Development of 3‐Phenyl‐N‐(2‐(3‐phenylureido)ethyl)‐thiophene‐2‐sulfonamide Compounds as Inhibitors of Antiapoptotic Bcl‐2 Family Proteins

Antiapoptotic Bcl‐2 family proteins, such as Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, and Mcl‐1, are often overexpressed in tumor cells, which contributes to tumor cell resistance to chemotherapies and radiotherapies. Inhibitors of these proteins thus have potential applications in cancer treatment. We discovered, through structure‐based virtual screening, a lead compound with micromolar binding affinity to Mcl‐1 (inhibition constant (K_i)=3 μM ). It contains a phenyltetrazole and a hydrazinecarbothioamide moiety, and it represents a structural scaffold not observed among known Bcl‐2 inhibitors. This work presents the structural optimization of this lead compound. By following the scaffold‐hopping strategy, we have designed and synthesized a total of 82 compounds in three sets. All of the compounds were evaluated in a fluorescence‐polarization binding assay to measure their binding affinities to Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, and Mcl‐1. Some of the compounds with a 3‐phenylthiophene‐2‐sulfonamide core moiety showed sub‐micromolar binding affinities to Mcl‐1 (K_i=0.3–0.4 μM ) or Bcl‐2 (K_i≈1 μM ). They also showed obvious cytotoxicity on tumor cells (IC₅₀<10 μM ). Two‐dimensional heteronuclear single quantum coherence NMR spectra of three selected compounds, that is, YCW‐E5, YCW‐E10, and YCW‐E11, indicated that they bind to the BH3‐binding groove on Bcl‐x_L in a similar mode to ABT‐737. Several apoptotic assays conducted on HL‐60 cells demonstrated that these compounds are able to induce cell apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway. We propose that the compounds with the 3‐phenylthiophene‐2‐sulfonamide core moiety are worth further optimization as effective apoptosis inducers with an interesting selectivity towards Mcl‐1 and Bcl‐2.     

Discovery and development of thiazolo[3,2-a]pyrimidinone derivatives as general inhibitors of Bcl-2 family proteins

A class of compounds with a common thiazolo[3,2‐a]pyrimidinone motif has been developed as general inhibitors of Bcl‐2 family proteins. The lead compound was originally identified in a random screening of a small compound library using a fluorescence polarization‐based competitive binding assay. Its binding to the Bcl‐x_L protein was further confirmed by ¹⁵N‐HSQC NMR experiments. Structural modifications on the lead compound were guided by the outcomes of molecular modeling studies. Among the 42 compounds obtained, a number of them exhibited much improved binding affinities to Bcl‐2 family proteins as compared to the lead compound. The most potent compound, BCL‐LZH‐ 40 , inhibited the binding of BH3 peptides to Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, and Mcl‐1 with inhibition constants (K_i) of 17, 534, and 200 nM , respectively.     

Characterization of the Stereochemical Structures of 2H‐Thiazolo[3,2‐a]pyrimidine Compounds and Their Binding Affinities for Anti‐apoptotic Bcl‐2 Family Proteins

In a previous study we reported a class of compounds with a 2H‐thiazolo[3,2‐a]pyrimidine core structure as general inhibitors of anti‐apoptotic Bcl‐2 family proteins. However, the absolute stereochemical configuration of one carbon atom on the core structure remained unsolved, and its potential impact on the binding affinities of compounds in this class was unknown. In this study, we obtained pure R and S enantiomers of four selected compounds by HPLC separation and chiral synthesis. The absolute configurations of these enantiomers were determined by comparing their circular dichroism spectra to that of an appropriate reference compound. In addition, a crystal structure of one selected compound revealed the exocyclic double bond in these compounds to be in the Z configuration. The binding affinities of all four pairs of enantiomers to Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, and Mcl‐1 proteins were measured in a fluorescence‐polarization‐based binding assay, yielding inhibition constants (K_i values) ranging from 0.24 to 2.20 μM . Interestingly, our results indicate that most R and S enantiomers exhibit similar binding affinities for the three tested proteins. A binding mode for this compound class was derived by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations to provide a reasonable interpretation of this observation.     

