Computing Sparse Multiples of Polynomials

We consider the problem of finding a sparse multiple of a polynomial. Given f??F[x] of degree d over a field F, and a desired sparsity t, our goal is to determine if there exists a multiple h??F[x] of f such that h has at most t non-zero terms, and if so, to find such an h. When F=? and t is constant, we give an algorithm which requires polynomial-time in d and the size of coefficients in h. When F is a finite field, we show that the problem is at least as hard as determining the multiplicative order of elements in an extension field of F (a problem thought to have complexity similar to that of factoring integers), and this lower bound is tight when t=2.     

A Competitive Analysis for Balanced Transactional Memory Workloads

We consider transactional memory contention management in the context of balanced workloads, where if a transaction is writing, the number of write operations it performs is a constant fraction of its total reads and writes. We explore the theoretical performance boundaries of contention management in balanced workloads from the worst-case perspective by presenting and analyzing two new polynomial time contention management algorithms. We analyze the performance of a contention management algorithm by comparison with an optimal offline contention management algorithm to provide a competitive ratio. The first algorithm Clairvoyant is $O(\sqrt{s})$ -competitive, where s is the number of shared resources. This algorithm depends on explicitly knowing the conflict graph at each time step of execution. The second algorithm Non-Clairvoyant is $O(\sqrt{s} \cdot \log n)$ -competitive, with high probability, which is only a O(log?n) factor worse, but does not require knowledge of the conflict graph, where n is the number of transactions. Both of these algorithms are greedy. We also prove that the performance of Clairvoyant is close to optimal, since there is no polynomial time contention management algorithm for the balanced transaction scheduling problem that is better than $O((\sqrt{s})^{1-\varepsilon})$ -competitive for any constant ε>0, unless NP?ZPP. To our knowledge, these results are significant improvements over the best previously known O(s) competitive ratio bound.     

Detecting Fixed Patterns in Chordal Graphs in Polynomial Time

The Contractibility problem takes as input two graphs G and H, and the task is to decide whether H can be obtained from G by a sequence of edge contractions. The Induced Minor and Induced Topological Minor problems are similar, but the first allows both edge contractions and vertex deletions, whereas the latter allows only vertex deletions and vertex dissolutions. All three problems are NP-complete, even for certain fixed graphs H. We show that these problems can be solved in polynomial time for every fixed H when the input graph G is chordal. Our results can be considered tight, since these problems are known to be W[1]-hard on chordal graphs when parameterized by the size of H. To solve Contractibility and Induced Minor, we define and use a generalization of the classic Disjoint Paths problem, where we require the vertices of each of the k paths to be chosen from a specified set. We prove that this variant is NP-complete even when k=2, but that it is polynomial-time solvable on chordal graphs for every fixed k. Our algorithm for Induced Topological Minor is based on another generalization of Disjoint Paths called Induced Disjoint Paths, where the vertices from different paths may no longer be adjacent. We show that this problem, which is known to be NP-complete when k=2, can be solved in polynomial time on chordal graphs even when k is part of the input. Our results fit into the general framework of graph containment problems, where the aim is to decide whether a graph can be modified into another graph by a sequence of specified graph operations. Allowing combinations of the four well-known operations edge deletion, edge contraction, vertex deletion, and vertex dissolution results in the following ten containment relations: (induced) minor, (induced) topological minor, (induced) subgraph, (induced) spanning subgraph, dissolution, and contraction. Our results, combined with existing results, settle the complexity of each of the ten corresponding containment problems on chordal graphs.     

On the power of unambiguity in log-space

We report progress on the NL versus UL problem.

We show that counting the number of s-t paths in graphs where the number of s-v paths for any v is bounded by a polynomial can be done in FUL: the unambiguous log-space function class. Several new upper bounds follow from this including ${{{ReachFewL} \subseteq {UL}}}$ and ${{{LFew} \subseteq {UL}^{FewL}}}$

We investigate the complexity of min-uniqueness—a central notion in studying the NL versus UL problem. In this regard we revisit the class OptL[log n] and introduce UOptL[log n], an unambiguous version of OptL[log n]. We investigate the relation between UOptL[log n] and other existing complexity classes.

