Adjuvant everolimus in high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final results from the PILLAR-2 randomized phase III trial

BackgroundPatients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≥3 are at higher risk for relapse after a complete response (CR) to first-line rituximab-based chemotherapy (R-chemo). Everolimus has single-agent activity in lymphoma. PILLAR-2 aimed to improve disease-free survival (DFS) with 1 year of adjuvant everolimus.Patients and methodsPatients with high-risk (IPI ≥3) DLBCL and a positron emission tomography/computed tomography-confirmed CR to first-line R-chemo were randomized to 1 year of everolimus 10 mg/day or placebo. The primary end point was DFS; secondary end points were overall survival, lymphoma-specific survival, and safety.ResultsBetween August 2009 and December 2013, 742 patients were randomized to everolimus (n = 372) or placebo (n = 370). Median follow-up was 50.4 months (range 24.0–76.9). Overall, 47% of patients were ≥65 years, 50% were male, and 42% had an IPI of 4 or 5. 48% and 67% completed everolimus and placebo, respectively. Primary reasons for everolimus discontinuation versus placebo were adverse events (AEs; 30% versus 12%) and relapsed disease (6% versus 13%). Everolimus did not significantly improve DFS compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.92; 95% CI 0.69–1.22; P = 0.276). Two-year DFS rate was 77.8% (95% CI 72.7–82.1) with everolimus and 77.0% (95% CI 72.1–81.1) with placebo. Common grade 3/4 AEs with everolimus were neutropenia, stomatitis, and decreased CD4 lymphocytes.ConclusionsAdjuvant everolimus did not improve DFS in patients already in PET/CT-confirmed CR. Future approaches should incorporate targeted agents such as everolimus with R-CHOP rather than as adjuvant therapy after CR has been obtained.ClinicalTrials.govNCT00790036     

Categories of response to first line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor targeted therapy and overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

IntroductionSequential use of targeted therapy (TT) has improved overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The value of objective response (OR) as compared to stable disease (SD) is unclear. We aimed to investigate OR of first-line TT and its impact on OS.Material and methodsRetrospective analysis of OS among 331 mRCC patients with a first-line assessment according to RECIST 1.0. Characteristics between objective responders (complete response [CR] or partial remission [PR]), patients with SD and non-responders (progressive disease [PD] and toxicity [Tox]) were compared with the Chi-square test and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox model analysis of Predictors of OS .ResultsBest response was CR, PR, SD, PD and Tox in 9 (2.7%), 61 (18.4%), 167 (50.5%), 80 (24.2%) and 14 (4.2%) patients respectively resulting in an OR rate of 21%. Median OS in months: CR 63.2; PR 37.6; SD 35.9; PD 14.6; TOX 22.5 (p < 0.0001). Median PFS for responders was 14.8, 11.5 for patients with SD and 2.5 for non-responders (p < 0.0001). Similarly median OS was 38.7, 35.9 and 15.5 (p < 0.00001). Primary resistance and a first-line PFS <6 months were the strongest independent predictors of OS. The achievement of OR as compared to SD did not impact OS.ConclusionsIn our cohort of unselected patients OR was not associated with superior OS as compared to SD.     

Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in the absence of disease progression or treatment limiting toxicity: clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma

BackgroundProgrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blocking monoclonal antibodies improve the overall survival of patients with advanced melanoma but the optimal duration of treatment has not been established.Patients and MethodsThis academic real-world cohort study investigated the outcome of 185 advanced melanoma patients who electively discontinued anti-PD-1 therapy with pembrolizumab (N = 167) or nivolumab (N = 18) in the absence of disease progression (PD) or treatment limiting toxicity (TLT) at 14 medical centres across Europe and Australia.ResultsMedian time on treatment was 12 months (range 0.7–43). The best objective tumour response at the time of treatment discontinuation was complete response (CR) in 117 (63%) patients, partial response (PR) in 44 (24%) patients and stable disease (SD) in 16 (9%) patients; 8 (4%) patients had no evaluable disease (NE). After a median follow-up of 18 months (range 0.7–48) after treatment discontinuation, 78% of patients remained free of progression. Median time to progression was 12 months (range 2–23). PD was less frequent in patients with CR (14%) compared with patients with PR (32%) and SD (50%). Six out of 19 (32%) patients who were retreated with an anti-PD-1 at the time of PD obtained a new antitumour response.ConclusionsIn this real-world cohort of advanced melanoma patients discontinuing anti-PD-1 therapy in the absence of TLT or PD, the duration of anti-PD-1 therapy was shorter when compared with clinical trials. In patients obtaining a CR, and being treated for >6 months, the risk of relapse after treatment discontinuation was low. Patients achieving a PR or SD as best tumour response were at higher risk for progression after discontinuing therapy, and defining optimal treatment duration in such patients deserves further study. Retreatment with an anti-PD-1 at the time of progression may lead to renewed antitumour activity in some patients.Clinical trial registrationNCT02673970 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02673970?cond=melanoma&cntry=BE&city=Jette&rank=3)     

Efficacy and safety findings from DREAM: a phase III study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) versus i.v. paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy

BackgroundPaclitaxel is currently only available as an intravenous (i.v.) formulation. DHP107 is a novel oral formulation of lipid ingredients and paclitaxel. DHP107 demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics to i.v. paclitaxel as a second-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). DREAM is a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized phase III study of patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed, unresectable/recurrent AGC after first-line therapy failure.Methods and materialsPatients were randomized 1 : 1 to DHP107 (200 mg/m² orally twice daily days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks) or i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg/m² day 1 every 3 weeks). Patients were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, disease status, and prior treatment; response was assessed (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) every 6 weeks. Primary end point: non-inferiority of progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points: overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. For the efficacy analysis, sequential tests for non-inferiority were carried out, first with a non-inferiority margin of 1.48, then with a margin of 1.25.ResultsBaseline characteristics were balanced in the 236 randomized patients (n = 118 per arm). Median PFS (per-protocol) was 3.0 (95% CI 1.7–4.0) months for DHP107 and 2.6 (95% CI 1.8–2.8) months for paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85; 95% CI 0.64–1.13). A sensitivity analysis on PFS using independent central review showed similar results (HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.70–1.24). Median OS (full analysis set) was 9.7 (95% CI 7.1 − 11.5) months for DHP107 versus 8.9 (95% CI 7.1–12.2) months for paclitaxel (HR = 1.04; 95% CI 0.76–1.41). ORR was 17.8% for DHP107 (CR 4.2%; PR 13.6%) versus 25.4% for paclitaxel (CR 3.4%; PR 22.0%). Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and mucositis were more common with DHP107; peripheral neuropathy was more common with paclitaxel. There were only few Grade≥3 adverse events, most commonly neutropenia (42% versus 53%); febrile neutropenia was reported infrequently (5.9% versus 2.5%). No hypersensitivity reactions occurred with DHP107 (paclitaxel 2.5%).ConclusionsDHP107 as a second-line treatment of AGC was non-inferior to paclitaxel for PFS; other efficacy and safety parameters were comparable. DHP107 is the first oral paclitaxel with proven efficacy/safety for the treatment of AGC.ClinicalTrials.govNCT01839773.     

Lenalidomide in combination with intravenous rituximab (REVRI) in relapsed/refractory primary CNS lymphoma or primary intraocular lymphoma: a multicenter prospective ‘proof of concept’ phase II study of the French Oculo-Cerebral lymphoma (LOC) Network and the Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA)