Structure‐Guided Rational Design of α/β‐Peptide Foldamers with High Affinity for BCL‐2 Family Prosurvival Proteins

We have used computational methods to improve the affinity of a foldamer ligand for its target protein. The effort began with a previously reported α/β‐peptide based on the BH3 domain of the proapoptotic protein Puma; this foldamer binds tightly to Bcl‐x_L but weakly to Mcl‐1. The crystal structure of the Puma‐derived α/β‐peptide complexed to Bcl‐x_L was used as the basis for computational design of variants intended to display improved binding to Mcl‐1. Molecular modelling suggested modification of three α residues of the original α/β backbone. Individually, each substitution caused only a modest (4‐ to 15‐fold) gain in affinity; however, together the three substitutions led to a 250‐fold increase in binding to Mcl‐1. These modifications had very little effect on affinity for Bcl‐x_L. Crystal structures of a number of the new α/β‐peptides bound to either Mcl‐1 or Bcl‐x_L validated the selection of each substitution. Overall, our findings demonstrate that structure‐guided rational design can be used to improve affinity and alter partner selectivity of peptidic ligands with unnatural backbones that bind to specific protein partners.     

Experimental Characterization of the Binding Affinities between Proapoptotic BH3 Peptides and Antiapoptotic Bcl‐2 Proteins

The Bcl‐2 family proteins are key regulators of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway and are among the validated targets for developing anticancer drugs. Protein–protein interactions between the pro‐ and antiapoptotic members of this family determine mitochondrial outer‐membrane permeabilization. Elucidating such protein–protein interactions in a quantitative way is helpful for network pharmacology studies on the Bcl‐2 family, which, in turn, will provide valuable guidance for developing new anticancer therapies. In this study, the binding affinities of the BH3 peptides derived from eight proapoptotic BH3‐only proteins (i.e., Bid, Bim, Puma, Noxa, Bad, Bmf, Bik, Hrk) against five well‐studied antiapoptotic proteins (i.e., Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, Mcl‐1, Bcl‐w, Bfl‐1) in the Bcl‐2 family have been measured. Three different types of binding assay (i.e., surface plasmon resonance, fluorescence polarization, and homogeneous time‐resolved fluorescence) were employed for cross‐validation. The results confirmed that each proapoptotic BH3 peptide exhibited a distinct binding profile against the five antiapoptotic proteins. The binding data obtained herein serve as a fresh update or correction to existing knowledge. It is expected that such binding data will be helpful for building more accurate mathematical network models for depicting the complex protein–protein interactions within the Bcl‐2 family.     

Two‐Face,Two‐Turn α‐Helix Mimetics Based on a Cross‐Acridine Scaffold: Analogues of the Bim BH3 Domain

The design of a cross‐acridine scaffold mimicking the i, i+3, i+5, and i+7 residues distributed over a two‐face, two‐turn α‐helix is described. Docking studies and 2D ¹H,¹⁵N HSQC NMR spectroscopy provide compelling evidence that compound 3 d accurately reproduces the arrangement of four hotspots in the Bim BH3 peptide to permit binding to the Mcl‐1 and Bcl‐2 proteins (K_i 0.079 and 0.056 μM , respectively). Furthermore, the hotspot mutation could also be mimicked by individual or multiple deletions of side chains on the scaffold.     

Discovery of a Small‐Molecule pBcl‐2 Inhibitor that Overcomes pBcl‐2‐Mediated Resistance to Apoptosis