We consider the unambiguous hierarchies over UL and UOptL[log n]. We show that the hierarchy over UOptL[log n] collapses. This implies that ${{{ULH} \subseteq {L}^{{promiseUL}}}}$ thus collapsing the UL hierarchy.

We show that the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 3 pages is complete for NL. This contrasts with the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 2 pages, which is log-space equivalent to the reachability problem in planar graphs and hence is in UL.

     

Exploiting structure in LTL synthesis

In this paper, we show how to exploit the structure of some automata-based construction to efficiently solve the LTL synthesis problem. We focus on a construction proposed in Schewe and Finkbeiner that reduces the synthesis problem to a safety game, which can then be solved by computing the solution of the classical fixpoint equation νX.Safe ∩ CPre(X), where CPre(X) are the controllable predecessors of X. We have shown in previous works that the sets computed during the fixpoint algorithm can be equipped with a partial order that allows one to represent them very compactly, by the antichain of their maximal elements. However the computation of CPre(X) cannot be done in polynomial time when X is represented by an antichain (unless P = NP). This motivates the use of SAT solvers to compute CPre(X). Also, we show that the CPre operator can be replaced by a weaker operator CPre _crit where the adversary is restricted to play a subset of critical signals. We show that the fixpoints of the two operators coincide, and so, instead of applying iteratively CPre, we can apply iteratively CPre _crit. In practice, this leads to important improvements on previous LTL synthesis methods. The reduction to SAT problems and the weakening of the CPre operator into CPre _crit and their performance evaluations are new.     

Exact Algorithms for Finding Longest Cycles in Claw-Free Graphs

The Hamiltonian Cycle problem is the problem of deciding whether an n-vertex graph G has a cycle passing through all vertices of G. This problem is a classic NP-complete problem. Finding an exact algorithm that solves it in ${\mathcal {O}}^{*}(\alpha^{n})$ time for some constant α<2 was a notorious open problem until very recently, when Björklund presented a randomized algorithm that uses ${\mathcal {O}}^{*}(1.657^{n})$ time and polynomial space. The Longest Cycle problem, in which the task is to find a cycle of maximum length, is a natural generalization of the Hamiltonian Cycle problem. For a claw-free graph G, finding a longest cycle is equivalent to finding a closed trail (i.e., a connected even subgraph, possibly consisting of a single vertex) that dominates the largest number of edges of some associated graph H. Using this translation we obtain two deterministic algorithms that solve the Longest Cycle problem, and consequently the Hamiltonian Cycle problem, for claw-free graphs: one algorithm that uses ${\mathcal {O}}^{*}(1.6818^{n})$ time and exponential space, and one algorithm that uses ${\mathcal {O}}^{*}(1.8878^{n})$ time and polynomial space.     

Window-based greedy contention management for transactional memory: theory and practice

We consider greedy contention managers for transactional memory for M?× N execution windows of transactions with M threads and N transactions per thread. We present, formally analyze, and experimentally evaluate three new randomized greedy contention management algorithms for transaction windows. Assuming that each transaction has duration τ and conflicts with at most C other transactions inside the window, the first algorithm Offline-Greedy produces a schedule of length O(τ· (C?+?N· log(MN))) with high probability. The offline algorithm depends on knowing the conflict graph which evolves while the execution of the transactions progresses. The second algorithm Online-Greedy produces a schedule of length that is only a logarithmic factor worse than Offline-Greedy, but does not require knowledge of the conflict graph. The third algorithm Adaptive-Greedy is the adaptive version of the previous algorithms which produces a schedule of length asymptotically the same as with online algorithm by adaptively guessing the value of C. All of the algorithms exhibit competitive ratio very close to O(s), where s is the number of shared resources, and at the same time, our algorithms provide new non-trivial tradeoffs for greedy transaction scheduling that parameterize window sizes and transaction conflicts within the execution window. We evaluate these window-based algorithms experimentally using the sorted link list, red-black tree, skip list, and vacation benchmarks. The evaluation results confirm their benefits in practical performance throughput and other metrics such as aborts per commit ratio and execution time overhead, along with the non-trivial provable properties of the algorithms.     

