should receive second-line chemotherapy and the response to this chemotherapy is crucial for the outcome. Benefit of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown in a large randomized study and, although is often proposed in relapsed HL, it may be not necessary in the rare group of patients with stage I/II and late relapse who can receive additional radiotherapy after response to chemotherapy. Patients with intermediate and unfavourable relapse should receive high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT when chemosensitive; the first goal is to achieve this chemosensitivity. For patients in the unfavourable group, including refractory patients, the role of tandem HDT or allogeneic SCT will be discussed and should be proposed for patients not in complete remission at the time of HDT.     

How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Despite progress in the upfront treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), patients still experience relapses. Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard second‐line treatment for relapsed and refractory (R/R) DLBCL. However, half of the patients will not be eligible for transplantation due to ineffective salvage treatment, and the other half will relapse after ASCT. In randomized studies, no salvage chemotherapy regimen is superior to another. The outcomes are affected by the secondary International Prognostic Index at relapse and various biological factors. The strategy is less clear in patients who require third‐line treatment. A multicohort retros pec tive non‐Hodgkin lymphoma research (SCHOLAR‐1) study conducted in 636 patients with refractory DLBCL showed an objective response rate of 26% (complete response 7%) to the next line of therapy with a median overall survival of 6·3 months. In the case of a response followed by transplantation, long‐term survival can be achieved in DLBCL patients. There is clearly a need for new drugs that improve salvage efficacy. Encouraging results have been reported with chimeric antigen receptor ‐T cell engineering, warranting further studies in a well‐defined control group of refractory patients. The Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) was used as a handy framework to build the discussion.     

High-dose melphalan is an effective salvage therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia patients with refractory relapse and relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation

In a pilot study high-dose melphalan (HD-Mel, 200 mg/m²) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were administered to 14 patients (median age 52, range 29–60 years) with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in first relapse after a previous ASCT in first complete remission (n=11) or chemotherapy (n=3). A first cohort of five patients received HD-Mel as salvage therapy after a previous cycle of mitoxantrone, topotecan and cytarabine (MTC) had failed in four out of five patients, while a second cohort of nine patients received HD-Mel in untreated relapse. Thirteen (93%) of 14 patients achieved a second complete remission (CR2), including all four patients who had been refractory to MTC. No treatment-related mortality was observed after HD-Mel. Thirteen (93%) patients were able to proceed to a dose-reduced allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) from human-leucocyte-antigens-compatible unrelated (n=12) or sibling donors (n=1) in CR2 (n=11) or poor recovery/relapse (n=2) after a median of 2 (1.7–4.5) months following HD-Mel. Three MTC-refractory patients, but none of the upfront HD-Mel patients, died due to an allograft-related non-relapse cause. Nine patients are alive in CR2 after a median of 6 (2–49) months after HD-Mel and a median of 4 (0.6–47) months after a sequential allo-SCT. Although median follow-up is still short, the proportion of patients achieving a CR2, as well as of those proceeding to a subsequent reduced-intensity-conditioning-allo-SCT, is superior to those previously reported. Our results highly encourage to further investigate HD-Mel and ASCT as a promising salvage regimen for relapsed AML patients for whom autologous peripheral blood stem cells are available.     

Outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma with progression of lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation in the rituximab era

Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the current standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with chemosensitive disease. The addition of rituximab results in improved overall survival (OS) after first‐line treatment, but cure rates of salvage therapy with ASCT are inferior when compared to historical controls. Historically, patients with DLBCL with disease progression following ASCT have had an extremely poor prognosis with a median OS of 3 months. However, there are little data regarding outcomes in the rituximab era. We performed a retrospective study of 56 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL with prior exposure to rituximab who had disease progression following ASCT. The median OS from progression following ASCT for the cohort was 9.9 months (95% CI: 5.3–13.1 months). Patients who progressed less than 1 year from ASCT had a significantly shorter OS than those who progressed at 1 year or greater from ASCT (8.2 vs. 26.7 months, P = 0.01). Patients with at least stable disease following ASCT had a longer OS than those who progressed immediately after ASCT (12.3 vs. 5.3 months, P = 0.01). Other factors associated with OS were International Prognostic Index (IPI) (P = 0.01) and LDH level (P = 0.0003) at the time of progression following ASCT. In the rituximab era, the prognosis for patients with disease progression following ASCT remains poor, but is improved when compared with historical controls. Ultimately, more work needs to be done to develop novel therapeutic strategies tailored to individual patients in this heterogeneous population. Am. J. Hematol. 88:890–894, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Improved survival for relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma is predicted by a negative pre‐transplant FDG‐PET scan following salvage chemotherapy