BackgroundPrimary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) are mainly diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) of the non-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB) subtype. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of rituximab plus lenalidomide (R²) in DLBCL–PCNSL.Patients and methodsPatients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) DLBCL–PCNSL or primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) were included in this prospective phase II study. The induction treatment consisted of eight 28-day cycles of R² (rituximab 375/m² i.v. D1; lenalidomide 20 mg/day, D1-21 for cycle 1; and 25 mg/day, D1-21 for the subsequent cycles); in responding patients, the induction treatment was followed by a maintenance phase comprising 12 28-day cycles of lenalidomide alone (10 mg/day, D1-21). The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) at the end of induction (P0 = 10%; P1 = 30%).ResultsFifty patients were included. Forty-five patients (PCNSL, N = 34; PVRL, N = 11) were assessable for response. The ORR at the end of induction was 35.6% (95% CI 21.9–51.2) in assessable patients and 32.0% (95% CI 21.9–51.2) in the intent-to-treat analysis, including 13 complete responses (CR)/unconfirmed CR (uCR; 29%) and 3 partial responses (PR; 7%). The best responses were 18 CR/uCR (40%) and 12 PR (27%) during the induction phase. The maintenance phase was started and completed by 18 and 5 patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 19.2 months (range 1.5–31), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.8 months (95% CI 3.9–11.3) and 17.7 months (95% CI 12.9 to not reached), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. The peripheral baseline CD4/CD8 ratio impacted PFS [median PFS = 9.5 months (95% CI, 8.1–14.8] for CD4/CD8 ≥ 1.6; median PFS = 2.8 months, [95% CI, 1.1–7.8) for CD4/CD8 < 1.6, P = 0.03).ConclusionsThe R² regimen showed significant activity in R/R PCNSL and PVRL patients. These results support assessments of the efficacy of R² combined with methotrexate-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment of PCNSL.Clinical trials numberNCT01956695.     

Relapses in hepatoblastoma patients: Clinical characteristics and outcome – Experience of the International Childhood Liver Tumour Strategy Group (SIOPEL)

PurposeTo analyse the clinical characteristics and outcome of hepatoblastoma (HB) patients who relapsed after enrolment on SIOPEL studies 1–3.Patients and methodsAnalysis of clinical data of all 59 patients (pts) registered in SIOPEL 1–3 studies, who relapsed after achieving complete remission (CR).ResultsThe median time from the initial diagnosis to relapse was 12 months (4–115 m). The site of relapse was lung N = 27, liver N = 21, both liver and lung N = 5 and other N = 5 (missing data-MD: 1 patient). All but 9 pts had an alpha-fetoprotein level >10 ng/mL at the time of relapse. Treatment of the relapse included chemotherapy and surgery N = 25, chemotherapy alone N = 21, surgery alone N = 7 and only palliative treatment N = 5 (MD: 1 pt). Overall, 31 pts (52%) achieved a second CR. With a median follow-up of 83 months, 23 pts are alive, (18 in 2nd CR, 5 after a second relapse) and 36 pts have died (35 from disease and 1 from complications). Three-year event-free survival and overall survival are 34% and 43% respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.69). The main factors associated with a good outcome were PRETEXT group I–III at diagnosis, a high AFP level at relapse and relapse treatment including both chemotherapy and surgery.ConclusionRelapses in HB are rare events occurring in less than 12% of pts after CR. Combined treatment with chemotherapy and surgical removal of the tumour is essential for long-term survival.     