Approximation Algorithms for the Directed k-Tour and k-Stroll Problems

We consider two natural generalizations of the Asymmetric Traveling Salesman problem: the k-Stroll and the k-Tour problems. The input to the k-Stroll problem is a directed n-vertex graph with nonnegative edge lengths, an integer k, as well as two special vertices s and t. The goal is to find a minimum-length s-t walk, containing at least k distinct vertices (including the endpoints s,t). The k-Tour problem can be viewed as a special case of k-Stroll, where s=t. That is, the walk is required to be a tour, containing some pre-specified vertex s. When k=n, the k-Stroll problem becomes equivalent to Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Path, and k-Tour to Asymmetric Traveling Salesman. Our main result is a polylogarithmic approximation algorithm for the k-Stroll problem. Prior to our work, only bicriteria (O(log² k),3)-approximation algorithms have been known, producing walks whose length is bounded by 3OPT, while the number of vertices visited is Ω(k/log² k). We also show a simple O(log² n/loglogn)-approximation algorithm for the k-Tour problem. The best previously known approximation algorithms achieved min(O(log³ k),O(log² n?logk/loglogn)) approximation in polynomial time, and O(log² k) approximation in quasipolynomial time.     

Counting Paths in VPA Is Complete for #NC 1

We give a #NC ¹ upper bound for the problem of counting accepting paths in any fixed visibly pushdown automaton. Our algorithm involves a non-trivial adaptation of the arithmetic formula evaluation algorithm of Buss, Cook, Gupta and Ramachandran (SIAM J. Comput. 21:755?C780, 1992). We also show that the problem is #NC ¹ hard. Our results show that the difference between #BWBP and #NC ¹ is captured exactly by the addition of a visible stack to a nondeterministic finite-state automaton.     

Resource Trade-offs in Syntactically Multilinear Arithmetic Circuits

The class of polynomials computable by polynomial size log-depth arithmetic circuits (VNC ¹) is known to be computable by constant width polynomial degree circuits (VsSC ⁰), but whether the converse containment holds is an open problem. As a partial answer to this question, we give a construction which shows that syntactically multilinear circuits of constant width and polynomial degree can be depth-reduced, which in our notation shows that sm-VsSC ⁰ ${\subseteq}$ ? sm-VNC ¹. We further strengthen this inclusion, by giving a separate construction that provides a width-efficient simulation for constant width syntactically multilinear circuits by constant width syntactically multilinear algebraic branching programs; in our notation, sm-VsSC ⁰ ${\subseteq}$ ? sm-VBWBP. We then focus on polynomial size syntactically multilinear circuits and study relationships between classes of functions obtained by imposing various resource (width, depth, degree) restrictions on these circuits. Along the way, we also observe a characterization of the class NC ¹ in terms of a restricted class of planar branching programs of polynomial size. Finally, in contrast to the general case, we report closure and stability of coefficient functions for the syntactically multilinear classes studied in this paper.     

Two-Way Automata Versus Logarithmic Space

We strengthen a previously known connection between the size complexity of two-way finite automata ( ) and the space complexity of Turing machines (tms). Specifically, we prove that

every s-state has a poly(s)-state that agrees with it on all inputs of length ≤s if and only if NL?L/poly, and

every s-state has a poly(s)-state that agrees with it on all inputs of length ≤2 ^s if and only if NLL?LL/polylog.

Here, and are the deterministic and nondeterministic , NL and L/poly are the standard classes of languages recognizable in logarithmic space by nondeterministic tms and by deterministic tms with access to polynomially long advice, and NLL and LL/polylog are the corresponding complexity classes for space O(loglogn) and advice length poly(logn). Our arguments strengthen and extend an old theorem by Berman and Lingas and can be used to obtain variants of the above statements for other modes of computation or other combinations of bounds for the input length, the space usage, and the length of advice.     