The utility of ^[18F]fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐ d ‐glucose positron‐emission tomography (FDG‐PET) for predicting outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is uncertain – existing studies include a range of histological subtypes or have a limited duration of follow‐up. Thirty‐nine patients with primary‐refractory or relapsed DLBCL with pre‐ASCT PET scans were analysed. The median follow‐up was 3 years. The 3‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) for patients with positive PET scans pre‐ASCT was 35% vs. 81% for those who had negative PET scans (P = 0·003). The overall survival (OS) in these groups was 39% and 81% (P = 0·01), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, PET result, number of salvage cycles and the presence of relapsed or refractory disease were shown to predict a longer PFS; PET negativity (P = 0·04) was predictive of a longer OS. PET is useful for defining those with an excellent prognosis post‐ASCT. Although those with positive scans can still be salvaged with current treatments, PET may useful for selecting patients eligible for novel consolidation strategies after salvage therapies.     

Non-myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicentre experience

Patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have failed or are ineligible for autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have a poor prognosis. We examined the outcomes of non-myeloablative allogeneic HCT in this setting. Thirty-one patients with DLBCL and one patient with Burkitt lymphoma received allogeneic HCT following 2 Gy total body irradiation with or without fludarabine. Median age was 52 years. Twenty-four patients (75%) had undergone prior autologous HCT. Disease status at HCT was complete response (14/32, 44%), partial response (9/32, 28%), or refractory (9/32, 28%). Cumulative incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV, grades III-IV, and chronic GVHD were 53%, 19%, and 47% respectively. With a median follow-up of 45 months, 3-year estimated overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 45% and 35% respectively. Three-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 41% and 25% respectively. In multivariate models, chemosensitive disease and receipt of >or=4 lines of treatment before HCT were associated with better OS. Patients with chemosensitive disease had 3-year OS and PFS of 56% and 43% respectively. Non-myeloablative allogeneic HCT can produce long-term disease-free survival in patients with chemosensitive relapsed DLBCL who have failed or are ineligible for autologous HCT.     

Role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced-stage diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma-B

The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma-B (DLCL-B) is poor with conventional salvage chemotherapy; therefore, high-dose therapy (HDT) combined with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has become the treatment of choice for these patients. The outcomes of transplant are better in patients with chemosensitive relapse: those with a longer duration of first remission (>12 month) and those with an age-adjusted low-risk International Prognostic Index (IPI) at relapse. Several high-dose regimens with or without total body irradiation (TBI) have been used with similar outcomes. Relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure, and thus the use of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in the high-dose regimens and incorporation of rituximab in the transplant setting have been explored. Several studies have shown that RIT both at conventional dose and at high dose can be given in combination with high-dose chemotherapy regimens without additional toxicity or delay in hematopoietic recovery after ASCT. Additional studies using RIT in combination with high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT are ongoing, and preliminary results suggest that these approaches may be superior to conventional high-dose regimens. Since rituximab is an effective therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and given its limited toxicity, rituximab has been incorporated into HDT and ASCT for DLCL-B as in vivo purging, as part of high-dose regimens, and as maintenance therapy to prevent relapse. Preliminary results suggested that rituximab during ASCT and as maintenance therapy post-transplant reduces the risk of relapse and improves survival; however, these results need to be confirmed in phase III randomized trials. The role of ASCT during first remission as consolidative therapy in patients with DLCL-B remains controversial and should not be performed outside of the clinical trial setting. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) for patients with relapsed DLCL-B is associated with significant toxicity and should be reserved for patients who relapse after ASCT or those with persistent marrow involvement. Innovative approaches are needed for primary refractory and chemoresistant relapsed DLCL-B since these patients have very poor outcomes after ASCT.