FDG-PET response and outcome from anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has resulted in impressive and durable clinical activity for many cancers including melanoma; however, there remain few reliable predictors for long-term response. This study investigated whether [¹⁸F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) imaging may better predict long-term outcomes compared with standard computed tomography (CT) response criteria.Patients and methodsRetrospective analysis of metastatic melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy with baseline and 1-year FDG-PET and CT imaging at Melanoma Institute Australia. One-year response was determined using RECIST for CT and EORTC criteria for PET, coded as complete response (CR or CMR), partial response (PR or PMR), stable disease (SD or SMD) or progressive disease (PD or PMD). Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined from the 1-year landmark.ResultsPatients (n = 104) were evaluated with median follow-up 30.1 months and 98% remain alive. Most received anti-PD-1 as monotherapy (67%) or combined with ipilimumab (31%). At 1 year, 28% had CR, 66% had PR and 6% had SD on CT, while 75% had CMR, 16% PMR and 9% SMD/PMD on PET. CMR was observed in 68% of patients with PR on CT. RECIST PFS post 1-year landmark was similar in patients with CR versus PR/SD, but improved in patients with CMR versus non-CMR {median not reached [NR] versus 12.8 month; hazard ratio [HR] 0.06 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02–0.23]; P < 0.01}. In patients with PR on CT, PFS was improved in patients with PR + CMR versus PR + non-CMR (median NR versus 12.8 months; HR 0.07 [95% CI 0.02–0.27]; P < 0.01). In the 78 CMR patients, 78% had discontinued treatment and 96% had ongoing response.ConclusionsWhilst only a small proportion of patients have a CR at 1 year, most patients with a PR have CMR on PET. Almost all patients with CMR at 1 year have ongoing response to therapy thereafter. PET may have utility in predicting long-term benefit and help guide discontinuation of therapy.     

Bortezomib in combination with CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with stage III/IV peripheral T-cell lymphomas: A multicentre,single-arm,phase 2 trial

BackgroundWe performed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of bortezomib in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) as first-line treatment for patients with stage III/IV peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) based on our phase I study results.MethodsPatients received bortezomib on days 1 and 8 at a dose of 1.6 mg/m² in addition to CHOP every 3 weeks for a total of six cycles.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled: PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, n = 16), extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL, n = 10), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n = 8), ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL, n = 6), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL, n = 5) and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (n = 1). Thirty patients achieved complete response (CR, 65%) and the overall response rate was 76% (35/46). Although the CR rate of ENKTL was only 30% (3/10), three subtypes of PTCLs (PTCL-NOS, AITL and ALCL) showed 87% of overall response rate (ORR) (26/30) and 73% of CR rate (22/30). However, the 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 47% and 35%, respectively due to frequent relapse after remission. Grade 3/4 leucopenia was the most frequent toxicity whereas neurotoxicity was tolerable: grade 1 or 2 of peripheral neuropathy.ConclusionsThe combined treatment of bortezomib and CHOP is an effective and feasible regimen for advanced-stage PTCLs other than ENKTL, with acceptable toxicity. However, future studies exploring new drug combinations are warranted to overcome relapse after remission.     

Metronomic chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: Impact on VEGF

BackgroundAnticancer chemotherapy is thought to be effective by means of direct cytotoxicity on tumor cells. Alternative mechanisms of efficacy have been ascribed to several common anticancer agents; including cyclophosphamide (CTX) and capecitabine (Cap) when given at lower doses for prolonged period (metronomic chemotherapy) postulating an antiangiogenic activity as well.Aim of workTo evaluate the action and tolerability of metronomic chemotherapy (MC) and its impact on serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.Patients and methodsIn this study we evaluated the clinical efficacy and tolerability of low dose, capecitabine (500 mg twice daily) together with oral cyclophosphamide (CTX) (a dose of 50 mg once daily) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an angiogenic marker, was measured in the serum samples; at base line, and after 2 and 6 months of therapy.ResultsSixty patients were evaluable. One achieved complete response (CR), 12 partial responses (PR), and 21 stable diseases (SD), while 26 were with progressive disease (PD). The overall response rate was 21.7% with overall disease control (CR, PR, and SD) 56.7%. The median time to progression was 7 ± 2.59 months and overall survival 16 ± 8.02 months. Toxicity was mild, Palmar–plantar erythrodythesia was the most common side effect and was observed in 22 patients (37%), leucopenia (G1 + 2) was the most common hematological toxicity, and it was reported in 27% of the cases. The median VEGF level was significantly declined after 2 and 6 months of therapy compared to the base line among the patients with disease control (CR, PR, and SD). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients with post-menopausal, positive hormonal receptors, negative HER-2/Neu, and one metastatic site, were statistically significant and have a better disease control rate.ConclusionsMC induced drop in VEGF, and was effective, minimally toxic regimen for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients.     