Although the role of Bcl‐2 phosphorylation is still under debate, it has been identified in a resistance mechanism to BH3 mimetics, for example ABT‐737 and S1 . We identified an S1 analogue, S1‐16 , as a small‐molecule inhibitor of pBcl‐2. S1‐16 efficiently kills EEE‐Bcl‐2 (a T69E, S70E, and S87E mutant mimicking phosphorylation)‐expressing HL‐60 cells and high endogenously expressing pBcl‐2 cells, by disrupting EEE‐Bcl‐2 or native pBcl‐2 interactions with Bax and Bak, followed by apoptosis. In vitro binding assays showed that S1‐16 binds to the BH3 binding groove of EEE‐Bcl‐2 (K_d=0.38 μM by ITC; IC₅₀=0.16 μM by ELISA), as well as nonphosphorylated Bcl‐2 (npBcl‐2; K_d=0.38 μM ; IC₅₀=0.12 μM ). However, ABT‐737 and S1 had much weaker affinities to EEE‐Bcl‐2 (IC₅₀=1.43 and >10 μM , respectively), compared with npBcl‐2 (IC₅₀=0.011 and 0.74 μM , respectively). The allosteric effect on BH3 binding groove by Bcl‐2 phosphorylation in the loop region was illustrated for the first time.     

Highly potent and selective 4,4'‐biphenyl‐4‐acylate‐4'‐N‐n‐butylcarbamate inhibitors of Pseudomonas species lipase

4,4'‐Biphenyl‐4‐acylate‐4'‐N‐n‐butylcarbamates ( 1–8 ) are synthesized and characterized as highly potent and selective pseudo‐substrate inhibitors of Pseudomonas species lipase. Thus, the n‐butylcarbamate moieties of the inhibitors bind to the first acyl chain binding site (ACS) of the enzyme. Therefore, the ester moieties of the inhibitors may bind to the second ACS of the enzyme, due to the linear 4,4'‐biphenyl moiety of the inhibitors. –logK_i, logk₂, and logk_i values of carbamates 1–8 are multiply linearly correlated with the Taft steric constant (E_S) and the Hansch hydrophobicity constant (π), but not with the Taft substituent constant (σ*). For –logK_i, logk₂, and logk_i correlations, values of δ are 0.8, 0.34, and 1.0, respectively, and values of ψ are 1.0, 0.4, and 1.3, respectively. Positive δ and ψ values for these correlations indicate that the second ACS of the enzyme prefers to bind to small and hydrophobic ester groups of the inhibitors. Among carbamates 1–8 , carbamate 3 , with a K_i value of 2.5 nM, is the most potent inhibitor.     

Synthetic Inhibitors of Extended Helix–Protein Interactions Based on a Biphenyl 4,4′‐Dicarboxamide Scaffold

Turn Bak : We present rationally designed scaffolds that mimic the spatial projection of the i, i+4, i+7, and i+11 residues of an α‐helix. A library of biphenyl derivatives was shown by competition fluorescence polarization and ITC to mimic Bak and disrupt the Bak/Bcl‐x_L protein–protein interaction. ¹⁵N HSQC experiments confirmed that the surface of Bcl‐x_L normally occupied by Bak was the target area of our new synthetic inhibitors.

     

Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of SNC80 Analogues with a Bridged Piperazine Ring

To discover novel δ‐opioid receptor ligands derived from SNC80 ( 1 ), a series of 6,8‐diazabicyclo[3.2.2]nonane derivatives bearing two aromatic moieties was prepared, and the affinity toward δ, μ, and κ receptors, as well as σ receptors, was investigated. After removal of the 4‐methoxybenzyl and 2,4‐dimethoxybenzyl protecting groups, the pharmacophoric N,N‐diethylcarbamoylbenzyl residue was attached to the 6,8‐diazabicyclo[3.2.2]nonane framework to yield the designed δ receptor ligands. In a first series of compounds the benzhydryl moiety of SNC80 was dissected, and one phenyl ring was attached to the bicyclic framework. In a second series of δ ligands the complete benzhydryl moiety was introduced into the bicyclic scaffold. The determined δ receptor affinities show that compounds based on an (R)‐glutamate‐derived bicyclic scaffold possess higher δ receptor affinity than their (S)‐glutamate‐derived counterparts. Furthermore, an intact benzhydryl moiety leads to δ receptor ligands that are more potent than compounds with two separated aromatic moieties. Compound 24 , with the same spatial arrangement of substituents around the benzhydryl stereocenter as SNC80, shows the highest δ receptor affinity of this series: K_i=24 nM . Whereas the highly potent δ ligands reveal good selectivity against μ and κ receptors, the σ₁ and/or σ₂ affinities of some compounds are almost in the same range as their δ receptor affinities, such as compound 25 (σ₂: K_i=83 nM ; δ: K_i=75 nM ). In [³⁵S]GTPγS assays the most potent δ ligands 24 and 25 showed almost the same intrinsic activity as the full agonist SNC80, proving the agonistic activity of 24 and 25 . The enantiomeric 4‐benzylidene derivatives 15 and ent‐ 15 showed selective cytotoxicity toward the 5637 (bladder) and A‐427 (small‐cell lung) human tumor cell lines.     