The Parallel Complexity of Graph Canonization Under Abelian Group Action

We study the problem of computing canonical forms for graphs and hypergraphs under Abelian group action and show tight complexity bounds. Our approach is algebraic. We transform the problem of computing canonical forms for graphs to the problem of computing canonical forms for associated algebraic structures, and we develop parallel algorithms for these associated problems.

1. In our first result we show that the problem of computing canonical labelings for hypergraphs of color class size 2 is logspace Turing equivalent to solving a system of linear equations over the field $\mathbb {F} _{2}$ . This implies a deterministic NC ² algorithm for the problem.
2. Similarly, we show that the problem of canonical labeling graphs and hypergraphs under arbitrary Abelian permutation group action is fairly well characterized by the problem of computing the integer determinant. In particular, this yields deterministic NC ³ and randomized NC ² algorithms for the problem.

     

Approximation Algorithms and Hardness Results for Packing Element-Disjoint Steiner Trees in Planar Graphs

We study the problem of packing element-disjoint Steiner trees in graphs. We are given a graph and a designated subset of terminal nodes, and the goal is to find a maximum cardinality set of element-disjoint trees such that each tree contains every terminal node. An element means a non-terminal node or an edge. (Thus, each non-terminal node and each edge must be in at most one of the trees.) We show that the problem is APX-hard when there are only three terminal nodes, thus answering an open question. Our main focus is on the special case when the graph is planar. We show that the problem of finding two element-disjoint Steiner trees in a planar graph is NP-hard. Similarly, the problem of finding two edge-disjoint Steiner trees in a planar graph is NP-hard. We design an algorithm for planar graphs that achieves an approximation guarantee close to 2. In fact, given a planar graph that is k element-connected on the terminals (k is an upper bound on the number of element-disjoint Steiner trees), the algorithm returns $\lfloor\frac{k}{2} \rfloor-1$ element-disjoint Steiner trees. Using this algorithm, we get an approximation algorithm for the edge-disjoint version of the problem on planar graphs that improves on the previous approximation guarantees. We also show that the natural LP relaxation of the planar problem has an integrality ratio approaching?2.     

On Uniformity and Circuit Lower Bounds

We explore relationships between circuit complexity, the complexity of generating circuits, and algorithms for analyzing circuits. Our results can be divided into two parts:

1. Lower bounds against medium-uniform circuits. Informally, a circuit class is “medium uniform” if it can be generated by an algorithmic process that is somewhat complex (stronger than LOGTIME) but not infeasible. Using a new kind of indirect diagonalization argument, we prove several new unconditional lower bounds against medium-uniform circuit classes, including: ? For all k, P is not contained in P-uniform SIZE(n ^k ). That is, for all k, there is a language \({L_k \in {\textsf P}}\) that does not have O(n ^k )-size circuits constructible in polynomial time. This improves Kannan’s lower bound from 1982 that NP is not in P-uniform SIZE(n ^k ) for any fixed k. ? For all k, NP is not in \({{\textsf P}^{\textsf NP}_{||}-{\textsf {uniform SIZE}}(n^k)}\) .This also improves Kannan’s theorem, but in a different way: the uniformity condition on the circuits is stronger than that on the language itself. ? For all k, LOGSPACE does not have LOGSPACE-uniform branching programs of size n ^k .
2. Eliminating non-uniformity and (non-uniform) circuit lower bounds. We complement these results by showing how to convert any potential simulation of LOGTIME-uniform NC ¹ in ACC ⁰/poly or TC ⁰/poly into a medium-uniform simulation using small advice. This lemma can be used to simplify the proof that faster SAT algorithms imply NEXP circuit lower bounds and leads to the following new connection: ? Consider the following task: given a TC ⁰ circuit C of n ^O(1) size, output yes when C is unsatisfiable, and output no when C has at least 2 ^n-2 satisfying assignments. (Behavior on other inputs can be arbitrary.) Clearly, this problem can be solved efficiently using randomness. If this problem can be solved deterministically in 2 ^n-ω(log n) time, then \({{\textsf{NEXP}} \not \subset {\textsf{TC}}^0/{\rm poly}}\) .