Clinical outcomes in patients receiving three lines of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from a large patient cohort

AimA number of targeted therapies (TTs) are effective in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but clinical outcomes with the sequential use of three TTs have been poorly investigated, this study evaluates their outcome.MethodsPatients with clear cells mRCC treated with three TTs were retrospectively studied. Therapies were classified as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi). Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and total PFS (tPFS) – defined as the time from start of first-line to progression on third-line treatment – were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and curves were compared with log-rank test.ResultsA total of 2065 patients with mRCC were consecutively treated with first-line TT in 23 centres in Italy. Overall 281/2065 patients (13%) were treated with three TTs. Median OS and tPFS were 44.7 and 34.1 months, respectively and were longer in patients receiving the sequence vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi)–VEGFi–mTORi compared with those receiving VEGFi–mTORi–VEGFi with a statistical difference in OS (50.7 versus 37.8 months, p = 0.004; 36.5 versus 29.3 months, p = 0.059, respectively).ConclusionsFew patients received three lines of TTs. The sequence VEGFi–VEGFi–mTORi was associated with improved survival with respect to VEGFi–mTORi–VEGFi and primary resistance to first-line was a negative predictive and prognostic factor.     

A prospective multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and weekly docetaxel as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (KCSG HN07-01)

BackgroundThe purpose of this phase II study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin and weekly docetaxel combination chemotherapy as a first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.Patients and MethodsRecurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer patients were enrolled and received a combination of weekly docetaxel (35 mg/m² on Day1 and Day8) and cisplatin (70 mg/m² D1) every 21 days, for up to a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, and the secondary endpoints included toxicity of combination chemotherapy, progression-free survival, overall survival and 1-year survival rate.ResultsIn total, 47 patients were enrolled and analysed, and 46 patients (97.9%) completed the planned protocol. In an intent-to-treat analysis, 6 patients (12.8%) achieved complete response (CR) and 27 patients (57.4%) showed partial response (PR), with an objective response rate of 70.2%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.6 months (95% C.I. 5.7–13.5 months) and 28.5 months (95% C.I. 16.9–40.1 months), respectively, and the 1-year survival rate was 89.9%. The common grade 3 adverse events were stomatitis (1.2%), neutropenia (0.8%), anaemia (0.8%), infection (0.8%) and diarrhoea (0.8%). Grade 4 adverse events were not observed in this study.ConclusionsThe combination chemotherapy of cisplatin and weekly docetaxel is highly effective and shows favourable toxicity as a first-line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.     

Efficacité et tolérance de la radiothérapie externe pour les patients atteints d'une récidive d'un carcinome différencié de la thyroïde

PurposeRadiation therapy is often the last resource treatment for cervical relapse in iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. We present locoregional control data in patients with cervical relapse treated with curative intent radiation therapy with or without concomitant carboplatin.Material and methodsThis monocentric retrospective study gathered data on patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma – vesicular or papillary – in relapse after thyroidectomy who received a curative intent cervical radiation therapy. Locoregional progression free survival (LRPFS), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) were gathered as well as acute and chronic adverse events assessed with the CTCAE v4.ResultsThirty-nine patients were consecutively included between 2005 and 2019. The median follow-up was 36.6 months. Fifteen patients (38%) had a locoregional relapse, locoregional control at 2 years was 66.7%. The median LRPFS was 48 months [32.9–not reached] and the median overall survival 49 months [38.8–not reached]. In multivariate analysis, initial incomplete resection was associated with poorer OS (HR: 24.39 [3.57–166.78], P = 0.00113) and LRPFS (HR: 33.91 [4.46–257.61], P = 0.00066), extra nodal spread was associated with poorer LRPFS (HR: 13.45 [1.81–99,76], P = 0.011). ECOG performance status was associated with OS (HR: 5.11 [1.57–16.66], P = 0.00688). Carboplatin association with radiation therapy was not associated with improved survivals (OS: P = 0.34, LRPFS: P = 0.84). The rate of acute grade 3 toxicities was 14%.ConclusionSalvage cervical radiation therapy was associated with a locoregional control of 66.7% at 2 years with a reasonable toxicity rate. Carboplatin association with radiation therapy did not improve locoregional control nor overall survival in comparison with radiotherapy alone.     