Development of Novel Amides as Noncovalent Inhibitors of Immunoproteasomes

The development of immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors is a promising strategy for treating hematologic malignancies, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In this context, we report the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a new series of amide derivatives as immunoproteasome inhibitors. Notably, the designed compounds act as noncovalent inhibitors, which might be a promising therapeutic option because of the lack of drawbacks and side effects associated with irreversible inhibition. Among the synthesized compounds, we identified a panel of active inhibitors with K_i values in the low micromolar or sub-micromolar ranges toward the β5i and/or β1i subunits of immunoproteasomes. One of the active compounds was shown to be the most potent and selective inhibitor with a K_i value of 21 nm against the single β1i subunit. Docking studies allowed us to determine the mode of binding of the molecules in the catalytic site of immunoproteasome subunits.     

Structure and Function of Benzoylurea‐Derived α‐Helix Mimetics Targeting the Bcl‐xL/Bak Binding Interface

Targeting Bcl‐x _L /Bak : A family of rationally designed α‐helix mimetics with improved solubility and synthetic feasibility based on a benzoylurea scaffold is presented. These benzoylurea derivatives favor a linear conformation stabilized by an intramolecular hydrogen bond, and are able to mimic the spatial projection of the i, i+4, and i+7 residues of an α‐helix. Binding affinities of the benzoylurea derivatives to Bcl‐x_L have been assessed using fluorescence polarization competition assays and isothermal titration calorimetry.

     

Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitory Activity: Methyl‐ versus Chlorochalcone Derivatives

Numerous studies have shown that chalcones are promising scaffolds for the development of new monoamine oxidase‐B (MAO‐B) inhibitors. As a continuation of our ongoing research into the development of reversible human MAO‐B (hMAO‐B) inhibitors, two series of twenty chalcones containing electron‐donating and electron‐withdrawing substituents were synthesized. All compounds were found to be competitive, selective, and reversible inhibitors of hMAO‐B except (2E)‐1‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐one ( P7 ) and (2E)‐1‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐one ( P17 ), which were found to be selective inhibitors of hMAO‐A. The most potent hMAO‐B inhibitor, (2E)‐1‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐3‐(4‐ethylphenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐one ( P16 ), showed a K_i value of 0.11±0.01 μm . Molecular docking simulations were carried out to identify the hypothetical binding mode for the most potent compounds in the active sites of hMAO‐A and B. The ability of the compounds to cross the blood–brain barrier was assessed by parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA). Additionally, the most potent hMAO‐B inhibitor P16 showed no toxicity in cultured hepatic cells at concentrations of 5 and 25 μm .     

2‐Amino[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolines and Derived Novel Heterocycles: Syntheses and Structure–Activity Relationships of Potent Adenosine Receptor Antagonists