Another application is to derandomize randomized TC ⁰ simulations of NC ¹ on almost all inputs: ?Suppose \({{\textsf{NC}}^1 \subseteq {\textsf{BPTC}}^0}\) . Then, for every ε > 0 and every language L in NC ¹, there is a LOGTIME?uniform TC ⁰ circuit family of polynomial size recognizing a language L′ such that L and L′ differ on at most \({2^{n^{\epsilon}}}\) inputs of length n, for all n.     

Approximating Node-Connectivity Augmentation Problems

We consider the (undirected) Node Connectivity Augmentation (NCA) problem: given a graph J=(V,E _J ) and connectivity requirements $\{r(u,v): u,v \in V\}$ , find a minimum size set I of new edges (any edge is allowed) such that the graph J∪I contains r(u,v) internally-disjoint uv-paths, for all u,v∈V. In Rooted NCA there is s∈V such that r(u,v)>0 implies u=s or v=s. For large values of k=max? _u,v∈V r(u,v), NCA is at least as hard to approximate as Label-Cover and thus it is unlikely to admit an approximation ratio polylogarithmic in k. Rooted NCA is at least as hard to approximate as Hitting-Set. The previously best approximation ratios for the problem were O(kln?n) for NCA and O(ln?n) for Rooted NCA. In this paper we give an approximation algorithm with ratios O(kln?² k) for NCA and O(ln?² k) for Rooted NCA. This is the first approximation algorithm with ratio independent of?n, and thus is a constant for any fixed k. Our algorithm is based on the following new structural result which is of independent interest. If $\mathcal{D}$ is a set of node pairs in a graph?J, then the maximum degree in the hypergraph formed by the inclusion minimal tight sets separating at least one pair in $\mathcal{D}$ is O(? ²), where ? is the maximum connectivity in J of a pair in $\mathcal{D}$ .     

Small Space Analogues of Valiant’s Classes and the Limitations of Skew Formulas

In the uniform circuit model of computation, the width of a boolean circuit exactly characterizes the “space” complexity of the computed function. Looking for a similar relationship in Valiant’s algebraic model of computation, we propose width of an arithmetic circuit as a possible measure of space. In the uniform setting, we show that our definition coincides with that of VPSPACE at polynomial width. We introduce the class VL as an algebraic variant of deterministic log-space L; VL is a subclass of VP. Further, to define algebraic variants of non-deterministic space-bounded classes, we introduce the notion of “read-once” certificates for arithmetic circuits. We show that polynomial-size algebraic branching programs (an algebraic analog of NL) can be expressed as read-once exponential sums over polynomials in ${{\sf VL}, {\it i.e.}\quad{\sf VBP} \in \Sigma^R \cdot {\sf VL}}$ . Thus, read-once exponential sums can be viewed as a reasonable way of capturing space-bounded non-determinism. We also show that Σ ^R ·VBP = VBP, i.e. VBPs are stable under read-once exponential sums. Though the best upper bound we have for Σ ^R ·VL itself is VNP, we can obtain better upper bounds for width-bounded multiplicatively disjoint (md-) circuits. Without the width restriction, md- arithmetic circuits are known to capture all of VP. We show that read-once exponential sums over md- constant-width arithmetic circuits are within VP and that read-once exponential sums over md- polylog-width arithmetic circuits are within VQP. We also show that exponential sums of a skew formula cannot represent the determinant polynomial.     

Spatial reasoning with rectangular cardinal relations

Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning plays a important role in various spatial applications. In this paper we introduce a new formalism, we name RCD calculus, for qualitative spatial reasoning with cardinal direction relations between regions of the plane approximated by rectangles. We believe this calculus leads to an attractive balance between efficiency, simplicity and expressive power, which makes it adequate for spatial applications. We define a constraint algebra and we identify a convex tractable subalgebra allowing efficient reasoning with definite and imprecise knowledge about spatial configurations specified by qualitative constraint networks. For such tractable fragment, we propose several polynomial algorithms based on constraint satisfaction to solve the consistency and minimality problems. Some of them rely on a translation of qualitative networks of the RCD calculus to qualitative networks of the Interval or Rectangle Algebra, and back. We show that the consistency problem for convex networks can also be solved inside the RCD calculus, by applying a suitable adaptation of the path-consistency algorithm. However, path consistency can not be applied to obtain the minimal network, contrary to what happens in the convex fragment of the Rectangle Algebra. Finally, we partially analyze the complexity of the consistency problem when adding non-convex relations, showing that it becomes NP-complete in the cases considered. This analysis may contribute to find a maximal tractable subclass of the RCD calculus and of the Rectangle Algebra, which remains an open problem.     