Salvage chemotherapy with alternating MINE–ESHAP regimen in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation

BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered the gold standard in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). However, the optimal salvage regimen has not yet been established.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of MINE (mesna, ifosfamide, mitoxantrone, and etoposide) alternated with ESHAP (etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin) in the treatment of 61 relapsed or refractory HL patients after ABVD-based chemotherapy.ResultsOverall, 25 patients (41%) achieved a complete response (CR), 23 (38%) a partial response (PR), 4 (7%) a stable disease, and 8 (13%) progressed for an overall response rate of 79%. Response to first-line chemotherapy was the most important prognostic factor for response to MINE–ESHAP (P = 0.041). No grade 4 extrahematologic toxic effects or toxic deaths were observed. Adequate peripheral blood stem-cell collection was achieved in 56 of 59 (95%) mobilized patients. Overall survival and event-free survival after HDT and ASCT were significantly higher for patients achieving CR/PR in comparison with those refractory to MINE–ESHAP (46% and 35% versus 74% and 69%, respectively).ConclusionMINE–ESHAP results in a high response rate with acceptable toxicity in patients with HL having failed ABVD-based treatment.     

Phase IIa study of the CD19 antibody MOR208 in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

BackgroundThis two-stage, phase IIa study investigated the antitumor activity and safety of MOR208, an Fc-engineered, humanized, CD19 antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory (R-R) B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). CD19 is broadly expressed across the B-lymphocyte lineage, including in B-cell malignancies, but not by hematological stem cells.Patients and methodsPatients aged ≥18 years, with R-R NHL progressing after ≥1 prior rituximab-containing regimen were enrolled into subtype-specific cohorts: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), other indolent (i)NHL and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Treatment was MOR208, 12 mg/kg intravenously, weekly, for 8 weeks. Patients with at least stable disease could continue treatment for an additional 4 weeks. Those with a partial or complete response after 12 weeks could receive extended MOR208 treatment (12 mg/kg, either monthly or every second week) until progression. The primary end point was overall response rate.ResultsNinety-two patients were enrolled: DLBCL (n = 35), FL (n = 34), other iNHL (n = 11) and MCL (n = 12). Responses were observed in DLBCL, FL and other iNHL cohorts (26%, 29% and 27%, respectively). They lasted ≥12 months in 5/9 responding patients with DLBCL, 4/9 with FL and 2/3 with other iNHL. Responses in nine patients are ongoing (>26 months in five instances). Patients with rituximab refractory disease showed a similar response rate and progression-free survival time to patients with non-refractory disease. The most common adverse events (any grade) were infusion-related reactions (12%) and neutropenia (12%). One patient experienced a grade 4 infusion-related reaction and eight patients (9%) experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths were reported.ConclusionsMOR208 monotherapy demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients with R-R DLBCL and R-R FL, including in patients with rituximab refractory tumors. These efficacy data and the favorable safety profile support further investigation of MOR208 in phase II/III combination therapy trials in R-R DLBCL.ClinicalTrials.gov numberNCT01685008.     

Breast cancer during follow-up and progression – A population based cohort on new cancers and changed biology