2‐Amino[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolines were identified as potent adenosine receptor (AR) antagonists. Synthetic strategies were devised to gain access to a broad range of derivatives including novel polyheterocyclic compounds. Potent and selective A₃AR antagonists were discovered, including 3,5‐diphenyl[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3‐c]quinazoline ( 17 , K_i human A₃AR 1.16 nm ) and 5′‐phenyl‐1,2‐dihydro‐3′H‐spiro[indole‐3,2′‐[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolin]‐2‐one ( 20 , K_i human A₃AR 6.94 nm ). In addition, multitarget antagonists were obtained, such as the dual A₁/A₃ antagonist 2,5‐diphenyl[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazoline ( 13 b , K_i human A₁AR 51.6 nm , human A₃AR 11.1 nm ), and the balanced pan‐AR antagonists 5‐(2‐thienyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolin‐2‐amine ( 11 c , K_i human A₁AR 131 nm , A_2AAR 32.7 nm , A_2BAR 150 nm , A₃AR 47.5 nm ) and 9‐bromo‐5‐phenyl[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolin‐2‐amine ( 11 q , K_i human A₁AR 67.7 nm , A_2AAR 13.6 nm , A_2BAR 75.0 nm , A₃AR 703 nm ). In many cases, significantly different affinities for human and rat receptors were observed, which emphasizes the need for caution in extrapolating conclusions between different species.     

Boroleucine-Derived Covalent Inhibitors of the ZIKV Protease

The Zika virus (ZIKV) remains a potential threat to the public health due to the lack of both an approved vaccination or a specific treatment. In this work, a series of peptidic inhibitors of the ZIKV protease with boroleucine as P1 residue was synthesized. The highest affinities with K_i values down to 8 nM were observed for compounds with basic residues in both P2 and P3 position and at the N-terminus. The low potency of reference compounds containing leucine, leucine-amide or isopentylamide as P1 residue suggested a covalent binding mode of the boroleucine-derived inhibitors. This was finally proven by crystal structure determination of the most potent inhibitor from this series in complex with the ZIKV protease.     

Molecular Recognition of Two 2,4‐syn‐Functionalized (S)‐Glutamate Analogues by the Kainate Receptor GluK3 Ligand Binding Domain

The kainate receptors are the least studied subfamily of ionotropic glutamate receptors. These receptors are thought to have a neuromodulatory role and have been associated with a variety of disorders in the central nervous system. This makes kainate receptors interesting potential drug targets. Today, structures of the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the kainate receptor GluK3 are only known in complex with the endogenous agonist glutamate, the natural product kainate, and two synthetic agonists. Herein we report structures of GluK3 LBD in complex with two 2,4‐syn‐functionalized (S)‐glutamate analogues to investigate their structural potential as chemical scaffolds. Similar binding affinities at GluK3 were determined for the 2‐(methylcarbamoyl)ethyl analogue (K_i=4.0 μM ) and the 2‐(methoxycarbonyl)ethyl analogue (K_i=1.7 μM ), in agreement with the similar positioning of the compounds within the binding pocket. As the binding affinity is similar to that of glutamate, this type of Cγ substituent could be used as a scaffold for introduction of even larger substituents reaching into unexplored binding site regions to achieve subtype selectivity.     

Synthesis of a Series of Structurally Diverse MB327 Derivatives and Their Affinity Characterization at the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

A novel series of 30 symmetric bispyridinium and related N‐heteroaromatic bisquaternary salts with a propane‐1,3‐diyl linker was synthesized and characterized for their binding affinity at the MB327 binding site of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) from Torpedo californica. Compounds targeting this binding site are of particular interest for research into new antidotes against organophosphate poisoning, as therapeutically active 4‐tert‐butyl‐substituted bispyridinium salt MB327 was previously identified as a nAChR re‐sensitizer. Efficient access to the target compounds was provided by newly developed methods enabling N‐alkylation of sterically hindered or electronically deactivated heterocycles exhibiting a wide variety of functional groups. Determination of binding affinities toward the MB327 binding site at the nAChR, using a recently developed mass spectrometry (MS)‐based Binding Assay, revealed that several compounds reached affinities similar to that of MB327 (pK_i=4.73±0.03). Notably, the newly prepared lipophilic 4‐tert‐butyl‐3‐phenyl‐substituted bispyridinium salt PTM0022 ( 3 h ) was found to have significantly higher binding affinity, with a pK_i value of 5.16±0.07, thus representing considerable progress toward the development of more potent nAChR re‐sensitizers.     