On Cutwidth Parameterized by Vertex Cover

We study the Cutwidth problem, where the input is a graph G, and the objective is find a linear layout of the vertices that minimizes the maximum number of edges intersected by any vertical line inserted between two consecutive vertices. We give an algorithm for Cutwidth with running time O(2 ^k n ^O(1)). Here k is the size of a minimum vertex cover of the input graph G, and n is the number of vertices in G. Our algorithm gives an O(2 ^n/2 n ^O(1)) time algorithm for Cutwidth on bipartite graphs as a corollary. This is the first non-trivial exact exponential time algorithm for Cutwidth on a graph class where the problem remains NP-complete. Additionally, we show that Cutwidth parameterized by the size of the minimum vertex cover of the input graph does not admit a polynomial kernel unless NP?coNP/poly. Our kernelization lower bound contrasts with the recent results of Bodlaender et al. (ICALP, Springer, Berlin, 2011; SWAT, Springer, Berlin, 2012) that both Treewidth and Pathwidth parameterized by vertex cover do admit polynomial kernels.     

Log-Space Algorithms for Paths and Matchings in k-Trees

Reachability and shortest path problems are NL-complete for general graphs. They are known to be in L for graphs of tree-width 2 (Jakoby and Tantau in Proceedings of FSTTCS’07: The 27th Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 216–227, 2007). In this paper, we improve these bounds for k-trees, where k is a constant. In particular, the main results of our paper are log-space algorithms for reachability in directed k-trees, and for computation of shortest and longest paths in directed acyclic k-trees. Besides the path problems mentioned above, we also consider the problem of deciding whether a k-tree has a perfect matching (decision version), and if so, finding a perfect matching (search version), and prove that these two problems are L-complete. These problems are known to be in P and in RNC for general graphs, and in SPL for planar bipartite graphs, as shown in Datta et al. (Theory Comput. Syst. 47:737–757, 2010). Our results settle the complexity of these problems for the class of k-trees. The results are also applicable for bounded tree-width graphs, when a tree-decomposition is given as input. The technique central to our algorithms is a careful implementation of the divide-and-conquer approach in log-space, along with some ideas from Jakoby and Tantau (Proceedings of FSTTCS’07: The 27th Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 216–227, 2007) and Limaye et al. (Theory Comput. Syst. 46(3):499–522, 2010).     

Amplifying circuit lower bounds against polynomial time, with applications

We give a self-reduction for the Circuit Evaluation problem (CircEval) and prove the following consequences.

1. Amplifying size–depth lower bounds. If CircEval has Boolean circuits of n ^k size and n ^1?δ depth for some k and δ, then for every ${\epsilon > 0}$ , there is a δ′ > 0 such that CircEval has circuits of ${n^{1 + \epsilon}}$ size and ${n^{1- \delta^{\prime}}}$ depth. Moreover, the resulting circuits require only ${\tilde{O}(n^{\epsilon})}$ bits of non-uniformity to construct. As a consequence, strong enough depth lower bounds for Circuit Evaluation imply a full separation of P and NC (even with a weak size lower bound).
2. Lower bounds for quantified Boolean formulas. Let c, d > 1 and e < 1 satisfy c < (1 ? e + d )/d. Either the problem of recognizing valid quantified Boolean formulas (QBF) is not solvable in TIME[n ^c ], or the Circuit Evaluation problem cannot be solved with circuits of n ^d size and n ^e depth. This implies unconditional polynomial-time uniform circuit lower bounds for solving QBF. We also prove that QBF does not have n ^c -time uniform NC circuits, for all c < 2.