BackgroundEmerging data indicate an important role for biopsies of clinically/radiologically defined breast cancer ‘recurrences’. The present study investigates tumour related events (relapses, other malignancies, benign conditions) after a primary breast cancer diagnosis.Patients and methodsThe cohort includes 2102 women, representing all patients, with primary invasive breast cancer during 2000–2011 in the county of Värmland, Sweden. A comparative analysis of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and proliferation (Ki67) between the primary tumour and the relapse was performed and related to outcome.ResultsWith a mean follow-up time of 4.8 years, 1060 out of 2102 patients have had a biopsy taken after the initial breast cancer diagnosis demonstrating 177 recurrences, 93 other malignancies (colorectal, lung, skin), 40 cancer in situ (skin, breast) and 857 benign lesions. Approximately 70% (177 out of 245) of all cases of relapsed breast cancer underwent a biopsy during this time period. For patients with recurrences, ER (n = 127), PR (n = 101), HER2 (n = 73) and Ki67 (n = 55) status in both primary tumour and the corresponding relapse were determined. The discordance of receptor status was 14.2%, 39.6%, 9.6% and 36.3%, respectively. Loss of ER or PR in the relapse resulted in a significant increased risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) 3.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.65–7.94) and (HR 2.34; 95% CI, 1.01–5.47) compared with patients with stable ER or PR positive tumours. The proportion of patients losing ER was bigger in the group treated with endocrine therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy, 16.7% and 13.3%, respectively, compared with the group treated with chemotherapy alone or that which received no treatment 4.3% and 7.7%, respectively.ConclusionDiscordance of biomarkers between the primary tumour and the corresponding relapse was seen in 10–40% of the patients, adjuvant therapies seem to drive clonal selections. Patients with tumours losing ER or PR during progression have worse survival compared with patients with retained receptor expression.     

Randomized phase III study of docetaxel plus bavituximab in previously treated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundBavituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets phosphatidylserine in the presence of β₂ glycoprotein 1 (β2GP1) to exert an antitumor immune response. This phase III trial determined the efficacy of bavituximab combined with docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsKey eligibility criteria included advanced non-squamous NSCLC with disease progression after treatment with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, evidence of disease control after at least two cycles of first-line therapy, presence of measurable disease, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, adequate bone marrow and organ function, and no recent history of clinically significant bleeding. Eligible patients were randomized 1 : 1 to receive up to six 21-day cycles of docetaxel plus either weekly bavituximab 3 mg/kg or placebo until progression or toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 597 patients were enrolled. Median OS was 10.5 months in the docetaxel + bavituximab arm and was 10.9 months in the docetaxel + placebo arm (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.88–1.29; P = 0.533). There was no difference in progression-free survival (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.82–1.22; P = 0.990). Toxicities were manageable and similar between arms. In subset analysis, among patients with high baseline serum β2GP1 levels ≥200 µg/ml, a nonsignificant OS trend favored the bavituximab arm (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.63–1.06; P = 0.134). Among patients who received post-study immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, OS favored the bavituximab arm (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.26–0.81; P = 0.006).ConclusionsThe combination of bavituximab plus docetaxel is not superior to docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. The addition of bavituximab to docetaxel does not meaningfully increase toxicity. The potential benefit of bavituximab observed in patients with high β2GP1 levels and in patients subsequently treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors requires further investigation.Clinical trial numberNCT01999673.     

Platinum-sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer: Towards a definition

BackgroundFirst-line oxaliplatin-based therapy is the standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but its dose-limiting toxicity is sensory neuropathy. The OPTIMisation of OXaliplatin (OPTIMOX) stop-and-go approach with oxaliplatin-free interval (OFI) offers a reasonable strategy. Influence of the first-line oxaliplatin-based treatment efficacy and the duration of OFI on tumour sensitivity to oxaliplatin reintroduction were investigated.MethodsThis was a pooled analysis of OPTIMOX1 and OPTIMOX2 studies, on 285 patients with previously untreated mCRC and FOLFOX reintroduction. An optimal OFI was estimated. Efficacy endpoints measured from reintroduction of FOLFOX included response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).FindingsTwo groups of OFI <6 and ?6 months, were defined. The RR following FOLFOX reintroduction were 14% and 22% in patients with an OFI <6 and ?6 months, respectively (overall RR 19%). The median PFS after FOLFOX reintroduction following OFI< 6 and ?6 months were 3.0 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.7–3.7] and 5.5 months [95% CI: 4.8–6.5], respectively. The median OS following OFI <6 months was 8.8 months [95% CI: 7.5–10.5] and OFI ?6 was months 16.8 months [95% CI: 15.3–19.6]. In the case of partial response (PR), median PFS and OS were 4.6 [95% CI: 4.1–5.0] and 14 months [95% CI: 12.1–16.4], respectively, whereas in patients with initial stable disease (SD) 3.4 [95% CI: 2.7–4.7] and 10.3 months [95% CI: 7.3–12.9], respectively.InterpretationA sensitive population of patients more likely to benefit from oxaliplatin reintroduction is defined by the efficacy of induction therapy followed by an OFI of at least 6 months between two periods of FOLFOX therapy. OFI of <6 months identifies a subgroup of partially-resistant patients who can still benefit from oxaliplatin reintroduction.     