Design,Synthesis, in vitro MAO‐B Inhibitory Evaluation,and Computational Studies of Some 6‐Nitrobenzothiazole‐Derived Semicarbazones

Monoamine oxidase B (MAO‐B) is an important drug target for the treatment of neurological disorders. A series of 6‐nitrobenzothiazole‐derived semicarbazones were designed, synthesized, and evaluated as inhibitors of the rat brain MAO‐B isoenzyme. Most of the compounds were found to be potent inhibitors of MAO‐B, with IC₅₀ values in the nanomolar to micromolar range. Molecular docking studies were performed with AutoDock 4.2 to deduce the affinity and binding mode of these inhibitors toward the MAO‐B active site. The free energies of binding (ΔG) and inhibition constants (K_i) of the docked compounds were calculated by the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) of AutoDock 4.2. Good correlations between the calculated and experimental results were obtained. 1‐[(4‐Chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methylene]‐4‐(6‐nitrobenzothiazol‐2‐yl)semicarbazide emerged as the lead MAO‐B inhibitor, with top ranking in both the experimental MAO‐B assay (IC₅₀: 0.004±0.001 μM ) and in computational docking studies (K_i: 1.08 μM ). Binding mode analysis of potent inhibitors suggests that these compounds are well accommodated by the MAO‐B active site through stable hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions. Interestingly, the 6‐nitrobenzothiazole moiety is stabilized in the substrate cavity with the aryl or diaryl residues extending up into the entrance cavity of the active site. According to our results, docking experiments could be an interesting approach for predicting the activity and binding interactions of this class of semicarbazones against MAO‐B. Thus, a binding site model consisting of three essential pharmacophoric features is proposed, and this can be used for the design of future MAO‐B inhibitors.     

Probing the Peptidylglycine α‐Hydroxylating Monooxygenase Active Site with Novel 4‐Phenyl‐3‐butenoic Acid Based Inhibitors

Specific inhibition of the copper‐containing peptidylglycine α‐hydroxylating monooxygenase (PHM), which catalyzes the post‐translational modification of peptides involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression, constitutes a new approach for combating cancer. We carried out a structure–activity study of new compounds derived from a well‐known PHM substrate analogue, the olefinic compound 4‐phenyl‐3‐butenoic acid (PBA). We designed, synthesized, and tested various PBA derivatives both in vitro and in silico. We show that it is possible to increase PBA affinity for PHM by appropriate functionalization of its aromatic nucleus. Compound 2 d , for example, bears a meta‐benzyloxy substituent, and exhibits better inhibition features (K_i=3.9 μM , k_inact/K_i=427 M ^?1 s^?1) than the parent PBA (K_i=19 μM , k_inact/K_i=82 M ^?1 s^?1). Docking calculations also suggest two different binding modes for PBA derivatives; these results will aid in the development of further PHM inhibitors with improved features.     

Synthesis and Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of 2‐(1,3,4‐Oxadiazole‐2(3H)‐thione)‐3‐amino‐5‐arylthieno[2,3‐b]pyridines as Inhibitors of DRAK2

In recent years, DAPK‐related apoptosis‐inducing protein kinase 2 (DRAK2) has emerged as a promising target for the treatment of a variety of autoimmune diseases and for the prevention of graft rejection after organ transplantation. However, medicinal chemistry optimization campaigns for the discovery of novel small‐molecule inhibitors of DRAK2 have not yet been published. Screening of a proprietary compound library led to the discovery of a benzothiophene analogue that displays an affinity constant (K_d) value of 0.25 μM . Variation of the core scaffold and of the substitution pattern afforded a series of 5‐arylthieno[2,3‐b]pyridines with strong binding affinity (K_d=0.008 μM for the most potent representative). These compounds also show promising activity in a functional biochemical DRAK2 enzyme assay, with an IC₅₀ value of 0.029 μM for the most potent congener. Selectivity profiling of the most potent compounds revealed that they lack selectivity within the DAPK family of kinases. However, one of the less potent analogues is a selective ligand for DRAK2 and can be used as starting point for the synthesis of selective and potent DRAK2 inhibitors.