Early response as assessed by anatomic imaging does not predict failure-free survival among patients with Group III rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group

BackgroundThe prognostic significance of response to induction therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) by anatomic imaging [computerised tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan] is controversial. We previously reported no relationship between early response and failure-free survival (FFS) on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-IV. We repeated the same analysis using a more recent clinical trial as an independent cohort of patients with non-metastatic, initially unresected RMS.MethodsA total of 338 patients enrolled in Children’s Oncology Group (COG) study D9803 met the inclusion criteria for this analysis: (1) non-metastatic, initially unresected (Group III); (2) embryonal (ERMS) or alveolar (ARMS) histology; (3) documented protocol week 12 response to induction chemotherapy (excluding progressive disease) based on anatomic imaging (CT/MRI) and (4) documented protocol therapy beyond week 12. Response at week 12 was determined by the treating institution as complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or no response (NR). FFS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and comparisons between patient subsets were made using the log-rank test.ResultsOverall objective response rate (CR + PR) at week 12 of therapy was 85% and was similar between ERMS and ARMS. FFS was similar among all patients with CR, PR or NR (p = 0.49). Restricting the analysis to either ERMS or ARMS, there was no difference in FFS by response within either histology subset (p = 0.89 and p = 0.08, respectively).ConclusionsThese findings provide additional evidence that anatomic imaging to assess early response to therapy among patients with RMS does not predict outcome and has questionable use in tailoring subsequent therapy.     

Progression free survival rate at 9 and 18 weeks predict overall survival in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: An individual patient pooled analysis of 10 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group studies and an independent study validation

BackgroundResponse criteria have always been difficult to apply to malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), due to its unique pattern of growth. We developed some models to show that progression free survival rate (PFSR) could be a better predictor of overall survival (OS) than the response rate (RR) in MPM patients. The results were validated independently in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 08052, a phase II study in MPM.MethodsIndividual patient data from 10 EORTC-Lung Cancer Group (LCG) studies of first-line chemotherapy in MPM were pooled. Response to therapy was assessed according to World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria in all except the two most recent trials, which used Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST). Landmark analyses (LA) at 9 weeks and 18 weeks after registration/randomisation were performed to assess the association between PFSR and OS. Independent validation of the results was conducted in EORTC 08052 study (82 patients) employing the same LA.ResultsAll 10 studies (N = 523 patients) were included in the LA of PFSR at 9 and 18 weeks (PFSR-9 and PFSR-18). PFSR-9 and PFSR-18 were confirmed as predictors of OS, with hazard ratio (HR) of 0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30–0.47) and 0.50 (0.38–0.65) and C-index of 0.62 and 0.58, respectively.In the validation study, 28.4% achieved CR/PR and 77.8% had disease control (CR/PR/SD) as their best overall response. PFSR-9 and PFSR-18 weeks were both strongly correlated with OS (HR of 0.35 [80% CI, 0.25–0.49] and 0.46 (0.32–0.67) and C-index of 0.66 and 0.60, respectively).ConclusionPFSR-18 was strongly correlated and discriminated patients with better OS from the poorer prognosis patients. An earlier end-point, PFSR-9 was also strongly correlated to OS with better discriminating capacity. The results were independently validated.